Skip to main content

dynamic - Localizing variables within a Manipulate


I have a notebook with several examples of very similar computations, each involving the same variable/parameter names of the ingredients used in a final Manipulate. For example,


(* example 1 *)
c = 1;

L = 1;
f[x_] = 180 x^4 (1 - x);
g[x_] = 1;
\[Lambda][n_] = ((n \[Pi])/L)^2;
a[n_] = 2/L Integrate[f[x] Sin[Sqrt[\[Lambda][n]] x], {x, 0, L}];
b[n_] = 2/(L Sqrt[\[Lambda][n]] c) Integrate[g[x] Sin[Sqrt[\[Lambda][n]] x], {x, 0, L}];
u[x_, t_] = Sum[(a[i] Cos[Sqrt[\[Lambda][i]] c t] +
b[i] Sin[Sqrt[\[Lambda][i]] c t]) Sin[Sqrt[\[Lambda][i]] x], {i, 1, 10}];

Manipulate[Plot[u[x, t], {x, 0, L}, PlotStyle -> {Thick, Blue}, PlotRange -> {-15, 15},

AxesLabel -> {x, "u"}], {t, 0, 5}]

followed by


(* example 2 *)
k = .2;
L = 1;
f[x_] = 180 x (1 - x)^4;
\[Lambda][n_] = (((2 n - 1) \[Pi])/(2 L))^2;
b[n_] = 2/L Integrate[f[x] Sin[Sqrt[\[Lambda][n]] x], {x, 0, L}];
u[x_, t_] = Sum[b[i] Sin[Sqrt[\[Lambda][i]] x] Exp[-\[Lambda][i] k t], {i, 1, 10}];


Manipulate[Plot[u[x, t], {x, 0, L}, PlotStyle -> {Thick, Blue}, PlotRange -> {-1, 16},
AxesLabel -> {x, "u"}], {t, 0, 5}]

As discussed in the documentation, evaluating the second block of code dynamically updates the output of the first Manipulate since the underlying quantities being plotted share the name $u(x,t)$ (among other parts) in each.


My question then is, what are some good ways to mitigate this behavior other than:



  1. Choosing distinct names for all underlying quantities for each problem. (This is intractable since I may have 10+ such exercises in each notebook.)

  2. Disabling dynamic updating. (This is unsatisfying since the point here is to see the Manipulate "movies".)

  3. Wrapping everything in a DynamicModule,



e.g.,


(* example 1a *)
DynamicModule[{a, b, c, f, g, L, \[Lambda], u},
c = 1;
L = 1;
f[x_] = 180 x^4 (1 - x);
g[x_] = 1;
\[Lambda][n_] = ((n \[Pi])/L)^2;
a[n_] = 2/L Integrate[f[x] Sin[Sqrt[\[Lambda][n]] x], {x, 0, L}];

b[n_] = 2/(L Sqrt[\[Lambda][n]] c) Integrate[g[x] Sin[Sqrt[\[Lambda][n]] x], {x, 0, L}];
u[x_, t_] = Sum[(a[i] Cos[Sqrt[\[Lambda][i]] c t] +
b[i] Sin[Sqrt[\[Lambda][i]] c t]) Sin[Sqrt[\[Lambda][i]] x], {i, 1, 10}];

Manipulate[Plot[u[x, t], {x, 0, L}, PlotStyle -> {Thick, Blue}, PlotRange -> {-15, 15},
AxesLabel -> {x, "u"}], {t, 0, 5}]]

and then


(* example 2a *)
DynamicModule[{a, b, k, f, L, \[Lambda], u},

k = .2;
L = 1;
f[x_] = 180 x (1 - x)^4;
\[Lambda][n_] = (((2 n - 1) \[Pi])/(2 L))^2;
b[n_] = 2/L Integrate[f[x] Sin[Sqrt[\[Lambda][n]] x], {x, 0, L}];
u[x_, t_] = Sum[b[i] Sin[Sqrt[\[Lambda][i]] x] Exp[-\[Lambda][i] k t], {i, 1, 10}];

Manipulate[Plot[u[x, t], {x, 0, L}, PlotStyle -> {Thick, Blue}, PlotRange -> {-1, 16},
AxesLabel -> {x, "u"}], {t, 0, 5}]]


This at least does what I am after: the variable/parameter names that are recycled across exercises are localized to its respective Manipulate. This just felt a little clunky and requires quite a bit of explanation to students about why we need to do this.


