Skip to main content

How to set return type of `InterpolatingFunction ` in compile


Consider this


s = C1 /. 
  First@NDSolve[{I C1'[t] == C2[t] E^(-I t), 
     I C2'[t] == C1[t] E^(I t), C1[0.] == 1., C2[0.] == 0.}, {C1, C2}, {t, 0., 10.}]
sol[t_] := 
 Piecewise[{{s[t], t <= 10.}, {Sin[t], t <= 20.}, {Cos[t], t <= 30}}, 0.]
On["CompilerWarnings"]
f3 = Compile[{{t, _Real}}, Evaluate@sol[t]]


I get warnings because compile doesn't know the return type of InterpolatingFunction



Compile::noinfo: No information is available for compilation of InterpolatingFunction[{{0.,10.}},{4,31,1,{107},{4},0,0,0,0,Automatic},<<1>>,{Developer`PackedArrayForm,{0,2,4,6,8,10,12,<<38>>,90,92,94,96,98,<<58>>},{1. +0. I,0. +0. I,1. +0. I,-0.000102139+0. I,1. +1.06555*10^-12 I,<<42>>,-0.5557+0.183522 I,0.767381 +0.0556081 I,-0.598783+0.22247 I,<<164>>}},{Automatic}][t] . The compiler will use an external evaluation and make assumptions about the return type. >>



and it failed to use the compiled version


f3[5.]


During evaluation of In[38]:= CompiledFunction::cfex: Could not complete external evaluation at instruction 3; proceeding with uncompiled evaluation. >>




(*-0.787326 - 0.231525 I*)

so I tried to set the return type like this


f3 = Compile[{{t, _Real}}, 
  Evaluate@sol[t], {{_InterpolatingFunction, _Complex}}]

or


f3 = Compile[{{t, _Real}}, Evaluate@sol[t], {{InterpolatingFunction[__], _Complex}}]

both don't work.



In contrary, Fourier seems also has this problem(example taken from here)


Compile[{{m, _Real, 2}}, Fourier[m]][Table[N[i - j], {i, 2}, {j, 2}]]


CompiledFunction::cfex: Could not complete external evaluation at instruction 1; proceeding with uncompiled evaluation. >>



(*{{0., 1.}, {-1., 0.}}*)

but after specify the return type, it works


Compile[{{m, _Real, 2}}, Fourier[m], {{_Fourier, _Complex, 2}}][Table[N[i - j], {i, 2}, {j, 2}]]

(*{{0. + 0. I, 1. + 0. I}, {-1. + 0. I, 0. + 0. I}}*)

So how should I specify the return type of InterpolationFunction?



Answer



Your pattern is wrong. I would try the following


f3 = Compile[{{t, _Real}}, 
  Evaluate@sol[t], {{InterpolatingFunction[__][t], _Complex}}]

which compiles without warning and lets you evaluate


f3[.5]

(* Out[112]= 0.880101 + 0.0200644 I *)

without a message. The problem with your pattern is that you used _InterpolatingFunction which means an expression with the Head InterpolatingFunction.


If you now check the this with the s[t] you used, then you see


Head[s[t]]
(* InterpolatingFunction[{{0.,10.}},<>] *)

Therefore, if you wanted to say it your way, you should be able to use


f3 = Function[expr, 
   Compile[{{t, _Real}}, 

    expr, {{_InterpolatingFunction[__], _Complex}}]][s[t]]

which again works on my machine.


Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

plotting - Filling between two spheres in SphericalPlot3D

Manipulate[ SphericalPlot3D[{1, 2 - n}, {θ, 0, Pi}, {ϕ, 0, 1.5 Pi}, Mesh -> None, PlotPoints -> 15, PlotRange -> {-2.2, 2.2}], {n, 0, 1}] I cant' seem to be able to make a filling between two spheres. I've already tried the obvious Filling -> {1 -> {2}} but Mathematica doesn't seem to like that option. Is there any easy way around this or ... Answer There is no built-in filling in SphericalPlot3D . One option is to use ParametricPlot3D to draw the surfaces between the two shells: Manipulate[ Show[SphericalPlot3D[{1, 2 - n}, {θ, 0, Pi}, {ϕ, 0, 1.5 Pi}, PlotPoints -> 15, PlotRange -> {-2.2, 2.2}], ParametricPlot3D[{ r {Sin[t] Cos[1.5 Pi], Sin[t] Sin[1.5 Pi], Cos[t]}, r {Sin[t] Cos[0 Pi], Sin[t] Sin[0 Pi], Cos[t]}}, {r, 1, 2 - n}, {t, 0, Pi}, PlotStyle -> Yellow, Mesh -> {2, 15}]], {n, 0, 1}]
Post a Comment
Read more

plotting - Plot 4D data with color as 4th dimension

I have a list of 4D data (x position, y position, amplitude, wavelength). I want to plot x, y, and amplitude on a 3D plot and have the color of the points correspond to the wavelength. I have seen many examples using functions to define color but my wavelength cannot be expressed by an analytic function. Is there a simple way to do this? Answer Here a another possible way to visualize 4D data: data = Flatten[Table[{x, y, x^2 + y^2, Sin[x - y]}, {x, -Pi, Pi,Pi/10}, {y,-Pi,Pi, Pi/10}], 1]; You can use the function Point along with VertexColors . Now the points are places using the first three elements and the color is determined by the fourth. In this case I used Hue, but you can use whatever you prefer. Graphics3D[ Point[data[[All, 1 ;; 3]], VertexColors -> Hue /@ data[[All, 4]]], Axes -> True, BoxRatios -> {1, 1, 1/GoldenRatio}]
Post a Comment
Read more

plotting - Mathematica: 3D plot based on combined 2D graphs

I have several sigmoidal fits to 3 different datasets, with mean fit predictions plus the 95% confidence limits (not symmetrical around the mean) and the actual data. I would now like to show these different 2D plots projected in 3D as in but then using proper perspective. In the link here they give some solutions to combine the plots using isometric perspective, but I would like to use proper 3 point perspective. Any thoughts? Also any way to show the mean points per time point for each series plus or minus the standard error on the mean would be cool too, either using points+vertical bars, or using spheres plus tubes. Below are some test data and the fit function I am using. Note that I am working on a logit(proportion) scale and that the final vertical scale is Log10(percentage). (* some test data *) data = Table[Null, {i, 4}]; data[[1]] = {{1, -5.8}, {2, -5.4}, {3, -0.8}, {4, -0.2}, {5, 4.6}, {1, -6.4}, {2, -5.6}, {3, -0.7}, {4, 0.04}, {5, 1.0}, {1, -6.8}, {2, -4.7}, {3, -1.
Post a Comment
Read more