Skip to main content

differential equations - FEM-ception: Using output of NDSolve FEM as input in another FEM problem


After having solved a Stokes flow problem in Mathematica on a subdomain RegionCapillary, I would like to solve an advection-diffusion problem on a larger domain RegionShell which contains the previous domain. This means taking the InterpolatingFunction returned by NDSolve FEM for the Stokes problem and setting it to zero everywhere on RegionShell, so that the Stokes velocity field can be used in the advection term of the transport problem on RegionShell. The solution, produced by Comsol, shows concentration boundary layers:


enter image description here



The left picture shows a solution of the velocity field $\boldsymbol{u}$ of the Stokes problem $\nabla\cdot\boldsymbol{u}=0, \nabla p=\mu\nabla^{2}\boldsymbol{u}$ solved on the domain RegionCapillary. The right pictures shows a solution of concentration field $c$ from the advection-diffusion problem $Pe\boldsymbol{u}\cdot\nabla c=\nabla^{2}c$ solved on RegionShell. Let's see if I can retrieve the Comsol solution in Mathematica.


   RegionCapillary = 
RegionUnion[Rectangle[{0, 0.1}, {0.9, 0.2}],
Rectangle[{0, 0.8}, {0.9, 0.9}],
Rectangle[{0.8, 0.2}, {0.9, 0.9}] ];
RegionShell = Rectangle[{0, 0}, {1, 1}];

<< NDSolve`FEM`
StokesOp := {
-Inactive[Laplacian][ u[x, y], {x, y}] + D[ p[x, y], x],

-Inactive[Laplacian][ v[x, y], {x, y}] + D[ p[x, y], y],
(* incompressibility div u = 0 *)
Div[{u[x, y], v[x, y]}, {x, y}]
} ;

bcs := {
DirichletCondition[p[x, y] == 10^3, x == 0 && y > 0.5],
DirichletCondition[p[x, y] == 0, x == 0 && y < 0.5],
DirichletCondition[{u[x, y] == 0., v[x, y] == 0.}, True]
};


Clear[xVel, yVel, pressure];
AbsoluteTiming[{xVel, yVel, pressure} =
NDSolveValue[{StokesOp == {0, 0, 0}, bcs}, {u, v,
p}, {x, y} \[Element] RegionCapillary,

Method -> {"FiniteElement",
"InterpolationOrder" -> {u -> 2, v -> 2, p -> 1},
"MeshOptions" -> {"MaxCellMeasure" -> 10^-4}}
]];


DensityPlot[Sqrt[
xVel[x, y]^2 + yVel[x, y]^2], {x, y} \[Element]
RegionCapillary,
PlotRange -> All, PlotLabel -> "velocity magnitude",
PlotPoints -> 30] // Quiet

This code produces the expected Stokes flow solution:


enter image description here


Here is my attempt to tackle the reaction-diffusion problem:



   Pe = 10^2;
advectionOp :=
If[{x, y} \[Element] RegionCapillary,
Pe {xVel[x, y], yVel[x, y]}.Inactive[Grad][c[x, y], {x, y}], 0] -
Inactive[Laplacian][c[x, y], {x, y}]

bcs := {DirichletCondition[c[x, y] == 0, x == 0 && 0.8 < y < 0.9],
DirichletCondition[c[x, y] == 1, x > 0]};

AbsoluteTiming[

csol = NDSolveValue[{advectionOp ==
NeumannValue[0, x == 0 && ((0 < y < 0.8) || (0.9 < y < 1))],
bcs}, c, {x, y} \[Element] RegionShell,
Method -> {"FiniteElement", "InterpolationOrder" -> {c -> 2},
"MeshOptions" -> {"MaxCellMeasure" -> 10^-3}}]];
DensityPlot[csol[x, y], {x, y} \[Element] RegionShell,
PlotRange -> All, PlotLabel -> "x velocity", PlotPoints -> 30]

enter image description here


You can see that my advection term $\boldsymbol{u}\cdot\nabla c$ is practically ignored. In it, I am trying to ensure that $\boldsymbol{u}=0$ if outside of RegionCapillary, but $\boldsymbol{u}$ taken from the previous NDSolve solution otherwise. You can see that my $c=0$ DirichletCondition diffuses but no advection happens.



Please help me to fix this. I suspect the main problem lies in the line


advectionOp := 
If[{x, y} \[Element] mr,
Pe {xVel[x, y], yVel[x, y]}.Inactive[Grad][c[x, y], {x, y}], 0] -
Inactive[Laplacian][c[x, y], {x, y}]

in which the InterpolatingFunctionscalled xVel, yVel are defined over the domain RegionCapillary



Answer



First, I think that DirichletCondition[{u[x, y] == 0., v[x, y] == 0.}, True] is not what you want, nor what you specified in COMSOL. I think you want something like this: DirichletCondition[{u[x, y] == 0., v[x, y] == 0.}, x > 0] Then we get:


RegionCapillary = 

RegionUnion[Rectangle[{0, 0.1}, {0.9, 0.2}],
Rectangle[{0, 0.8}, {0.9, 0.9}], Rectangle[{0.8, 0.2}, {0.9, 0.9}]];
RegionShell = Rectangle[{0, 0}, {1, 1}];

<< NDSolve`FEM`
StokesOp := {-Inactive[Laplacian][u[x, y], {x, y}] +
D[p[x, y], x], -Inactive[Laplacian][v[x, y], {x, y}] +
D[p[x, y], y],(*incompressibility div u=0*)
Div[{u[x, y], v[x, y]}, {x, y}]};


bcs := {DirichletCondition[p[x, y] == 10^3, x == 0 && y > 0.5],
DirichletCondition[p[x, y] == 0, x == 0 && y < 0.5],
DirichletCondition[{u[x, y] == 0., v[x, y] == 0.}, x > 0]};

