Skip to main content

splines - How to make the result of Piecewise be a closed interval?


Description


This question comes from two questions. Namely Q1 and Q2


The defintion of B-Spline basis function as shown below:


Let $\vec{U}=\{u_0,u_1,\ldots,u_m\}$ a nondecreasing sequence of real numbers,i.e, $u_i\leq u_{i+1}\quad i=0,1,2\ldots m-1$


$$N_{i,0}(u)= \begin{cases} 1 & u_i\leq u

  NBSpline[i_Integer, 0, knots_?(VectorQ[#, NumericQ] && OrderedQ[#] &),u_] /;
i <= Length[knots] - 2 :=

Piecewise[
{{1, knots[[i + 1]] <= u < knots[[i + 2]]}},0]

coeff[u_, i_, j_, knots_] /; knots[[i]] == knots[[j]] := 0;
coeff[u_, i_, j_, knots_] := (u - knots[[i]])/(knots[[j]] - knots[[i]])

NBSpline[i_Integer, p_Integer, knots_?(VectorQ[#, NumericQ] && OrderedQ[#] &),
u_] /;p > 0 && i + p <= Length[knots] - 2 :=
Module[{init, res},
init = Table[NBSpline[j, 0, knots, u], {j, i, i + p}];

res = First@
Nest[
Dot @@@
(Thread@
{Partition[#, 2, 1],
With[{m = p + 2 - Length@#},
Table[
{coeff[u, k + 1, k + m + 1, knots],
coeff[u, k + m + 2, k + 2, knots]}, {k, i, i + Length@# - 2}]]}) &,
init, p]

]

Compare to built-in function BSplineBasis


 sortResult[x_ /; x == 0] := 0;
sortResult[res_] := MapAt[SortBy[#, Last] &, res, 1]

pts = {{0, 0}, {0, 2}, {2, 3}, {4, 0}, {6, 3}, {8, 2}, {8, 0}};
knots = {0, 0, 0, 1/5, 2/5, 3/5, 4/5, 1, 1, 1};

Comparsion 1



 NBSpline[#, 0, knots, u] & /@ Range[0, 8] // Simplify


enter image description here



 PiecewiseExpand@BSplineBasis[{0, knots}, #, u] & /@ Range[0, 8]


enter image description here




Comparsion 2


sortResult /@ (NBSpline[#, 1, knots, u] & /@ Range[0, 7] // Simplify)


enter image description here



sortResult /@ (PiecewiseExpand@BSplineBasis[{1, knots}, #, u] & /@ 
Range[0, 7] // Simplify)



enter image description here





By the comparsion, I found that the result of BSplineBasis is always a closed interval, whereas the result my function NBSpline is a half closed- half open interval.


My trail:


postProcess[res_ /; res == 0] := 0;

postProcess[res_] :=
Module[{interval, pos, expr},
interval =

First@Simplify@res;
pos =
Position[
SortBy[interval, Last], Less];
expr =
ReplacePart[
SortBy[interval, Last], pos[[-1]] -> LessEqual];
Piecewise[expr, 0]
]


Test


 postProcess /@ (NBSpline[#, 1, knots, u] & /@ Range[0, 7])


enter image description here



Question:


Is there any good/simple method(strategy) to deal with this problem? I think my method is complex.



enter image description here





Answer



a fix, specially treating the end interval:


 NBSpline[i_Integer, 0, knots_?(VectorQ[#, NumericQ] && OrderedQ[#] &),
u_] /; i <= Length[knots] - 2 := (
If[ knots[[i + 2]] != knots[[-1]],
Piecewise[{{1, knots[[i + 1]] <= u < knots[[i + 2]]}}, 0],
Piecewise[{{1, knots[[i + 1]] <= u <= knots[[i + 2]]}}, 0] ]);
coeff[u_, i_, j_, knots_] /; knots[[i]] == knots[[j]] := 0;
coeff[u_, i_, j_, knots_] := (u - knots[[i]])/(knots[[j]] - knots[[i]])

NBSpline[i_Integer, p_Integer,
knots_?(VectorQ[#, NumericQ] && OrderedQ[#] &), u_] /;
p > 0 && i + p <= Length[knots] - 2 :=
Module[{init, res},
init = Table[NBSpline[j, 0, knots, u], {j, i, i + p}];
res = First@
Nest[Dot @@@ (Thread@{Partition[#, 2, 1],
With[{m = p + 2 - Length@#},
Table[{coeff[u, k + 1, k + m + 1, knots],
coeff[u, k + m + 2, k + 2, knots]}, {k, i,

