Skip to main content

calculus and analysis - Non-trivial functional derivatives


Looking for ways to calculate functional derivatives in Mathematica, I found this question. The answer by Jens points to a documented application of DiracDelta exactly for this purpose. The documentation suggests


\[ScriptCapitalD][functional_, f_[y_]] := 
Assuming[Element[y, Reals],
Limit[((functional /.
f :> Function[x, f[x] + ε DiracDelta[x - y]]) -
functional)/ε, ε -> 0]]


However, this implementation as well the other answers to that question are very limited in scope. As pointed out in the comments, they fail for an example as simple as $\delta G[f(x)]/\delta f(y)$ (or as code \[ScriptCapitalD][G[f[x]], f[y]]), which should output


$$G^\prime[f(x)] \, \delta(x-y).$$


In my case I'd like to compute functional derivatives of the form


$$\frac{\delta^n \, \Gamma[\rho(\varphi)]}{\delta \varphi_{i_1}(p_1) \dots \delta \varphi_{i_n}(p_n)},$$


where $\rho(\varphi) = \frac{1}{2} \sum_{i = 1}^n \varphi_i^2$ is a regular function of the $\varphi_i$, $i \in \{1,\dots,n\}$.


Is there a way to equip Mathematica with the ability to calculate such derivatives with justifiable effort?



Answer



Update 2


My first update added support for derivatives of the functionals. This second update adds support for multiple functional derivatives, as long as they are all the same functional. Adding support for multiple, different functionals is harder, but could be done.



FunctionalD[expr_, v:(f_[_]|{f_[_],_Integer}) .., OptionsPattern[]] := Internal`InheritedBlock[{f},
f /: D[f[x_], f[y_], NonConstants->{f}] := DiracDelta[x-y];
f /: D[f, f[y_], NonConstants->{f}] := DiracDelta[#-y]&;

D[expr, v, NonConstants->{f}]
]

Here is FunctionalD on the OP's simple example:


FunctionalD[G[f[x]], f[y]]
% //TeXForm



DiracDelta[x - y] Derivative[1][G][f[x]]


$\delta (x-y) G'(f(x))$



After the update, the following example of a Lagrangian and action for a simple 1D particle in a potential now works:


L = 1/2 m x'[t]^2 - V[x[t]];
S = Integrate[L, {t, t0, t1}];
S //TeXForm



$\int_{\operatorname{t0}}^{\operatorname{t1}} \left(\frac{1}{2} m x'(t)^2-V(x(t))\right) \, dt$



The functional derivative of this action is:


Assuming[t0<Ï„


$-m x''(\tau )-V'(x(\tau ))$



and setting the above to zero yields the usual equations of motion for a 1D particle.



And finally, the example from the comments with multiple functional derivatives:


FunctionalD[Exp[-(1/2) f[x]^2], {f[y],2}, f[z]] //Factor //TeXForm


$-e^{-\frac{1}{2} f(x)^2} f(x) \left(f(x)^2-3\right) \delta (x-y)^2 \delta (x-z)$



Comments

Popular posts from this blog

plotting - How to draw lines between specified dots on ListPlot?

I would like to create a plot where I have unconnected dots and some connected. So far, I have figured out how to draw the dots. My code is the following: ListPlot[{{1, 1}, {2, 2}, {3, 3}, {4, 4}, {1, 4}, {2, 5}, {3, 6}, {4, 7}, {1, 7}, {2, 8}, {3, 9}, {4, 10}, {1, 10}, {2, 11}, {3, 12}, {4,13}, {2.5, 7}}, Ticks -> {{1, 2, 3, 4}, None}, AxesStyle -> Thin, TicksStyle -> Directive[Black, Bold, 12], Mesh -> Full] I have thought using ListLinePlot command, but I don't know how to specify to the command to draw only selected lines between the dots. Do have any suggestions/hints on how to do that? Thank you. Answer One possibility would be to use Epilog with Line : ListPlot[ {{1, 1}, {2, 2}, {3, 3}, {4, 4}, {1, 4}, {2, 5}, {3, 6}, {4, 7}, {1, 7}, {2, 8}, {3, 9}, {4, 10}, {1, 10}, {2, 11}, {3, 12}, {4, 13}, {2.5, 7}}, Ticks -> {{1, 2, 3, 4}, None}, AxesStyle -> Thin, TicksStyle -> Directive[Black, Bold, 12], Mesh -> Full, Epilog -> { Line[ ...

list manipulation - Selecting multiple columns from a matrix?

Sample data: data = { {{2013, 1, 1}, 24.13, 167.67, 231.82}, {{2013, 1, 2}, 32.15, 170.92, 225.99}, {{2013, 1, 3}, 35.43, 172.68, 221.67}, {{2013, 1, 4}, 36.73, 173.05, 218.32}, {{2013, 1, 5}, 58.19, 165.96, 197.05}, {{2013, 1, 6}, 69.99, 163.50, 187.52}, {{2013, 1, 7}, 71.37, 154.21, 175.58}, {{2013, 1, 8}, 72.51, 149.66, 163.25}}; I want a DateListPlot with three graphs, so for a matrix formed by columns 1 and 2, one for columns 1 and 3, and 1 for columns 1 and 4. At the moment I'm using this code: data2 = Transpose[{data[[All, 1]], data[[All, 2]]}]; data3 = Transpose[{data[[All, 1]], data[[All, 3]]}]; data4 = Transpose[{data[[All, 1]], data[[All, 4]]}]; DateListPlot[{data2, data3, data4}, Joined -> True, Filling -> {3 -> {1}}] but I have a hunch that this can be done more efficiently. I don't like the Transpose s in particular. Any ideas? edit (for extra credit) What if I need to multiply the second column by 2, which in my solution is simp...

calculus and analysis - Integral of the Sinc product

Let us consider the following integral $$ B_n = \int_0^\infty \prod_{k=1,3,5,\dots}^n\frac{\sin (x/k)}{x/k}dx $$ By definition, Sinc[x] == Sin[x]/x , therefore B[n_?OddQ] := Integrate[Product[Sinc[x/k], {k, 1, n, 2}], {x, 0, Infinity}] B /@ Range[1, 13, 2] {Pi/2, Pi/2, Pi/2, Pi/2, Pi/2, Pi/2, Pi/2} OK, everything is fine. But... B[15] 467807924713440738696537864469 Pi/935615849440640907310521750000 What's going on? Answer As Eckhard wrote in comments B[n] is the n-th Borwein integral . (The letter B was not accidental :) ) This funny properties of Borwein integrals is related to the Fourier transform of Sinc function FourierTransform[Sinc[x], x, k] 1/2 Sqrt[Pi/2] (Sign[1 - k] + Sign[1 + k]) Plot[%, {k, -2, 2}, Filling -> 0] which is the box function. The result is $\pi/2$ while the sum $$ 1/3+1/5+\dots+1/n $$ B_n = \frac{\pi}{2} - \pi \bigg(\sum_{k=3,5,\ldots}^n\frac{1}{k} -1\biggr)^\frac{n-1}{2}\prod_{k=3,5,\dots}^n\frac{k}{k-1}. $$ For $n=15$ it is equal to $$ \frac{46780...