Skip to main content

modeling - Model fitting to noisy data with a custom minimization function


I'm looking into fitting some data with Mathematica. I've got my head around how NonlinearModelFit works (I've been using the Levenberg-Marquardt algorithm for some other work).


But my data this time is Poisson distributed, and I want to see if using the appropriate MLE for Poisson data is better for my scenario than nonlinear least squares fitting.


According to the paper Efficient Levenberg-Marquardt minimization of the maximum likelihood estimator for Poisson deviates, then the minimization for least-squares fitting, for data $y_{i}$ and the model $f_{i}$ is


$$ \chi^{2}=2\sum_{i=1}^{N} \frac{\left ( f_{i}-y_{i} \right )^{2}}{\sigma_{i}^{2}} $$


whereas for Poisson distributed data according to the paper, the minimization is


$$ \chi^{2}=2\sum_{i=1}^{N}f_{i}-y_{i}-2\sum_{i=1,y\neq 0}^{N}y_{i}\ln \left ( \frac{f_{i}}{y_i} \right ) $$


Is it possible to run a model-fitting in Mathematica using this minimization? And can a (modified?) Levenberg-Marquardt algorithm still be used?



Edit


There's an associated Nature Methods letter at http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/nmeth0510-338, with a revised version of the above link: http://www.nature.com/nmeth/journal/v7/n5/extref/nmeth0510-338-S1.pdf (courtesy of @belisarius)


Update #1


So here's the sort of data/model I'm looking to fit: the sum of two (or more) Gaussians, which may sometimes overlap as shown in the example below.


The amount of Poisson noise is deliberately significant as I'm dealing with very low counts. I've only posted a one-dimensional example here, but the data is in 2D, so there are more variables (x,y,means,heights,sigma...). I'm happy with using NonlinearModelFit to solve the problem, but I'm curious about dealing with the Poisson noise "more appropriately".


twoGaussianFunction[x_, A1_, sigma1_, mean1_, A2_, sigma2_, mean2_] := 
A1 Exp[-((x - mean1)^2/(2 sigma1^2))] +
A2 Exp[-((x - mean2)^2/(2 sigma2^2))];

cleandata = Table[twoGaussianFunction[i, 10, 10, 30, 10, 10, 60], {i, 0, 100}];


noisydata = RandomVariate[PoissonDistribution[0.5 #]] & /@ cleandata;
ListLinePlot[{cleandata, noisydata}, PlotRange -> Full]

enter image description here



Answer



To answer my own question, I went with the suggestion by Oleksandr R:



Here I'm suggesting that you just write it directly as a minimization problem. In 4700, Ajasja and I did exactly this to perform a least squares fit using a custom minimizer, but you can of course minimize anything you want. By the way, you may also like to see GeneralizedLinearModelFit, which can be used for fitting Poisson-distributed data directly.




I ended up using NMinimize for my problem, rather than FindMinimum, but writing it as a minimisation problem was the solution. I used my Gaussian model as $f_{i}$ to solve for the data $y_{i}$ this:


$$ \chi^{2}=2\sum_{i=1}^{N}f_{i}-y_{i}-2\sum_{i=1,y\neq 0}^{N}y_{i}\ln \left ( \frac{f_{i}}{y_i} \right ) $$


as intended, with decent results.


First, the data:


twoGaussianFunction[x_, A1_, sigma1_, mean1_, A2_, sigma2_, mean2_] :=
A1 Exp[-((x - mean1)^2/(2 sigma1^2))] +
A2 Exp[-((x - mean2)^2/(2 sigma2^2))];

cleandata =
Table[twoGaussianFunction[i, 2, 3, 20, 2, 3, 30], {i, 0, 50}];


noisydata = RandomVariate[PoissonDistribution[2 #]]/2 & /@ cleandata;

ListLinePlot[{cleandata, noisydata}, PlotRange -> Full, PlotLegends -> {"Original", "Noisy"}]

enter image description here


Then the minimisation function:


minimizeFunction[A1guess_, sigma1guess_, mean1guess_, A2guess_, 
sigma2guess_, mean2guess_] :=
2 Sum[twoGaussianFunction[i, A1guess, sigma1guess, mean1guess,

A2guess, sigma2guess, mean2guess] - noisydata[[i]], {i, 50}] -
2 Sum[If[noisydata[[i]] == 0., 0,noisydata[[i]]*
Log[twoGaussianFunction[i, A1guess, sigma1guess, mean1guess,
A2guess, sigma2guess, mean2guess]/noisydata[[i]]]], {i,50}];

