Skip to main content

calculus and analysis - Non-trivial functional derivatives


Looking for ways to calculate functional derivatives in Mathematica, I found this question. The answer by Jens points to a documented application of DiracDelta exactly for this purpose. The documentation suggests


\[ScriptCapitalD][functional_, f_[y_]] := 
Assuming[Element[y, Reals],
Limit[((functional /.
f :> Function[x, f[x] + ε DiracDelta[x - y]]) -
functional)/ε, ε -> 0]]


However, this implementation as well the other answers to that question are very limited in scope. As pointed out in the comments, they fail for an example as simple as $\delta G[f(x)]/\delta f(y)$ (or as code \[ScriptCapitalD][G[f[x]], f[y]]), which should output


$$G^\prime[f(x)] \, \delta(x-y).$$


In my case I'd like to compute functional derivatives of the form


$$\frac{\delta^n \, \Gamma[\rho(\varphi)]}{\delta \varphi_{i_1}(p_1) \dots \delta \varphi_{i_n}(p_n)},$$


where $\rho(\varphi) = \frac{1}{2} \sum_{i = 1}^n \varphi_i^2$ is a regular function of the $\varphi_i$, $i \in \{1,\dots,n\}$.


Is there a way to equip Mathematica with the ability to calculate such derivatives with justifiable effort?



Answer



Update 2


My first update added support for derivatives of the functionals. This second update adds support for multiple functional derivatives, as long as they are all the same functional. Adding support for multiple, different functionals is harder, but could be done.



FunctionalD[expr_, v:(f_[_]|{f_[_],_Integer}) .., OptionsPattern[]] := Internal`InheritedBlock[{f},
f /: D[f[x_], f[y_], NonConstants->{f}] := DiracDelta[x-y];
f /: D[f, f[y_], NonConstants->{f}] := DiracDelta[#-y]&;

D[expr, v, NonConstants->{f}]
]

Here is FunctionalD on the OP's simple example:


FunctionalD[G[f[x]], f[y]]
% //TeXForm



DiracDelta[x - y] Derivative[1][G][f[x]]


$\delta (x-y) G'(f(x))$



After the update, the following example of a Lagrangian and action for a simple 1D particle in a potential now works:


L = 1/2 m x'[t]^2 - V[x[t]];
S = Integrate[L, {t, t0, t1}];
S //TeXForm



$\int_{\operatorname{t0}}^{\operatorname{t1}} \left(\frac{1}{2} m x'(t)^2-V(x(t))\right) \, dt$



The functional derivative of this action is:


Assuming[t0<Ï„


$-m x''(\tau )-V'(x(\tau ))$



and setting the above to zero yields the usual equations of motion for a 1D particle.



And finally, the example from the comments with multiple functional derivatives:


FunctionalD[Exp[-(1/2) f[x]^2], {f[y],2}, f[z]] //Factor //TeXForm


$-e^{-\frac{1}{2} f(x)^2} f(x) \left(f(x)^2-3\right) \delta (x-y)^2 \delta (x-z)$



Comments

Popular posts from this blog

plotting - How to draw lines between specified dots on ListPlot?

I would like to create a plot where I have unconnected dots and some connected. So far, I have figured out how to draw the dots. My code is the following: ListPlot[{{1, 1}, {2, 2}, {3, 3}, {4, 4}, {1, 4}, {2, 5}, {3, 6}, {4, 7}, {1, 7}, {2, 8}, {3, 9}, {4, 10}, {1, 10}, {2, 11}, {3, 12}, {4,13}, {2.5, 7}}, Ticks -> {{1, 2, 3, 4}, None}, AxesStyle -> Thin, TicksStyle -> Directive[Black, Bold, 12], Mesh -> Full] I have thought using ListLinePlot command, but I don't know how to specify to the command to draw only selected lines between the dots. Do have any suggestions/hints on how to do that? Thank you. Answer One possibility would be to use Epilog with Line : ListPlot[ {{1, 1}, {2, 2}, {3, 3}, {4, 4}, {1, 4}, {2, 5}, {3, 6}, {4, 7}, {1, 7}, {2, 8}, {3, 9}, {4, 10}, {1, 10}, {2, 11}, {3, 12}, {4, 13}, {2.5, 7}}, Ticks -> {{1, 2, 3, 4}, None}, AxesStyle -> Thin, TicksStyle -> Directive[Black, Bold, 12], Mesh -> Full, Epilog -> { Line[ ...

equation solving - Invert and fit implicitly defined curve

I need to fit an implicitly defined curve. I thought I could get some data out of Solve , and then using FindFit . Therefore, I would like to find the relation the parametric curve defined by $F(x,y)=0$: Solve[-(1/2) + 1/2 (0.41202 BesselK[0, 0.1 Sqrt[x^2 + y^2]] + (0.101483 x BesselK[1, 0.1 Sqrt[x^2 + y^2]])/Sqrt[x^2 + y^2]) == 0, y] But I can't get an output: Solve was unable to solve the system with inexact coefficients or the system obtained by direct rationalization of inexact numbers present in the system. Since many of the methods used by Solve require exact input, providing Solve with an exact version of the system may help. >> Edit: In particular, I would like to fit the data coming from the curve with the expression of another curve, and not with a function $f(x)$. In particular, since this clearly looks like a cardioid , I would like it to fit to something like it. What other strategies could I try?

dynamic - How can I make a clickable ArrayPlot that returns input?

I would like to create a dynamic ArrayPlot so that the rectangles, when clicked, provide the input. Can I use ArrayPlot for this? Or is there something else I should have to use? Answer ArrayPlot is much more than just a simple array like Grid : it represents a ranged 2D dataset, and its visualization can be finetuned by options like DataReversed and DataRange . These features make it quite complicated to reproduce the same layout and order with Grid . Here I offer AnnotatedArrayPlot which comes in handy when your dataset is more than just a flat 2D array. The dynamic interface allows highlighting individual cells and possibly interacting with them. AnnotatedArrayPlot works the same way as ArrayPlot and accepts the same options plus Enabled , HighlightCoordinates , HighlightStyle and HighlightElementFunction . data = {{Missing["HasSomeMoreData"], GrayLevel[ 1], {RGBColor[0, 1, 1], RGBColor[0, 0, 1], GrayLevel[1]}, RGBColor[0, 1, 0]}, {GrayLevel[0], GrayLevel...