Skip to main content

differential equations - Limitations of ParametricNDSolve family w.r.t objective functions


Observation:


I can see even for very simple modification in case of an scalar objective involving an definite integral in time ParametricNDSolve fails. Here is an example!


eqns = {y''[t] + y[t] == 3 a Sin[y[t]], y[0] == y'[0] == 1};

pfun =ParametricNDSolveValue[eqns,Integrate[y[s] - a s, {s, 0, 5}], {t, 0, 5}, {a},
Method -> {"ParametricSensitivity" -> "ForwardSensitivity"}];
pfun[1.5]


Meaningless output!



Same kind of output for pfun'[1.5] but from pfun''[1.5] onwards for higher derivatives we get numerical values which I guess are totally wrong.


However everything will be fine if one uses Integrate[y[s], {s, 0, 5}]! So I tried {"ParametricSensitivity" -> "AdjointSensitivity"} which is most suitable for integrated objective functions. Again failure but this time for both the cases. We get the following error




ParametricNDSolveValue::adjsens: The adjoint sensitivity method cannot be used for the output function {t,0,5}. It can only be used for output functions that are at a particular time or are a definite integral over time. >>



I feel this is a major inconsistency of implementation internal. Using Trace I found some esoteric IntegrateImproperDump` andInternalDependsOnQ.


What should be pfun[1.5]:


We know


Distribute[Integrate[y[s] - a s, {s, 0, 5}], Plus] === 
Integrate[-a s, {s, 0, 5}] + Integrate[y[s], {s, 0, 5}]


True




So we first can find pfun[1.5] using


eqns = {y''[t] + y[t] == 3 a Sin[y[t]], y[0] == y'[0] == 1};
pfun = ParametricNDSolveValue[eqns,
Integrate[y[s], {s, 0, 5}], {t, 0, 5}, {a},
Method -> {"ParametricSensitivity" -> "ForwardSensitivity"}];
(pfun[1.5] + Integrate[-a s, {s, 0, 5}]) /. a -> 1.5


-7.86673




and the first order sensitivity will be


(pfun'[1.5] + D[Integrate[-a s, {s, 0, 5}], a]) /. a -> 1.5


-7.87591



Crosschecking the first order sensitivity below!


fun1[aval_?NumericQ] :=NIntegrate[Block[{a = aval}, 
Evaluate@(y /. First@NDSolve[Evaluate@eqns, y, {t, 0, 5}])[t] -a t] , {t, 0, 5}];

Needs["NumericalCalculus`"];
ND[fun1[x], x, 1.5]


-7.87604



Pretty much as expected.


Question:



  • It will be great to know if we can use ParametricNDSolve family to find parameter dependency of integrated objective like the following: $$ G(p)=\int_a^{b} g(y(s),s,p) \,ds$$ where $g$ is a function of the dependent variable $y(s)$ of the underlying differential equation system and $p$ represents the parameter with respect to which the sensitivity $\frac{dG}{dp}$ is sought (i.e a in the above example).


  • Also why {"ParametricSensitivity" -> "AdjointSensitivity"} fails in the above example?


For some math reference check here.


BR



Answer



OK,


eqns = {y''[t] + y[t] == 3 a Sin[y[t]], y[0] == y'[0] == 1};
pfun = ParametricNDSolveValue[eqns,
Integrate[y[s] - a s, {s, 0, 5}], {t, 0, 5}, {a}
(*,Method\[Rule]{"ParametricSensitivity"\[Rule]\"ForwardSensitivity"}*)];

pfun[1.5]

does not return 'meaningless' stuff but a symbolic integral. And in fact you have requested it to return an Integrate. So to evaluate it just call N.


N[pfun[1.5]]
(* -7.86673 *)

And the same holds for the derivatives. Now, you can not request an NIntegrate in NDSolve, since that would give messages during the function call since then the input to NIntegrate were then symbolic. And similar for the derivative. As to why the second derivative self evaluates, I do not know. If you feel passionate about it, you might report a bug to WRI.


