Skip to main content

splines - How to make the result of Piecewise be a closed interval?


Description


This question comes from two questions. Namely Q1 and Q2


The defintion of B-Spline basis function as shown below:


Let $\vec{U}=\{u_0,u_1,\ldots,u_m\}$ a nondecreasing sequence of real numbers,i.e, $u_i\leq u_{i+1}\quad i=0,1,2\ldots m-1$


$$N_{i,0}(u)= \begin{cases} 1 & u_i\leq u

  NBSpline[i_Integer, 0, knots_?(VectorQ[#, NumericQ] && OrderedQ[#] &),u_] /;
i <= Length[knots] - 2 :=

Piecewise[
{{1, knots[[i + 1]] <= u < knots[[i + 2]]}},0]

coeff[u_, i_, j_, knots_] /; knots[[i]] == knots[[j]] := 0;
coeff[u_, i_, j_, knots_] := (u - knots[[i]])/(knots[[j]] - knots[[i]])

NBSpline[i_Integer, p_Integer, knots_?(VectorQ[#, NumericQ] && OrderedQ[#] &),
u_] /;p > 0 && i + p <= Length[knots] - 2 :=
Module[{init, res},
init = Table[NBSpline[j, 0, knots, u], {j, i, i + p}];

res = First@
Nest[
Dot @@@
(Thread@
{Partition[#, 2, 1],
With[{m = p + 2 - Length@#},
Table[
{coeff[u, k + 1, k + m + 1, knots],
coeff[u, k + m + 2, k + 2, knots]}, {k, i, i + Length@# - 2}]]}) &,
init, p]

]

Compare to built-in function BSplineBasis


 sortResult[x_ /; x == 0] := 0;
sortResult[res_] := MapAt[SortBy[#, Last] &, res, 1]

pts = {{0, 0}, {0, 2}, {2, 3}, {4, 0}, {6, 3}, {8, 2}, {8, 0}};
knots = {0, 0, 0, 1/5, 2/5, 3/5, 4/5, 1, 1, 1};

Comparsion 1



 NBSpline[#, 0, knots, u] & /@ Range[0, 8] // Simplify


enter image description here



 PiecewiseExpand@BSplineBasis[{0, knots}, #, u] & /@ Range[0, 8]


enter image description here




Comparsion 2


sortResult /@ (NBSpline[#, 1, knots, u] & /@ Range[0, 7] // Simplify)


enter image description here



sortResult /@ (PiecewiseExpand@BSplineBasis[{1, knots}, #, u] & /@ 
Range[0, 7] // Simplify)



enter image description here





By the comparsion, I found that the result of BSplineBasis is always a closed interval, whereas the result my function NBSpline is a half closed- half open interval.


My trail:


postProcess[res_ /; res == 0] := 0;

postProcess[res_] :=
Module[{interval, pos, expr},
interval =

First@Simplify@res;
pos =
Position[
SortBy[interval, Last], Less];
expr =
ReplacePart[
SortBy[interval, Last], pos[[-1]] -> LessEqual];
Piecewise[expr, 0]
]


Test


 postProcess /@ (NBSpline[#, 1, knots, u] & /@ Range[0, 7])


enter image description here



Question:


Is there any good/simple method(strategy) to deal with this problem? I think my method is complex.



enter image description here





Answer



a fix, specially treating the end interval:


 NBSpline[i_Integer, 0, knots_?(VectorQ[#, NumericQ] && OrderedQ[#] &),
u_] /; i <= Length[knots] - 2 := (
If[ knots[[i + 2]] != knots[[-1]],
Piecewise[{{1, knots[[i + 1]] <= u < knots[[i + 2]]}}, 0],
Piecewise[{{1, knots[[i + 1]] <= u <= knots[[i + 2]]}}, 0] ]);
coeff[u_, i_, j_, knots_] /; knots[[i]] == knots[[j]] := 0;
coeff[u_, i_, j_, knots_] := (u - knots[[i]])/(knots[[j]] - knots[[i]])

NBSpline[i_Integer, p_Integer,
knots_?(VectorQ[#, NumericQ] && OrderedQ[#] &), u_] /;
p > 0 && i + p <= Length[knots] - 2 :=
Module[{init, res},
init = Table[NBSpline[j, 0, knots, u], {j, i, i + p}];
res = First@
Nest[Dot @@@ (Thread@{Partition[#, 2, 1],
With[{m = p + 2 - Length@#},
Table[{coeff[u, k + 1, k + m + 1, knots],
coeff[u, k + m + 2, k + 2, knots]}, {k, i,

