Skip to main content

graphics - Generate nonoverlapping random circles



I want to distribute n circles unformly in an area(e.g. free plannar space). The circles could touch each other but cannot overlap.


n = 5;
r = 0.2;

Table[pt[i] = RandomReal[{-1, 1}, 2], {i, 1, n}];
Graphics[{Table[Circle[pt[i], r], {i, n}]}, Axes -> True,
PlotRange -> {{-1, 1}, {-1, 1}}]

My method is to generate the random points firstly, and then calculate the smallest distance between all point pairs. If the smallest distance is larger than 2r, the points are kept. However, the problem with this method is that the larger the radius, the more trials have to be taken. enter image description here



Answer



There are a bunch of Region functions that just showed up in 10. This uses RegionDistance[] to make a function that computes the shortest distance from a point to a region. The generated function runs faster than just checking all the circles. Though the creation of the function in the first place has to look at all the circles. So this still runs in $\mathrm O(n^2)$ time, but at least the inner While should be faster when there are already a lot of circles and not a lot of places to put a new one.


distinct[n_,r_]:=Module[{d,f,p},
d={Circle[RandomReal[{-1,1},2],r]};
Do[

f=RegionDistance[RegionUnion@@d];
While[p=RandomReal[{-1,1},2];f[p] d=Append[d,Circle[p,r]],
{n-1}];
d
]

Example:


distinct[75, 0.1] // Graphics


75 non-overlapping circles


The following runs quite a bit faster, generating a Nearest function for a large set of circles, and using that one function to eliminate many overlaps in a single pass.


sweep[pts_,r_]:=Module[{p,f,c},
p=pts;
While[
f=Nearest[p->Automatic];
c=f[p,{2,r}];
Last[Dimensions[c]]!=1,
p=Pick[p,First[#]<=Last[#]&/@c];
];

p
]

distinct2[n_,r_]:=Module[{p},
p={};
While[
p=Join[p,RandomReal[{-1,1},{n,2}]];
p=sweep[p,2r];
Length[p] ];

Circle[#,r]&/@Take[p,n]
]

Measuring the performance (your mileage may vary):


Timing[distinct[75,0.1];]


{3.021209,Null}

Timing[distinct2[75,0.1];]



{0.077105,Null}

A problem with both of these algorithms is that there is no assurance that they will halt. You can ask for too many circles, and end up with the While loops trying to add circles forever when there is no place to put even one. If this is supposed to be part of some larger automated process, then you need to add a check for no progress after so many tries in order to give up. E.g.:


distinct3[n_,r_,maxiter_]:=Module[{p,m,k},
p={};
m=0;
k=maxiter;
While[

p=Join[p,RandomReal[{-1,1},{n,2}]];
p=sweep[p,2r];
k=If[Length[p]>m,maxiter,k-1];
m=Length[p];
m0
];
Circle[#,r]&/@If[Length[p]>n,Take[p,n],p]
]

Then:



distinct3[100,0.1,1000]//Length


80

distinct3[100,0.1,1000]//Length


78


As pointed out by Ernst Stelzer, this works in 3D just as well with two small changes:


distinct3D[n_,r_,maxiter_]:=Module[{p,m,k},
p={};
m=0;
k=maxiter;
While[
p=Join[p,RandomReal[{-1,1},{n,3}]];
p=sweep[p,2r];
k=If[Length[p]>m,maxiter,k-1];
m=Length[p];

m0
];
Sphere[#,r]&/@If[Length[p]>n,Take[p,n],p]
]

Then:


distinct3D[150, 0.2, 100]//Graphics3D

118 spheres of radius 0.2 packed into 2x2x2 box


That is 118 spheres.



I'd show you one in four dimensions, except that there's no HyperSphere[] or Graphics4D[]. Perhaps someone could work on those.


