Skip to main content

computational geometry - Ideas for visualizing the shape of a random walk


Context:


In the context of (3D) random walks or polymer chains, a useful quantity for capturing and characterizing the shape of the walk or the conformation of the polymer in space is the gyration tensor $T$, which in words is the arithmetic mean of the second moment of particle positions along the chain, and visited positions in case of random walks.


Given that the gyration tensor is a symmetric 3-by-3 matrix, it can be diagonalized and written in the following form:


$$ T = \begin{pmatrix} \lambda_x^2 & 0 & 0 \\ 0 & \lambda_y^2 & 0 \\ 0 & 0 & \lambda_z^2 \end{pmatrix} \tag{1} $$ and the axes chosen such that the diagonal elements follow the $\lambda_z^2 \ge \lambda_y^2 \ge \lambda_x^2$ relation.



The found eigen-spectrum and various function of $T$ can be used to define geometric descriptors such as:




  • Radius of gyration (average spatial extent of the structure) $R_g^2 = \lambda_z^2+\lambda_y^2+\lambda_x^2 \tag{2}$




  • The asphericity ($0$ when the structure of the walk or the distribution of the particles is spherically symmetric, and positive otherwise) $b = \frac{1}{2}(3\lambda_z^2-R_g^2) \tag{3}$




  • Similarly, acylindrity ($0$ when there's cylindrical symmetry): $c = \lambda_y^2 - \lambda_x^2 \tag{4}$





  • Relative shape anisotropy (takes values between $0$ and $1$, it reaches near $1$ for linear structures, line-like, and $0$ for highly symmetric ones), with a slight modification of $T,$ namely $\hat{T}_{ij}=T_{ij}-\delta_{ij}\text{Tr}(T/3)$ it can be written as ($\text{Tr}$ denoting the trace operation) $$\kappa^2 = \frac{3}{2}\frac{\text{Tr}(\hat{T}^2)}{(\text{Tr}\hat{T})^2}\tag{5}$$




  • Nature of asphericity, describing the prolateness or oblateness of the structure, can be expressed as (varying between $-1$ to $1$, with $-1$ corresponding to the fully oblate case, and $1$ to the fully prolate one.) $$ S=\frac{4 \text{det}\hat{T}}{\left(\frac{2}{3}\text{Tr}\hat{T}^2\right)^{3/2}} \tag{6} $$




Therefore we have all these quantities which together describe the overall geometric properties of the structure.






  • Based on the so-defined geometric descriptors of a random walk (or polymer chain), would it be possible to visualize/mimic the overall structure in Mathematica? Intuitively, I imagine a parametric approach where one would start from a sphere for example, and by changing either of the geometric descriptors (e.g. as a manipulate parameter) adjusting the drawn structure, but I don't know how to compose a visualisation from the collection of these properties alone. Any ideas for how to create such a visualisation would be most welcome.


The cool aspect of it all is that the gyration tensor allows one to capture and characterize the essence of the geometric structure by abstracting away from the actual details of the system (whether it's a random walk, a polymer, etc.), therefore, any visualisation would be likely useful for a variety of systems.




Comments

Popular posts from this blog

plotting - Plot 4D data with color as 4th dimension

I have a list of 4D data (x position, y position, amplitude, wavelength). I want to plot x, y, and amplitude on a 3D plot and have the color of the points correspond to the wavelength. I have seen many examples using functions to define color but my wavelength cannot be expressed by an analytic function. Is there a simple way to do this? Answer Here a another possible way to visualize 4D data: data = Flatten[Table[{x, y, x^2 + y^2, Sin[x - y]}, {x, -Pi, Pi,Pi/10}, {y,-Pi,Pi, Pi/10}], 1]; You can use the function Point along with VertexColors . Now the points are places using the first three elements and the color is determined by the fourth. In this case I used Hue, but you can use whatever you prefer. Graphics3D[ Point[data[[All, 1 ;; 3]], VertexColors -> Hue /@ data[[All, 4]]], Axes -> True, BoxRatios -> {1, 1, 1/GoldenRatio}]

plotting - Filling between two spheres in SphericalPlot3D

Manipulate[ SphericalPlot3D[{1, 2 - n}, {θ, 0, Pi}, {ϕ, 0, 1.5 Pi}, Mesh -> None, PlotPoints -> 15, PlotRange -> {-2.2, 2.2}], {n, 0, 1}] I cant' seem to be able to make a filling between two spheres. I've already tried the obvious Filling -> {1 -> {2}} but Mathematica doesn't seem to like that option. Is there any easy way around this or ... Answer There is no built-in filling in SphericalPlot3D . One option is to use ParametricPlot3D to draw the surfaces between the two shells: Manipulate[ Show[SphericalPlot3D[{1, 2 - n}, {θ, 0, Pi}, {ϕ, 0, 1.5 Pi}, PlotPoints -> 15, PlotRange -> {-2.2, 2.2}], ParametricPlot3D[{ r {Sin[t] Cos[1.5 Pi], Sin[t] Sin[1.5 Pi], Cos[t]}, r {Sin[t] Cos[0 Pi], Sin[t] Sin[0 Pi], Cos[t]}}, {r, 1, 2 - n}, {t, 0, Pi}, PlotStyle -> Yellow, Mesh -> {2, 15}]], {n, 0, 1}]

plotting - Mathematica: 3D plot based on combined 2D graphs

I have several sigmoidal fits to 3 different datasets, with mean fit predictions plus the 95% confidence limits (not symmetrical around the mean) and the actual data. I would now like to show these different 2D plots projected in 3D as in but then using proper perspective. In the link here they give some solutions to combine the plots using isometric perspective, but I would like to use proper 3 point perspective. Any thoughts? Also any way to show the mean points per time point for each series plus or minus the standard error on the mean would be cool too, either using points+vertical bars, or using spheres plus tubes. Below are some test data and the fit function I am using. Note that I am working on a logit(proportion) scale and that the final vertical scale is Log10(percentage). (* some test data *) data = Table[Null, {i, 4}]; data[[1]] = {{1, -5.8}, {2, -5.4}, {3, -0.8}, {4, -0.2}, {5, 4.6}, {1, -6.4}, {2, -5.6}, {3, -0.7}, {4, 0.04}, {5, 1.0}, {1, -6.8}, {2, -4.7}, {3, -1....