Skip to main content

probability or statistics - How to remove outliers from data


I have a data with noise which some times includes significant outliers. The position of the outliers are random.


For example:


data1 = Table[PDF[NormalDistribution[3.5, .8], i], {i, -5, 15, .01}] +
RandomReal[{100, 500}];
noise = RandomReal /@ RandomReal[{-0.2, .2}, Length[data1]];
data2 = data1 + noise;
n = RandomInteger[{1, Length[data2]}, RandomInteger[{2, 10}]];
data2[[n]] = data2[[n]]*1.01;
ListPlot[{data2}, PlotRange -> All]


enter image description here


One solution is to use the average of the data but because the position of the outliers are random, the non-noisy data is hard to extract. The whole level of the data is random which means I can not use fixed reference to check and remove outliers.


Any idea how to remove these points using Mathematica?


Thanks.



Answer



I will give you two similar methods. But, I will rewrite one of the comments above just to make sure it is read.




You've been given some fine answers, but be absolutely sure that removing the outliers is Doing The Right Thing™. You might want to consider "robust" methods that can deal with the presence of outliers. – Guess who it is.





Simple Gaussian Threshold


The simplest way is to remove the moving mean of the data, then compute its standard deviation ($\sigma$), then pick a level at which you want to reject the data, say at 1%, so you can remove any points that vary more than $ 3\times \sigma$ . If you know how the data is distributed about its mean values, then you can pick a different method. You can also remove the median since that would be less sensitive to the distribution.


SeedRandom[1245]; 
data1 =
Table[PDF[NormalDistribution[3.5, .8], i], {i, -5, 15, .01}] +
RandomReal[{100, 500}];
noise = RandomReal /@ RandomReal[{-0.2, .2}, Length[data1]];
data2 = data1 + noise;

n = RandomInteger[{1, Length[data2]}, RandomInteger[{2, 10}]];
data2[[n]] = data2[[n]]*1.01;
ListPlot[{data2}, PlotRange -> All]

enter image description here


We have about 8 outliers. We compute the moving average,


movingAvg=ArrayPad[MovingAverage[data2, 5],{5-1,0},"Fixed"]

Here we subtract the moving mean,


subtractedmean = (Subtract @@@Transpose[{data2, movingAvg}]);


enter image description here


Now find the locations of the outliers:


 outpos=Position[subtractedmean, x_ /; x>StandardDeviation[subtractedmean]*3];

Length[outpos]


8




looks like we got the right number of outliers. Removing them.


 newdata=Delete[data2,outpos]
ListPlot[newdata, PlotRange -> All]

enter image description here


To give you an idea of "Threshold" line in this case,


 dathreshold = 
ConstantArray[StandardDeviation[subtractedmean]*3, Length[data2]] + movingAvg;

Here is the "Threshold" line drawn along with the points removed,



 Show[ListPlot[data2, PlotRange -> All, AspectRatio -> 1], 
ListPlot[dathreshold, Joined -> True, PlotStyle -> {Thick, Purple}],
Graphics[{Red,Circle[#, {100, 0.5}] & /@
Thread[{First /@ outpos, data2[[First /@ outpos]]}]}]]

enter image description here


By derivatives


A second way to remove outliers, is by looking at the Derivatives, then threshold on them. Differences in the data are more likely to behave gaussian then the actual distributions.


 diff=Abs@Differences[data2,2];


ListPlot[diff, PlotRange -> All, Joined -> True]

enter image description here


Now you do the same threshold, (based on the standard deviation) on these peaks. Note that the outliers are now really well separated from the actual data. You can find the peak positions that are above the threshold you set, in our case we will keep using $3 \times \sigma$.


You can probably use the peak finding function from V10 (not sure if there is a way to threshold the peaks), but since I stuck in V9 I do the poor's man way.


 newpos=Flatten[Position[Partition[diff, 3, 1], 
x_ /; ((x[[1]] < x[[2]] > x[[3]]) && (x[[2]] > 3*sddif)), {1}]] + 2

newpos===First /@ outpos



True



Comments

Popular posts from this blog

plotting - Filling between two spheres in SphericalPlot3D

Manipulate[ SphericalPlot3D[{1, 2 - n}, {θ, 0, Pi}, {ϕ, 0, 1.5 Pi}, Mesh -> None, PlotPoints -> 15, PlotRange -> {-2.2, 2.2}], {n, 0, 1}] I cant' seem to be able to make a filling between two spheres. I've already tried the obvious Filling -> {1 -> {2}} but Mathematica doesn't seem to like that option. Is there any easy way around this or ... Answer There is no built-in filling in SphericalPlot3D . One option is to use ParametricPlot3D to draw the surfaces between the two shells: Manipulate[ Show[SphericalPlot3D[{1, 2 - n}, {θ, 0, Pi}, {ϕ, 0, 1.5 Pi}, PlotPoints -> 15, PlotRange -> {-2.2, 2.2}], ParametricPlot3D[{ r {Sin[t] Cos[1.5 Pi], Sin[t] Sin[1.5 Pi], Cos[t]}, r {Sin[t] Cos[0 Pi], Sin[t] Sin[0 Pi], Cos[t]}}, {r, 1, 2 - n}, {t, 0, Pi}, PlotStyle -> Yellow, Mesh -> {2, 15}]], {n, 0, 1}]

plotting - Plot 4D data with color as 4th dimension

I have a list of 4D data (x position, y position, amplitude, wavelength). I want to plot x, y, and amplitude on a 3D plot and have the color of the points correspond to the wavelength. I have seen many examples using functions to define color but my wavelength cannot be expressed by an analytic function. Is there a simple way to do this? Answer Here a another possible way to visualize 4D data: data = Flatten[Table[{x, y, x^2 + y^2, Sin[x - y]}, {x, -Pi, Pi,Pi/10}, {y,-Pi,Pi, Pi/10}], 1]; You can use the function Point along with VertexColors . Now the points are places using the first three elements and the color is determined by the fourth. In this case I used Hue, but you can use whatever you prefer. Graphics3D[ Point[data[[All, 1 ;; 3]], VertexColors -> Hue /@ data[[All, 4]]], Axes -> True, BoxRatios -> {1, 1, 1/GoldenRatio}]

plotting - Mathematica: 3D plot based on combined 2D graphs

I have several sigmoidal fits to 3 different datasets, with mean fit predictions plus the 95% confidence limits (not symmetrical around the mean) and the actual data. I would now like to show these different 2D plots projected in 3D as in but then using proper perspective. In the link here they give some solutions to combine the plots using isometric perspective, but I would like to use proper 3 point perspective. Any thoughts? Also any way to show the mean points per time point for each series plus or minus the standard error on the mean would be cool too, either using points+vertical bars, or using spheres plus tubes. Below are some test data and the fit function I am using. Note that I am working on a logit(proportion) scale and that the final vertical scale is Log10(percentage). (* some test data *) data = Table[Null, {i, 4}]; data[[1]] = {{1, -5.8}, {2, -5.4}, {3, -0.8}, {4, -0.2}, {5, 4.6}, {1, -6.4}, {2, -5.6}, {3, -0.7}, {4, 0.04}, {5, 1.0}, {1, -6.8}, {2, -4.7}, {3, -1.