i + Length@# - 2}]]}) &, init, p]]
pts = {{1/10, 2/10}, {0, 2}, {2, 3}, {4, 0}, {6, 3}, {8, 2}, {8, 0}};
knots = {0, 0, 0, 1/5, 2/5, 3/5, 4/5, 1, 1, 1};
BSplinePlot1[pts : {{_, _} ..}, knots_, opts : OptionsPattern[Plot]] :=
Module[{p = Length@First@Split[knots] - 1, a, b},
{a, b} = {First[knots], Last[knots]};
f[u_] =
Evaluate@
Simplify@
Total@MapIndexed[NBSpline[First@#2 - 1, p, knots, u] #1 &,

pts] /. x_Piecewise :> Piecewise[x[[1]], Null];
ParametricPlot[f[u], {u, a, b}, opts, PlotPoints -> 1000]]
BSplinePlot1[pts, knots, ImageSize -> 600]

this bit: /. x_Piecewise :> Piecewise[x[[1]], Null] fixes the catchall behavior of Piecewise so you will get an error if you try to evaluate out of bounds. (not necessary for this example )


here is f[u] , note that we have closed just the end interval..


enter image description here


note as a practical matter @belisarius approach works as well, so long as you apply at the last stage:


 f[u_] = Evaluate@
Simplify@

Total@MapIndexed[NBSpline[First@#2 - 1, p, knots, u] #1 &,
pts] /. Less :> LessEqual /. x_Piecewise :> Piecewise[x[[1]], Null]

enter image description here


since the function is continuous it doesn't really matter if you close all the internal intervals.


Comments

Popular posts from this blog

plotting - How to draw lines between specified dots on ListPlot?

I would like to create a plot where I have unconnected dots and some connected. So far, I have figured out how to draw the dots. My code is the following: ListPlot[{{1, 1}, {2, 2}, {3, 3}, {4, 4}, {1, 4}, {2, 5}, {3, 6}, {4, 7}, {1, 7}, {2, 8}, {3, 9}, {4, 10}, {1, 10}, {2, 11}, {3, 12}, {4,13}, {2.5, 7}}, Ticks -> {{1, 2, 3, 4}, None}, AxesStyle -> Thin, TicksStyle -> Directive[Black, Bold, 12], Mesh -> Full] I have thought using ListLinePlot command, but I don't know how to specify to the command to draw only selected lines between the dots. Do have any suggestions/hints on how to do that? Thank you. Answer One possibility would be to use Epilog with Line : ListPlot[ {{1, 1}, {2, 2}, {3, 3}, {4, 4}, {1, 4}, {2, 5}, {3, 6}, {4, 7}, {1, 7}, {2, 8}, {3, 9}, {4, 10}, {1, 10}, {2, 11}, {3, 12}, {4, 13}, {2.5, 7}}, Ticks -> {{1, 2, 3, 4}, None}, AxesStyle -> Thin, TicksStyle -> Directive[Black, Bold, 12], Mesh -> Full, Epilog -> { Line[ ...

dynamic - How can I make a clickable ArrayPlot that returns input?

I would like to create a dynamic ArrayPlot so that the rectangles, when clicked, provide the input. Can I use ArrayPlot for this? Or is there something else I should have to use? Answer ArrayPlot is much more than just a simple array like Grid : it represents a ranged 2D dataset, and its visualization can be finetuned by options like DataReversed and DataRange . These features make it quite complicated to reproduce the same layout and order with Grid . Here I offer AnnotatedArrayPlot which comes in handy when your dataset is more than just a flat 2D array. The dynamic interface allows highlighting individual cells and possibly interacting with them. AnnotatedArrayPlot works the same way as ArrayPlot and accepts the same options plus Enabled , HighlightCoordinates , HighlightStyle and HighlightElementFunction . data = {{Missing["HasSomeMoreData"], GrayLevel[ 1], {RGBColor[0, 1, 1], RGBColor[0, 0, 1], GrayLevel[1]}, RGBColor[0, 1, 0]}, {GrayLevel[0], GrayLevel...

Is there a way to do conditional matrix loop using 'continue'

I have the following: n = 3; m = 5; ww = RandomReal[{0, 0.1}, {n, n}]; uu = RandomReal[{0, 1}, {m, n}]; pp = RandomReal[{0, 1}, {n, n}]; ss = RandomInteger[{0, 5}, {m, n}]; Grid[{{"ww", "uu", "pp", "ss"}, {ww // TableForm, uu // TableForm, pp // TableForm, ss // TableForm}}, Spacings -> {5, 2}, Dividers -> All] where I would like to look at every element of matrix ss and produce a matrix tt , with zeroes at the locations in ss which have zeroes, and in all other positions do the following: tt = (-1/Subscript[ww, m]) Log[(1 - uu)/(Subscript[pp, m - 1])], where Subscript[ww, m] is the value at index of ww matrix and where Subscript[pp, m - 1] is the value at index-1 of pp matrix. So for example if the first value ever read from matrix ss happens to be 2, then value taken from matrix ww would be from the row 2, but from pp would be from row 1. Also how to tell difference between a 0 as a valid value from within the matrix elemen...