Skip to main content

A function that accepts a pair or a list of pairs


Probably a duplicate, but it's not easy to search on "lists".


I have a function that accepts a list of lists, say {{a1, b1}, {a2, b2}, {a3, b3}} and performs some computation on {ai,bi} for each i. (We may assume that none of the ai or bi are themselves lists). I would like this function to also accept simply {a1,b1} as its argument list and operate on this as if it were the only member of the (nonexistent) outer list. That is, I would like


f[{a1,b1}]

to behave the same way as


f[{{a1,b1}}]


What I have done is the following:


f[list_] := Module[{nlist},
nlist = If [ListQ[list[[1]]], list, {list}];

]

This works fine, but seems pretty inelegant. Is there a better way?



Answer



In many circumstances it is practical and clear to do this with pattern matching.


Option 1



f[x : {{_, _} ..}] := f /@ x

f[{a_, b_}] := a^b

Now:


f[{p, q}]


p^q


f[{{a, b}, {c, d}, {e, f}}]


{a^b, c^d, e^f}

Option 2


The code above it written assuming that your function best operates on a single pair of values: the function is mapped over every pair individually. If however the function is written to more efficiently operate on the list of pairs then it would be better to consider f[{a, b}] as a special case rather than the other way around. For example:


f2[a : {{_, _} ..}] := Power @@ (a\[Transpose])
f2[x : {_, _}] := f2[{x}]


f2[{a, b}]
f2[{{a, b}, {c, d}, {e, f}}]


{a^b}

{a^b, c^d, e^f}

You could use := First @ f2[{x}] if you wish f2 to return a bare a^b in the first instance.


The second function is an order of magnitude faster on large packed arrays:



rnd = RandomReal[{1, 19}, {1500000, 2}];

f[rnd] // Timing // First
f2[rnd] // Timing // First


1.514


0.141



Option 3



Yet another method is to use a single pattern that matches either form, using Alternatives. This method is less common, and may be less efficient than the other options, but it can be quite concise which I appreciate.


Using this the f2 function might be written like this:


f3[{a : {_, _} ..} | a : {_, _}] := Power @@ ({a}\[Transpose])

With a default configuration making this definition produces a message:



Pattern::patv: Name a used for both fixed and variable length patterns. >>



This is not an error but rather a warning that you may have made a mistake. I fairly frequently use pattern names for both fixed and variable length patterns therefore I either turn off or ignore this message.


Function is as f2 above:



f3[{a, b}]
f3[{{a, b}, {c, d}, {e, f}}]


{a^b}

{a^b, c^d, e^f}



A note on definition ordering



Normally multiple DownValues definitions (simple definitions with a pattern on the left side) are automatically ordered by apparent specificity. This is briefly described in the documentation page The Ordering Of Definitions. But, as stated there:



Although in many practical cases, Mathematica can recognize when one rule is more general than another, you should realize that this is not always possible. For example, if two rules both contain complicated conditions, it may not be possible to work out which is more general, and, in fact, there may not be a definite ordering. Whenever the appropriate ordering is not clear, Mathematica stores rules in the order you give them.



In the methods above Mathematica cannot decide the order of the patterns used and the definitions will be tried in the order given. It is important therefore to make the {{_, _} ..} definition first otherwise {{1, 2}, {3, 4}} would be incorrectly matched by {a_, b_}.


In the case of Option 3 patterns given in Alternatives are always matched in the order given and therefore must be ordered manually when order is important.


Comments

Popular posts from this blog

plotting - How to draw lines between specified dots on ListPlot?

I would like to create a plot where I have unconnected dots and some connected. So far, I have figured out how to draw the dots. My code is the following: ListPlot[{{1, 1}, {2, 2}, {3, 3}, {4, 4}, {1, 4}, {2, 5}, {3, 6}, {4, 7}, {1, 7}, {2, 8}, {3, 9}, {4, 10}, {1, 10}, {2, 11}, {3, 12}, {4,13}, {2.5, 7}}, Ticks -> {{1, 2, 3, 4}, None}, AxesStyle -> Thin, TicksStyle -> Directive[Black, Bold, 12], Mesh -> Full] I have thought using ListLinePlot command, but I don't know how to specify to the command to draw only selected lines between the dots. Do have any suggestions/hints on how to do that? Thank you. Answer One possibility would be to use Epilog with Line : ListPlot[ {{1, 1}, {2, 2}, {3, 3}, {4, 4}, {1, 4}, {2, 5}, {3, 6}, {4, 7}, {1, 7}, {2, 8}, {3, 9}, {4, 10}, {1, 10}, {2, 11}, {3, 12}, {4, 13}, {2.5, 7}}, Ticks -> {{1, 2, 3, 4}, None}, AxesStyle -> Thin, TicksStyle -> Directive[Black, Bold, 12], Mesh -> Full, Epilog -> { Line[ ...

equation solving - Invert and fit implicitly defined curve

I need to fit an implicitly defined curve. I thought I could get some data out of Solve , and then using FindFit . Therefore, I would like to find the relation the parametric curve defined by $F(x,y)=0$: Solve[-(1/2) + 1/2 (0.41202 BesselK[0, 0.1 Sqrt[x^2 + y^2]] + (0.101483 x BesselK[1, 0.1 Sqrt[x^2 + y^2]])/Sqrt[x^2 + y^2]) == 0, y] But I can't get an output: Solve was unable to solve the system with inexact coefficients or the system obtained by direct rationalization of inexact numbers present in the system. Since many of the methods used by Solve require exact input, providing Solve with an exact version of the system may help. >> Edit: In particular, I would like to fit the data coming from the curve with the expression of another curve, and not with a function $f(x)$. In particular, since this clearly looks like a cardioid , I would like it to fit to something like it. What other strategies could I try?

dynamic - How can I make a clickable ArrayPlot that returns input?

I would like to create a dynamic ArrayPlot so that the rectangles, when clicked, provide the input. Can I use ArrayPlot for this? Or is there something else I should have to use? Answer ArrayPlot is much more than just a simple array like Grid : it represents a ranged 2D dataset, and its visualization can be finetuned by options like DataReversed and DataRange . These features make it quite complicated to reproduce the same layout and order with Grid . Here I offer AnnotatedArrayPlot which comes in handy when your dataset is more than just a flat 2D array. The dynamic interface allows highlighting individual cells and possibly interacting with them. AnnotatedArrayPlot works the same way as ArrayPlot and accepts the same options plus Enabled , HighlightCoordinates , HighlightStyle and HighlightElementFunction . data = {{Missing["HasSomeMoreData"], GrayLevel[ 1], {RGBColor[0, 1, 1], RGBColor[0, 0, 1], GrayLevel[1]}, RGBColor[0, 1, 0]}, {GrayLevel[0], GrayLevel...