Skip to main content

control systems - Strange output of a simple statespace model



The output of statespace model seems strange.


In the follwing code, the odes are governing equations of a three floors structure, and the output are three accelerations of floors.


If I understand statespace correctly, the output is simply obtained by using C matrix and D matrix as shown in the following code.


However, the result given by statespace model is wrong.


Am I using StateSpaceModel in a wrong way?


I am not sure if I state my problem clearly, sorry for my poor English.


Thanks.


 Remove["Global`*"] // Quiet;
\[DoubleStruckCapitalM] = {{m1, 0, 0}, {0, m2, 0}, {0, 0, m3}};
\[DoubleStruckCapitalK] = {{k11, k12, k13}, {k21, k22, k23}, {k31, k32, k33}};

\[DoubleStruckCapitalC] = {{c11, c12, c13}, {c21, c22, c23}, {c31, c32, c33}};
\[DoubleStruckCapitalB]\[DoubleStruckS] = {{1, -1, 0}, {0, 1, -1}, {0, 0, 1}};
\[DoubleStruckX] = {{x1[t]}, {x2[t]}, {x3[t]}};
uvec = {{u1[t]}, {u2[t]}, {u3[t]}};
\[CapitalLambda] = {{1}, {1}, {1}};
lhs = \[DoubleStruckCapitalM].D[\[DoubleStruckX], {t,2}] + \[DoubleStruckCapitalC].D[\[DoubleStruckX],t] + \[DoubleStruckCapitalK].\[DoubleStruckX] // Flatten;
rhs = \[DoubleStruckCapitalB]\[DoubleStruckS].uvec - \[DoubleStruckCapitalM].\[CapitalLambda] ddxg[t] // Flatten;
eq = lhs == rhs // Thread;

\[DoubleStruckZ] = {x1[t], x2[t], x3[t], x1'[t], x2'[t], x3'[t]};

\[DoubleStruckY] = {x1''[t], x2''[t], x3''[t]};
\[DoubleStruckU] = {u1[t], u2[t], u3[t], ddxg[t]};
ss = StateSpaceModel[eq, \[DoubleStruckZ], \[DoubleStruckU], \[DoubleStruckY], t];
{AA, BB, CC, DD} = Normal[ss];
ddxSS = CC.\[DoubleStruckZ] + DD.\[DoubleStruckU] // Flatten;
ddxEQ = {x1''[t], x2''[t], x3''[t]} /. Solve[eq, {x1''[t], x2''[t], x3''[t]}] // Flatten;
ddxSS - ddxEQ // Simplify(*this should be {0,0,0}*)

code picture



Answer




You can verify that the result from StateSpaceModel is correct by manually computing the transfer function and comparing it to the transfer function of the result.


With[{vars = LaplaceTransform[#[t], t, s] & /@ {x1, x2, x3}},
s^2 D[vars /. Solve[LaplaceTransform[eq, t, s], vars][[1]],
{LaplaceTransform[#[t], t, s] & /@ {u1, u2, u3, ddxg}}]] - TransferFunctionModel[ss][s]//
AllTrue[#, PossibleZeroQ, 2] &


True



The mistake in your verification is that you are assuming that the states of ss are also $\mathbf{z}$. You have a descriptor system that has been converted to a standard state-space form and the original states are lost.



To preserve the original structure set the option DescriptorStateSpace to True. Now you can see that eq appears in the last state equations and the states of the descriptor state-space representation are $\left\{\text{x1}(t),\text{x1}'(t),\text{x1}''(t),\text{x2}(t),\text{x2}'(t),\text{x2}''(t ),\text{x3}(t),\text{x3}'(t),\text{x3}''(t)\right\}$.


StateSpaceModel[eq, \[DoubleStruckZ], \[DoubleStruckU], \[DoubleStruckY], t, DescriptorStateSpace -> True]


>



eq // TableForm


enter image description here




Comments

Popular posts from this blog

plotting - How to draw lines between specified dots on ListPlot?

I would like to create a plot where I have unconnected dots and some connected. So far, I have figured out how to draw the dots. My code is the following: ListPlot[{{1, 1}, {2, 2}, {3, 3}, {4, 4}, {1, 4}, {2, 5}, {3, 6}, {4, 7}, {1, 7}, {2, 8}, {3, 9}, {4, 10}, {1, 10}, {2, 11}, {3, 12}, {4,13}, {2.5, 7}}, Ticks -> {{1, 2, 3, 4}, None}, AxesStyle -> Thin, TicksStyle -> Directive[Black, Bold, 12], Mesh -> Full] I have thought using ListLinePlot command, but I don't know how to specify to the command to draw only selected lines between the dots. Do have any suggestions/hints on how to do that? Thank you. Answer One possibility would be to use Epilog with Line : ListPlot[ {{1, 1}, {2, 2}, {3, 3}, {4, 4}, {1, 4}, {2, 5}, {3, 6}, {4, 7}, {1, 7}, {2, 8}, {3, 9}, {4, 10}, {1, 10}, {2, 11}, {3, 12}, {4, 13}, {2.5, 7}}, Ticks -> {{1, 2, 3, 4}, None}, AxesStyle -> Thin, TicksStyle -> Directive[Black, Bold, 12], Mesh -> Full, Epilog -> { Line[ ...

dynamic - How can I make a clickable ArrayPlot that returns input?

I would like to create a dynamic ArrayPlot so that the rectangles, when clicked, provide the input. Can I use ArrayPlot for this? Or is there something else I should have to use? Answer ArrayPlot is much more than just a simple array like Grid : it represents a ranged 2D dataset, and its visualization can be finetuned by options like DataReversed and DataRange . These features make it quite complicated to reproduce the same layout and order with Grid . Here I offer AnnotatedArrayPlot which comes in handy when your dataset is more than just a flat 2D array. The dynamic interface allows highlighting individual cells and possibly interacting with them. AnnotatedArrayPlot works the same way as ArrayPlot and accepts the same options plus Enabled , HighlightCoordinates , HighlightStyle and HighlightElementFunction . data = {{Missing["HasSomeMoreData"], GrayLevel[ 1], {RGBColor[0, 1, 1], RGBColor[0, 0, 1], GrayLevel[1]}, RGBColor[0, 1, 0]}, {GrayLevel[0], GrayLevel...

Is there a way to do conditional matrix loop using 'continue'

I have the following: n = 3; m = 5; ww = RandomReal[{0, 0.1}, {n, n}]; uu = RandomReal[{0, 1}, {m, n}]; pp = RandomReal[{0, 1}, {n, n}]; ss = RandomInteger[{0, 5}, {m, n}]; Grid[{{"ww", "uu", "pp", "ss"}, {ww // TableForm, uu // TableForm, pp // TableForm, ss // TableForm}}, Spacings -> {5, 2}, Dividers -> All] where I would like to look at every element of matrix ss and produce a matrix tt , with zeroes at the locations in ss which have zeroes, and in all other positions do the following: tt = (-1/Subscript[ww, m]) Log[(1 - uu)/(Subscript[pp, m - 1])], where Subscript[ww, m] is the value at index of ww matrix and where Subscript[pp, m - 1] is the value at index-1 of pp matrix. So for example if the first value ever read from matrix ss happens to be 2, then value taken from matrix ww would be from the row 2, but from pp would be from row 1. Also how to tell difference between a 0 as a valid value from within the matrix elemen...