Skip to main content

programming - Basic questions about running Mathematica



  1. Is there a command window and an editor in Mathematica 8 similar to those in Matlab? In Mathematica GUI mode, all I saw is write code and run it in the same notebook.


  2. In my Ubuntu terminal, I successfully started Mathematica by ./math (which is the only way I know by the way and I would also like to know what options are available when starting up).


    When I simply copy and paste the code from Heike , nothing new appears, and when I copy and paste the code of Daniel, it works. Wonder why?





  3. Is it correct that there are exactly two ways of running Mathematica code: in a notebook, and in a Mathematica session running in my Linux terminal?


    Are the notebook way and the GUI mode the same thing?


    What does "kernel" mean in Mathematica?


    What are some basic concepts and common sense of running Mathematica?





Answer



Heike's code produces a graphics output. So if you run it inside a raw kernel (which is what the math command does on linux), it won't display any graphics. Instead you'll see something like --Graphics-- on your screen. To actually display the output, you'll need to load the JavaGraphics package as < before the plot command (this needs to be done only once per session).


Jens has more on running Mathematica without a front-end. Brett Champion also notes the following:




When using JavaGraphics`, graphics are rendered by a child front end and converted to a bitmap format. So most new features of graphics are supported. The exception is that if there are interactive aspects to the graphic (tooltips, mouse-overs, Dynamics), they will effectively be ignored. Visualization functions sometimes have problems since in order for them to work correctly, they have to handle Show and DisplayFunction just right. If you do run across problems with a visualization function when using JavaGraphics` , please file it as a bug.



As for the rest of the questions, I'll refer you to the official documentation that Sjoerd shared, as there is no need to duplicate information.


Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

plotting - Filling between two spheres in SphericalPlot3D

Manipulate[ SphericalPlot3D[{1, 2 - n}, {θ, 0, Pi}, {ϕ, 0, 1.5 Pi}, Mesh -> None, PlotPoints -> 15, PlotRange -> {-2.2, 2.2}], {n, 0, 1}] I cant' seem to be able to make a filling between two spheres. I've already tried the obvious Filling -> {1 -> {2}} but Mathematica doesn't seem to like that option. Is there any easy way around this or ... Answer There is no built-in filling in SphericalPlot3D . One option is to use ParametricPlot3D to draw the surfaces between the two shells: Manipulate[ Show[SphericalPlot3D[{1, 2 - n}, {θ, 0, Pi}, {ϕ, 0, 1.5 Pi}, PlotPoints -> 15, PlotRange -> {-2.2, 2.2}], ParametricPlot3D[{ r {Sin[t] Cos[1.5 Pi], Sin[t] Sin[1.5 Pi], Cos[t]}, r {Sin[t] Cos[0 Pi], Sin[t] Sin[0 Pi], Cos[t]}}, {r, 1, 2 - n}, {t, 0, Pi}, PlotStyle -> Yellow, Mesh -> {2, 15}]], {n, 0, 1}]
Post a Comment
Read more

plotting - Plot 4D data with color as 4th dimension

I have a list of 4D data (x position, y position, amplitude, wavelength). I want to plot x, y, and amplitude on a 3D plot and have the color of the points correspond to the wavelength. I have seen many examples using functions to define color but my wavelength cannot be expressed by an analytic function. Is there a simple way to do this? Answer Here a another possible way to visualize 4D data: data = Flatten[Table[{x, y, x^2 + y^2, Sin[x - y]}, {x, -Pi, Pi,Pi/10}, {y,-Pi,Pi, Pi/10}], 1]; You can use the function Point along with VertexColors . Now the points are places using the first three elements and the color is determined by the fourth. In this case I used Hue, but you can use whatever you prefer. Graphics3D[ Point[data[[All, 1 ;; 3]], VertexColors -> Hue /@ data[[All, 4]]], Axes -> True, BoxRatios -> {1, 1, 1/GoldenRatio}]
Post a Comment
Read more

plotting - Mathematica: 3D plot based on combined 2D graphs

I have several sigmoidal fits to 3 different datasets, with mean fit predictions plus the 95% confidence limits (not symmetrical around the mean) and the actual data. I would now like to show these different 2D plots projected in 3D as in but then using proper perspective. In the link here they give some solutions to combine the plots using isometric perspective, but I would like to use proper 3 point perspective. Any thoughts? Also any way to show the mean points per time point for each series plus or minus the standard error on the mean would be cool too, either using points+vertical bars, or using spheres plus tubes. Below are some test data and the fit function I am using. Note that I am working on a logit(proportion) scale and that the final vertical scale is Log10(percentage). (* some test data *) data = Table[Null, {i, 4}]; data[[1]] = {{1, -5.8}, {2, -5.4}, {3, -0.8}, {4, -0.2}, {5, 4.6}, {1, -6.4}, {2, -5.6}, {3, -0.7}, {4, 0.04}, {5, 1.0}, {1, -6.8}, {2, -4.7}, {3, -1.
Post a Comment
Read more