Skip to main content

graphics - Find intersection of pairs of straight lines


I have a list of 24 points, in which two consecutive points (1st and 2nd, 3rd and 4th, …) are supposed to form a line:


p1={{243.8, 77.}, {467.4, 12.}, {291.8, 130.}, {476., 210.5}, {103.2, 
  327.}, {245.2, 110.5}, {47.4, 343.}, {87.4, 108.5}, {371., 
  506.5}, {384.6, 277.}, {264.6, 525.5}, {353.8, 294.5}, {113.2, 
  484.5}, {296., 304.5}, {459.6, 604.5}, {320.2, 466.5}, {288.2, 

  630.5}, {199.6, 446.5}, {138.8, 615.5}, {81.8, 410.}, {232.4, 
  795.}, {461.8, 727.}, {27.4, 671.5}, {206.8, 763.5}};

I also have another list of 24 points with the same property:


p2={{356.8, 32.}, {363.2, 120.}, {346., 245.}, {393.8, 158.}, {163.8, 
  211.5}, {230.2, 250.}, {54.6, 225.}, {139.6, 220.}, {366., 
  394.5}, {451.8, 372.}, {241., 398.}, {321., 411.5}, {163.2, 
  347.}, {213.2, 406.5}, {332.4, 596.5}, {402.4, 528.5}, {176., 
  585.5}, {256., 530.5}, {38.2, 553.}, {122.4, 507.}, {345.2, 
  774.5}, {345.2, 688.}, {104.6, 728.}, {161.8, 647.}};


My goal is to find the intersections between a line in p1 and a line in p2 as shown in the graph below. I really don't know how to start with this, and worse, a line on p1 does not match up with the intersecting line in p2 in terms of order in each list. This could be observed by different colors of 2 intersecting lines, and makes it harder for element-by-element manipulation*. How can I solve this?


Join[Partition[p1, 2], Partition[p2, 2]] // ListLinePlot

Join Partition line intersection


*I found out that this is thankfully not true, as seen below when line i in p1 and line i in p2 are plotted together, and also by Öskå in a comment to eldo's answer.


Row@Table[
  ListLinePlot[{Partition[p1, 2][[i]], Partition[p2, 2][[i]]}], {i, 1,
    Length@Partition[p1, 2]}]


line pairs


lines



Answer



p1 = Partition[{{243.8, 77.}, {467.4, 12.}, {291.8, 130.}, {476., 
    210.5}, {103.2, 327.}, {245.2, 110.5}, {47.4, 343.}, {87.4, 
    108.5}, {371., 506.5}, {384.6, 277.}, {264.6, 525.5}, {353.8, 
    294.5}, {113.2, 484.5}, {296., 304.5}, {459.6, 604.5}, {320.2, 
    466.5}, {288.2, 630.5}, {199.6, 446.5}, {138.8, 615.5}, {81.8, 
    410.}, {232.4, 795.}, {461.8, 727.}, {27.4, 671.5}, {206.8, 
    763.5}}, 2];


p2 = Partition[{{356.8, 32.}, {363.2, 120.}, {346., 245.}, {393.8, 
     158.}, {163.8, 211.5}, {230.2, 250.}, {54.6, 225.}, {139.6, 
     220.}, {366., 394.5}, {451.8, 372.}, {241., 398.}, {321., 
     411.5}, {163.2, 347.}, {213.2, 406.5}, {332.4, 596.5}, {402.4, 
     528.5}, {176., 585.5}, {256., 530.5}, {38.2, 553.}, {122.4, 
     507.}, {345.2, 774.5}, {345.2, 688.}, {104.6, 728.}, {161.8, 
     647.}}, 2];

LineIntersectionPoint[{a_, b_}, {c_, d_}] := 

  (Det[{a, b}] (c - d) - Det[{c, d}] (a - b))/Det[{a - b, c - d}]

Graphics[{Line /@ {p1, p2}, Red, PointSize@.05, 
  Point /@ MapThread[LineIntersectionPoint, {p1, p2}]}, Frame -> True]

Mathematica graphics


Ref for finding intersection of 2 lines by determinants


line graph


determinant intersection


Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

plotting - Plot 4D data with color as 4th dimension

I have a list of 4D data (x position, y position, amplitude, wavelength). I want to plot x, y, and amplitude on a 3D plot and have the color of the points correspond to the wavelength. I have seen many examples using functions to define color but my wavelength cannot be expressed by an analytic function. Is there a simple way to do this? Answer Here a another possible way to visualize 4D data: data = Flatten[Table[{x, y, x^2 + y^2, Sin[x - y]}, {x, -Pi, Pi,Pi/10}, {y,-Pi,Pi, Pi/10}], 1]; You can use the function Point along with VertexColors . Now the points are places using the first three elements and the color is determined by the fourth. In this case I used Hue, but you can use whatever you prefer. Graphics3D[ Point[data[[All, 1 ;; 3]], VertexColors -> Hue /@ data[[All, 4]]], Axes -> True, BoxRatios -> {1, 1, 1/GoldenRatio}]
Post a Comment
Read more

plotting - Filling between two spheres in SphericalPlot3D

Manipulate[ SphericalPlot3D[{1, 2 - n}, {θ, 0, Pi}, {ϕ, 0, 1.5 Pi}, Mesh -> None, PlotPoints -> 15, PlotRange -> {-2.2, 2.2}], {n, 0, 1}] I cant' seem to be able to make a filling between two spheres. I've already tried the obvious Filling -> {1 -> {2}} but Mathematica doesn't seem to like that option. Is there any easy way around this or ... Answer There is no built-in filling in SphericalPlot3D . One option is to use ParametricPlot3D to draw the surfaces between the two shells: Manipulate[ Show[SphericalPlot3D[{1, 2 - n}, {θ, 0, Pi}, {ϕ, 0, 1.5 Pi}, PlotPoints -> 15, PlotRange -> {-2.2, 2.2}], ParametricPlot3D[{ r {Sin[t] Cos[1.5 Pi], Sin[t] Sin[1.5 Pi], Cos[t]}, r {Sin[t] Cos[0 Pi], Sin[t] Sin[0 Pi], Cos[t]}}, {r, 1, 2 - n}, {t, 0, Pi}, PlotStyle -> Yellow, Mesh -> {2, 15}]], {n, 0, 1}]
Post a Comment
Read more

plotting - Mathematica: 3D plot based on combined 2D graphs

I have several sigmoidal fits to 3 different datasets, with mean fit predictions plus the 95% confidence limits (not symmetrical around the mean) and the actual data. I would now like to show these different 2D plots projected in 3D as in but then using proper perspective. In the link here they give some solutions to combine the plots using isometric perspective, but I would like to use proper 3 point perspective. Any thoughts? Also any way to show the mean points per time point for each series plus or minus the standard error on the mean would be cool too, either using points+vertical bars, or using spheres plus tubes. Below are some test data and the fit function I am using. Note that I am working on a logit(proportion) scale and that the final vertical scale is Log10(percentage). (* some test data *) data = Table[Null, {i, 4}]; data[[1]] = {{1, -5.8}, {2, -5.4}, {3, -0.8}, {4, -0.2}, {5, 4.6}, {1, -6.4}, {2, -5.6}, {3, -0.7}, {4, 0.04}, {5, 1.0}, {1, -6.8}, {2, -4.7}, {3, -1....
Post a Comment
Read more