Skip to main content

export - Why do I sometimes get errors when exporting 3D graphics which have been translated or scaled?


Update notice: The expression returned by "Faces" changed in V11, so an alternative for V11 has been included.


When I try and export 3D graphics, I get an error if some of the graphics complexes are translated. For example:


r1 = PolyhedronData["RhombicDodecahedron", "Faces"];           (* works in V10 *)
r1 = PolyhedronData["RhombicDodecahedron", "GraphicsComplex"]; (* fix for V11 *)

trans = 2 Table[
Mean[PolyhedronData["RhombicDodecahedron", "VertexCoordinates"][[
n]]], {n, PolyhedronData["RhombicDodecahedron", "FaceIndices"]}];


r2 = Table[
Translate[r1, n], {n,
Table[Accumulate[RandomChoice[trans, m]], {m, 6}]}];

exp = Graphics3D[r2, Boxed -> False, SphericalRegion -> True];

Export["rhomdod2.obj", exp]

gives the errors




Export::type: Graphics3D cannot be exported to the OBJ format. >>
Export::type: RuleDelayed cannot be exported to the OBJ format. >>



I never get these errors when I just export a single object or an untranslated object.



Answer



If, as I suspect, exporting to "OBJ" does not support geometric transformations, one fix is to convert your graphics to "normal" graphics. (I wish Normal would do this, perhaps via an option.)


Here is a quick example of how to do this. To code it up in full generality means handling all of the graphics primitives and all the transformations (and transforming the VertexNormals, too, I suppose). I'll restrict my focus to the OP's specific example. (Update notice: I simplified the code a bit. See edit history.)


ClearAll[normify, xfcoords, ixfcoords];
normify[Translate[g_, v : {__?NumericQ}]] := normify[Translate[g, {v}]];
normify[Translate[g_, v_?MatrixQ]] := xfcoords[g, TranslationTransform[#]] & /@ v;

normify[g_] := g;

SetAttributes[xfcoords, Listable];
xfcoords[g_, xf_] := ixfcoords[g, xf];
ixfcoords[(obj : GraphicsComplex | Polygon | Line | Point)[coords_, rest___], xf_] :=
obj[xf[coords], rest];
ixfcoords[g_, xf_] := g;

Example:


normalexp = normify //@ exp


Mathematica graphics


FreeQ[normalexp, Translate]
(* True *)

It exports without error and creates a file, but I don't know how to check the output.


Export["/tmp/rhomdod2.obj", normalexp]
(* "/tmp/rhomdod2.obj" *)

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

plotting - How to draw lines between specified dots on ListPlot?

I would like to create a plot where I have unconnected dots and some connected. So far, I have figured out how to draw the dots. My code is the following: ListPlot[{{1, 1}, {2, 2}, {3, 3}, {4, 4}, {1, 4}, {2, 5}, {3, 6}, {4, 7}, {1, 7}, {2, 8}, {3, 9}, {4, 10}, {1, 10}, {2, 11}, {3, 12}, {4,13}, {2.5, 7}}, Ticks -> {{1, 2, 3, 4}, None}, AxesStyle -> Thin, TicksStyle -> Directive[Black, Bold, 12], Mesh -> Full] I have thought using ListLinePlot command, but I don't know how to specify to the command to draw only selected lines between the dots. Do have any suggestions/hints on how to do that? Thank you. Answer One possibility would be to use Epilog with Line : ListPlot[ {{1, 1}, {2, 2}, {3, 3}, {4, 4}, {1, 4}, {2, 5}, {3, 6}, {4, 7}, {1, 7}, {2, 8}, {3, 9}, {4, 10}, {1, 10}, {2, 11}, {3, 12}, {4, 13}, {2.5, 7}}, Ticks -> {{1, 2, 3, 4}, None}, AxesStyle -> Thin, TicksStyle -> Directive[Black, Bold, 12], Mesh -> Full, Epilog -> { Line[ ...

equation solving - Invert and fit implicitly defined curve

I need to fit an implicitly defined curve. I thought I could get some data out of Solve , and then using FindFit . Therefore, I would like to find the relation the parametric curve defined by $F(x,y)=0$: Solve[-(1/2) + 1/2 (0.41202 BesselK[0, 0.1 Sqrt[x^2 + y^2]] + (0.101483 x BesselK[1, 0.1 Sqrt[x^2 + y^2]])/Sqrt[x^2 + y^2]) == 0, y] But I can't get an output: Solve was unable to solve the system with inexact coefficients or the system obtained by direct rationalization of inexact numbers present in the system. Since many of the methods used by Solve require exact input, providing Solve with an exact version of the system may help. >> Edit: In particular, I would like to fit the data coming from the curve with the expression of another curve, and not with a function $f(x)$. In particular, since this clearly looks like a cardioid , I would like it to fit to something like it. What other strategies could I try?

dynamic - How can I make a clickable ArrayPlot that returns input?

I would like to create a dynamic ArrayPlot so that the rectangles, when clicked, provide the input. Can I use ArrayPlot for this? Or is there something else I should have to use? Answer ArrayPlot is much more than just a simple array like Grid : it represents a ranged 2D dataset, and its visualization can be finetuned by options like DataReversed and DataRange . These features make it quite complicated to reproduce the same layout and order with Grid . Here I offer AnnotatedArrayPlot which comes in handy when your dataset is more than just a flat 2D array. The dynamic interface allows highlighting individual cells and possibly interacting with them. AnnotatedArrayPlot works the same way as ArrayPlot and accepts the same options plus Enabled , HighlightCoordinates , HighlightStyle and HighlightElementFunction . data = {{Missing["HasSomeMoreData"], GrayLevel[ 1], {RGBColor[0, 1, 1], RGBColor[0, 0, 1], GrayLevel[1]}, RGBColor[0, 1, 0]}, {GrayLevel[0], GrayLevel...