Skip to main content

differential equations - Limitations of ParametricNDSolve family w.r.t objective functions


Observation:


I can see even for very simple modification in case of an scalar objective involving an definite integral in time ParametricNDSolve fails. Here is an example!


eqns = {y''[t] + y[t] == 3 a Sin[y[t]], y[0] == y'[0] == 1};

pfun =ParametricNDSolveValue[eqns,Integrate[y[s] - a s, {s, 0, 5}], {t, 0, 5}, {a},
Method -> {"ParametricSensitivity" -> "ForwardSensitivity"}];
pfun[1.5]


Meaningless output!



Same kind of output for pfun'[1.5] but from pfun''[1.5] onwards for higher derivatives we get numerical values which I guess are totally wrong.


However everything will be fine if one uses Integrate[y[s], {s, 0, 5}]! So I tried {"ParametricSensitivity" -> "AdjointSensitivity"} which is most suitable for integrated objective functions. Again failure but this time for both the cases. We get the following error




ParametricNDSolveValue::adjsens: The adjoint sensitivity method cannot be used for the output function {t,0,5}. It can only be used for output functions that are at a particular time or are a definite integral over time. >>



I feel this is a major inconsistency of implementation internal. Using Trace I found some esoteric IntegrateImproperDump` andInternalDependsOnQ.


What should be pfun[1.5]:


We know


Distribute[Integrate[y[s] - a s, {s, 0, 5}], Plus] === 
Integrate[-a s, {s, 0, 5}] + Integrate[y[s], {s, 0, 5}]


True




So we first can find pfun[1.5] using


eqns = {y''[t] + y[t] == 3 a Sin[y[t]], y[0] == y'[0] == 1};
pfun = ParametricNDSolveValue[eqns,
Integrate[y[s], {s, 0, 5}], {t, 0, 5}, {a},
Method -> {"ParametricSensitivity" -> "ForwardSensitivity"}];
(pfun[1.5] + Integrate[-a s, {s, 0, 5}]) /. a -> 1.5


-7.86673




and the first order sensitivity will be


(pfun'[1.5] + D[Integrate[-a s, {s, 0, 5}], a]) /. a -> 1.5


-7.87591



Crosschecking the first order sensitivity below!


fun1[aval_?NumericQ] :=NIntegrate[Block[{a = aval}, 
Evaluate@(y /. First@NDSolve[Evaluate@eqns, y, {t, 0, 5}])[t] -a t] , {t, 0, 5}];

Needs["NumericalCalculus`"];
ND[fun1[x], x, 1.5]


-7.87604



Pretty much as expected.


Question:



  • It will be great to know if we can use ParametricNDSolve family to find parameter dependency of integrated objective like the following: $$ G(p)=\int_a^{b} g(y(s),s,p) \,ds$$ where $g$ is a function of the dependent variable $y(s)$ of the underlying differential equation system and $p$ represents the parameter with respect to which the sensitivity $\frac{dG}{dp}$ is sought (i.e a in the above example).


  • Also why {"ParametricSensitivity" -> "AdjointSensitivity"} fails in the above example?


For some math reference check here.


BR



Answer



OK,


eqns = {y''[t] + y[t] == 3 a Sin[y[t]], y[0] == y'[0] == 1};
pfun = ParametricNDSolveValue[eqns,
Integrate[y[s] - a s, {s, 0, 5}], {t, 0, 5}, {a}
(*,Method\[Rule]{"ParametricSensitivity"\[Rule]\"ForwardSensitivity"}*)];

pfun[1.5]

does not return 'meaningless' stuff but a symbolic integral. And in fact you have requested it to return an Integrate. So to evaluate it just call N.


N[pfun[1.5]]
(* -7.86673 *)

And the same holds for the derivatives. Now, you can not request an NIntegrate in NDSolve, since that would give messages during the function call since then the input to NIntegrate were then symbolic. And similar for the derivative. As to why the second derivative self evaluates, I do not know. If you feel passionate about it, you might report a bug to WRI.


