Skip to main content

programming - Keep function range as a variable


Plot[2*x^2 - x + 2, {x, -1, 1}] plots a function of x from -1 to 1. As far as I can see, I cannot "save" this range in a variable:


u = {x, -1, 1};
Plot[2*x^2 - x + 2, u]

Generates Plot::pllim: Range specification u is not of the form {x, xmin, xmax}. Hopefully my intention is obvious, what is the most concise way of accomplishing it?


Because someone will wonder why I could possibly want to do this: I have


NDSolve[..., ..., {t, 0, 100}];

Plot[..., {t, 0, 100}];

I don't want to need to modify both 100's as my desired range changes. Yes, I could use variables t0 and t1, but is what type is the range/domain expression? Why can't I store it directly?



Answer



Better methods


My original answer was pretty poor and I'll show you why.


Suppose x has a value assigned: x = 7. This does not bother Plot:


Plot[2*x^2 - x + 2, {x, -1, 1}]  (* outputs graphic *)

It however will prevent my earlier suggestions from working:



Plot[2*x^2 - x + 2, Evaluate@u]


During evaluation of In[23]:= Plot::itraw: Raw object 7 cannot be used as an iterator. >>


Plot[2 x^2 - x + 2, {7, -1, 1}]

Instead you should store your range in a way that holds the plot parameter unevaluated:


u = Hold[{x, -1, 1}];

Then you need a way to put this inside the Plot expression without it evaluating. This can be done with a Function and a hold attribute and Apply:



Function[spec, Plot[2*x^2 - x + 2, spec], HoldAll] @@ u  (* outputs graphic *)

Or more tersely with the "injector pattern":


u /. _[spec_] :> Plot[2*x^2 - x + 2, spec]  (* outputs graphic *)



Old answer


You just need Evaluate:


u = {x, -1, 1};


Plot[2*x^2 - x + 2, Evaluate @ u]

Mathematica graphics


Or as I often prefer, Function:


Plot[2*x^2 - x + 2, #] & @ u

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

plotting - How to draw lines between specified dots on ListPlot?

I would like to create a plot where I have unconnected dots and some connected. So far, I have figured out how to draw the dots. My code is the following: ListPlot[{{1, 1}, {2, 2}, {3, 3}, {4, 4}, {1, 4}, {2, 5}, {3, 6}, {4, 7}, {1, 7}, {2, 8}, {3, 9}, {4, 10}, {1, 10}, {2, 11}, {3, 12}, {4,13}, {2.5, 7}}, Ticks -> {{1, 2, 3, 4}, None}, AxesStyle -> Thin, TicksStyle -> Directive[Black, Bold, 12], Mesh -> Full] I have thought using ListLinePlot command, but I don't know how to specify to the command to draw only selected lines between the dots. Do have any suggestions/hints on how to do that? Thank you. Answer One possibility would be to use Epilog with Line : ListPlot[ {{1, 1}, {2, 2}, {3, 3}, {4, 4}, {1, 4}, {2, 5}, {3, 6}, {4, 7}, {1, 7}, {2, 8}, {3, 9}, {4, 10}, {1, 10}, {2, 11}, {3, 12}, {4, 13}, {2.5, 7}}, Ticks -> {{1, 2, 3, 4}, None}, AxesStyle -> Thin, TicksStyle -> Directive[Black, Bold, 12], Mesh -> Full, Epilog -> { Line[ ...

equation solving - Invert and fit implicitly defined curve

I need to fit an implicitly defined curve. I thought I could get some data out of Solve , and then using FindFit . Therefore, I would like to find the relation the parametric curve defined by $F(x,y)=0$: Solve[-(1/2) + 1/2 (0.41202 BesselK[0, 0.1 Sqrt[x^2 + y^2]] + (0.101483 x BesselK[1, 0.1 Sqrt[x^2 + y^2]])/Sqrt[x^2 + y^2]) == 0, y] But I can't get an output: Solve was unable to solve the system with inexact coefficients or the system obtained by direct rationalization of inexact numbers present in the system. Since many of the methods used by Solve require exact input, providing Solve with an exact version of the system may help. >> Edit: In particular, I would like to fit the data coming from the curve with the expression of another curve, and not with a function $f(x)$. In particular, since this clearly looks like a cardioid , I would like it to fit to something like it. What other strategies could I try?

dynamic - How can I make a clickable ArrayPlot that returns input?

I would like to create a dynamic ArrayPlot so that the rectangles, when clicked, provide the input. Can I use ArrayPlot for this? Or is there something else I should have to use? Answer ArrayPlot is much more than just a simple array like Grid : it represents a ranged 2D dataset, and its visualization can be finetuned by options like DataReversed and DataRange . These features make it quite complicated to reproduce the same layout and order with Grid . Here I offer AnnotatedArrayPlot which comes in handy when your dataset is more than just a flat 2D array. The dynamic interface allows highlighting individual cells and possibly interacting with them. AnnotatedArrayPlot works the same way as ArrayPlot and accepts the same options plus Enabled , HighlightCoordinates , HighlightStyle and HighlightElementFunction . data = {{Missing["HasSomeMoreData"], GrayLevel[ 1], {RGBColor[0, 1, 1], RGBColor[0, 0, 1], GrayLevel[1]}, RGBColor[0, 1, 0]}, {GrayLevel[0], GrayLevel...