Skip to main content

modeling - Model fitting to noisy data with a custom minimization function


I'm looking into fitting some data with Mathematica. I've got my head around how NonlinearModelFit works (I've been using the Levenberg-Marquardt algorithm for some other work).


But my data this time is Poisson distributed, and I want to see if using the appropriate MLE for Poisson data is better for my scenario than nonlinear least squares fitting.


According to the paper Efficient Levenberg-Marquardt minimization of the maximum likelihood estimator for Poisson deviates, then the minimization for least-squares fitting, for data $y_{i}$ and the model $f_{i}$ is


$$ \chi^{2}=2\sum_{i=1}^{N} \frac{\left ( f_{i}-y_{i} \right )^{2}}{\sigma_{i}^{2}} $$


whereas for Poisson distributed data according to the paper, the minimization is


$$ \chi^{2}=2\sum_{i=1}^{N}f_{i}-y_{i}-2\sum_{i=1,y\neq 0}^{N}y_{i}\ln \left ( \frac{f_{i}}{y_i} \right ) $$


Is it possible to run a model-fitting in Mathematica using this minimization? And can a (modified?) Levenberg-Marquardt algorithm still be used?



Edit


There's an associated Nature Methods letter at http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/nmeth0510-338, with a revised version of the above link: http://www.nature.com/nmeth/journal/v7/n5/extref/nmeth0510-338-S1.pdf (courtesy of @belisarius)


Update #1


So here's the sort of data/model I'm looking to fit: the sum of two (or more) Gaussians, which may sometimes overlap as shown in the example below.


The amount of Poisson noise is deliberately significant as I'm dealing with very low counts. I've only posted a one-dimensional example here, but the data is in 2D, so there are more variables (x,y,means,heights,sigma...). I'm happy with using NonlinearModelFit to solve the problem, but I'm curious about dealing with the Poisson noise "more appropriately".


twoGaussianFunction[x_, A1_, sigma1_, mean1_, A2_, sigma2_, mean2_] := 
A1 Exp[-((x - mean1)^2/(2 sigma1^2))] +
A2 Exp[-((x - mean2)^2/(2 sigma2^2))];

cleandata = Table[twoGaussianFunction[i, 10, 10, 30, 10, 10, 60], {i, 0, 100}];


noisydata = RandomVariate[PoissonDistribution[0.5 #]] & /@ cleandata;
ListLinePlot[{cleandata, noisydata}, PlotRange -> Full]

enter image description here



Answer



To answer my own question, I went with the suggestion by Oleksandr R:



Here I'm suggesting that you just write it directly as a minimization problem. In 4700, Ajasja and I did exactly this to perform a least squares fit using a custom minimizer, but you can of course minimize anything you want. By the way, you may also like to see GeneralizedLinearModelFit, which can be used for fitting Poisson-distributed data directly.




I ended up using NMinimize for my problem, rather than FindMinimum, but writing it as a minimisation problem was the solution. I used my Gaussian model as $f_{i}$ to solve for the data $y_{i}$ this:


$$ \chi^{2}=2\sum_{i=1}^{N}f_{i}-y_{i}-2\sum_{i=1,y\neq 0}^{N}y_{i}\ln \left ( \frac{f_{i}}{y_i} \right ) $$


as intended, with decent results.


First, the data:


twoGaussianFunction[x_, A1_, sigma1_, mean1_, A2_, sigma2_, mean2_] :=
A1 Exp[-((x - mean1)^2/(2 sigma1^2))] +
A2 Exp[-((x - mean2)^2/(2 sigma2^2))];

cleandata =
Table[twoGaussianFunction[i, 2, 3, 20, 2, 3, 30], {i, 0, 50}];


noisydata = RandomVariate[PoissonDistribution[2 #]]/2 & /@ cleandata;

ListLinePlot[{cleandata, noisydata}, PlotRange -> Full, PlotLegends -> {"Original", "Noisy"}]

enter image description here


Then the minimisation function:


minimizeFunction[A1guess_, sigma1guess_, mean1guess_, A2guess_, 
sigma2guess_, mean2guess_] :=
2 Sum[twoGaussianFunction[i, A1guess, sigma1guess, mean1guess,

A2guess, sigma2guess, mean2guess] - noisydata[[i]], {i, 50}] -
2 Sum[If[noisydata[[i]] == 0., 0,noisydata[[i]]*
Log[twoGaussianFunction[i, A1guess, sigma1guess, mean1guess,
A2guess, sigma2guess, mean2guess]/noisydata[[i]]]], {i,50}];

