Skip to main content

How to set return type of `InterpolatingFunction ` in compile


Consider this


s = C1 /. 
First@NDSolve[{I C1'[t] == C2[t] E^(-I t),
I C2'[t] == C1[t] E^(I t), C1[0.] == 1., C2[0.] == 0.}, {C1, C2}, {t, 0., 10.}]
sol[t_] :=
Piecewise[{{s[t], t <= 10.}, {Sin[t], t <= 20.}, {Cos[t], t <= 30}}, 0.]
On["CompilerWarnings"]
f3 = Compile[{{t, _Real}}, Evaluate@sol[t]]


I get warnings because compile doesn't know the return type of InterpolatingFunction



Compile::noinfo: No information is available for compilation of InterpolatingFunction[{{0.,10.}},{4,31,1,{107},{4},0,0,0,0,Automatic},<<1>>,{Developer`PackedArrayForm,{0,2,4,6,8,10,12,<<38>>,90,92,94,96,98,<<58>>},{1. +0. I,0. +0. I,1. +0. I,-0.000102139+0. I,1. +1.06555*10^-12 I,<<42>>,-0.5557+0.183522 I,0.767381 +0.0556081 I,-0.598783+0.22247 I,<<164>>}},{Automatic}][t] . The compiler will use an external evaluation and make assumptions about the return type. >>



and it failed to use the compiled version


f3[5.]


During evaluation of In[38]:= CompiledFunction::cfex: Could not complete external evaluation at instruction 3; proceeding with uncompiled evaluation. >>




(*-0.787326 - 0.231525 I*)

so I tried to set the return type like this


f3 = Compile[{{t, _Real}}, 
Evaluate@sol[t], {{_InterpolatingFunction, _Complex}}]

or


f3 = Compile[{{t, _Real}}, Evaluate@sol[t], {{InterpolatingFunction[__], _Complex}}]

both don't work.



In contrary, Fourier seems also has this problem(example taken from here)


Compile[{{m, _Real, 2}}, Fourier[m]][Table[N[i - j], {i, 2}, {j, 2}]]


CompiledFunction::cfex: Could not complete external evaluation at instruction 1; proceeding with uncompiled evaluation. >>



(*{{0., 1.}, {-1., 0.}}*)

but after specify the return type, it works


Compile[{{m, _Real, 2}}, Fourier[m], {{_Fourier, _Complex, 2}}][Table[N[i - j], {i, 2}, {j, 2}]]

(*{{0. + 0. I, 1. + 0. I}, {-1. + 0. I, 0. + 0. I}}*)

So how should I specify the return type of InterpolationFunction?



Answer



Your pattern is wrong. I would try the following


f3 = Compile[{{t, _Real}}, 
Evaluate@sol[t], {{InterpolatingFunction[__][t], _Complex}}]

which compiles without warning and lets you evaluate


f3[.5]

(* Out[112]= 0.880101 + 0.0200644 I *)

without a message. The problem with your pattern is that you used _InterpolatingFunction which means an expression with the Head InterpolatingFunction.


If you now check the this with the s[t] you used, then you see


Head[s[t]]
(* InterpolatingFunction[{{0.,10.}},<>] *)

Therefore, if you wanted to say it your way, you should be able to use


f3 = Function[expr, 
Compile[{{t, _Real}},

expr, {{_InterpolatingFunction[__], _Complex}}]][s[t]]

which again works on my machine.


Comments

Popular posts from this blog

plotting - How to draw lines between specified dots on ListPlot?

I would like to create a plot where I have unconnected dots and some connected. So far, I have figured out how to draw the dots. My code is the following: ListPlot[{{1, 1}, {2, 2}, {3, 3}, {4, 4}, {1, 4}, {2, 5}, {3, 6}, {4, 7}, {1, 7}, {2, 8}, {3, 9}, {4, 10}, {1, 10}, {2, 11}, {3, 12}, {4,13}, {2.5, 7}}, Ticks -> {{1, 2, 3, 4}, None}, AxesStyle -> Thin, TicksStyle -> Directive[Black, Bold, 12], Mesh -> Full] I have thought using ListLinePlot command, but I don't know how to specify to the command to draw only selected lines between the dots. Do have any suggestions/hints on how to do that? Thank you. Answer One possibility would be to use Epilog with Line : ListPlot[ {{1, 1}, {2, 2}, {3, 3}, {4, 4}, {1, 4}, {2, 5}, {3, 6}, {4, 7}, {1, 7}, {2, 8}, {3, 9}, {4, 10}, {1, 10}, {2, 11}, {3, 12}, {4, 13}, {2.5, 7}}, Ticks -> {{1, 2, 3, 4}, None}, AxesStyle -> Thin, TicksStyle -> Directive[Black, Bold, 12], Mesh -> Full, Epilog -> { Line[ ...

list manipulation - Selecting multiple columns from a matrix?

Sample data: data = { {{2013, 1, 1}, 24.13, 167.67, 231.82}, {{2013, 1, 2}, 32.15, 170.92, 225.99}, {{2013, 1, 3}, 35.43, 172.68, 221.67}, {{2013, 1, 4}, 36.73, 173.05, 218.32}, {{2013, 1, 5}, 58.19, 165.96, 197.05}, {{2013, 1, 6}, 69.99, 163.50, 187.52}, {{2013, 1, 7}, 71.37, 154.21, 175.58}, {{2013, 1, 8}, 72.51, 149.66, 163.25}}; I want a DateListPlot with three graphs, so for a matrix formed by columns 1 and 2, one for columns 1 and 3, and 1 for columns 1 and 4. At the moment I'm using this code: data2 = Transpose[{data[[All, 1]], data[[All, 2]]}]; data3 = Transpose[{data[[All, 1]], data[[All, 3]]}]; data4 = Transpose[{data[[All, 1]], data[[All, 4]]}]; DateListPlot[{data2, data3, data4}, Joined -> True, Filling -> {3 -> {1}}] but I have a hunch that this can be done more efficiently. I don't like the Transpose s in particular. Any ideas? edit (for extra credit) What if I need to multiply the second column by 2, which in my solution is simp...

dynamic - How can I make a clickable ArrayPlot that returns input?

I would like to create a dynamic ArrayPlot so that the rectangles, when clicked, provide the input. Can I use ArrayPlot for this? Or is there something else I should have to use? Answer ArrayPlot is much more than just a simple array like Grid : it represents a ranged 2D dataset, and its visualization can be finetuned by options like DataReversed and DataRange . These features make it quite complicated to reproduce the same layout and order with Grid . Here I offer AnnotatedArrayPlot which comes in handy when your dataset is more than just a flat 2D array. The dynamic interface allows highlighting individual cells and possibly interacting with them. AnnotatedArrayPlot works the same way as ArrayPlot and accepts the same options plus Enabled , HighlightCoordinates , HighlightStyle and HighlightElementFunction . data = {{Missing["HasSomeMoreData"], GrayLevel[ 1], {RGBColor[0, 1, 1], RGBColor[0, 0, 1], GrayLevel[1]}, RGBColor[0, 1, 0]}, {GrayLevel[0], GrayLevel...