Skip to main content

plotting - How to ListContourPlot an eigenvalue spectrum without jumping?


MWE:


Block[{dim = 4, grain = 250, matrix, domain, spectrum, locus},

matrix = DiagonalMatrix[Table[Sqrt[(x + 1/2 - (1 + Exp[-(i - 1)])^(-1))^2 +
(y (1 + Exp[-2 (i - 1)])^(-1))^2], {i, 1, dim}]];
domain = Flatten[Table[{x, y}, {x, -1, 1, 2./(grain - 1)}, {y, -1, 1,2./(grain - 1)}], 1];
spectrum = Table[Append[σ, Sort@Re@Eigenvalues[ReplaceAll[matrix, {x -> σ[[1]],
y -> σ[[2]]}]]], {σ, domain}];
locus[energy_] := Table[Join[spectrum[[σ, 1 ;;2]], Take[SortBy[spectrum[[σ, 3]],

Abs[# - energy] &],1]], {σ, 1, Length@domain}];

ListContourPlot[locus[0.1], Contours -> {0.1}, InterpolationOrder -> 4] /.
_Polygon -> Sequence[]

]

This code block functions roughly as desired, but the quality of the plot is very bad and cannot be satisfactorily improved by increasing grain and InterpolationOrder. Clearly, in this example matrix, the contours should be smooth ellipses and we need to recover that to a higher fidelity.


The matrix here is a toy, the only real constraint on the matrix I need to preserve is that it must be Hermitian and depend on two independent, real variables.


My solution attempt:




  1. discretizes the domain into a mesh of (x,y) points

  2. collects into array spectrum a dim-dimensional eigenvalue-list (of real numbers) at every point in the domain

  3. Defines a function locus which reduces the spectrum array to include only a single eigenvalue (rather than dim-many) at every point in the domain.

  4. Perform a ListContourPlot of the locus


However, I believe that the Take of the "correct" eigenvalue in step 3 eigenvalue at every point in the domain is likely the source of the problem.


In my MWE, I Take the eigenvalue which is absolutely nearest to the function argument energy. However, I can envision several pathological function landscapes which break this selection and, indeed, the plots illustrate this problem.


The goal of the code is to plot a level set (contour) of all points where there is any eigenvalue of the matrix



Answer




To see what is happening here, first plot a blow-up of the 2D region to show clearly the contours.


ListContourPlot[locus[0.1], Contours -> {0.1}, InterpolationOrder -> 1, 
ContourShading -> None, PlotRange -> {{-0.2, 0.6}, {-0.4, 0.4}}]

enter image description here


The plot appears to consist of four ellipses plus two ragged curves. Note that InterpolationOrder -> 1 is used instead of 4, as in the question, to avoid any possible oscillations in the interpolation, which could occur near discontinuities. Note also, that ContourShading -> None is used to display contours only. The question used /. _Polygon -> Sequence[] instead, but the latter may be less transparent to some readers.


To clarify the nature of the ragged curves, next plot a slice through the 2D region, for instance, y == 0.


ListPlot[Delete[#, 2] & /@ Select[locus[0.1], Abs[#[[2]]] < .01 &], 
PlotRange -> {{-0.2, 0.6}, {0, .2}}]


enter image description here


With this plot aligned with the first, it is evident that the two ragged curves are associated with discontinuities in locus[0.1]. J.M. suggested in a comment a related 1-D problem in which the solution was to sort eigenvalues to produce continuous arrays. The following seems more straightforward in 2D, however: Plot contours for each of the four sets of eigenvalues and superimpose them. This works well, because Eigenvalues sorts the eigenvalues it produces by size, and those eigenvalues vary smoothly with {x, y} except where the eigenvalues intersect.


eig[n_] := Extract[#, {{1}, {2}, {3, n}}] & /@ spectrum    
Show @@ (ListContourPlot[eig[#], Contours -> {0.1}, InterpolationOrder -> 1,
ContourShading -> None, PlotRange -> {{-0.2, 0.6}, {-0.4, 0.4}}] & /@ Range[1, 4])

enter image description here


as desired


Comments

Popular posts from this blog

plotting - Filling between two spheres in SphericalPlot3D

Manipulate[ SphericalPlot3D[{1, 2 - n}, {θ, 0, Pi}, {ϕ, 0, 1.5 Pi}, Mesh -> None, PlotPoints -> 15, PlotRange -> {-2.2, 2.2}], {n, 0, 1}] I cant' seem to be able to make a filling between two spheres. I've already tried the obvious Filling -> {1 -> {2}} but Mathematica doesn't seem to like that option. Is there any easy way around this or ... Answer There is no built-in filling in SphericalPlot3D . One option is to use ParametricPlot3D to draw the surfaces between the two shells: Manipulate[ Show[SphericalPlot3D[{1, 2 - n}, {θ, 0, Pi}, {ϕ, 0, 1.5 Pi}, PlotPoints -> 15, PlotRange -> {-2.2, 2.2}], ParametricPlot3D[{ r {Sin[t] Cos[1.5 Pi], Sin[t] Sin[1.5 Pi], Cos[t]}, r {Sin[t] Cos[0 Pi], Sin[t] Sin[0 Pi], Cos[t]}}, {r, 1, 2 - n}, {t, 0, Pi}, PlotStyle -> Yellow, Mesh -> {2, 15}]], {n, 0, 1}]

plotting - Plot 4D data with color as 4th dimension

I have a list of 4D data (x position, y position, amplitude, wavelength). I want to plot x, y, and amplitude on a 3D plot and have the color of the points correspond to the wavelength. I have seen many examples using functions to define color but my wavelength cannot be expressed by an analytic function. Is there a simple way to do this? Answer Here a another possible way to visualize 4D data: data = Flatten[Table[{x, y, x^2 + y^2, Sin[x - y]}, {x, -Pi, Pi,Pi/10}, {y,-Pi,Pi, Pi/10}], 1]; You can use the function Point along with VertexColors . Now the points are places using the first three elements and the color is determined by the fourth. In this case I used Hue, but you can use whatever you prefer. Graphics3D[ Point[data[[All, 1 ;; 3]], VertexColors -> Hue /@ data[[All, 4]]], Axes -> True, BoxRatios -> {1, 1, 1/GoldenRatio}]

plotting - Mathematica: 3D plot based on combined 2D graphs

I have several sigmoidal fits to 3 different datasets, with mean fit predictions plus the 95% confidence limits (not symmetrical around the mean) and the actual data. I would now like to show these different 2D plots projected in 3D as in but then using proper perspective. In the link here they give some solutions to combine the plots using isometric perspective, but I would like to use proper 3 point perspective. Any thoughts? Also any way to show the mean points per time point for each series plus or minus the standard error on the mean would be cool too, either using points+vertical bars, or using spheres plus tubes. Below are some test data and the fit function I am using. Note that I am working on a logit(proportion) scale and that the final vertical scale is Log10(percentage). (* some test data *) data = Table[Null, {i, 4}]; data[[1]] = {{1, -5.8}, {2, -5.4}, {3, -0.8}, {4, -0.2}, {5, 4.6}, {1, -6.4}, {2, -5.6}, {3, -0.7}, {4, 0.04}, {5, 1.0}, {1, -6.8}, {2, -4.7}, {3, -1.