For a sanity check we can use:


Block[{a = 1.5}, 
eqns = {y''[t] + y[t] == 3 a Sin[y[t]], y[0] == y'[0] == 1};

nds = NDSolveValue[eqns, y[t], {t, 0, 5}];
NIntegrate[nds - a t, {t, 0, 5}]
]
(* -7.86673 *)

Using the


, Method -> {"ParametricSensitivity" -> "AdjointSensitivity"}

gives a warning message:


(*

ParametricNDSolveValue::adjsens: "The adjoint sensitivity method cannot be used for the output function {t,0,5}. It can only be used for output functions that are at a particular time or are a definite integral over time."
*)

So only something like this is possible:


eqns = {y''[t] + y[t] == 3 a Sin[y[t]], y[0] == y'[0] == 1};
pfun = ParametricNDSolveValue[eqns,
Integrate[y[1.5], {s, 0, 5}], {t, 0, 5}, {a}
, Method -> {"ParametricSensitivity" -> "AdjointSensitivity"}];
pfun[1.5]


I think ParametricNDSolve is quite a useful function and produces everything else then meaningless output.


Comments

Popular posts from this blog

plotting - How to draw lines between specified dots on ListPlot?

I would like to create a plot where I have unconnected dots and some connected. So far, I have figured out how to draw the dots. My code is the following: ListPlot[{{1, 1}, {2, 2}, {3, 3}, {4, 4}, {1, 4}, {2, 5}, {3, 6}, {4, 7}, {1, 7}, {2, 8}, {3, 9}, {4, 10}, {1, 10}, {2, 11}, {3, 12}, {4,13}, {2.5, 7}}, Ticks -> {{1, 2, 3, 4}, None}, AxesStyle -> Thin, TicksStyle -> Directive[Black, Bold, 12], Mesh -> Full] I have thought using ListLinePlot command, but I don't know how to specify to the command to draw only selected lines between the dots. Do have any suggestions/hints on how to do that? Thank you. Answer One possibility would be to use Epilog with Line : ListPlot[ {{1, 1}, {2, 2}, {3, 3}, {4, 4}, {1, 4}, {2, 5}, {3, 6}, {4, 7}, {1, 7}, {2, 8}, {3, 9}, {4, 10}, {1, 10}, {2, 11}, {3, 12}, {4, 13}, {2.5, 7}}, Ticks -> {{1, 2, 3, 4}, None}, AxesStyle -> Thin, TicksStyle -> Directive[Black, Bold, 12], Mesh -> Full, Epilog -> { Line[ ...

equation solving - Invert and fit implicitly defined curve

I need to fit an implicitly defined curve. I thought I could get some data out of Solve , and then using FindFit . Therefore, I would like to find the relation the parametric curve defined by $F(x,y)=0$: Solve[-(1/2) + 1/2 (0.41202 BesselK[0, 0.1 Sqrt[x^2 + y^2]] + (0.101483 x BesselK[1, 0.1 Sqrt[x^2 + y^2]])/Sqrt[x^2 + y^2]) == 0, y] But I can't get an output: Solve was unable to solve the system with inexact coefficients or the system obtained by direct rationalization of inexact numbers present in the system. Since many of the methods used by Solve require exact input, providing Solve with an exact version of the system may help. >> Edit: In particular, I would like to fit the data coming from the curve with the expression of another curve, and not with a function $f(x)$. In particular, since this clearly looks like a cardioid , I would like it to fit to something like it. What other strategies could I try?

dynamic - How can I make a clickable ArrayPlot that returns input?

I would like to create a dynamic ArrayPlot so that the rectangles, when clicked, provide the input. Can I use ArrayPlot for this? Or is there something else I should have to use? Answer ArrayPlot is much more than just a simple array like Grid : it represents a ranged 2D dataset, and its visualization can be finetuned by options like DataReversed and DataRange . These features make it quite complicated to reproduce the same layout and order with Grid . Here I offer AnnotatedArrayPlot which comes in handy when your dataset is more than just a flat 2D array. The dynamic interface allows highlighting individual cells and possibly interacting with them. AnnotatedArrayPlot works the same way as ArrayPlot and accepts the same options plus Enabled , HighlightCoordinates , HighlightStyle and HighlightElementFunction . data = {{Missing["HasSomeMoreData"], GrayLevel[ 1], {RGBColor[0, 1, 1], RGBColor[0, 0, 1], GrayLevel[1]}, RGBColor[0, 1, 0]}, {GrayLevel[0], GrayLevel...