Skip to main content

geography - Loading data from a shapefile



After saving (with QGis) the part of the map I´m interested in for a local visualization, I have the .zip file where you can see 5 files. I load the map in Mathematica with


e1 = Import["Estrada.zip"]

all works fine.


But the problem is... when I want to list the name of every region, I can´t find the names, but I can see LayerNames if I type


e2 = Import["Estrada.zip","Elements"]

zip file at https://we.tl/t-NqBdMYcOSN (sorry for not attanching to the message, if I must upload the file to another site, please tell me)


I´m doing bad anything or is not available the LayerName in this zip file?



Answer




It does appear that "LayerNames" does not work correctly with Shapefile zips - I would recommend emailing WRI support about this, as I think it's a bug.


As a workaround, you can unzip the shapefile zip and import the .shp inside instead of importing the zip file.


I uncompressed the zip file locally (just by double-clicking the zip file), and then I can do:


Import["~/Downloads/Estrada/estrada.shp", {"SHP", "LayerNames"}]


"estrada"



Which (I checked) is the only layer in the file.


You can get the Graphics object like so:



Import["~/Downloads/Estrada/estrada.shp", {"SHP", "Graphics"}]


enter image description here



and the data like so:


Import["~/Downloads/Estrada/estrada.shp", {"SHP", "Data"}]

For example, you can get the names of each area by doing:


Association[

Association[
Import["~/Downloads/Estrada/estrada.shp", {"SHP", "Data"}]][
"LabeledData"]]["PARROQUIA"]


enter image description here



By the way, "LayerNames" may not be what you think they are. They are the names of layers in the shapefile, rather than objects within a layer. The file you have only shows a single layer. In QGIS, you can see this in the bottom left:



enter image description here




One thing to note: your data purports to be, but is not, in the EPSG:4326 spatial reference system. I would recommend exporting in this SRS if you wish to use the geospatial data within Mathematica.


I have determined that your data is in the UTM Zone 29 SRS (EPSG:32629). You can set this as such in QGIS and export as 4326, or you can happily use these positions in Mathematica, now that we know what they are.


To use this in Mathematica, we need GeoGridPosition.


Let's convert the geometry in the Data field to GeoGridPosition:


geom = Association[
Import["~/Downloads/Estrada/estrada.shp", {"SHP", "Data"}]][
"Geometry"] /.
Polygon[x_] :> (Polygon[GeoGridPosition[#, "UTMZone29"] & /@ x])


Now we can use it like any normal GeoPosition:


enter image description here


GeoRegionValuePlot[AssociationThread[
geom,
Association[
Association[
Import["~/Downloads/Estrada/estrada.shp", {"SHP", "Data"}]][
"LabeledData"]]["SUPERFICIE"]]]

enter image description here



Finally, though this is a Mathematica forum, here is how to generate similar plots in QGIS, since you mentioned it:


enter image description here


giving


enter image description here


You asked the right person ;)


Comments

Popular posts from this blog

mathematical optimization - Minimizing using indices, error: Part::pkspec1: The expression cannot be used as a part specification

I want to use Minimize where the variables to minimize are indices pointing into an array. Here a MWE that hopefully shows what my problem is. vars = u@# & /@ Range[3]; cons = Flatten@ { Table[(u[j] != #) & /@ vars[[j + 1 ;; -1]], {j, 1, 3 - 1}], 1 vec1 = {1, 2, 3}; vec2 = {1, 2, 3}; Minimize[{Total@((vec1[[#]] - vec2[[u[#]]])^2 & /@ Range[1, 3]), cons}, vars, Integers] The error I get: Part::pkspec1: The expression u[1] cannot be used as a part specification. >> Answer Ok, it seems that one can get around Mathematica trying to evaluate vec2[[u[1]]] too early by using the function Indexed[vec2,u[1]] . The working MWE would then look like the following: vars = u@# & /@ Range[3]; cons = Flatten@{ Table[(u[j] != #) & /@ vars[[j + 1 ;; -1]], {j, 1, 3 - 1}], 1 vec1 = {1, 2, 3}; vec2 = {1, 2, 3}; NMinimize[ {Total@((vec1[[#]] - Indexed[vec2, u[#]])^2 & /@ R...

functions - Get leading series expansion term?

Given a function f[x] , I would like to have a function leadingSeries that returns just the leading term in the series around x=0 . For example: leadingSeries[(1/x + 2)/(4 + 1/x^2 + x)] x and leadingSeries[(1/x + 2 + (1 - 1/x^3)/4)/(4 + x)] -(1/(16 x^3)) Is there such a function in Mathematica? Or maybe one can implement it efficiently? EDIT I finally went with the following implementation, based on Carl Woll 's answer: lds[ex_,x_]:=( (ex/.x->(x+O[x]^2))/.SeriesData[U_,Z_,L_List,Mi_,Ma_,De_]:>SeriesData[U,Z,{L[[1]]},Mi,Mi+1,De]//Quiet//Normal) The advantage is, that this one also properly works with functions whose leading term is a constant: lds[Exp[x],x] 1 Answer Update 1 Updated to eliminate SeriesData and to not return additional terms Perhaps you could use: leadingSeries[expr_, x_] := Normal[expr /. x->(x+O[x]^2) /. a_List :> Take[a, 1]] Then for your examples: leadingSeries[(1/x + 2)/(4 + 1/x^2 + x), x] leadingSeries[Exp[x], x] leadingSeries[(1/x + 2 + (1 - 1/x...

What is and isn't a valid variable specification for Manipulate?

I have an expression whose terms have arguments (representing subscripts), like this: myExpr = A[0] + V[1,T] I would like to put it inside a Manipulate to see its value as I move around the parameters. (The goal is eventually to plot it wrt one of the variables inside.) However, Mathematica complains when I set V[1,T] as a manipulated variable: Manipulate[Evaluate[myExpr], {A[0], 0, 1}, {V[1, T], 0, 1}] (*Manipulate::vsform: Manipulate argument {V[1,T],0,1} does not have the correct form for a variable specification. >> *) As a workaround, if I get rid of the symbol T inside the argument, it works fine: Manipulate[ Evaluate[myExpr /. T -> 15], {A[0], 0, 1}, {V[1, 15], 0, 1}] Why this behavior? Can anyone point me to the documentation that says what counts as a valid variable? And is there a way to get Manpiulate to accept an expression with a symbolic argument as a variable? Investigations I've done so far: I tried using variableQ from this answer , but it says V[1...