Followed by NMinimize:


bestfit = 
NMinimize[{minimizeFunction[a, b, c, d, e, f],
a > 0 && b > 0 && c > 0 && d > 0 && e > 0 && f > 0},
{{a, 1, 3},

{b, 2, 4},
{c, 15, 25},
{d, 1, 3},
{e, 2, 4},
{f, 25, 35}},
Method -> "NelderMead",
MaxIterations -> 100
];

cleaneddata =

Table[twoGaussianFunction[i, a /. Last[bestfit], b /. Last[bestfit],
c /. Last[bestfit], d /. Last[bestfit], e /. Last[bestfit],
f /. Last[bestfit]], {i, 1, 50}];

ListLinePlot[{cleandata, cleaneddata}, PlotRange -> Full,
PlotLegends -> {"Original", "Fitted"}]

enter image description here


There's probably room for improvement in the way I've implemented it - certainly for speed, perhaps using Parallelize in the minimisation function? (That was my first thought). I've still got to test it fully against the standard least-squares method though...


Comments

Popular posts from this blog

plotting - Plot 4D data with color as 4th dimension

I have a list of 4D data (x position, y position, amplitude, wavelength). I want to plot x, y, and amplitude on a 3D plot and have the color of the points correspond to the wavelength. I have seen many examples using functions to define color but my wavelength cannot be expressed by an analytic function. Is there a simple way to do this? Answer Here a another possible way to visualize 4D data: data = Flatten[Table[{x, y, x^2 + y^2, Sin[x - y]}, {x, -Pi, Pi,Pi/10}, {y,-Pi,Pi, Pi/10}], 1]; You can use the function Point along with VertexColors . Now the points are places using the first three elements and the color is determined by the fourth. In this case I used Hue, but you can use whatever you prefer. Graphics3D[ Point[data[[All, 1 ;; 3]], VertexColors -> Hue /@ data[[All, 4]]], Axes -> True, BoxRatios -> {1, 1, 1/GoldenRatio}]

plotting - Filling between two spheres in SphericalPlot3D

Manipulate[ SphericalPlot3D[{1, 2 - n}, {θ, 0, Pi}, {ϕ, 0, 1.5 Pi}, Mesh -> None, PlotPoints -> 15, PlotRange -> {-2.2, 2.2}], {n, 0, 1}] I cant' seem to be able to make a filling between two spheres. I've already tried the obvious Filling -> {1 -> {2}} but Mathematica doesn't seem to like that option. Is there any easy way around this or ... Answer There is no built-in filling in SphericalPlot3D . One option is to use ParametricPlot3D to draw the surfaces between the two shells: Manipulate[ Show[SphericalPlot3D[{1, 2 - n}, {θ, 0, Pi}, {ϕ, 0, 1.5 Pi}, PlotPoints -> 15, PlotRange -> {-2.2, 2.2}], ParametricPlot3D[{ r {Sin[t] Cos[1.5 Pi], Sin[t] Sin[1.5 Pi], Cos[t]}, r {Sin[t] Cos[0 Pi], Sin[t] Sin[0 Pi], Cos[t]}}, {r, 1, 2 - n}, {t, 0, Pi}, PlotStyle -> Yellow, Mesh -> {2, 15}]], {n, 0, 1}]

plotting - Mathematica: 3D plot based on combined 2D graphs

I have several sigmoidal fits to 3 different datasets, with mean fit predictions plus the 95% confidence limits (not symmetrical around the mean) and the actual data. I would now like to show these different 2D plots projected in 3D as in but then using proper perspective. In the link here they give some solutions to combine the plots using isometric perspective, but I would like to use proper 3 point perspective. Any thoughts? Also any way to show the mean points per time point for each series plus or minus the standard error on the mean would be cool too, either using points+vertical bars, or using spheres plus tubes. Below are some test data and the fit function I am using. Note that I am working on a logit(proportion) scale and that the final vertical scale is Log10(percentage). (* some test data *) data = Table[Null, {i, 4}]; data[[1]] = {{1, -5.8}, {2, -5.4}, {3, -0.8}, {4, -0.2}, {5, 4.6}, {1, -6.4}, {2, -5.6}, {3, -0.7}, {4, 0.04}, {5, 1.0}, {1, -6.8}, {2, -4.7}, {3, -1....