I was curious if there were other/better ways to accomplish this (that I could then share with them).



Answer



In your notebook, do the following:



  • Separate the examples into cell groups. You can use, e.g., Section or Subsection cells to do this.

  • Choose the menu item Evaluation->Notebook's Default Context->Unique to Each Cell Group.

  • Re-evaluate your notebook.


You'll now get the code isolation you're looking for. By using the menu item I point out, you're instructing the FE to automatically create and manage a guaranteed-unique context name for each cell group. You can see the results of this by evaluating $Context in the various cell groups if you're interested in exploring how it works.



Note that, in addition to isolating the context, Mathematica also isolates the line numbering, the history (as accessible by %), and the context path (so a Needs called in one section will not make the package available to other sections or other notebooks).


Comments

Popular posts from this blog

mathematical optimization - Minimizing using indices, error: Part::pkspec1: The expression cannot be used as a part specification

I want to use Minimize where the variables to minimize are indices pointing into an array. Here a MWE that hopefully shows what my problem is. vars = u@# & /@ Range[3]; cons = Flatten@ { Table[(u[j] != #) & /@ vars[[j + 1 ;; -1]], {j, 1, 3 - 1}], 1 vec1 = {1, 2, 3}; vec2 = {1, 2, 3}; Minimize[{Total@((vec1[[#]] - vec2[[u[#]]])^2 & /@ Range[1, 3]), cons}, vars, Integers] The error I get: Part::pkspec1: The expression u[1] cannot be used as a part specification. >> Answer Ok, it seems that one can get around Mathematica trying to evaluate vec2[[u[1]]] too early by using the function Indexed[vec2,u[1]] . The working MWE would then look like the following: vars = u@# & /@ Range[3]; cons = Flatten@{ Table[(u[j] != #) & /@ vars[[j + 1 ;; -1]], {j, 1, 3 - 1}], 1 vec1 = {1, 2, 3}; vec2 = {1, 2, 3}; NMinimize[ {Total@((vec1[[#]] - Indexed[vec2, u[#]])^2 & /@ R...

functions - Get leading series expansion term?

Given a function f[x] , I would like to have a function leadingSeries that returns just the leading term in the series around x=0 . For example: leadingSeries[(1/x + 2)/(4 + 1/x^2 + x)] x and leadingSeries[(1/x + 2 + (1 - 1/x^3)/4)/(4 + x)] -(1/(16 x^3)) Is there such a function in Mathematica? Or maybe one can implement it efficiently? EDIT I finally went with the following implementation, based on Carl Woll 's answer: lds[ex_,x_]:=( (ex/.x->(x+O[x]^2))/.SeriesData[U_,Z_,L_List,Mi_,Ma_,De_]:>SeriesData[U,Z,{L[[1]]},Mi,Mi+1,De]//Quiet//Normal) The advantage is, that this one also properly works with functions whose leading term is a constant: lds[Exp[x],x] 1 Answer Update 1 Updated to eliminate SeriesData and to not return additional terms Perhaps you could use: leadingSeries[expr_, x_] := Normal[expr /. x->(x+O[x]^2) /. a_List :> Take[a, 1]] Then for your examples: leadingSeries[(1/x + 2)/(4 + 1/x^2 + x), x] leadingSeries[Exp[x], x] leadingSeries[(1/x + 2 + (1 - 1/x...

What is and isn't a valid variable specification for Manipulate?

I have an expression whose terms have arguments (representing subscripts), like this: myExpr = A[0] + V[1,T] I would like to put it inside a Manipulate to see its value as I move around the parameters. (The goal is eventually to plot it wrt one of the variables inside.) However, Mathematica complains when I set V[1,T] as a manipulated variable: Manipulate[Evaluate[myExpr], {A[0], 0, 1}, {V[1, T], 0, 1}] (*Manipulate::vsform: Manipulate argument {V[1,T],0,1} does not have the correct form for a variable specification. >> *) As a workaround, if I get rid of the symbol T inside the argument, it works fine: Manipulate[ Evaluate[myExpr /. T -> 15], {A[0], 0, 1}, {V[1, 15], 0, 1}] Why this behavior? Can anyone point me to the documentation that says what counts as a valid variable? And is there a way to get Manpiulate to accept an expression with a symbolic argument as a variable? Investigations I've done so far: I tried using variableQ from this answer , but it says V[1...