Skip to main content

Eliminating parameter from parametric equation



In Mathematica Online I tried:



Eliminate[{x == t + t^3, y == t - t^3, z == 1 + t^4}, {t}]


x^2 == -4 + y^2 + 4 z && 
x y z == -4 + 2 y^2 + 6 z - y^2 z - 2 z^2 &&
x (-2 + z) z == y (4 - 2 y^2 - 4 z - z^2) &&
x (-2 + y^2 + z) == y (2 - y^2 -3 z) &&
y^4 + y^2 (-4 + 4 z) == -4 + 8 z - 5 z^2 + z^3

Apart from the question of how to understand the answer, this is not what I expected. What I expected was




(x^2 + y^2)^2 == (x^2 - y^2)z^2

I consider my expectation reasonable because


Simplify[((t+t^3)^2 + (t-t^3)^2)^2 - ((t+t^3)^2 -(t-t^3)^2)*(1+t^4)^2] 

gives 0.


Is there a better way to achieve the elimination of t?


I also tried


Eliminate[{

(x^2 + y^2)^2 == (x^2 - y^2)*z^2,
u == 2*x*(x^2 + y^2) - x*z^2,
v == 2*y*(x^2 + y^2) + y* z^2,
w == z*(y^2 - x^2)},
{x, y, z}]

which gave a neat solution:



(-15u^4 - 78u^2v^2 - 15v^4)w^2 + (-48u^2 + 48v^2)w^4 + 64w^6 == 
u^6 - 3u^4v^2 + 3u^2v^4 - v^6


Considering such a result I thought Mathematica would be able to eliminate t in my first example as well.


Edit


Just right now I discovered that the following command gives the correct and expected result:


Eliminate[{x == (t + t^3)/(1 + t^4), y == (t - t^3)/(1 + t^4)}, {t}]

Is using three parameter x, y, z instead of only x, y too much for Mathematica?




Comments

Popular posts from this blog

plotting - How to draw lines between specified dots on ListPlot?

I would like to create a plot where I have unconnected dots and some connected. So far, I have figured out how to draw the dots. My code is the following: ListPlot[{{1, 1}, {2, 2}, {3, 3}, {4, 4}, {1, 4}, {2, 5}, {3, 6}, {4, 7}, {1, 7}, {2, 8}, {3, 9}, {4, 10}, {1, 10}, {2, 11}, {3, 12}, {4,13}, {2.5, 7}}, Ticks -> {{1, 2, 3, 4}, None}, AxesStyle -> Thin, TicksStyle -> Directive[Black, Bold, 12], Mesh -> Full] I have thought using ListLinePlot command, but I don't know how to specify to the command to draw only selected lines between the dots. Do have any suggestions/hints on how to do that? Thank you. Answer One possibility would be to use Epilog with Line : ListPlot[ {{1, 1}, {2, 2}, {3, 3}, {4, 4}, {1, 4}, {2, 5}, {3, 6}, {4, 7}, {1, 7}, {2, 8}, {3, 9}, {4, 10}, {1, 10}, {2, 11}, {3, 12}, {4, 13}, {2.5, 7}}, Ticks -> {{1, 2, 3, 4}, None}, AxesStyle -> Thin, TicksStyle -> Directive[Black, Bold, 12], Mesh -> Full, Epilog -> { Line[ ...

dynamic - How can I make a clickable ArrayPlot that returns input?

I would like to create a dynamic ArrayPlot so that the rectangles, when clicked, provide the input. Can I use ArrayPlot for this? Or is there something else I should have to use? Answer ArrayPlot is much more than just a simple array like Grid : it represents a ranged 2D dataset, and its visualization can be finetuned by options like DataReversed and DataRange . These features make it quite complicated to reproduce the same layout and order with Grid . Here I offer AnnotatedArrayPlot which comes in handy when your dataset is more than just a flat 2D array. The dynamic interface allows highlighting individual cells and possibly interacting with them. AnnotatedArrayPlot works the same way as ArrayPlot and accepts the same options plus Enabled , HighlightCoordinates , HighlightStyle and HighlightElementFunction . data = {{Missing["HasSomeMoreData"], GrayLevel[ 1], {RGBColor[0, 1, 1], RGBColor[0, 0, 1], GrayLevel[1]}, RGBColor[0, 1, 0]}, {GrayLevel[0], GrayLevel...

functions - What best practices or performance considerations are there for choosing between Cases, Position, Pick and Select?

Cases , Select , Pick and Position each have different syntaxes and purposes, but there are times when you can express the same calculation equivalently using either of them. So with this input: test = RandomInteger[{-25, 25}, {20, 2}] {{-15, 13}, {-8, 16}, {-8, -19}, {7, 6}, {-21, 9}, {-3, -25}, {21, -18}, {4, 4}, {2, -2}, {-24, 8}, {-17, -8}, {4, -18}, {22, -24}, {-4, -3}, {21, 0}, {19, 18}, {-23, -8}, {23, -25}, {14, -2}, {-1, -13}} You can get the following equivalent results: Cases[test, {_, _?Positive}] {{-15, 13}, {-8, 16}, {7, 6}, {-21, 9}, {4, 4}, {-24, 8}, {19, 18}} Select[test, #[[2]] > 0 &] {{-15, 13}, {-8, 16}, {7, 6}, {-21, 9}, {4, 4}, {-24, 8}, {19, 18}} Pick[test, Sign[test[[All, 2]] ], 1] {{-15, 13}, {-8, 16}, {7, 6}, {-21, 9}, {4, 4}, {-24, 8}, {19, 18}} test[[Flatten@Position[test[[All, 2]], _?Positive] ]] {{-15, 13}, {-8, 16}, {7, 6}, {-21, 9}, {4, 4}, {-24, 8}, {19, 18}} Are there performance or other considerations that should guide which you shou...