Skip to main content

programming - How to exit from the innermost enclosing pure function?


Here is what I tried to do:


Scan[Function[x,
Scan[Function[y,
If[y == 2, Return[]];

(* Do something useful *) Print[y]],
x]],
{{1, 2, 3}, {4, 5, 6}}]

My intention was that the Return[] exited from the innermost enclosing pure function (having the parameter y). Instead, it terminated execution of the innermost enclosing Scan and proceeded to the next iteration of the outermost Scan.


1 4 5 6

The documentation for Return says:



Return exits only the innermost construct in which it is invoked




I do not see why the innermost Scan is considered the innermost enclosing construct here. If, CompoundExpression and Function look like more inner constructs.




Question 1: Could you give a more clear explanation of what precisely Return does?




After I realized that Return does not do what I want here, I looked for workaround, and found several ones:


(a) I can restructure the body of the innermost pure function:


Scan[Function[x,
Scan[Function[y,
If[y != 2,

(* Do something useful *) Print[y]]
],
x]],
{{1, 2, 3}, {4, 5, 6}}]

In this case it looks straighforward, but becomes messy if I have more nested control flow operators and multiple points where I might need to exit.


(b) I can use infamous Label and Goto constructs:


Scan[Function[x,
Scan[Function[y,
Module[{exit},

If[y == 2, Goto[exit]];
(* Do something useful *) Print[y];
Label[exit];
]],
x]],
{{1, 2, 3}, {4, 5, 6}}]

(c) I can use Throw and Catch constructs:


Scan[Function[x,
Scan[Function[y,

Module[{exit},
Catch[
If[y == 2, Throw[Null, exit]];
(* Do something useful *) Print[y],
exit]]],
x]],
{{1, 2, 3}, {4, 5, 6}}]



Question 2: Which of them would you prefer? Or can you suggest a better way to do this?




Answer



You can specify the evaluation of which construct should be stopped by Return by providing the second argument (undocumented?). For example,


Scan[Function[x,
Module[{},
Print[x];
Return[$Failed, Module];
Print[-x]]],
{1, 2, 3}]

or



Scan[Function[x,
Print[x];
Return[$Failed, CompoundExpression];
Print[-x]],
{1, 2, 3}]

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

plotting - How to draw lines between specified dots on ListPlot?

I would like to create a plot where I have unconnected dots and some connected. So far, I have figured out how to draw the dots. My code is the following: ListPlot[{{1, 1}, {2, 2}, {3, 3}, {4, 4}, {1, 4}, {2, 5}, {3, 6}, {4, 7}, {1, 7}, {2, 8}, {3, 9}, {4, 10}, {1, 10}, {2, 11}, {3, 12}, {4,13}, {2.5, 7}}, Ticks -> {{1, 2, 3, 4}, None}, AxesStyle -> Thin, TicksStyle -> Directive[Black, Bold, 12], Mesh -> Full] I have thought using ListLinePlot command, but I don't know how to specify to the command to draw only selected lines between the dots. Do have any suggestions/hints on how to do that? Thank you. Answer One possibility would be to use Epilog with Line : ListPlot[ {{1, 1}, {2, 2}, {3, 3}, {4, 4}, {1, 4}, {2, 5}, {3, 6}, {4, 7}, {1, 7}, {2, 8}, {3, 9}, {4, 10}, {1, 10}, {2, 11}, {3, 12}, {4, 13}, {2.5, 7}}, Ticks -> {{1, 2, 3, 4}, None}, AxesStyle -> Thin, TicksStyle -> Directive[Black, Bold, 12], Mesh -> Full, Epilog -> { Line[ ...

equation solving - Invert and fit implicitly defined curve

I need to fit an implicitly defined curve. I thought I could get some data out of Solve , and then using FindFit . Therefore, I would like to find the relation the parametric curve defined by $F(x,y)=0$: Solve[-(1/2) + 1/2 (0.41202 BesselK[0, 0.1 Sqrt[x^2 + y^2]] + (0.101483 x BesselK[1, 0.1 Sqrt[x^2 + y^2]])/Sqrt[x^2 + y^2]) == 0, y] But I can't get an output: Solve was unable to solve the system with inexact coefficients or the system obtained by direct rationalization of inexact numbers present in the system. Since many of the methods used by Solve require exact input, providing Solve with an exact version of the system may help. >> Edit: In particular, I would like to fit the data coming from the curve with the expression of another curve, and not with a function $f(x)$. In particular, since this clearly looks like a cardioid , I would like it to fit to something like it. What other strategies could I try?

dynamic - How can I make a clickable ArrayPlot that returns input?

I would like to create a dynamic ArrayPlot so that the rectangles, when clicked, provide the input. Can I use ArrayPlot for this? Or is there something else I should have to use? Answer ArrayPlot is much more than just a simple array like Grid : it represents a ranged 2D dataset, and its visualization can be finetuned by options like DataReversed and DataRange . These features make it quite complicated to reproduce the same layout and order with Grid . Here I offer AnnotatedArrayPlot which comes in handy when your dataset is more than just a flat 2D array. The dynamic interface allows highlighting individual cells and possibly interacting with them. AnnotatedArrayPlot works the same way as ArrayPlot and accepts the same options plus Enabled , HighlightCoordinates , HighlightStyle and HighlightElementFunction . data = {{Missing["HasSomeMoreData"], GrayLevel[ 1], {RGBColor[0, 1, 1], RGBColor[0, 0, 1], GrayLevel[1]}, RGBColor[0, 1, 0]}, {GrayLevel[0], GrayLevel...