Skip to main content

formatting - How can I make the script level styles imitate TeX?


In math mode in TEX, there are four styles that are used to determine what font will be used to typeset parts of a formula. In decreasing hierarchical order, they are, with default font size in parentheses:




  • d: \displaystyle (10 pt)

  • t: \textstyle (10 pt)

  • s: \scriptstyle (7 pt)

  • ss: \scriptscriptstyle (5 pt)


In-line mathematics formulas start at \textstyle; displayed formulas start at \displaystyle. Different fonts are defined for each style. The style in TeX are implemented by defining three fonts (for each font family, etc. -- unnecessary details omitted). Both \displaystyle and \textstyle use the same font.


In fractions, the styles progress d(10pt)→t(10pt)→s(7pt)→ss(5pt)→ss(5pt)→⋯ In exponents, the styles progress d(10pt)t(10pt)}→s(7pt)→ss(5pt)→ss(5pt)→⋯


Example:


d(10pt)7pt5pt5pt5pt5pt+t(10pt)7pt5ptt(10pt)+s(7pt)5pt5pts(7pt)+ss(5pt)5ptss(5pt)+ss(5pt)5ptss(5pt)


Below is the default Mathematica behavior on a similar fraction. Note that the size of the first level of the fraction is reduced. The size of the exponents 5 on d continue to decrease until the last step. And the spacing around the + in the fractions does not occur.



Default


If we set AllowScriptLevelChange -> False, we get no change in font size in the exponents or fractions and the spacing around the + remains.


AllowScriptLevelChange->False


Is there any way to imitate the behavior of TEX? Or to get close?


Related: Adjusting size and positioning of math notation in a Mathematica notebook? and Any way to make my equations look better, more Latex like?. However, to mimic TEX, we cannot simply suppress the change in size in fractions.



Answer



Mathematica keeps track of a ScriptLevel to control the size of fractions and exponents. Normally the script level increases by one in the numerator and denominator of a fraction, unless the option AllowScriptLevelChange -> False is set. The script level also increases for each exponent. When the ScriptLevel increases, the font size is changed by the corresponding factor in ScriptSizeMultipliers. A setting


ScriptSizeMultipliers -> {s1, s2, ..., sn} 

indicates at the i-th change of level, the font size is to be multiplied by si. For changes after the n-th level change, the multiplier is sn. There is also the option ScriptMinSize which puts a lower limit on how small the font size can get.



To mimic TeX font sizes in displayed formulas, we need to do two things. For the fractions, set ScriptSizeMultipliers to {1., 0.7, 5./7., 1.} in the BaseStyle of FractionBoxOptions of the formula's cell or cell style; and for the exponents set ScriptSizeMultipliers for the cell or cell's style to {0.7, 5./7., 1.}:


ScriptSizeMultipliers -> {0.7, 0.7142857, 1.},
FractionBoxOptions -> {BaseStyle -> {ScriptSizeMultipliers -> {1., 0.7, 0.7142857, 1.}}}

The final 1. in ScriptSizeMultipliers means that further increases in ScriptLevel beyond level 4 will not affect the font size. Because of that, we do not need to worry about specifying ScriptMinSize, provided it is small enough.


These options may be set in the Option Inspector: Formatting Options > Expression Formatting > ...



  • SpecificBoxOptions > FractionBoxOptions > BaseStyle

  • DisplayOptions > ScriptSizeMultipliers



One can use the Option Inspector to edit a single cell or a style in the stylesheet.


The option AutoSpacing affects the spacing of formulas, but changing it (it can only be True or False) has no effect on fractions. Apparently when the ScriptLevel is greater than 0, autospacing is off. The workaround is to manually space around operations like +.


Here is the result of the setting the ScriptSizeMultipliers in a "Text" cell:


enter image description here


Spaces or \[ThinSpace] etc. may be added if desired. Perhaps someone will know an automatic way to have the spacing adjusted, at least at the first level where it is most obvious.


Comments

Popular posts from this blog

functions - Get leading series expansion term?

Given a function f[x] , I would like to have a function leadingSeries that returns just the leading term in the series around x=0 . For example: leadingSeries[(1/x + 2)/(4 + 1/x^2 + x)] x and leadingSeries[(1/x + 2 + (1 - 1/x^3)/4)/(4 + x)] -(1/(16 x^3)) Is there such a function in Mathematica? Or maybe one can implement it efficiently? EDIT I finally went with the following implementation, based on Carl Woll 's answer: lds[ex_,x_]:=( (ex/.x->(x+O[x]^2))/.SeriesData[U_,Z_,L_List,Mi_,Ma_,De_]:>SeriesData[U,Z,{L[[1]]},Mi,Mi+1,De]//Quiet//Normal) The advantage is, that this one also properly works with functions whose leading term is a constant: lds[Exp[x],x] 1 Answer Update 1 Updated to eliminate SeriesData and to not return additional terms Perhaps you could use: leadingSeries[expr_, x_] := Normal[expr /. x->(x+O[x]^2) /. a_List :> Take[a, 1]] Then for your examples: leadingSeries[(1/x + 2)/(4 + 1/x^2 + x), x] leadingSeries[Exp[x], x] leadingSeries[(1/x + 2 + (1 - 1/x...

mathematical optimization - Minimizing using indices, error: Part::pkspec1: The expression cannot be used as a part specification

I want to use Minimize where the variables to minimize are indices pointing into an array. Here a MWE that hopefully shows what my problem is. vars = u@# & /@ Range[3]; cons = Flatten@ { Table[(u[j] != #) & /@ vars[[j + 1 ;; -1]], {j, 1, 3 - 1}], 1 vec1 = {1, 2, 3}; vec2 = {1, 2, 3}; Minimize[{Total@((vec1[[#]] - vec2[[u[#]]])^2 & /@ Range[1, 3]), cons}, vars, Integers] The error I get: Part::pkspec1: The expression u[1] cannot be used as a part specification. >> Answer Ok, it seems that one can get around Mathematica trying to evaluate vec2[[u[1]]] too early by using the function Indexed[vec2,u[1]] . The working MWE would then look like the following: vars = u@# & /@ Range[3]; cons = Flatten@{ Table[(u[j] != #) & /@ vars[[j + 1 ;; -1]], {j, 1, 3 - 1}], 1 vec1 = {1, 2, 3}; vec2 = {1, 2, 3}; NMinimize[ {Total@((vec1[[#]] - Indexed[vec2, u[#]])^2 & /@ R...

plotting - Plot 4D data with color as 4th dimension

I have a list of 4D data (x position, y position, amplitude, wavelength). I want to plot x, y, and amplitude on a 3D plot and have the color of the points correspond to the wavelength. I have seen many examples using functions to define color but my wavelength cannot be expressed by an analytic function. Is there a simple way to do this? Answer Here a another possible way to visualize 4D data: data = Flatten[Table[{x, y, x^2 + y^2, Sin[x - y]}, {x, -Pi, Pi,Pi/10}, {y,-Pi,Pi, Pi/10}], 1]; You can use the function Point along with VertexColors . Now the points are places using the first three elements and the color is determined by the fourth. In this case I used Hue, but you can use whatever you prefer. Graphics3D[ Point[data[[All, 1 ;; 3]], VertexColors -> Hue /@ data[[All, 4]]], Axes -> True, BoxRatios -> {1, 1, 1/GoldenRatio}]