And now for something completely different. @novice did not ask that the circles be placed randomly, rather that the circles be distributed "uniformly". You can get more circles in if they are not placed randomly. This hexagonally packs in as many circles as possible of radius r, and then removes any excess circles randomly:


distinctx[n_,r_]:=Module[{x,c},
x={
2Floor[1/(2r)+1/2]-1,
2Floor[1/(2r)],
Sqrt[3](2Floor[1/(2Sqrt[3]r)+1/2]-1),
2Sqrt[3]Floor[1/(2Sqrt[3]r)]}//
Min[1/Select[#,#>0&]]&;
c=Join[

Table[Circle[x{2 i+1,Sqrt[3]j},r],
{i,-Floor[1/(2x)+1/2],Floor[1/(2x)-1/2]},
{j,-1-2Floor[1/(2Sqrt[3]x)-1/2],1+2Floor[1/(2Sqrt[3]x)-1/2],2}]
//Flatten,
Table[Circle[x{2 i,Sqrt[3]j},r],
{i,-Floor[1/(2x)],Floor[1/(2x)]},
{j,-2Floor[1/(2Sqrt[3]x)],2Floor[1/(2Sqrt[3]x)],2}]
//Flatten];
If[Length[c]>n,RandomSample[c,n],c]
]


For example:


distinctx[10,0.15]//
Graphics[{Blue,Line[{{-1,-1},{-1,1},{1,1},{1,-1},{-1,-1}}],Black,#}]&

random sample of hex arrangement


distinctx[40,0.15]//
Graphics[{Blue,Line[{{-1,-1},{-1,1},{1,1},{1,-1},{-1,-1}}],Black,#}]&

just a few missing



You're very unlikely to be able to get 40 circles of radius 0.15 stuffed in there randomly.


Comments

Popular posts from this blog

plotting - Filling between two spheres in SphericalPlot3D

Manipulate[ SphericalPlot3D[{1, 2 - n}, {θ, 0, Pi}, {ϕ, 0, 1.5 Pi}, Mesh -> None, PlotPoints -> 15, PlotRange -> {-2.2, 2.2}], {n, 0, 1}] I cant' seem to be able to make a filling between two spheres. I've already tried the obvious Filling -> {1 -> {2}} but Mathematica doesn't seem to like that option. Is there any easy way around this or ... Answer There is no built-in filling in SphericalPlot3D . One option is to use ParametricPlot3D to draw the surfaces between the two shells: Manipulate[ Show[SphericalPlot3D[{1, 2 - n}, {θ, 0, Pi}, {ϕ, 0, 1.5 Pi}, PlotPoints -> 15, PlotRange -> {-2.2, 2.2}], ParametricPlot3D[{ r {Sin[t] Cos[1.5 Pi], Sin[t] Sin[1.5 Pi], Cos[t]}, r {Sin[t] Cos[0 Pi], Sin[t] Sin[0 Pi], Cos[t]}}, {r, 1, 2 - n}, {t, 0, Pi}, PlotStyle -> Yellow, Mesh -> {2, 15}]], {n, 0, 1}]

plotting - Plot 4D data with color as 4th dimension

I have a list of 4D data (x position, y position, amplitude, wavelength). I want to plot x, y, and amplitude on a 3D plot and have the color of the points correspond to the wavelength. I have seen many examples using functions to define color but my wavelength cannot be expressed by an analytic function. Is there a simple way to do this? Answer Here a another possible way to visualize 4D data: data = Flatten[Table[{x, y, x^2 + y^2, Sin[x - y]}, {x, -Pi, Pi,Pi/10}, {y,-Pi,Pi, Pi/10}], 1]; You can use the function Point along with VertexColors . Now the points are places using the first three elements and the color is determined by the fourth. In this case I used Hue, but you can use whatever you prefer. Graphics3D[ Point[data[[All, 1 ;; 3]], VertexColors -> Hue /@ data[[All, 4]]], Axes -> True, BoxRatios -> {1, 1, 1/GoldenRatio}]

plotting - Mathematica: 3D plot based on combined 2D graphs

I have several sigmoidal fits to 3 different datasets, with mean fit predictions plus the 95% confidence limits (not symmetrical around the mean) and the actual data. I would now like to show these different 2D plots projected in 3D as in but then using proper perspective. In the link here they give some solutions to combine the plots using isometric perspective, but I would like to use proper 3 point perspective. Any thoughts? Also any way to show the mean points per time point for each series plus or minus the standard error on the mean would be cool too, either using points+vertical bars, or using spheres plus tubes. Below are some test data and the fit function I am using. Note that I am working on a logit(proportion) scale and that the final vertical scale is Log10(percentage). (* some test data *) data = Table[Null, {i, 4}]; data[[1]] = {{1, -5.8}, {2, -5.4}, {3, -0.8}, {4, -0.2}, {5, 4.6}, {1, -6.4}, {2, -5.6}, {3, -0.7}, {4, 0.04}, {5, 1.0}, {1, -6.8}, {2, -4.7}, {3, -1.