Skip to main content

functions - Cannot evaluate differential in Mathematica



I have a small toy script in Mathematica that I am trying to use to evaluate the pdf of $Y$ where $Y=X^2$, and $X$ is uniformly distributed in $[0,a]$.


The script is,


assum = {a > 0}; 
Subscript[P, X][x_] := If[Inequality[0, Less, x, LessEqual, a], 1/a, 0];

Y[x_] := x^2

Subscript[F, Y][y_] := Integrate[If[Y[x] <= y, 1, 0]*Subscript[P, X][x],
{x, -Infinity, Infinity}]


Subscript[P, Y][y_] := D[Subscript[F, Y][y], y]

It shows the correct form of the pdf:


In[192]:=
Simplify[Subscript[P, Y][y], assum]

Out[192]=
Piecewise[{{1/(2*a*Sqrt[y]), y > 0 && a^2 >= y}}, 0]

However, it doesn't evaluate the expression correctly:



In[194]:=
Simplify[Subscript[P, Y][a*(a/2)], assum]

During evaluation of In[194]:= General::ivar:a^2/2 is not a valid variable. >>

Out[194]=
D[1/Sqrt[2], a^2/2]

The session, in pretty printing looks like this:


enter image description here




Answer



$P[y]$ is defined to be $\partial_yF[y]$. If you now call $P[2]$ for example, this is translated to $\partial_2F[2]$, which of course does not make any sense.


One way to get around this behavior is not taking the derivative with respect to y, but with respect to the first argument instead. The following example assigns f[y] to be the derivative of g[y]:


g[y_] := y^2
f[y_] := Derivative[1][g][y]
f[x]


2 x


Instead of Derivative[1][g][y] you could also have used the shorthand notation g'[y]. Read the explicit long version I used as an operator applied to multiple things: Derivative[1] takes a function and calculates its first derivative with respect to the first argument. Derivative[1][g] is that derivative (as a pure function), and Derivative[1][g][y] is that pure function applied to a value y.


The script above has one problem however: Every time you call f[x], it re-calculates the derivative, which can take some time if your function is more complicated and you need a lot of data points. If you use functions instead of patterns (i.e. no :=) you can also get around this problem:


g = #^2 &
f = g'
f[x]


#1^2 &
2 #1 &
2 x


Comments

Popular posts from this blog

plotting - Filling between two spheres in SphericalPlot3D

Manipulate[ SphericalPlot3D[{1, 2 - n}, {θ, 0, Pi}, {ϕ, 0, 1.5 Pi}, Mesh -> None, PlotPoints -> 15, PlotRange -> {-2.2, 2.2}], {n, 0, 1}] I cant' seem to be able to make a filling between two spheres. I've already tried the obvious Filling -> {1 -> {2}} but Mathematica doesn't seem to like that option. Is there any easy way around this or ... Answer There is no built-in filling in SphericalPlot3D . One option is to use ParametricPlot3D to draw the surfaces between the two shells: Manipulate[ Show[SphericalPlot3D[{1, 2 - n}, {θ, 0, Pi}, {ϕ, 0, 1.5 Pi}, PlotPoints -> 15, PlotRange -> {-2.2, 2.2}], ParametricPlot3D[{ r {Sin[t] Cos[1.5 Pi], Sin[t] Sin[1.5 Pi], Cos[t]}, r {Sin[t] Cos[0 Pi], Sin[t] Sin[0 Pi], Cos[t]}}, {r, 1, 2 - n}, {t, 0, Pi}, PlotStyle -> Yellow, Mesh -> {2, 15}]], {n, 0, 1}]

plotting - Plot 4D data with color as 4th dimension

I have a list of 4D data (x position, y position, amplitude, wavelength). I want to plot x, y, and amplitude on a 3D plot and have the color of the points correspond to the wavelength. I have seen many examples using functions to define color but my wavelength cannot be expressed by an analytic function. Is there a simple way to do this? Answer Here a another possible way to visualize 4D data: data = Flatten[Table[{x, y, x^2 + y^2, Sin[x - y]}, {x, -Pi, Pi,Pi/10}, {y,-Pi,Pi, Pi/10}], 1]; You can use the function Point along with VertexColors . Now the points are places using the first three elements and the color is determined by the fourth. In this case I used Hue, but you can use whatever you prefer. Graphics3D[ Point[data[[All, 1 ;; 3]], VertexColors -> Hue /@ data[[All, 4]]], Axes -> True, BoxRatios -> {1, 1, 1/GoldenRatio}]

plotting - Mathematica: 3D plot based on combined 2D graphs

I have several sigmoidal fits to 3 different datasets, with mean fit predictions plus the 95% confidence limits (not symmetrical around the mean) and the actual data. I would now like to show these different 2D plots projected in 3D as in but then using proper perspective. In the link here they give some solutions to combine the plots using isometric perspective, but I would like to use proper 3 point perspective. Any thoughts? Also any way to show the mean points per time point for each series plus or minus the standard error on the mean would be cool too, either using points+vertical bars, or using spheres plus tubes. Below are some test data and the fit function I am using. Note that I am working on a logit(proportion) scale and that the final vertical scale is Log10(percentage). (* some test data *) data = Table[Null, {i, 4}]; data[[1]] = {{1, -5.8}, {2, -5.4}, {3, -0.8}, {4, -0.2}, {5, 4.6}, {1, -6.4}, {2, -5.6}, {3, -0.7}, {4, 0.04}, {5, 1.0}, {1, -6.8}, {2, -4.7}, {3, -1.