Skip to main content

plotting - RevolutionPlot3D: but NOT revolving about the z axis


I want to demonstrate generating a solid of revolution by revolving a planar region about, say, a horizontal axis. However, RevolutionPlot3D doesn't seem to have an option for revolving a curve about something other than the $z$ axis. I'm curious how you all would handle this.


Here's a simple example:


theta0 = Pi;
Manipulate[

GraphicsRow[{
Plot[x^2, {x, 0, 1}, PlotStyle -> {Thick, Black}, Filling -> Axis],
Rotate[RevolutionPlot3D[Sqrt[x], {x, 0, 1}, {t, theta0 - .001, T},
PlotRange -> {{-1, 1}, {-1, 1}, {0, 1}}, BoxRatios -> 1,
Boxed -> False, Axes -> False, ViewPoint -> {0, -2, 1}], -Pi/2]
}],
{T, theta0, theta0 + 2 Pi}]

enter image description here


My questions:





  1. Is there a "better" way to showcase revolving about a horizontal axis of revolution than what I've done with Rotate?




  2. Is it possible to generate the higher quality, finished surface of revolution while the slider bar is moving instead of only when the slider is released?




  3. How do I prevent the vertical tick labels on the far left edge as well as the graphic on the far right edge from being clipped? (I tried Spacings and ImagePadding.)





  4. How do I vertically align the horizontal axis of revolution of the right graphic with the horizontal axis of the left graphic?




Edit: I had a follow up question but I will spin that off as a separate question.



Answer



Answers:



  1. RevolutionAxis, set to either "X" or {1,0,0}. (This also required adjustments to the PlotRange and ViewPoint options.)

  2. PerformanceGoal -> "Quality"


  3. I switched from GraphicsRow to Row, which I like much better. (I then also set ImageSize -> Small to make the plots a bit bigger than they'd naturally be in Row.)

  4. I was able to align the plots pretty well by setting BaselinePosition for each of the plots.


I also turned off the Mesh since I felt it was distracting, especially at the beginning of the sequence.


theta0 = Pi;
Manipulate[Row[{
Plot[x^2, {x, 0, 1}, PlotStyle -> {Thick, Black},
Filling -> Axis, BaselinePosition -> Axis, ImageSize -> Small],
RevolutionPlot3D[x^2, {x, 0, 1}, {t, theta0 - .001, T},
PlotRange -> {{0, 1}, {-1, 1}, {-1, 1}}, BoxRatios -> 1,

Boxed -> False, Axes -> False, ViewPoint -> {1, -2, 0},
Mesh -> None, RevolutionAxis -> "X", PerformanceGoal -> "Quality",
BaselinePosition -> Center, ImageSize -> Small]
}], {T, theta0, theta0 + 2 Pi}]

enter image description here


Comments

Popular posts from this blog

plotting - How to draw lines between specified dots on ListPlot?

I would like to create a plot where I have unconnected dots and some connected. So far, I have figured out how to draw the dots. My code is the following: ListPlot[{{1, 1}, {2, 2}, {3, 3}, {4, 4}, {1, 4}, {2, 5}, {3, 6}, {4, 7}, {1, 7}, {2, 8}, {3, 9}, {4, 10}, {1, 10}, {2, 11}, {3, 12}, {4,13}, {2.5, 7}}, Ticks -> {{1, 2, 3, 4}, None}, AxesStyle -> Thin, TicksStyle -> Directive[Black, Bold, 12], Mesh -> Full] I have thought using ListLinePlot command, but I don't know how to specify to the command to draw only selected lines between the dots. Do have any suggestions/hints on how to do that? Thank you. Answer One possibility would be to use Epilog with Line : ListPlot[ {{1, 1}, {2, 2}, {3, 3}, {4, 4}, {1, 4}, {2, 5}, {3, 6}, {4, 7}, {1, 7}, {2, 8}, {3, 9}, {4, 10}, {1, 10}, {2, 11}, {3, 12}, {4, 13}, {2.5, 7}}, Ticks -> {{1, 2, 3, 4}, None}, AxesStyle -> Thin, TicksStyle -> Directive[Black, Bold, 12], Mesh -> Full, Epilog -> { Line[ ...

equation solving - Invert and fit implicitly defined curve

I need to fit an implicitly defined curve. I thought I could get some data out of Solve , and then using FindFit . Therefore, I would like to find the relation the parametric curve defined by $F(x,y)=0$: Solve[-(1/2) + 1/2 (0.41202 BesselK[0, 0.1 Sqrt[x^2 + y^2]] + (0.101483 x BesselK[1, 0.1 Sqrt[x^2 + y^2]])/Sqrt[x^2 + y^2]) == 0, y] But I can't get an output: Solve was unable to solve the system with inexact coefficients or the system obtained by direct rationalization of inexact numbers present in the system. Since many of the methods used by Solve require exact input, providing Solve with an exact version of the system may help. >> Edit: In particular, I would like to fit the data coming from the curve with the expression of another curve, and not with a function $f(x)$. In particular, since this clearly looks like a cardioid , I would like it to fit to something like it. What other strategies could I try?

dynamic - How can I make a clickable ArrayPlot that returns input?

I would like to create a dynamic ArrayPlot so that the rectangles, when clicked, provide the input. Can I use ArrayPlot for this? Or is there something else I should have to use? Answer ArrayPlot is much more than just a simple array like Grid : it represents a ranged 2D dataset, and its visualization can be finetuned by options like DataReversed and DataRange . These features make it quite complicated to reproduce the same layout and order with Grid . Here I offer AnnotatedArrayPlot which comes in handy when your dataset is more than just a flat 2D array. The dynamic interface allows highlighting individual cells and possibly interacting with them. AnnotatedArrayPlot works the same way as ArrayPlot and accepts the same options plus Enabled , HighlightCoordinates , HighlightStyle and HighlightElementFunction . data = {{Missing["HasSomeMoreData"], GrayLevel[ 1], {RGBColor[0, 1, 1], RGBColor[0, 0, 1], GrayLevel[1]}, RGBColor[0, 1, 0]}, {GrayLevel[0], GrayLevel...