Skip to main content

gui construction - How can I get "custom" controls to appear and behave like "default" controls in my Manipulate?



For various reasons I need to define some controls in my Manipulate with complex behaviors that are not (or at least I don't think can be) accomplished using the simple default syntax for Manipulate controls.


Thanks to some answers here, I have controls that support thee behaviors, but



  • I can't get them to appear in my Manipulate aligned and labeled like the default controls, and

  • one of the controls does not update its displayed value when I click on it.


For example with


Manipulate[
 Row@start,
 {{r2, "q", "R2"}, {"p", "m", "q", "y", "z"}, ControlType -> SetterBar, Appearance -> "Palette"},

 {{r3, "z", "Label R3"}, {"p", "m", "q", "y", "z"}, ControlType -> SetterBar, Appearance -> "Palette"},

 {{r4, "-"}, ControlType -> None},
 Row[{
   SetterBar[
    Dynamic[r4, If[# != "-", n = 4; start = Take[Join[start, {"A"}], n], n = 3; start = Take[start, n]] &],
    {"\[Beta]", "\[Gamma]", "-"},
    Appearance -> "Palette"]
 }],


 Column[{Dynamic[pop /@ Range[n] // Row, TrackedSymbols :> {n}]}], {x,None}, {n, None}, {start, None},

 Initialization :> (pop[i_] := With[{j = i}, PopupMenu[Dynamic[start[[j]]], CharacterRange["A", "Z"], ImageSize -> {45, 19}]]; start = ConstantArray["A", 3]; n = 3;)

 ]

I get



in which




  • the controls for r4 and the popup menus lack labels and do not align with the other (default style) controls, and

  • the r4 control does not reflect changes in the value of the variable.


How can I get these "custom" controls to appear and behave correctly in my Manipulate?



If there's a solution that uses "default" Manipulate control specification that I'm missing, that would be great, as would a solution that allows me to specify define and reuse a custom control (I have several that are similar to the popup control in that they involve several popups).



Answer



I do not understand everything the code is suppose to do, but passing the control as a pure function inside a variable declaration might give the desired behavior. The other change is the variable-setting function in the Dynamic for r4 was changed to actually set the value of r4 upon an update.


Manipulate[
 Row@start,

 {{r2, "q", "R2"}, {"p", "m", "q", "y", "z"}, 
  ControlType -> SetterBar, Appearance -> "Palette"},
 {{r3, "z", "Label R3"}, {"p", "m", "q", "y", "z"}, 
  ControlType -> SetterBar, Appearance -> "Palette"},
 {{r4, "-"}, 
  Row[{SetterBar[
      Dynamic[r4, 
       If[(r4 = #) != "-", n = 4; start = Take[Join[start, {"A"}], n],
          n = 3; start = Take[start, n]] &], {"\[Beta]", "\[Gamma]", 
       "-"}, Appearance -> "Palette"]}] &},

 {n, Column[{Dynamic[pop /@ Range[n] // Row, 
      TrackedSymbols :> {n}]}] &},
 {x, None}, {start, None},
 Initialization :> (pop[i_] := 
    With[{j = i}, 
     PopupMenu[Dynamic[start[[j]]], CharacterRange["A", "Z"], 
      ImageSize -> {45, 19}]]; start = ConstantArray["A", 3]; n = 3;)]

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

functions - Get leading series expansion term?

Given a function f[x] , I would like to have a function leadingSeries that returns just the leading term in the series around x=0 . For example: leadingSeries[(1/x + 2)/(4 + 1/x^2 + x)] x and leadingSeries[(1/x + 2 + (1 - 1/x^3)/4)/(4 + x)] -(1/(16 x^3)) Is there such a function in Mathematica? Or maybe one can implement it efficiently? EDIT I finally went with the following implementation, based on Carl Woll 's answer: lds[ex_,x_]:=( (ex/.x->(x+O[x]^2))/.SeriesData[U_,Z_,L_List,Mi_,Ma_,De_]:>SeriesData[U,Z,{L[[1]]},Mi,Mi+1,De]//Quiet//Normal) The advantage is, that this one also properly works with functions whose leading term is a constant: lds[Exp[x],x] 1 Answer Update 1 Updated to eliminate SeriesData and to not return additional terms Perhaps you could use: leadingSeries[expr_, x_] := Normal[expr /. x->(x+O[x]^2) /. a_List :> Take[a, 1]] Then for your examples: leadingSeries[(1/x + 2)/(4 + 1/x^2 + x), x] leadingSeries[Exp[x], x] leadingSeries[(1/x + 2 + (1 - 1/x...
Post a Comment
Read more

mathematical optimization - Minimizing using indices, error: Part::pkspec1: The expression cannot be used as a part specification

I want to use Minimize where the variables to minimize are indices pointing into an array. Here a MWE that hopefully shows what my problem is. vars = u@# & /@ Range[3]; cons = Flatten@ { Table[(u[j] != #) & /@ vars[[j + 1 ;; -1]], {j, 1, 3 - 1}], 1 vec1 = {1, 2, 3}; vec2 = {1, 2, 3}; Minimize[{Total@((vec1[[#]] - vec2[[u[#]]])^2 & /@ Range[1, 3]), cons}, vars, Integers] The error I get: Part::pkspec1: The expression u[1] cannot be used as a part specification. >> Answer Ok, it seems that one can get around Mathematica trying to evaluate vec2[[u[1]]] too early by using the function Indexed[vec2,u[1]] . The working MWE would then look like the following: vars = u@# & /@ Range[3]; cons = Flatten@{ Table[(u[j] != #) & /@ vars[[j + 1 ;; -1]], {j, 1, 3 - 1}], 1 vec1 = {1, 2, 3}; vec2 = {1, 2, 3}; NMinimize[ {Total@((vec1[[#]] - Indexed[vec2, u[#]])^2 & /@ R...
Post a Comment
Read more

plotting - Plot 4D data with color as 4th dimension

I have a list of 4D data (x position, y position, amplitude, wavelength). I want to plot x, y, and amplitude on a 3D plot and have the color of the points correspond to the wavelength. I have seen many examples using functions to define color but my wavelength cannot be expressed by an analytic function. Is there a simple way to do this? Answer Here a another possible way to visualize 4D data: data = Flatten[Table[{x, y, x^2 + y^2, Sin[x - y]}, {x, -Pi, Pi,Pi/10}, {y,-Pi,Pi, Pi/10}], 1]; You can use the function Point along with VertexColors . Now the points are places using the first three elements and the color is determined by the fourth. In this case I used Hue, but you can use whatever you prefer. Graphics3D[ Point[data[[All, 1 ;; 3]], VertexColors -> Hue /@ data[[All, 4]]], Axes -> True, BoxRatios -> {1, 1, 1/GoldenRatio}]
Post a Comment
Read more