Skip to main content

Solving system of equations with Root


I have this system of equations. I want to express all variables in terms of x as you can see. x is a parameter.


Solve[{y (z - x) == x^6, x zg - z zg == x z^2 za zb - x z za zb zg, 
za zg - zb zg == z za zb - z za^2 zb, zb - zg == z za zb - z zb^2, 
za zb (z - zg) == zg (-zb + zg), za > 0, zb > 0, zg > 0, z > 0}, {y, za, zb, zg, z}, Reals]


However Mathematica doesn't know how to solve it. Solutions show me something called Root and I can't make sense out of any of the expressions I get. What I get is:


y -> ConditionalExpression[((
x^6)/(-x + 
Root[-x + 
2 x^2 + (1 - 3 x - x^2) #1 + (1 + 2 x - 4 x^2) #1^2 + (-1 + 
 5 x - x^2) #1^3 + (-1 + x - x^2) #1^4 + x^2 #1^5 &, 3]))

I also tried using reduce which gives me a set of solutions for y:


y == Root[

x^26 + (-x^18 + x^19 - x^20 + 5 x^21) #1 + (-x^12 + x^13 + 3 x^14 - 
   4 x^15 + 10 x^16) #1^2 + (x^6 - x^7 + 5 x^8 + 3 x^9 - 6 x^10 + 
   10 x^11) #1^3 + (1 - x + 3 x^3 + x^4 - 4 x^5 + 
   5 x^6) #1^4 + (-1 + x) #1^5 &, 1]

I've read this thread: How do I work with Root objects? but it doesn't solve my problem since I have this free parameter x that ruins everything. For example if I try ToRadicals or numerical value I don't get anything. How do I make sense of it? How can I proceed to get the full expression for y in terms of x without Root? I tried FindInstance but it doesn't work in my case since I have this free parameter x. If this helps I'm only interested in y, the rest of the parameters don't really matter. Any help is greatly appreciated.



Answer



From a comment, it seems maybe the OP would like to rationalize the expression:


Product[y - 
   Root[x^26 + (-x^18 + x^19 - x^20 + 5 x^21) #1 + (-x^12 + x^13 + 

         3 x^14 - 4 x^15 + 10 x^16) #1^2 + (x^6 - x^7 + 5 x^8 + 
         3 x^9 - 6 x^10 + 10 x^11) #1^3 + (1 - x + 3 x^3 + x^4 - 
         4 x^5 + 5 x^6) #1^4 + (-1 + x) #1^5 &, i], {i, 
   5}] // FullSimplify
(*
(1/(-1 + x))(x^26 + x^18 (-1 + x - x^2 + 5 x^3) y + 
  x^12 (-1 + x (1 + x (3 + 2 x (-2 + 5 x)))) y^2 + 
  x^6 (1 + x (-1 + x (5 + x (3 + 2 x (-3 + 5 x))))) y^3 + (1 - x + 
     3 x^3 + x^4 - 4 x^5 + 5 x^6) y^4 + (-1 + x) y^5)
*)


Set this equal to zero to represent the locus. Note that the product may or may not have introduced extraneous solutions.



Addendum


Silly me, this is equivalent to, with less work, the following:


First[
  Root[x^26 + (-x^18 + x^19 - x^20 + 5 x^21) #1 + (-x^12 + x^13 + 
        3 x^14 - 4 x^15 + 10 x^16) #1^2 + (x^6 - x^7 + 5 x^8 + 
        3 x^9 - 6 x^10 + 10 x^11) #1^3 + (1 - x + 3 x^3 + x^4 - 
        4 x^5 + 5 x^6) #1^4 + (-1 + x) #1^5 &, 1]

  ]@y
(*
x^26 + (-x^18 + x^19 - x^20 + 5 x^21) y + (-x^12 + x^13 + 3 x^14 - 
    4 x^15 + 10 x^16) y^2 + (x^6 - x^7 + 5 x^8 + 3 x^9 - 6 x^10 + 
    10 x^11) y^3 + (1 - x + 3 x^3 + x^4 - 4 x^5 + 5 x^6) y^4 + (-1 + 
    x) y^5
*)

There is still the general caveat about rationalizing leads potentially to extraneously solutions.


Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

front end - keyboard shortcut to invoke Insert new matrix

I frequently need to type in some matrices, and the menu command Insert > Table/Matrix > New... allows matrices with lines drawn between columns and rows, which is very helpful. I would like to make a keyboard shortcut for it, but cannot find the relevant frontend token command (4209405) for it. Since the FullForm[] and InputForm[] of matrices with lines drawn between rows and columns is the same as those without lines, it's hard to do this via 3rd party system-wide text expanders (e.g. autohotkey or atext on mac). How does one assign a keyboard shortcut for the menu item Insert > Table/Matrix > New... , preferably using only mathematica? Thanks! Answer In the MenuSetup.tr (for linux located in the $InstallationDirectory/SystemFiles/FrontEnd/TextResources/X/ directory), I changed the line MenuItem["&New...", "CreateGridBoxDialog"] to read MenuItem["&New...", "CreateGridBoxDialog", MenuKey["m", Modifiers-...
Post a Comment
Read more

How to thread a list

I have data in format data = {{a1, a2}, {b1, b2}, {c1, c2}, {d1, d2}} Tableform: I want to thread it to : tdata = {{{a1, b1}, {a2, b2}}, {{a1, c1}, {a2, c2}}, {{a1, d1}, {a2, d2}}} Tableform: And I would like to do better then pseudofunction[n_] := Transpose[{data2[[1]], data2[[n]]}]; SetAttributes[pseudofunction, Listable]; Range[2, 4] // pseudofunction Here is my benchmark data, where data3 is normal sample of real data. data3 = Drop[ExcelWorkBook[[Column1 ;; Column4]], None, 1]; data2 = {a #, b #, c #, d #} & /@ Range[1, 10^5]; data = RandomReal[{0, 1}, {10^6, 4}]; Here is my benchmark code kptnw[list_] := Transpose[{Table[First@#, {Length@# - 1}], Rest@#}, {3, 1, 2}] &@list kptnw2[list_] := Transpose[{ConstantArray[First@#, Length@# - 1], Rest@#}, {3, 1, 2}] &@list OleksandrR[list_] := Flatten[Outer[List, List@First[list], Rest[list], 1], {{2}, {1, 4}}] paradox2[list_] := Partition[Riffle[list[[1]], #], 2] & /@ Drop[list, 1] RM[list_] := FoldList[Transpose[{First@li...
Post a Comment
Read more

dynamic - How can I make a clickable ArrayPlot that returns input?

I would like to create a dynamic ArrayPlot so that the rectangles, when clicked, provide the input. Can I use ArrayPlot for this? Or is there something else I should have to use? Answer ArrayPlot is much more than just a simple array like Grid : it represents a ranged 2D dataset, and its visualization can be finetuned by options like DataReversed and DataRange . These features make it quite complicated to reproduce the same layout and order with Grid . Here I offer AnnotatedArrayPlot which comes in handy when your dataset is more than just a flat 2D array. The dynamic interface allows highlighting individual cells and possibly interacting with them. AnnotatedArrayPlot works the same way as ArrayPlot and accepts the same options plus Enabled , HighlightCoordinates , HighlightStyle and HighlightElementFunction . data = {{Missing["HasSomeMoreData"], GrayLevel[ 1], {RGBColor[0, 1, 1], RGBColor[0, 0, 1], GrayLevel[1]}, RGBColor[0, 1, 0]}, {GrayLevel[0], GrayLevel...
Post a Comment
Read more