Followed by NMinimize:


bestfit = 
NMinimize[{minimizeFunction[a, b, c, d, e, f],
a > 0 && b > 0 && c > 0 && d > 0 && e > 0 && f > 0},
{{a, 1, 3},

{b, 2, 4},
{c, 15, 25},
{d, 1, 3},
{e, 2, 4},
{f, 25, 35}},
Method -> "NelderMead",
MaxIterations -> 100
];

cleaneddata =

Table[twoGaussianFunction[i, a /. Last[bestfit], b /. Last[bestfit],
c /. Last[bestfit], d /. Last[bestfit], e /. Last[bestfit],
f /. Last[bestfit]], {i, 1, 50}];

ListLinePlot[{cleandata, cleaneddata}, PlotRange -> Full,
PlotLegends -> {"Original", "Fitted"}]

enter image description here


There's probably room for improvement in the way I've implemented it - certainly for speed, perhaps using Parallelize in the minimisation function? (That was my first thought). I've still got to test it fully against the standard least-squares method though...


Comments

Popular posts from this blog

plotting - How to draw lines between specified dots on ListPlot?

I would like to create a plot where I have unconnected dots and some connected. So far, I have figured out how to draw the dots. My code is the following: ListPlot[{{1, 1}, {2, 2}, {3, 3}, {4, 4}, {1, 4}, {2, 5}, {3, 6}, {4, 7}, {1, 7}, {2, 8}, {3, 9}, {4, 10}, {1, 10}, {2, 11}, {3, 12}, {4,13}, {2.5, 7}}, Ticks -> {{1, 2, 3, 4}, None}, AxesStyle -> Thin, TicksStyle -> Directive[Black, Bold, 12], Mesh -> Full] I have thought using ListLinePlot command, but I don't know how to specify to the command to draw only selected lines between the dots. Do have any suggestions/hints on how to do that? Thank you. Answer One possibility would be to use Epilog with Line : ListPlot[ {{1, 1}, {2, 2}, {3, 3}, {4, 4}, {1, 4}, {2, 5}, {3, 6}, {4, 7}, {1, 7}, {2, 8}, {3, 9}, {4, 10}, {1, 10}, {2, 11}, {3, 12}, {4, 13}, {2.5, 7}}, Ticks -> {{1, 2, 3, 4}, None}, AxesStyle -> Thin, TicksStyle -> Directive[Black, Bold, 12], Mesh -> Full, Epilog -> { Line[ ...

equation solving - Invert and fit implicitly defined curve

I need to fit an implicitly defined curve. I thought I could get some data out of Solve , and then using FindFit . Therefore, I would like to find the relation the parametric curve defined by $F(x,y)=0$: Solve[-(1/2) + 1/2 (0.41202 BesselK[0, 0.1 Sqrt[x^2 + y^2]] + (0.101483 x BesselK[1, 0.1 Sqrt[x^2 + y^2]])/Sqrt[x^2 + y^2]) == 0, y] But I can't get an output: Solve was unable to solve the system with inexact coefficients or the system obtained by direct rationalization of inexact numbers present in the system. Since many of the methods used by Solve require exact input, providing Solve with an exact version of the system may help. >> Edit: In particular, I would like to fit the data coming from the curve with the expression of another curve, and not with a function $f(x)$. In particular, since this clearly looks like a cardioid , I would like it to fit to something like it. What other strategies could I try?

dynamic - How can I make a clickable ArrayPlot that returns input?

I would like to create a dynamic ArrayPlot so that the rectangles, when clicked, provide the input. Can I use ArrayPlot for this? Or is there something else I should have to use? Answer ArrayPlot is much more than just a simple array like Grid : it represents a ranged 2D dataset, and its visualization can be finetuned by options like DataReversed and DataRange . These features make it quite complicated to reproduce the same layout and order with Grid . Here I offer AnnotatedArrayPlot which comes in handy when your dataset is more than just a flat 2D array. The dynamic interface allows highlighting individual cells and possibly interacting with them. AnnotatedArrayPlot works the same way as ArrayPlot and accepts the same options plus Enabled , HighlightCoordinates , HighlightStyle and HighlightElementFunction . data = {{Missing["HasSomeMoreData"], GrayLevel[ 1], {RGBColor[0, 1, 1], RGBColor[0, 0, 1], GrayLevel[1]}, RGBColor[0, 1, 0]}, {GrayLevel[0], GrayLevel...