i + Length@# - 2}]]}) &, init, p]]
pts = {{1/10, 2/10}, {0, 2}, {2, 3}, {4, 0}, {6, 3}, {8, 2}, {8, 0}};
knots = {0, 0, 0, 1/5, 2/5, 3/5, 4/5, 1, 1, 1};
BSplinePlot1[pts : {{_, _} ..}, knots_, opts : OptionsPattern[Plot]] :=
Module[{p = Length@First@Split[knots] - 1, a, b},
{a, b} = {First[knots], Last[knots]};
f[u_] =
Evaluate@
Simplify@
Total@MapIndexed[NBSpline[First@#2 - 1, p, knots, u] #1 &,

pts] /. x_Piecewise :> Piecewise[x[[1]], Null];
ParametricPlot[f[u], {u, a, b}, opts, PlotPoints -> 1000]]
BSplinePlot1[pts, knots, ImageSize -> 600]

this bit: /. x_Piecewise :> Piecewise[x[[1]], Null] fixes the catchall behavior of Piecewise so you will get an error if you try to evaluate out of bounds. (not necessary for this example )


here is f[u] , note that we have closed just the end interval..


enter image description here


note as a practical matter @belisarius approach works as well, so long as you apply at the last stage:


 f[u_] = Evaluate@
Simplify@

Total@MapIndexed[NBSpline[First@#2 - 1, p, knots, u] #1 &,
pts] /. Less :> LessEqual /. x_Piecewise :> Piecewise[x[[1]], Null]

enter image description here


since the function is continuous it doesn't really matter if you close all the internal intervals.


Comments

Popular posts from this blog

plotting - How to draw lines between specified dots on ListPlot?

I would like to create a plot where I have unconnected dots and some connected. So far, I have figured out how to draw the dots. My code is the following: ListPlot[{{1, 1}, {2, 2}, {3, 3}, {4, 4}, {1, 4}, {2, 5}, {3, 6}, {4, 7}, {1, 7}, {2, 8}, {3, 9}, {4, 10}, {1, 10}, {2, 11}, {3, 12}, {4,13}, {2.5, 7}}, Ticks -> {{1, 2, 3, 4}, None}, AxesStyle -> Thin, TicksStyle -> Directive[Black, Bold, 12], Mesh -> Full] I have thought using ListLinePlot command, but I don't know how to specify to the command to draw only selected lines between the dots. Do have any suggestions/hints on how to do that? Thank you. Answer One possibility would be to use Epilog with Line : ListPlot[ {{1, 1}, {2, 2}, {3, 3}, {4, 4}, {1, 4}, {2, 5}, {3, 6}, {4, 7}, {1, 7}, {2, 8}, {3, 9}, {4, 10}, {1, 10}, {2, 11}, {3, 12}, {4, 13}, {2.5, 7}}, Ticks -> {{1, 2, 3, 4}, None}, AxesStyle -> Thin, TicksStyle -> Directive[Black, Bold, 12], Mesh -> Full, Epilog -> { Line[ ...

equation solving - Invert and fit implicitly defined curve

I need to fit an implicitly defined curve. I thought I could get some data out of Solve , and then using FindFit . Therefore, I would like to find the relation the parametric curve defined by $F(x,y)=0$: Solve[-(1/2) + 1/2 (0.41202 BesselK[0, 0.1 Sqrt[x^2 + y^2]] + (0.101483 x BesselK[1, 0.1 Sqrt[x^2 + y^2]])/Sqrt[x^2 + y^2]) == 0, y] But I can't get an output: Solve was unable to solve the system with inexact coefficients or the system obtained by direct rationalization of inexact numbers present in the system. Since many of the methods used by Solve require exact input, providing Solve with an exact version of the system may help. >> Edit: In particular, I would like to fit the data coming from the curve with the expression of another curve, and not with a function $f(x)$. In particular, since this clearly looks like a cardioid , I would like it to fit to something like it. What other strategies could I try?

dynamic - How can I make a clickable ArrayPlot that returns input?

I would like to create a dynamic ArrayPlot so that the rectangles, when clicked, provide the input. Can I use ArrayPlot for this? Or is there something else I should have to use? Answer ArrayPlot is much more than just a simple array like Grid : it represents a ranged 2D dataset, and its visualization can be finetuned by options like DataReversed and DataRange . These features make it quite complicated to reproduce the same layout and order with Grid . Here I offer AnnotatedArrayPlot which comes in handy when your dataset is more than just a flat 2D array. The dynamic interface allows highlighting individual cells and possibly interacting with them. AnnotatedArrayPlot works the same way as ArrayPlot and accepts the same options plus Enabled , HighlightCoordinates , HighlightStyle and HighlightElementFunction . data = {{Missing["HasSomeMoreData"], GrayLevel[ 1], {RGBColor[0, 1, 1], RGBColor[0, 0, 1], GrayLevel[1]}, RGBColor[0, 1, 0]}, {GrayLevel[0], GrayLevel...