Skip to main content

control systems - Strange output of a simple statespace model



The output of statespace model seems strange.


In the follwing code, the odes are governing equations of a three floors structure, and the output are three accelerations of floors.


If I understand statespace correctly, the output is simply obtained by using C matrix and D matrix as shown in the following code.


However, the result given by statespace model is wrong.


Am I using StateSpaceModel in a wrong way?


I am not sure if I state my problem clearly, sorry for my poor English.


Thanks.


 Remove["Global`*"] // Quiet;
\[DoubleStruckCapitalM] = {{m1, 0, 0}, {0, m2, 0}, {0, 0, m3}};
\[DoubleStruckCapitalK] = {{k11, k12, k13}, {k21, k22, k23}, {k31, k32, k33}};

\[DoubleStruckCapitalC] = {{c11, c12, c13}, {c21, c22, c23}, {c31, c32, c33}};
\[DoubleStruckCapitalB]\[DoubleStruckS] = {{1, -1, 0}, {0, 1, -1}, {0, 0, 1}};
\[DoubleStruckX] = {{x1[t]}, {x2[t]}, {x3[t]}};
uvec = {{u1[t]}, {u2[t]}, {u3[t]}};
\[CapitalLambda] = {{1}, {1}, {1}};
lhs = \[DoubleStruckCapitalM].D[\[DoubleStruckX], {t,2}] + \[DoubleStruckCapitalC].D[\[DoubleStruckX],t] + \[DoubleStruckCapitalK].\[DoubleStruckX] // Flatten;
rhs = \[DoubleStruckCapitalB]\[DoubleStruckS].uvec - \[DoubleStruckCapitalM].\[CapitalLambda] ddxg[t] // Flatten;
eq = lhs == rhs // Thread;

\[DoubleStruckZ] = {x1[t], x2[t], x3[t], x1'[t], x2'[t], x3'[t]};

\[DoubleStruckY] = {x1''[t], x2''[t], x3''[t]};
\[DoubleStruckU] = {u1[t], u2[t], u3[t], ddxg[t]};
ss = StateSpaceModel[eq, \[DoubleStruckZ], \[DoubleStruckU], \[DoubleStruckY], t];
{AA, BB, CC, DD} = Normal[ss];
ddxSS = CC.\[DoubleStruckZ] + DD.\[DoubleStruckU] // Flatten;
ddxEQ = {x1''[t], x2''[t], x3''[t]} /. Solve[eq, {x1''[t], x2''[t], x3''[t]}] // Flatten;
ddxSS - ddxEQ // Simplify(*this should be {0,0,0}*)

code picture



Answer




You can verify that the result from StateSpaceModel is correct by manually computing the transfer function and comparing it to the transfer function of the result.


With[{vars = LaplaceTransform[#[t], t, s] & /@ {x1, x2, x3}},
s^2 D[vars /. Solve[LaplaceTransform[eq, t, s], vars][[1]],
{LaplaceTransform[#[t], t, s] & /@ {u1, u2, u3, ddxg}}]] - TransferFunctionModel[ss][s]//
AllTrue[#, PossibleZeroQ, 2] &


True



The mistake in your verification is that you are assuming that the states of ss are also $\mathbf{z}$. You have a descriptor system that has been converted to a standard state-space form and the original states are lost.



To preserve the original structure set the option DescriptorStateSpace to True. Now you can see that eq appears in the last state equations and the states of the descriptor state-space representation are $\left\{\text{x1}(t),\text{x1}'(t),\text{x1}''(t),\text{x2}(t),\text{x2}'(t),\text{x2}''(t ),\text{x3}(t),\text{x3}'(t),\text{x3}''(t)\right\}$.


StateSpaceModel[eq, \[DoubleStruckZ], \[DoubleStruckU], \[DoubleStruckY], t, DescriptorStateSpace -> True]


>



eq // TableForm


enter image description here




Comments

Popular posts from this blog

plotting - How to draw lines between specified dots on ListPlot?

I would like to create a plot where I have unconnected dots and some connected. So far, I have figured out how to draw the dots. My code is the following: ListPlot[{{1, 1}, {2, 2}, {3, 3}, {4, 4}, {1, 4}, {2, 5}, {3, 6}, {4, 7}, {1, 7}, {2, 8}, {3, 9}, {4, 10}, {1, 10}, {2, 11}, {3, 12}, {4,13}, {2.5, 7}}, Ticks -> {{1, 2, 3, 4}, None}, AxesStyle -> Thin, TicksStyle -> Directive[Black, Bold, 12], Mesh -> Full] I have thought using ListLinePlot command, but I don't know how to specify to the command to draw only selected lines between the dots. Do have any suggestions/hints on how to do that? Thank you. Answer One possibility would be to use Epilog with Line : ListPlot[ {{1, 1}, {2, 2}, {3, 3}, {4, 4}, {1, 4}, {2, 5}, {3, 6}, {4, 7}, {1, 7}, {2, 8}, {3, 9}, {4, 10}, {1, 10}, {2, 11}, {3, 12}, {4, 13}, {2.5, 7}}, Ticks -> {{1, 2, 3, 4}, None}, AxesStyle -> Thin, TicksStyle -> Directive[Black, Bold, 12], Mesh -> Full, Epilog -> { Line[ ...

equation solving - Invert and fit implicitly defined curve

I need to fit an implicitly defined curve. I thought I could get some data out of Solve , and then using FindFit . Therefore, I would like to find the relation the parametric curve defined by $F(x,y)=0$: Solve[-(1/2) + 1/2 (0.41202 BesselK[0, 0.1 Sqrt[x^2 + y^2]] + (0.101483 x BesselK[1, 0.1 Sqrt[x^2 + y^2]])/Sqrt[x^2 + y^2]) == 0, y] But I can't get an output: Solve was unable to solve the system with inexact coefficients or the system obtained by direct rationalization of inexact numbers present in the system. Since many of the methods used by Solve require exact input, providing Solve with an exact version of the system may help. >> Edit: In particular, I would like to fit the data coming from the curve with the expression of another curve, and not with a function $f(x)$. In particular, since this clearly looks like a cardioid , I would like it to fit to something like it. What other strategies could I try?

dynamic - How can I make a clickable ArrayPlot that returns input?

I would like to create a dynamic ArrayPlot so that the rectangles, when clicked, provide the input. Can I use ArrayPlot for this? Or is there something else I should have to use? Answer ArrayPlot is much more than just a simple array like Grid : it represents a ranged 2D dataset, and its visualization can be finetuned by options like DataReversed and DataRange . These features make it quite complicated to reproduce the same layout and order with Grid . Here I offer AnnotatedArrayPlot which comes in handy when your dataset is more than just a flat 2D array. The dynamic interface allows highlighting individual cells and possibly interacting with them. AnnotatedArrayPlot works the same way as ArrayPlot and accepts the same options plus Enabled , HighlightCoordinates , HighlightStyle and HighlightElementFunction . data = {{Missing["HasSomeMoreData"], GrayLevel[ 1], {RGBColor[0, 1, 1], RGBColor[0, 0, 1], GrayLevel[1]}, RGBColor[0, 1, 0]}, {GrayLevel[0], GrayLevel...