Skip to main content

import - How to Flatten and stack Efficiently 50000 Images



I have 50000 grayscale images with 56*56 pixels each one. I need to flatten images and stakck it in the same array with dimensions 50000*3136 after that export the file as .CSV. I am doing this code which load all images in the memory which can cause a problem if we have not enough memory space.


imagesToArray[pathsrc_, pathdes_] := Module[{filesList, data}, (
(* pathsrc_ : list of images path *)
(* pathdes_ : CSV file path*)

filesList = FileNames["*.png", pathsrc];
Print["Number of images :", Length@filesList];
data =
Table[Flatten[ImageData[Import[filesList[[i]]]]], {i, 1,
Length@filesList}];

Export[pathdes, data];
data
)]

Is there any alternative to do it faster without memory problem?



Answer



You can combine @nikie's approach above with the use of a faster built-in import function.


If you can forgo all the behind-the-scene checking that Import does, you can try using the built-in function that Import ultimately calls to read in a PNG file, which is Image`ImportExportDump`ImageReadPNG. I found that out by using Trace@Import[somePNGfile] and wading through quite a lot of output. Incidentally, the counterpart to this function also exists, i.e. ImageWritePNG, but it requires multiple arguments and I haven't figured that one out yet; however, Export is already quite a bit zippier than Import at least for PNG files, so the need is less pronounced there.


It returns a list containing the image imported. To get each image, you can use e.g.


First@Image`ImportExportDump`ImageReadPNG[pathToImage]


It is at least 10x faster than using Import, and quite possibly more.


For instance, let's generate 200 small PNGs of the kind you are working with:


MapIndexed[
Export["images\\" <> ToString[First@#2] <> ".png", #1] &,
Image /@ RandomReal[{0, 1}, {200, 56, 56}]
];

Now let's compare timings:


First@Image`ImportExportDump`ImageReadPNG["images\\" <> ToString[#] <> ".png"] & /@ 

Range[1, 200]; // AbsoluteTiming

Import["images\\" <> ToString[#] <> ".png"] & /@ Range[1, 200]; // AbsoluteTiming

(* Out:
{0.221601, Null}
{15.5932, Null}
*)

That's a 70x speedup!



Comments

Popular posts from this blog

functions - Get leading series expansion term?

Given a function f[x] , I would like to have a function leadingSeries that returns just the leading term in the series around x=0 . For example: leadingSeries[(1/x + 2)/(4 + 1/x^2 + x)] x and leadingSeries[(1/x + 2 + (1 - 1/x^3)/4)/(4 + x)] -(1/(16 x^3)) Is there such a function in Mathematica? Or maybe one can implement it efficiently? EDIT I finally went with the following implementation, based on Carl Woll 's answer: lds[ex_,x_]:=( (ex/.x->(x+O[x]^2))/.SeriesData[U_,Z_,L_List,Mi_,Ma_,De_]:>SeriesData[U,Z,{L[[1]]},Mi,Mi+1,De]//Quiet//Normal) The advantage is, that this one also properly works with functions whose leading term is a constant: lds[Exp[x],x] 1 Answer Update 1 Updated to eliminate SeriesData and to not return additional terms Perhaps you could use: leadingSeries[expr_, x_] := Normal[expr /. x->(x+O[x]^2) /. a_List :> Take[a, 1]] Then for your examples: leadingSeries[(1/x + 2)/(4 + 1/x^2 + x), x] leadingSeries[Exp[x], x] leadingSeries[(1/x + 2 + (1 - 1/x...

mathematical optimization - Minimizing using indices, error: Part::pkspec1: The expression cannot be used as a part specification

I want to use Minimize where the variables to minimize are indices pointing into an array. Here a MWE that hopefully shows what my problem is. vars = u@# & /@ Range[3]; cons = Flatten@ { Table[(u[j] != #) & /@ vars[[j + 1 ;; -1]], {j, 1, 3 - 1}], 1 vec1 = {1, 2, 3}; vec2 = {1, 2, 3}; Minimize[{Total@((vec1[[#]] - vec2[[u[#]]])^2 & /@ Range[1, 3]), cons}, vars, Integers] The error I get: Part::pkspec1: The expression u[1] cannot be used as a part specification. >> Answer Ok, it seems that one can get around Mathematica trying to evaluate vec2[[u[1]]] too early by using the function Indexed[vec2,u[1]] . The working MWE would then look like the following: vars = u@# & /@ Range[3]; cons = Flatten@{ Table[(u[j] != #) & /@ vars[[j + 1 ;; -1]], {j, 1, 3 - 1}], 1 vec1 = {1, 2, 3}; vec2 = {1, 2, 3}; NMinimize[ {Total@((vec1[[#]] - Indexed[vec2, u[#]])^2 & /@ R...

What is and isn't a valid variable specification for Manipulate?

I have an expression whose terms have arguments (representing subscripts), like this: myExpr = A[0] + V[1,T] I would like to put it inside a Manipulate to see its value as I move around the parameters. (The goal is eventually to plot it wrt one of the variables inside.) However, Mathematica complains when I set V[1,T] as a manipulated variable: Manipulate[Evaluate[myExpr], {A[0], 0, 1}, {V[1, T], 0, 1}] (*Manipulate::vsform: Manipulate argument {V[1,T],0,1} does not have the correct form for a variable specification. >> *) As a workaround, if I get rid of the symbol T inside the argument, it works fine: Manipulate[ Evaluate[myExpr /. T -> 15], {A[0], 0, 1}, {V[1, 15], 0, 1}] Why this behavior? Can anyone point me to the documentation that says what counts as a valid variable? And is there a way to get Manpiulate to accept an expression with a symbolic argument as a variable? Investigations I've done so far: I tried using variableQ from this answer , but it says V[1...