Clear[xVel, yVel, pressure];
AbsoluteTiming[{xVel, yVel, pressure} =
NDSolveValue[{StokesOp == {0, 0, 0}, bcs}, {u, v,
p}, {x, y} \[Element] RegionCapillary,
Method -> {"FiniteElement",
"InterpolationOrder" -> {u -> 2, v -> 2, p -> 1},

"MeshOptions" -> {"MaxCellMeasure" -> 10^-4}},
"ExtrapolationHandler" -> {0. &, "WarningMessage" -> False}];]

For making the interpolating function 0. outside the region you could set the "ExtrapolationHandler" -> {0. &, "WarningMessage" -> False} like documented in the Extrapolation of Solution Domains section,


DensityPlot[
Sqrt[xVel[x, y]^2 + yVel[x, y]^2], {x, y} \[Element] RegionCapillary,
PlotRange -> All, PlotLabel -> "velocity magnitude",
PlotPoints -> 100, ColorFunction -> "TemperatureMap"]
{0.306492, Null}


enter image description here


The interpolating function returns 0 outside it's original region:


xVel[0.5, 0.5]
0.

Not sure if the Pe=10^2 is what is specified in COMSOL, if I use:


Pe = 100^2;

Thinks looks similar:


eqn = Pe {xVel[x, y], yVel[x, y]}.Grad[c[x, y], {x, y}] - 

Laplacian[c[x, y], {x, y}];

mesh = ToElementMesh[RegionShell, MaxCellMeasure -> 0.001(*,
"MeshElementType"\[Rule]TriangleElement*)]

bcs = {DirichletCondition[c[x, y] == 0, x == 0 && 0.8 < y < 0.9],
DirichletCondition[c[x, y] == 1, x > 0]};

AbsoluteTiming[
csol = NDSolveValue[{eqn == 0, bcs}, c, {x, y} \[Element] mesh];]


{0.527804, Null}

DensityPlot[csol[x, y], {x, y} \[Element] RegionShell,
PlotRange -> All, PlotLabel -> "x velocity", PlotPoints -> 100,
ColorFunction -> "TemperatureMap"]

enter image description here


Comments

Popular posts from this blog

plotting - Filling between two spheres in SphericalPlot3D

Manipulate[ SphericalPlot3D[{1, 2 - n}, {θ, 0, Pi}, {ϕ, 0, 1.5 Pi}, Mesh -> None, PlotPoints -> 15, PlotRange -> {-2.2, 2.2}], {n, 0, 1}] I cant' seem to be able to make a filling between two spheres. I've already tried the obvious Filling -> {1 -> {2}} but Mathematica doesn't seem to like that option. Is there any easy way around this or ... Answer There is no built-in filling in SphericalPlot3D . One option is to use ParametricPlot3D to draw the surfaces between the two shells: Manipulate[ Show[SphericalPlot3D[{1, 2 - n}, {θ, 0, Pi}, {ϕ, 0, 1.5 Pi}, PlotPoints -> 15, PlotRange -> {-2.2, 2.2}], ParametricPlot3D[{ r {Sin[t] Cos[1.5 Pi], Sin[t] Sin[1.5 Pi], Cos[t]}, r {Sin[t] Cos[0 Pi], Sin[t] Sin[0 Pi], Cos[t]}}, {r, 1, 2 - n}, {t, 0, Pi}, PlotStyle -> Yellow, Mesh -> {2, 15}]], {n, 0, 1}]

plotting - Plot 4D data with color as 4th dimension

I have a list of 4D data (x position, y position, amplitude, wavelength). I want to plot x, y, and amplitude on a 3D plot and have the color of the points correspond to the wavelength. I have seen many examples using functions to define color but my wavelength cannot be expressed by an analytic function. Is there a simple way to do this? Answer Here a another possible way to visualize 4D data: data = Flatten[Table[{x, y, x^2 + y^2, Sin[x - y]}, {x, -Pi, Pi,Pi/10}, {y,-Pi,Pi, Pi/10}], 1]; You can use the function Point along with VertexColors . Now the points are places using the first three elements and the color is determined by the fourth. In this case I used Hue, but you can use whatever you prefer. Graphics3D[ Point[data[[All, 1 ;; 3]], VertexColors -> Hue /@ data[[All, 4]]], Axes -> True, BoxRatios -> {1, 1, 1/GoldenRatio}]

plotting - Mathematica: 3D plot based on combined 2D graphs

I have several sigmoidal fits to 3 different datasets, with mean fit predictions plus the 95% confidence limits (not symmetrical around the mean) and the actual data. I would now like to show these different 2D plots projected in 3D as in but then using proper perspective. In the link here they give some solutions to combine the plots using isometric perspective, but I would like to use proper 3 point perspective. Any thoughts? Also any way to show the mean points per time point for each series plus or minus the standard error on the mean would be cool too, either using points+vertical bars, or using spheres plus tubes. Below are some test data and the fit function I am using. Note that I am working on a logit(proportion) scale and that the final vertical scale is Log10(percentage). (* some test data *) data = Table[Null, {i, 4}]; data[[1]] = {{1, -5.8}, {2, -5.4}, {3, -0.8}, {4, -0.2}, {5, 4.6}, {1, -6.4}, {2, -5.6}, {3, -0.7}, {4, 0.04}, {5, 1.0}, {1, -6.8}, {2, -4.7}, {3, -1.