Skip to main content

equation solving - How to pick a solution from a list of solutions using a test?


I have a list of solutions that depends on a parameter b3 and I'd like to get the solution for which the x value is minimal when the parameter value is substituted. for example:


b3 =.;
f[x_] := x^2 - b3
solutions = Solve[f[x] == 0, x]


{{x -> -Sqrt[b3]}, {x -> Sqrt[b3]}}

I'm trying to get the element for which x/.element is minimal (which should be b3-depended). I started with:



f[x_] := x^2 - b3
solutions = Solve[f[x] == 0, x]
minsol := Pick[solutions, x /. solutions, Min[x /.solutions]]
pickminimum = minsol /. {b3 -> 2}

but when trying the above I got:



Pick::incomp: "Expressions {{x->-\[Sqrt]b3},{x->\[Sqrt]b3}} and {-\[Sqrt]b3,\[Sqrt]b3} have incompatible shapes."
Pick::incomp: "Expressions {{x->-\[Sqrt]2},{x->\[Sqrt]2}} and {-\[Sqrt]2,\[Sqrt]2} have incompatible shapes"


Then I tried to remove the extra {}:


f[x_] := x^2 - b3
solutions = Solve[f[x] == 0, x]
minsol := Pick[((#[[1]]) & /@ solutions), x /. solutions, Min[x /. solutions]]
pickminimum = minsol /. {b3 -> 2};

for which I got:



Rule::argr: Rule called with 1 argument; 2 arguments are expected
Rule::argrx: Rule called with 0 arguments; 2 arguments are expected.


Trying just to see if it works for some list, also got me nowhere:


f[x_] := x^2 - b3
solutions = Solve[f[x] == 0, x];
minsol := Pick[{1, 2}, x /. solutions, Min[x /. solutions]]
minsol /. {b3 -> 2}


{}


I think I understand why I get the first error - but I have no idea why the second/third won't work.


clarification I'd like to have an expression for any value of b3. this is because later I'm interested at various quantities which are related to this point for many values of b3 (for example draw the first derivative of this 'minimal point' as a function of b3). so I'm less interested in a solution for a particular value of b3



Answer



Your updated request makes no sense me unless you mean something much simpler that you appeared to be attempting. Perhaps all you want is this:


min = Min[x /. solutions]


Min[-Sqrt[b3], Sqrt[b3]]

min /. b3 -> 2



-Sqrt[2]

I hope this helps. If not I'm at a loss.




There are a couple of problems here. First, as Nasser comments your replacement is done out of order. If you correct that to:


Pick[solutions, #, Min@#] &[x /. solutions /. b3 -> 2]



Pick::incomp: Expressions {{x->-Sqrt[b3]},{x->Sqrt[b3]}} and {-Sqrt[2],Sqrt[2]} have incompatible shapes. >>


Pick[{{x -> -Sqrt[b3]}, {x -> Sqrt[b3]}}, {-Sqrt[2], Sqrt[2]}, -Sqrt[2]]

You still get an error because Pick wants matching structures for the first two arguments. It is IMHO the wrong tool for this particular task.


Instead I would use Position:


solutions ~Extract~ Position[#, Min@#] &[x /. solutions /. b3 -> 2]


{{x -> -Sqrt[b3]}}


Or a bit more advanced, Ordering:


solutions ~Extract~ Ordering[x /. solutions /. b3 -> 2, 1]


{x -> -Sqrt[b3]}

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

plotting - Plot 4D data with color as 4th dimension

I have a list of 4D data (x position, y position, amplitude, wavelength). I want to plot x, y, and amplitude on a 3D plot and have the color of the points correspond to the wavelength. I have seen many examples using functions to define color but my wavelength cannot be expressed by an analytic function. Is there a simple way to do this? Answer Here a another possible way to visualize 4D data: data = Flatten[Table[{x, y, x^2 + y^2, Sin[x - y]}, {x, -Pi, Pi,Pi/10}, {y,-Pi,Pi, Pi/10}], 1]; You can use the function Point along with VertexColors . Now the points are places using the first three elements and the color is determined by the fourth. In this case I used Hue, but you can use whatever you prefer. Graphics3D[ Point[data[[All, 1 ;; 3]], VertexColors -> Hue /@ data[[All, 4]]], Axes -> True, BoxRatios -> {1, 1, 1/GoldenRatio}]

plotting - Filling between two spheres in SphericalPlot3D

Manipulate[ SphericalPlot3D[{1, 2 - n}, {θ, 0, Pi}, {ϕ, 0, 1.5 Pi}, Mesh -> None, PlotPoints -> 15, PlotRange -> {-2.2, 2.2}], {n, 0, 1}] I cant' seem to be able to make a filling between two spheres. I've already tried the obvious Filling -> {1 -> {2}} but Mathematica doesn't seem to like that option. Is there any easy way around this or ... Answer There is no built-in filling in SphericalPlot3D . One option is to use ParametricPlot3D to draw the surfaces between the two shells: Manipulate[ Show[SphericalPlot3D[{1, 2 - n}, {θ, 0, Pi}, {ϕ, 0, 1.5 Pi}, PlotPoints -> 15, PlotRange -> {-2.2, 2.2}], ParametricPlot3D[{ r {Sin[t] Cos[1.5 Pi], Sin[t] Sin[1.5 Pi], Cos[t]}, r {Sin[t] Cos[0 Pi], Sin[t] Sin[0 Pi], Cos[t]}}, {r, 1, 2 - n}, {t, 0, Pi}, PlotStyle -> Yellow, Mesh -> {2, 15}]], {n, 0, 1}]

plotting - Mathematica: 3D plot based on combined 2D graphs

I have several sigmoidal fits to 3 different datasets, with mean fit predictions plus the 95% confidence limits (not symmetrical around the mean) and the actual data. I would now like to show these different 2D plots projected in 3D as in but then using proper perspective. In the link here they give some solutions to combine the plots using isometric perspective, but I would like to use proper 3 point perspective. Any thoughts? Also any way to show the mean points per time point for each series plus or minus the standard error on the mean would be cool too, either using points+vertical bars, or using spheres plus tubes. Below are some test data and the fit function I am using. Note that I am working on a logit(proportion) scale and that the final vertical scale is Log10(percentage). (* some test data *) data = Table[Null, {i, 4}]; data[[1]] = {{1, -5.8}, {2, -5.4}, {3, -0.8}, {4, -0.2}, {5, 4.6}, {1, -6.4}, {2, -5.6}, {3, -0.7}, {4, 0.04}, {5, 1.0}, {1, -6.8}, {2, -4.7}, {3, -1....