Skip to main content

formatting - How can I make the script level styles imitate TeX?


In math mode in $\TeX$, there are four styles that are used to determine what font will be used to typeset parts of a formula. In decreasing hierarchical order, they are, with default font size in parentheses:




  • $d$: \displaystyle (10 pt)

  • $t$: \textstyle (10 pt)

  • $s$: \scriptstyle (7 pt)

  • $ss$: \scriptscriptstyle (5 pt)


In-line mathematics formulas start at \textstyle; displayed formulas start at \displaystyle. Different fonts are defined for each style. The style in TeX are implemented by defining three fonts (for each font family, etc. -- unnecessary details omitted). Both \displaystyle and \textstyle use the same font.


In fractions, the styles progress $$ d(10\,pt) \rightarrow t(10\,pt) \rightarrow s(7\,pt) \rightarrow ss(5\,pt) \rightarrow ss(5\,pt) \rightarrow \cdots$$ In exponents, the styles progress $$ \left.{d(10\,pt) \atop t(10\,pt)}\right\rbrace \rightarrow s(7\,pt) \rightarrow ss(5\,pt) \rightarrow ss(5\,pt) \rightarrow \cdots$$


Example:


$$d(10\,pt)^{7 pt^{5pt^{5pt^{5pt^{5pt}}}}} + {t(10\,pt)^{7pt^{5pt}} \over t(10\,pt)+{s(7pt)^{5pt^{5pt}}\over s(7pt)+{ss(5pt)^{5pt}\over ss(5pt)+{ss(5pt)^{5pt}\over ss(5pt)}}}}$$


Below is the default Mathematica behavior on a similar fraction. Note that the size of the first level of the fraction is reduced. The size of the exponents 5 on d continue to decrease until the last step. And the spacing around the + in the fractions does not occur.



Default


If we set AllowScriptLevelChange -> False, we get no change in font size in the exponents or fractions and the spacing around the + remains.


AllowScriptLevelChange->False


Is there any way to imitate the behavior of $\TeX$? Or to get close?


Related: Adjusting size and positioning of math notation in a Mathematica notebook? and Any way to make my equations look better, more Latex like?. However, to mimic $\TeX$, we cannot simply suppress the change in size in fractions.



Answer



Mathematica keeps track of a ScriptLevel to control the size of fractions and exponents. Normally the script level increases by one in the numerator and denominator of a fraction, unless the option AllowScriptLevelChange -> False is set. The script level also increases for each exponent. When the ScriptLevel increases, the font size is changed by the corresponding factor in ScriptSizeMultipliers. A setting


ScriptSizeMultipliers -> {s1, s2, ..., sn} 

indicates at the i-th change of level, the font size is to be multiplied by si. For changes after the n-th level change, the multiplier is sn. There is also the option ScriptMinSize which puts a lower limit on how small the font size can get.



To mimic TeX font sizes in displayed formulas, we need to do two things. For the fractions, set ScriptSizeMultipliers to {1., 0.7, 5./7., 1.} in the BaseStyle of FractionBoxOptions of the formula's cell or cell style; and for the exponents set ScriptSizeMultipliers for the cell or cell's style to {0.7, 5./7., 1.}:


ScriptSizeMultipliers -> {0.7, 0.7142857, 1.},
FractionBoxOptions -> {BaseStyle -> {ScriptSizeMultipliers -> {1., 0.7, 0.7142857, 1.}}}

The final 1. in ScriptSizeMultipliers means that further increases in ScriptLevel beyond level 4 will not affect the font size. Because of that, we do not need to worry about specifying ScriptMinSize, provided it is small enough.


These options may be set in the Option Inspector: Formatting Options > Expression Formatting > ...



  • SpecificBoxOptions > FractionBoxOptions > BaseStyle

  • DisplayOptions > ScriptSizeMultipliers



One can use the Option Inspector to edit a single cell or a style in the stylesheet.


The option AutoSpacing affects the spacing of formulas, but changing it (it can only be True or False) has no effect on fractions. Apparently when the ScriptLevel is greater than 0, autospacing is off. The workaround is to manually space around operations like +.


Here is the result of the setting the ScriptSizeMultipliers in a "Text" cell:


enter image description here


Spaces or \[ThinSpace] etc. may be added if desired. Perhaps someone will know an automatic way to have the spacing adjusted, at least at the first level where it is most obvious.


Comments

Popular posts from this blog

plotting - Plot 4D data with color as 4th dimension

I have a list of 4D data (x position, y position, amplitude, wavelength). I want to plot x, y, and amplitude on a 3D plot and have the color of the points correspond to the wavelength. I have seen many examples using functions to define color but my wavelength cannot be expressed by an analytic function. Is there a simple way to do this? Answer Here a another possible way to visualize 4D data: data = Flatten[Table[{x, y, x^2 + y^2, Sin[x - y]}, {x, -Pi, Pi,Pi/10}, {y,-Pi,Pi, Pi/10}], 1]; You can use the function Point along with VertexColors . Now the points are places using the first three elements and the color is determined by the fourth. In this case I used Hue, but you can use whatever you prefer. Graphics3D[ Point[data[[All, 1 ;; 3]], VertexColors -> Hue /@ data[[All, 4]]], Axes -> True, BoxRatios -> {1, 1, 1/GoldenRatio}]

plotting - Filling between two spheres in SphericalPlot3D

Manipulate[ SphericalPlot3D[{1, 2 - n}, {θ, 0, Pi}, {ϕ, 0, 1.5 Pi}, Mesh -> None, PlotPoints -> 15, PlotRange -> {-2.2, 2.2}], {n, 0, 1}] I cant' seem to be able to make a filling between two spheres. I've already tried the obvious Filling -> {1 -> {2}} but Mathematica doesn't seem to like that option. Is there any easy way around this or ... Answer There is no built-in filling in SphericalPlot3D . One option is to use ParametricPlot3D to draw the surfaces between the two shells: Manipulate[ Show[SphericalPlot3D[{1, 2 - n}, {θ, 0, Pi}, {ϕ, 0, 1.5 Pi}, PlotPoints -> 15, PlotRange -> {-2.2, 2.2}], ParametricPlot3D[{ r {Sin[t] Cos[1.5 Pi], Sin[t] Sin[1.5 Pi], Cos[t]}, r {Sin[t] Cos[0 Pi], Sin[t] Sin[0 Pi], Cos[t]}}, {r, 1, 2 - n}, {t, 0, Pi}, PlotStyle -> Yellow, Mesh -> {2, 15}]], {n, 0, 1}]

plotting - Mathematica: 3D plot based on combined 2D graphs

I have several sigmoidal fits to 3 different datasets, with mean fit predictions plus the 95% confidence limits (not symmetrical around the mean) and the actual data. I would now like to show these different 2D plots projected in 3D as in but then using proper perspective. In the link here they give some solutions to combine the plots using isometric perspective, but I would like to use proper 3 point perspective. Any thoughts? Also any way to show the mean points per time point for each series plus or minus the standard error on the mean would be cool too, either using points+vertical bars, or using spheres plus tubes. Below are some test data and the fit function I am using. Note that I am working on a logit(proportion) scale and that the final vertical scale is Log10(percentage). (* some test data *) data = Table[Null, {i, 4}]; data[[1]] = {{1, -5.8}, {2, -5.4}, {3, -0.8}, {4, -0.2}, {5, 4.6}, {1, -6.4}, {2, -5.6}, {3, -0.7}, {4, 0.04}, {5, 1.0}, {1, -6.8}, {2, -4.7}, {3, -1....