Skip to main content

equation solving - Parsing output of a reduce operation


This question is a broader question than this. The output of Reduce can be of different forms. The solutions proposed for that question works well when the output of Reduce is as provided in that question. The output of Reduce can also be of the forms:


$n_2\in \mathbb{Z}\land n_1=1\land 0\leq n_2\leq 1993.$


or


$\left(n_1|n_2\right)\in \mathbb{Z}\land \left(\left(n_1=0\land 1.\leq n_2\leq 19979.\right)\lor \left(1.\leq n_1\leq 2222.\land 0\leq n_2\leq \text{3.5534074004528205$\grave{ }$*${}^{\wedge}$-79} \sqrt{-4.55384\times 10^{157} n_1^2+1.50383\times 10^{162} n_1+7.9031\times 10^{164}}+\text{1.7152185859604652$\grave{ }$*${}^{\wedge}$-56} \left(3.20659\times 10^{56} n_1+5.82404\times 10^{59}\right)\right)\lor \left(2223.\leq n_1\leq 33540.\land \text{1.7152185859604652$\grave{ }$*${}^{\wedge}$-56} \left(3.20659\times 10^{56} n_1+5.82404\times 10^{59}\right)-\text{3.5534074004528205$\grave{ }$*${}^{\wedge}$-79} \sqrt{-4.55384\times 10^{157} n_1^2+1.50383\times 10^{162} n_1+7.9031\times 10^{164}}\leq n_2\leq \text{3.5534074004528205$\grave{ }$*${}^{\wedge}$-79} \sqrt{-4.55384\times 10^{157} n_1^2+1.50383\times 10^{162} n_1+7.9031\times 10^{164}}+\text{1.7152185859604652$\grave{ }$*${}^{\wedge}$-56} \left(3.20659\times 10^{56} n_1+5.82404\times 10^{59}\right)\right)\right)$


In such cases, how can I find the maximum value of $n_1$ and $n_2$ from the Reduce output?



Edit: Please find below the function and the reduce operations that produce the two kind of outputs:


driftParamSet = (-0.72 
\!\(\*SubsuperscriptBox[\(n\), \(1\), \(2\)]\) -
Subscript[n,
1] (0.35` (0.8` - 0.39 Subscript[n, 2]) +
0.8` (-2.35 - 0.1` Subscript[n, 2])) -
0.19 Subscript[n,
2] (0.39` - 0.1` Subscript[n, 2] +
0.1` (-3 + 2 Subscript[n, 2])))/(0.8` Subscript[n, 1] +
0.19 Subscript[n, 2])

Reduce[driftParamSet > -5 && Subscript[n, 1] >= 0 &&
Subscript[n, 2] >= 0 , {Subscript[n, 1], Subscript[n,
2]}, Integers]
Reduce[driftParamSet > -1000 && Subscript[n, 1] >= 0 &&
Subscript[n, 2] >= 0 , {Subscript[n, 1], Subscript[n, 2]}, Integers]

Answer



You can use Maximize on the first example:


r1 = Quiet @ Reduce[
driftParamSet > -5 && Subscript[n, 1] >= 0 && Subscript[n, 2] >= 0,
{Subscript[n, 1], Subscript[n, 2]},

Integers
];

Maximize[{Subscript[n, 2], r1}, {Subscript[n, 1], Subscript[n, 2]}]


{657., {Subscript[n, 1] -> 102., Subscript[n, 2] -> 657}}



For the second example, Maximize is unable to find a result, and then uses NMaximize:


r2 = Quiet @ Reduce[

driftParamSet > -1000 && Subscript[n, 1] >= 0 && Subscript[n, 2] >= 0,
{Subscript[n, 1], Subscript[n, 2]},
Integers
];

Maximize[{Subscript[n, 2], r2}, {Subscript[n, 1], Subscript[n, 2]}]


NMaximize::cvmit: Failed to converge to the requested accuracy or precision within 100 iterations.


{22712., {Subscript[n, 1] -> 1118, Subscript[n, 2] -> 22712}}




As the error message says, 100 iterations were not sufficient. So, switch to using NMaximize, and raise the iteration maximum:


NMaximize[
{Subscript[n, 2], r2},
{Subscript[n, 1], Subscript[n, 2]},
MaxIterations -> 2000
]


{114663., {Subscript[n, 1] -> 17793, Subscript[n, 2] -> 114663}}




Comments

Popular posts from this blog

plotting - Plot 4D data with color as 4th dimension

I have a list of 4D data (x position, y position, amplitude, wavelength). I want to plot x, y, and amplitude on a 3D plot and have the color of the points correspond to the wavelength. I have seen many examples using functions to define color but my wavelength cannot be expressed by an analytic function. Is there a simple way to do this? Answer Here a another possible way to visualize 4D data: data = Flatten[Table[{x, y, x^2 + y^2, Sin[x - y]}, {x, -Pi, Pi,Pi/10}, {y,-Pi,Pi, Pi/10}], 1]; You can use the function Point along with VertexColors . Now the points are places using the first three elements and the color is determined by the fourth. In this case I used Hue, but you can use whatever you prefer. Graphics3D[ Point[data[[All, 1 ;; 3]], VertexColors -> Hue /@ data[[All, 4]]], Axes -> True, BoxRatios -> {1, 1, 1/GoldenRatio}]

plotting - Filling between two spheres in SphericalPlot3D

Manipulate[ SphericalPlot3D[{1, 2 - n}, {θ, 0, Pi}, {ϕ, 0, 1.5 Pi}, Mesh -> None, PlotPoints -> 15, PlotRange -> {-2.2, 2.2}], {n, 0, 1}] I cant' seem to be able to make a filling between two spheres. I've already tried the obvious Filling -> {1 -> {2}} but Mathematica doesn't seem to like that option. Is there any easy way around this or ... Answer There is no built-in filling in SphericalPlot3D . One option is to use ParametricPlot3D to draw the surfaces between the two shells: Manipulate[ Show[SphericalPlot3D[{1, 2 - n}, {θ, 0, Pi}, {ϕ, 0, 1.5 Pi}, PlotPoints -> 15, PlotRange -> {-2.2, 2.2}], ParametricPlot3D[{ r {Sin[t] Cos[1.5 Pi], Sin[t] Sin[1.5 Pi], Cos[t]}, r {Sin[t] Cos[0 Pi], Sin[t] Sin[0 Pi], Cos[t]}}, {r, 1, 2 - n}, {t, 0, Pi}, PlotStyle -> Yellow, Mesh -> {2, 15}]], {n, 0, 1}]

plotting - Mathematica: 3D plot based on combined 2D graphs

I have several sigmoidal fits to 3 different datasets, with mean fit predictions plus the 95% confidence limits (not symmetrical around the mean) and the actual data. I would now like to show these different 2D plots projected in 3D as in but then using proper perspective. In the link here they give some solutions to combine the plots using isometric perspective, but I would like to use proper 3 point perspective. Any thoughts? Also any way to show the mean points per time point for each series plus or minus the standard error on the mean would be cool too, either using points+vertical bars, or using spheres plus tubes. Below are some test data and the fit function I am using. Note that I am working on a logit(proportion) scale and that the final vertical scale is Log10(percentage). (* some test data *) data = Table[Null, {i, 4}]; data[[1]] = {{1, -5.8}, {2, -5.4}, {3, -0.8}, {4, -0.2}, {5, 4.6}, {1, -6.4}, {2, -5.6}, {3, -0.7}, {4, 0.04}, {5, 1.0}, {1, -6.8}, {2, -4.7}, {3, -1....