Skip to main content

How to set return type of `InterpolatingFunction ` in compile


Consider this


s = C1 /. 
  First@NDSolve[{I C1'[t] == C2[t] E^(-I t), 
     I C2'[t] == C1[t] E^(I t), C1[0.] == 1., C2[0.] == 0.}, {C1, C2}, {t, 0., 10.}]
sol[t_] := 
 Piecewise[{{s[t], t <= 10.}, {Sin[t], t <= 20.}, {Cos[t], t <= 30}}, 0.]
On["CompilerWarnings"]
f3 = Compile[{{t, _Real}}, Evaluate@sol[t]]


I get warnings because compile doesn't know the return type of InterpolatingFunction



Compile::noinfo: No information is available for compilation of InterpolatingFunction[{{0.,10.}},{4,31,1,{107},{4},0,0,0,0,Automatic},<<1>>,{Developer`PackedArrayForm,{0,2,4,6,8,10,12,<<38>>,90,92,94,96,98,<<58>>},{1. +0. I,0. +0. I,1. +0. I,-0.000102139+0. I,1. +1.06555*10^-12 I,<<42>>,-0.5557+0.183522 I,0.767381 +0.0556081 I,-0.598783+0.22247 I,<<164>>}},{Automatic}][t] . The compiler will use an external evaluation and make assumptions about the return type. >>



and it failed to use the compiled version


f3[5.]


During evaluation of In[38]:= CompiledFunction::cfex: Could not complete external evaluation at instruction 3; proceeding with uncompiled evaluation. >>




(*-0.787326 - 0.231525 I*)

so I tried to set the return type like this


f3 = Compile[{{t, _Real}}, 
  Evaluate@sol[t], {{_InterpolatingFunction, _Complex}}]

or


f3 = Compile[{{t, _Real}}, Evaluate@sol[t], {{InterpolatingFunction[__], _Complex}}]

both don't work.



In contrary, Fourier seems also has this problem(example taken from here)


Compile[{{m, _Real, 2}}, Fourier[m]][Table[N[i - j], {i, 2}, {j, 2}]]


CompiledFunction::cfex: Could not complete external evaluation at instruction 1; proceeding with uncompiled evaluation. >>



(*{{0., 1.}, {-1., 0.}}*)

but after specify the return type, it works


Compile[{{m, _Real, 2}}, Fourier[m], {{_Fourier, _Complex, 2}}][Table[N[i - j], {i, 2}, {j, 2}]]

(*{{0. + 0. I, 1. + 0. I}, {-1. + 0. I, 0. + 0. I}}*)

So how should I specify the return type of InterpolationFunction?



Answer



Your pattern is wrong. I would try the following


f3 = Compile[{{t, _Real}}, 
  Evaluate@sol[t], {{InterpolatingFunction[__][t], _Complex}}]

which compiles without warning and lets you evaluate


f3[.5]

(* Out[112]= 0.880101 + 0.0200644 I *)

without a message. The problem with your pattern is that you used _InterpolatingFunction which means an expression with the Head InterpolatingFunction.


If you now check the this with the s[t] you used, then you see


Head[s[t]]
(* InterpolatingFunction[{{0.,10.}},<>] *)

Therefore, if you wanted to say it your way, you should be able to use


f3 = Function[expr, 
   Compile[{{t, _Real}}, 

    expr, {{_InterpolatingFunction[__], _Complex}}]][s[t]]

which again works on my machine.


Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

functions - Get leading series expansion term?

Given a function f[x] , I would like to have a function leadingSeries that returns just the leading term in the series around x=0 . For example: leadingSeries[(1/x + 2)/(4 + 1/x^2 + x)] x and leadingSeries[(1/x + 2 + (1 - 1/x^3)/4)/(4 + x)] -(1/(16 x^3)) Is there such a function in Mathematica? Or maybe one can implement it efficiently? EDIT I finally went with the following implementation, based on Carl Woll 's answer: lds[ex_,x_]:=( (ex/.x->(x+O[x]^2))/.SeriesData[U_,Z_,L_List,Mi_,Ma_,De_]:>SeriesData[U,Z,{L[[1]]},Mi,Mi+1,De]//Quiet//Normal) The advantage is, that this one also properly works with functions whose leading term is a constant: lds[Exp[x],x] 1 Answer Update 1 Updated to eliminate SeriesData and to not return additional terms Perhaps you could use: leadingSeries[expr_, x_] := Normal[expr /. x->(x+O[x]^2) /. a_List :> Take[a, 1]] Then for your examples: leadingSeries[(1/x + 2)/(4 + 1/x^2 + x), x] leadingSeries[Exp[x], x] leadingSeries[(1/x + 2 + (1 - 1/x...
Post a Comment
Read more

mathematical optimization - Minimizing using indices, error: Part::pkspec1: The expression cannot be used as a part specification

I want to use Minimize where the variables to minimize are indices pointing into an array. Here a MWE that hopefully shows what my problem is. vars = u@# & /@ Range[3]; cons = Flatten@ { Table[(u[j] != #) & /@ vars[[j + 1 ;; -1]], {j, 1, 3 - 1}], 1 vec1 = {1, 2, 3}; vec2 = {1, 2, 3}; Minimize[{Total@((vec1[[#]] - vec2[[u[#]]])^2 & /@ Range[1, 3]), cons}, vars, Integers] The error I get: Part::pkspec1: The expression u[1] cannot be used as a part specification. >> Answer Ok, it seems that one can get around Mathematica trying to evaluate vec2[[u[1]]] too early by using the function Indexed[vec2,u[1]] . The working MWE would then look like the following: vars = u@# & /@ Range[3]; cons = Flatten@{ Table[(u[j] != #) & /@ vars[[j + 1 ;; -1]], {j, 1, 3 - 1}], 1 vec1 = {1, 2, 3}; vec2 = {1, 2, 3}; NMinimize[ {Total@((vec1[[#]] - Indexed[vec2, u[#]])^2 & /@ R...
Post a Comment
Read more

plotting - Plot 4D data with color as 4th dimension

I have a list of 4D data (x position, y position, amplitude, wavelength). I want to plot x, y, and amplitude on a 3D plot and have the color of the points correspond to the wavelength. I have seen many examples using functions to define color but my wavelength cannot be expressed by an analytic function. Is there a simple way to do this? Answer Here a another possible way to visualize 4D data: data = Flatten[Table[{x, y, x^2 + y^2, Sin[x - y]}, {x, -Pi, Pi,Pi/10}, {y,-Pi,Pi, Pi/10}], 1]; You can use the function Point along with VertexColors . Now the points are places using the first three elements and the color is determined by the fourth. In this case I used Hue, but you can use whatever you prefer. Graphics3D[ Point[data[[All, 1 ;; 3]], VertexColors -> Hue /@ data[[All, 4]]], Axes -> True, BoxRatios -> {1, 1, 1/GoldenRatio}]
Post a Comment
Read more