Skip to main content

Create recursive sequence of functions with memoization


I am trying to create a sequence of functions and have it properly memoize the results. The recursive operation is simply convolution, so it possible there is a better way to do this (obviously, if I could find a closed form expression for the n-th convolution, that would be ideal, but I'm not certain I can do that). Here is my current code


f[x_, c2_] := (
Exp[-c2^2/2 + c2 Sqrt[-Log[2 π] - 2 Log[x]]] +
Exp[-c2^2/2 - c2 Sqrt[-Log[2 π] - 2 Log[x]]]
) / Sqrt[(-Log[2 π] - 2 Log[x])]


LogExpect[x_, shift_] := Piecewise[{{f[Exp[x], shift] Exp[x], x < -1/2 Log[2 π]}}, 0]

LogExpectN[t_, n_] := Module[{xx},
LogExpectN[t, n] = Convolve[LogExpectN[xx, n - 1], LogExpect[xx, 0], xx, t]
]
LogExpectN[t_, 1] = LogExpect[t, 0]

In general this works, as it will properly calculate LogExpectN[t,5] for example, and it will memorize that specific result, but if I ask it for LogExpectN[2 t,5] or LogExpectN[x,5] it has to redo the copmutation completely, instead of just plugging 2t or y into the function it already found and thus there is no speed up from the memoization. Is there a way to get the behavior I want?


Edit: By changing the the recursive definition to use a pattern, I have improved things



LogExpectN[t_, n_] := Module[{xx}, LogExpectN[t_, n] = Convolve[LogExpectN[xx, n - 1], LogExpect[xx, 0], xx, t]]

However, This only works if I evaluate consecutive values of n in order. FOr example, after setting the base case for n=1, I can calculate for n=2 and then n=3, but if I try to calculate n=3 directly, it will give me an expression in terms of the internal variable xx$$. I am not really sure what is going on here.




Comments

Popular posts from this blog

plotting - How to draw lines between specified dots on ListPlot?

I would like to create a plot where I have unconnected dots and some connected. So far, I have figured out how to draw the dots. My code is the following: ListPlot[{{1, 1}, {2, 2}, {3, 3}, {4, 4}, {1, 4}, {2, 5}, {3, 6}, {4, 7}, {1, 7}, {2, 8}, {3, 9}, {4, 10}, {1, 10}, {2, 11}, {3, 12}, {4,13}, {2.5, 7}}, Ticks -> {{1, 2, 3, 4}, None}, AxesStyle -> Thin, TicksStyle -> Directive[Black, Bold, 12], Mesh -> Full] I have thought using ListLinePlot command, but I don't know how to specify to the command to draw only selected lines between the dots. Do have any suggestions/hints on how to do that? Thank you. Answer One possibility would be to use Epilog with Line : ListPlot[ {{1, 1}, {2, 2}, {3, 3}, {4, 4}, {1, 4}, {2, 5}, {3, 6}, {4, 7}, {1, 7}, {2, 8}, {3, 9}, {4, 10}, {1, 10}, {2, 11}, {3, 12}, {4, 13}, {2.5, 7}}, Ticks -> {{1, 2, 3, 4}, None}, AxesStyle -> Thin, TicksStyle -> Directive[Black, Bold, 12], Mesh -> Full, Epilog -> { Line[ ...

equation solving - Invert and fit implicitly defined curve

I need to fit an implicitly defined curve. I thought I could get some data out of Solve , and then using FindFit . Therefore, I would like to find the relation the parametric curve defined by $F(x,y)=0$: Solve[-(1/2) + 1/2 (0.41202 BesselK[0, 0.1 Sqrt[x^2 + y^2]] + (0.101483 x BesselK[1, 0.1 Sqrt[x^2 + y^2]])/Sqrt[x^2 + y^2]) == 0, y] But I can't get an output: Solve was unable to solve the system with inexact coefficients or the system obtained by direct rationalization of inexact numbers present in the system. Since many of the methods used by Solve require exact input, providing Solve with an exact version of the system may help. >> Edit: In particular, I would like to fit the data coming from the curve with the expression of another curve, and not with a function $f(x)$. In particular, since this clearly looks like a cardioid , I would like it to fit to something like it. What other strategies could I try?

dynamic - How can I make a clickable ArrayPlot that returns input?

I would like to create a dynamic ArrayPlot so that the rectangles, when clicked, provide the input. Can I use ArrayPlot for this? Or is there something else I should have to use? Answer ArrayPlot is much more than just a simple array like Grid : it represents a ranged 2D dataset, and its visualization can be finetuned by options like DataReversed and DataRange . These features make it quite complicated to reproduce the same layout and order with Grid . Here I offer AnnotatedArrayPlot which comes in handy when your dataset is more than just a flat 2D array. The dynamic interface allows highlighting individual cells and possibly interacting with them. AnnotatedArrayPlot works the same way as ArrayPlot and accepts the same options plus Enabled , HighlightCoordinates , HighlightStyle and HighlightElementFunction . data = {{Missing["HasSomeMoreData"], GrayLevel[ 1], {RGBColor[0, 1, 1], RGBColor[0, 0, 1], GrayLevel[1]}, RGBColor[0, 1, 0]}, {GrayLevel[0], GrayLevel...