Skip to main content

What is the fastest way to locate an image inside a larger image?


let b =


enter image description here




let c =


enter image description here




How to do:


find[c,b]


that returns the bounding box of c in b?


Notes



  • Original b is not scaled, this is only the case in this post.

  • (Update: this may actually not be the case.) Because b contains an exact copy of c, this can be thought of as a problem of finding a submatrix in a larger matrix.


Links to original images



Update



Here are the results so far:


enter image description here


Final Result (using Heike's answer)


enter image description here



Answer



Using ImageCorrelate, you can do something like


bbox[img_, crop_] := {#, # + Reverse@ImageDimensions[crop] - 1} &@
Position[ImageData@
Binarize[
ImageCorrelate[img, crop, SquaredEuclideanDistance,

Padding -> None], .001], 0][[1]]

Example


img = ExampleData[{"TestImage", "Mandrill"}]
crop = ImageTake[img, {40, 80}, {141, 200}]

bbox[img, crop]


{{40, 141}, {80, 200}}


Edit


In response to the OP's question,here is an explanation of how bbox works.


ImageCorrelate in bbox creates a new image by calculating the Euclidean distance between crop and each of the sub images of img with the same dimensions as crop. The option Padding -> None is to make sure that the pixel at {i,j} in the result of ImageCorrelate corresponds to the sub image whose upper left corner is at position {i,j} in the original image.


The Euclidean distance between two images is zero only if they are the same, so to find the position of crop in img we just need to extract the position of the pixels with value {0.,0.,0.} from the image data of ImageCorrelate which is what Position[ImageData@Binarize[....]], 0] does.


This will give us the position of the upper left corner of crop. The lower right corner is then the upper-left corner plus the dimensions of crop (note that since ImageDimensions returns {number of cols, number of rows}, and the bounding box is given as {{rowMin, colMin}, {roxMaw, colMax}} we need to reverse ImageDimensions)


Edit 2


As Szabolcs pointed out, the cut off in Binarize is somewhat arbitrary, and might cause false positives. As an alternative you could do something like this instead, which would find the best fit in the image:


bbox[img_, crop_] := {#, # + Reverse@ImageDimensions[crop] - 1} &@
(Position[#, Min[#]][[1]] &@

ImageData[ColorConvert[
ImageCorrelate[img, crop, SquaredEuclideanDistance,
Padding -> None], "Graylevel"]])

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

plotting - How to draw lines between specified dots on ListPlot?

I would like to create a plot where I have unconnected dots and some connected. So far, I have figured out how to draw the dots. My code is the following: ListPlot[{{1, 1}, {2, 2}, {3, 3}, {4, 4}, {1, 4}, {2, 5}, {3, 6}, {4, 7}, {1, 7}, {2, 8}, {3, 9}, {4, 10}, {1, 10}, {2, 11}, {3, 12}, {4,13}, {2.5, 7}}, Ticks -> {{1, 2, 3, 4}, None}, AxesStyle -> Thin, TicksStyle -> Directive[Black, Bold, 12], Mesh -> Full] I have thought using ListLinePlot command, but I don't know how to specify to the command to draw only selected lines between the dots. Do have any suggestions/hints on how to do that? Thank you. Answer One possibility would be to use Epilog with Line : ListPlot[ {{1, 1}, {2, 2}, {3, 3}, {4, 4}, {1, 4}, {2, 5}, {3, 6}, {4, 7}, {1, 7}, {2, 8}, {3, 9}, {4, 10}, {1, 10}, {2, 11}, {3, 12}, {4, 13}, {2.5, 7}}, Ticks -> {{1, 2, 3, 4}, None}, AxesStyle -> Thin, TicksStyle -> Directive[Black, Bold, 12], Mesh -> Full, Epilog -> { Line[ ...

equation solving - Invert and fit implicitly defined curve

I need to fit an implicitly defined curve. I thought I could get some data out of Solve , and then using FindFit . Therefore, I would like to find the relation the parametric curve defined by $F(x,y)=0$: Solve[-(1/2) + 1/2 (0.41202 BesselK[0, 0.1 Sqrt[x^2 + y^2]] + (0.101483 x BesselK[1, 0.1 Sqrt[x^2 + y^2]])/Sqrt[x^2 + y^2]) == 0, y] But I can't get an output: Solve was unable to solve the system with inexact coefficients or the system obtained by direct rationalization of inexact numbers present in the system. Since many of the methods used by Solve require exact input, providing Solve with an exact version of the system may help. >> Edit: In particular, I would like to fit the data coming from the curve with the expression of another curve, and not with a function $f(x)$. In particular, since this clearly looks like a cardioid , I would like it to fit to something like it. What other strategies could I try?

dynamic - How can I make a clickable ArrayPlot that returns input?

I would like to create a dynamic ArrayPlot so that the rectangles, when clicked, provide the input. Can I use ArrayPlot for this? Or is there something else I should have to use? Answer ArrayPlot is much more than just a simple array like Grid : it represents a ranged 2D dataset, and its visualization can be finetuned by options like DataReversed and DataRange . These features make it quite complicated to reproduce the same layout and order with Grid . Here I offer AnnotatedArrayPlot which comes in handy when your dataset is more than just a flat 2D array. The dynamic interface allows highlighting individual cells and possibly interacting with them. AnnotatedArrayPlot works the same way as ArrayPlot and accepts the same options plus Enabled , HighlightCoordinates , HighlightStyle and HighlightElementFunction . data = {{Missing["HasSomeMoreData"], GrayLevel[ 1], {RGBColor[0, 1, 1], RGBColor[0, 0, 1], GrayLevel[1]}, RGBColor[0, 1, 0]}, {GrayLevel[0], GrayLevel...