For a sanity check we can use:


Block[{a = 1.5}, 
eqns = {y''[t] + y[t] == 3 a Sin[y[t]], y[0] == y'[0] == 1};

nds = NDSolveValue[eqns, y[t], {t, 0, 5}];
NIntegrate[nds - a t, {t, 0, 5}]
]
(* -7.86673 *)

Using the


, Method -> {"ParametricSensitivity" -> "AdjointSensitivity"}

gives a warning message:


(*

ParametricNDSolveValue::adjsens: "The adjoint sensitivity method cannot be used for the output function {t,0,5}. It can only be used for output functions that are at a particular time or are a definite integral over time."
*)

So only something like this is possible:


eqns = {y''[t] + y[t] == 3 a Sin[y[t]], y[0] == y'[0] == 1};
pfun = ParametricNDSolveValue[eqns,
Integrate[y[1.5], {s, 0, 5}], {t, 0, 5}, {a}
, Method -> {"ParametricSensitivity" -> "AdjointSensitivity"}];
pfun[1.5]


I think ParametricNDSolve is quite a useful function and produces everything else then meaningless output.


Comments

Popular posts from this blog

plotting - Plot 4D data with color as 4th dimension

I have a list of 4D data (x position, y position, amplitude, wavelength). I want to plot x, y, and amplitude on a 3D plot and have the color of the points correspond to the wavelength. I have seen many examples using functions to define color but my wavelength cannot be expressed by an analytic function. Is there a simple way to do this? Answer Here a another possible way to visualize 4D data: data = Flatten[Table[{x, y, x^2 + y^2, Sin[x - y]}, {x, -Pi, Pi,Pi/10}, {y,-Pi,Pi, Pi/10}], 1]; You can use the function Point along with VertexColors . Now the points are places using the first three elements and the color is determined by the fourth. In this case I used Hue, but you can use whatever you prefer. Graphics3D[ Point[data[[All, 1 ;; 3]], VertexColors -> Hue /@ data[[All, 4]]], Axes -> True, BoxRatios -> {1, 1, 1/GoldenRatio}]

plotting - Filling between two spheres in SphericalPlot3D

Manipulate[ SphericalPlot3D[{1, 2 - n}, {θ, 0, Pi}, {ϕ, 0, 1.5 Pi}, Mesh -> None, PlotPoints -> 15, PlotRange -> {-2.2, 2.2}], {n, 0, 1}] I cant' seem to be able to make a filling between two spheres. I've already tried the obvious Filling -> {1 -> {2}} but Mathematica doesn't seem to like that option. Is there any easy way around this or ... Answer There is no built-in filling in SphericalPlot3D . One option is to use ParametricPlot3D to draw the surfaces between the two shells: Manipulate[ Show[SphericalPlot3D[{1, 2 - n}, {θ, 0, Pi}, {ϕ, 0, 1.5 Pi}, PlotPoints -> 15, PlotRange -> {-2.2, 2.2}], ParametricPlot3D[{ r {Sin[t] Cos[1.5 Pi], Sin[t] Sin[1.5 Pi], Cos[t]}, r {Sin[t] Cos[0 Pi], Sin[t] Sin[0 Pi], Cos[t]}}, {r, 1, 2 - n}, {t, 0, Pi}, PlotStyle -> Yellow, Mesh -> {2, 15}]], {n, 0, 1}]

plotting - Mathematica: 3D plot based on combined 2D graphs

I have several sigmoidal fits to 3 different datasets, with mean fit predictions plus the 95% confidence limits (not symmetrical around the mean) and the actual data. I would now like to show these different 2D plots projected in 3D as in but then using proper perspective. In the link here they give some solutions to combine the plots using isometric perspective, but I would like to use proper 3 point perspective. Any thoughts? Also any way to show the mean points per time point for each series plus or minus the standard error on the mean would be cool too, either using points+vertical bars, or using spheres plus tubes. Below are some test data and the fit function I am using. Note that I am working on a logit(proportion) scale and that the final vertical scale is Log10(percentage). (* some test data *) data = Table[Null, {i, 4}]; data[[1]] = {{1, -5.8}, {2, -5.4}, {3, -0.8}, {4, -0.2}, {5, 4.6}, {1, -6.4}, {2, -5.6}, {3, -0.7}, {4, 0.04}, {5, 1.0}, {1, -6.8}, {2, -4.7}, {3, -1....