Skip to main content

calculus and analysis - Non-trivial functional derivatives


Looking for ways to calculate functional derivatives in Mathematica, I found this question. The answer by Jens points to a documented application of DiracDelta exactly for this purpose. The documentation suggests


\[ScriptCapitalD][functional_, f_[y_]] := 
Assuming[Element[y, Reals],
Limit[((functional /.
f :> Function[x, f[x] + ε DiracDelta[x - y]]) -
functional)/ε, ε -> 0]]


However, this implementation as well the other answers to that question are very limited in scope. As pointed out in the comments, they fail for an example as simple as $\delta G[f(x)]/\delta f(y)$ (or as code \[ScriptCapitalD][G[f[x]], f[y]]), which should output


$$G^\prime[f(x)] \, \delta(x-y).$$


In my case I'd like to compute functional derivatives of the form


$$\frac{\delta^n \, \Gamma[\rho(\varphi)]}{\delta \varphi_{i_1}(p_1) \dots \delta \varphi_{i_n}(p_n)},$$


where $\rho(\varphi) = \frac{1}{2} \sum_{i = 1}^n \varphi_i^2$ is a regular function of the $\varphi_i$, $i \in \{1,\dots,n\}$.


Is there a way to equip Mathematica with the ability to calculate such derivatives with justifiable effort?



Answer



Update 2


My first update added support for derivatives of the functionals. This second update adds support for multiple functional derivatives, as long as they are all the same functional. Adding support for multiple, different functionals is harder, but could be done.



FunctionalD[expr_, v:(f_[_]|{f_[_],_Integer}) .., OptionsPattern[]] := Internal`InheritedBlock[{f},
f /: D[f[x_], f[y_], NonConstants->{f}] := DiracDelta[x-y];
f /: D[f, f[y_], NonConstants->{f}] := DiracDelta[#-y]&;

D[expr, v, NonConstants->{f}]
]

Here is FunctionalD on the OP's simple example:


FunctionalD[G[f[x]], f[y]]
% //TeXForm



DiracDelta[x - y] Derivative[1][G][f[x]]


$\delta (x-y) G'(f(x))$



After the update, the following example of a Lagrangian and action for a simple 1D particle in a potential now works:


L = 1/2 m x'[t]^2 - V[x[t]];
S = Integrate[L, {t, t0, t1}];
S //TeXForm



$\int_{\operatorname{t0}}^{\operatorname{t1}} \left(\frac{1}{2} m x'(t)^2-V(x(t))\right) \, dt$



The functional derivative of this action is:


Assuming[t0<Ï„


$-m x''(\tau )-V'(x(\tau ))$



and setting the above to zero yields the usual equations of motion for a 1D particle.



And finally, the example from the comments with multiple functional derivatives:


FunctionalD[Exp[-(1/2) f[x]^2], {f[y],2}, f[z]] //Factor //TeXForm


$-e^{-\frac{1}{2} f(x)^2} f(x) \left(f(x)^2-3\right) \delta (x-y)^2 \delta (x-z)$



Comments

Popular posts from this blog

mathematical optimization - Minimizing using indices, error: Part::pkspec1: The expression cannot be used as a part specification

I want to use Minimize where the variables to minimize are indices pointing into an array. Here a MWE that hopefully shows what my problem is. vars = u@# & /@ Range[3]; cons = Flatten@ { Table[(u[j] != #) & /@ vars[[j + 1 ;; -1]], {j, 1, 3 - 1}], 1 vec1 = {1, 2, 3}; vec2 = {1, 2, 3}; Minimize[{Total@((vec1[[#]] - vec2[[u[#]]])^2 & /@ Range[1, 3]), cons}, vars, Integers] The error I get: Part::pkspec1: The expression u[1] cannot be used as a part specification. >> Answer Ok, it seems that one can get around Mathematica trying to evaluate vec2[[u[1]]] too early by using the function Indexed[vec2,u[1]] . The working MWE would then look like the following: vars = u@# & /@ Range[3]; cons = Flatten@{ Table[(u[j] != #) & /@ vars[[j + 1 ;; -1]], {j, 1, 3 - 1}], 1 vec1 = {1, 2, 3}; vec2 = {1, 2, 3}; NMinimize[ {Total@((vec1[[#]] - Indexed[vec2, u[#]])^2 & /@ R...

functions - Get leading series expansion term?

Given a function f[x] , I would like to have a function leadingSeries that returns just the leading term in the series around x=0 . For example: leadingSeries[(1/x + 2)/(4 + 1/x^2 + x)] x and leadingSeries[(1/x + 2 + (1 - 1/x^3)/4)/(4 + x)] -(1/(16 x^3)) Is there such a function in Mathematica? Or maybe one can implement it efficiently? EDIT I finally went with the following implementation, based on Carl Woll 's answer: lds[ex_,x_]:=( (ex/.x->(x+O[x]^2))/.SeriesData[U_,Z_,L_List,Mi_,Ma_,De_]:>SeriesData[U,Z,{L[[1]]},Mi,Mi+1,De]//Quiet//Normal) The advantage is, that this one also properly works with functions whose leading term is a constant: lds[Exp[x],x] 1 Answer Update 1 Updated to eliminate SeriesData and to not return additional terms Perhaps you could use: leadingSeries[expr_, x_] := Normal[expr /. x->(x+O[x]^2) /. a_List :> Take[a, 1]] Then for your examples: leadingSeries[(1/x + 2)/(4 + 1/x^2 + x), x] leadingSeries[Exp[x], x] leadingSeries[(1/x + 2 + (1 - 1/x...

What is and isn't a valid variable specification for Manipulate?

I have an expression whose terms have arguments (representing subscripts), like this: myExpr = A[0] + V[1,T] I would like to put it inside a Manipulate to see its value as I move around the parameters. (The goal is eventually to plot it wrt one of the variables inside.) However, Mathematica complains when I set V[1,T] as a manipulated variable: Manipulate[Evaluate[myExpr], {A[0], 0, 1}, {V[1, T], 0, 1}] (*Manipulate::vsform: Manipulate argument {V[1,T],0,1} does not have the correct form for a variable specification. >> *) As a workaround, if I get rid of the symbol T inside the argument, it works fine: Manipulate[ Evaluate[myExpr /. T -> 15], {A[0], 0, 1}, {V[1, 15], 0, 1}] Why this behavior? Can anyone point me to the documentation that says what counts as a valid variable? And is there a way to get Manpiulate to accept an expression with a symbolic argument as a variable? Investigations I've done so far: I tried using variableQ from this answer , but it says V[1...