Skip to main content

equation solving - I can't understand why "FindRoot::nlnum:" shows up in my code


I want to solve a system of equations using Findroot as follows:


Clear[a]; Clear[c]; n = 2;
SysEqn1 = Table[a[i] + I Sum[(PolyLog[1, E^(I (c[j] - a[i] + 0.5))] +

PolyLog[1, E^(I (c[j] - a[i] + (2 \[Pi] - 1.2)))] -
PolyLog[1, E^(I (c[j] - a[i] - 0.3))] -
PolyLog[1, E^(I (c[j] - a[i] - 0.4))]), {i, n}], {j, n}];
SysEqn2 = Table[c[i] + I Sum[(PolyLog[1, E^(I (c[j] - a[i] + 0.5))] +
PolyLog[1, E^(I (c[j] - a[i] + (2 \[Pi] - 1.2)))] -
PolyLog[1, E^(I (c[j] - a[i] - 0.3))] -
PolyLog[1, E^(I (c[j] - a[i] - 0.4))]), {i, n}], {j, n}];
SysEqn = Join[SysEqn1, SysEqn2];
startingValues1 = Table[{a[i], -1 + 2 i/n}, {i, n}];
startingValues2 = Table[{c[i], -0.9 + 2 i/n}, {i, n}];

starting = Join[startingValues1, startingValues2];
FindRoot[SysEqn, starting]

The error message from the above code is as fo


FindRoot::nlnum: "The function value {a[i]+(0. +1.\ I)\ (1.\ Log[1. +Times[<<2>>]]+1.\ Log[1. +Times[<<2>>]]-1.\ Log[1. +Times[<<2>>]]-1.\ Log[1. +Times[<<2>>]]+1.\ Log[1. +Times[<<2>>]]+1.\ Log[1. +Times[<<2>>]]-1.\ Log[1. +Times[<<2>>]]-1.\ Log[1. +Times[<<2>>]]),a[i]+(0. +1.\ I)\ (<<1>>),<<1>>,c[i]+(0. +1.\ I)\ (1.\ Log[1. +Times[<<2>>]]+<<11>>)} is not a list of numbers with dimensions {4} at {a[1],a[2],c[1],c[2]} = {0.,1.,0.1,1.1}."

For n=2 case, I have four equations so I think the number of starting variables that should be determined is also four. But for some reason my code doesn't work... I would really appreciate if you can help me out with this problem!



Answer



First of all, there seems to be a bug:


PolyLog[1, E^(I (c[1] - a[2] + (2 π - 1.2)))]

(* -1. Log[1 - 2.71828^((0. + 1. I) (5.08319 - 1. a[2.] + c[1.]))] *)

Note the indices have been converted from Integer to Real numbers. This can be easily fixed with NHoldAll.


Second, there's an a[i] and c[i] at the beginning of Table in each system, but the Table iterator is j. Looking at the image posted in the original form of the question, it seems the j iterator for the Sum was misplaced in the edit.


ClearAll[a];
ClearAll[c];
SetAttributes[a, NHoldAll];
SetAttributes[c, NHoldAll];
n = 2;
SysEqn1 = Table[a[i] + I Sum[(PolyLog[1, E^(I (c[j] - a[i] + 0.5))] +

PolyLog[1, E^(I (c[j] - a[i] + (2 π - 1.2)))] -
PolyLog[1, E^(I (c[j] - a[i] - 0.3))] -
PolyLog[1, E^(I (c[j] - a[i] - 0.4))]), {j, n}], {i, n}];
SysEqn2 = Table[c[i] + I Sum[(PolyLog[1, E^(I (c[j] - a[i] + 0.5))] +
PolyLog[1, E^(I (c[j] - a[i] + (2 π - 1.2)))] -
PolyLog[1, E^(I (c[j] - a[i] - 0.3))] -
PolyLog[1, E^(I (c[j] - a[i] - 0.4))]), {j, n}], {i, n}];
SysEqn = Join[SysEqn1, SysEqn2];
startingValues1 = Table[{a[i], -1 + 2 i/n}, {i, n}];
startingValues2 = Table[{c[i], -0.9 + 2 i/n}, {i, n}];

starting = Join[startingValues1, startingValues2];

FindRoot[SysEqn, starting]
(*
{a[1] -> 1.8484 + 0.907529 I, a[2] -> 3.0128 + 1.14394 I,
c[1] -> 1.8484 + 0.907529 I, c[2] -> 3.0128 + 1.14394 I}
*)

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

plotting - Plot 4D data with color as 4th dimension

I have a list of 4D data (x position, y position, amplitude, wavelength). I want to plot x, y, and amplitude on a 3D plot and have the color of the points correspond to the wavelength. I have seen many examples using functions to define color but my wavelength cannot be expressed by an analytic function. Is there a simple way to do this? Answer Here a another possible way to visualize 4D data: data = Flatten[Table[{x, y, x^2 + y^2, Sin[x - y]}, {x, -Pi, Pi,Pi/10}, {y,-Pi,Pi, Pi/10}], 1]; You can use the function Point along with VertexColors . Now the points are places using the first three elements and the color is determined by the fourth. In this case I used Hue, but you can use whatever you prefer. Graphics3D[ Point[data[[All, 1 ;; 3]], VertexColors -> Hue /@ data[[All, 4]]], Axes -> True, BoxRatios -> {1, 1, 1/GoldenRatio}]

plotting - Filling between two spheres in SphericalPlot3D

Manipulate[ SphericalPlot3D[{1, 2 - n}, {θ, 0, Pi}, {ϕ, 0, 1.5 Pi}, Mesh -> None, PlotPoints -> 15, PlotRange -> {-2.2, 2.2}], {n, 0, 1}] I cant' seem to be able to make a filling between two spheres. I've already tried the obvious Filling -> {1 -> {2}} but Mathematica doesn't seem to like that option. Is there any easy way around this or ... Answer There is no built-in filling in SphericalPlot3D . One option is to use ParametricPlot3D to draw the surfaces between the two shells: Manipulate[ Show[SphericalPlot3D[{1, 2 - n}, {θ, 0, Pi}, {ϕ, 0, 1.5 Pi}, PlotPoints -> 15, PlotRange -> {-2.2, 2.2}], ParametricPlot3D[{ r {Sin[t] Cos[1.5 Pi], Sin[t] Sin[1.5 Pi], Cos[t]}, r {Sin[t] Cos[0 Pi], Sin[t] Sin[0 Pi], Cos[t]}}, {r, 1, 2 - n}, {t, 0, Pi}, PlotStyle -> Yellow, Mesh -> {2, 15}]], {n, 0, 1}]

plotting - Mathematica: 3D plot based on combined 2D graphs

I have several sigmoidal fits to 3 different datasets, with mean fit predictions plus the 95% confidence limits (not symmetrical around the mean) and the actual data. I would now like to show these different 2D plots projected in 3D as in but then using proper perspective. In the link here they give some solutions to combine the plots using isometric perspective, but I would like to use proper 3 point perspective. Any thoughts? Also any way to show the mean points per time point for each series plus or minus the standard error on the mean would be cool too, either using points+vertical bars, or using spheres plus tubes. Below are some test data and the fit function I am using. Note that I am working on a logit(proportion) scale and that the final vertical scale is Log10(percentage). (* some test data *) data = Table[Null, {i, 4}]; data[[1]] = {{1, -5.8}, {2, -5.4}, {3, -0.8}, {4, -0.2}, {5, 4.6}, {1, -6.4}, {2, -5.6}, {3, -0.7}, {4, 0.04}, {5, 1.0}, {1, -6.8}, {2, -4.7}, {3, -1....