Skip to main content

graphs and networks - Getting cell edges from a picture


I would like to write a program that, given a picture of an epithelium (2D cell array), for example



enter image description here


automatically detects the cell edges and returns the corresponding lattice. Illustratively,


enter image description here


Naturally, if such program is based on contrast and colour detection, the original picture might need to be edited so that cell membrane contrasts enough with cell interior. Furthermore, unlike the above sketch, I would need such polygons to be convex (maybe too tricky?).


Now, I know this might be a lot to ask, so as a first step I would like to know whether there are already inbuilt functions or packages that might help doing this type of image processing (maybe some neural network implementation?). Once edges are obtained as Line-type objects, for example, building the graph or mesh from them shouldn't be that hard.


Just as a reference, I would be interested in building something along the lines of Packing Analyzer.


Edit: Following Lukas Lang's answer below, it seems the presented code doesn't recognise images with "more evident" edges, like the image


enter image description here


or even a similar picture to the first


enter image description here



Image sources: 1, 2 and 3. Might have to do with the way the image is processed via preprocImg or the mergedCells function. Any ideas?



Answer



Here is an approach based on WatershedComponents and MorphologicalGraph. Some of the steps feel a bit over-complicated, so feel free to point out any improvements.


The end result is a Graph expression describing the cell walls:


enter image description here


Here is the code with some intermediate results:


Get the original image:


img = Import["https://i.stack.imgur.com/elbTN.png"]

enter image description here



Do some blurring & sharpening, followed by an extraction of the red color channel. The goal of this step is to get an image with the cell walls as visible as possible.


preprocImg = First@ColorSeparate@Sharpen[#, 5] &@Blur[img, 3]

enter image description here


The next step is the call to WatershedComponents. Unfortunately, I didn't manage to preprocess the image enough to get perfect results, so we have to postprocess them instead.


wsComponents = 
WatershedComponents[preprocImg, Method -> {"MinimumSaliency", .65}];
wsComponents // Colorize

enter image description here



As can be seen, some of the cells are split into multiple pieces. The idea of the next step is to exploit the fact that the cells are all convex. First, we compute the convex hulls of the individual components:


cellMeshes = Map[
ConvexHullMesh@*
Map[{#2, -#} & // Apply](*
convert from image coordinates to plot coordinates *)
]@
Values@GroupBy[First -> Last]@(* group positions by component *)
Catenate@
MapIndexed[List,
wsComponents, {2}](* add position to component indices *);

Show@cellMeshes

enter image description here


We can now merge those that overlap by some amount (I compare to the "reduced area", in analogy to the reduced mass from physics):


mergedCells =
Graph[(* create graph where overlapping cells are connected *)
cellMeshes,
If[(* check whether overlap is big enough *)
Area@RegionIntersection@##*(1/Area@# + 1/Area@#2) > 0.35,
UndirectedEdge@##,

Nothing
] & @@@ Subsets[cellMeshes, {2}](* look at all cell pairs *)
] // Map[RegionUnion]@*
ConnectedComponents(* merge overlapping cells *);
Show@mergedCells

enter image description here


Now we are almost done - we convert the result back into an image, so that we can finally use MorphologicalGraph. For this, we apply some styling to the regions and rasterize:


procImg = Region[(* apply cell styling *)
#,

BaseStyle -> {EdgeForm@{White, Thick}, FaceForm@Black}
] & /@ mergedCells //
Show[#, PlotRangePadding -> 0, ImageMargins -> 0] & //(*
remove image border *)
Rasterize[#, ImageSize -> ImageDimensions@img] & //
Binarize //
ImagePad[ImageCrop@#, BorderDimensions@#] &(* make border black *)

enter image description here


Now we are at the finish line - a call to MorphologicalGraph and some nice presentation is all that's needed now:



MorphologicalGraph[
#,
EdgeStyle -> Directive[Thick, Red],
VertexStyle -> Blue,
VertexSize -> 2,
Prolog -> Inset[img, {0, 0}, {0, 0}, ImageDimensions@img]
] &@procImg

enter image description here


Notes



The key difficulty with this approach is to get preprocImg to be sufficiently "nice" for WatershedComponents to work. For the three images in the question, the following three approaches seem to work:


img = Import["https://i.stack.imgur.com/elbTN.png"]
preprocImg = First@ColorSeparate@Sharpen[#, 5] &@Blur[img, 3]
wsComponents = WatershedComponents[preprocImg, Method -> {"MinimumSaliency", 0.65}];
Row@{img, preprocImg, wsComponents // Colorize}

enter image description here


img = Import["https://i.stack.imgur.com/5RPz5.png"]
preprocImg = ColorNegate@First@ColorSeparate@Sharpen[#, 5] &@Blur[img, 3]
wsComponents = WatershedComponents[preprocImg, Method -> {"MinimumSaliency", 0.65}];

Row@{img, preprocImg, wsComponents // Colorize}

enter image description here


img = Import["https://i.stack.imgur.com/dgz9H.jpg"]
preprocImg =
ColorNegate[20 (#2 - #)*#3] & @@ ColorSeparate@Sharpen[#, 3] &@
Blur[img, 10]
wsComponents = WatershedComponents[preprocImg, Method -> {"MinimumSaliency", 0.45}];

enter image description here




  • As can be seen, each image requires a different approach - unfortunately I couldn't get it to work with a single one yet

  • In the end preprocImg needs to be bright between the cells and dark inside the cells. For the first and second image, this is pretty straightforward using the brightness of the image. (Note that the image needs to be inverted in the second case) For the third image, I had to do some math on the color channels to get a meaningful result.

  • The blur radius is increased in the third case to smooth out the bright and dark areas.

  • The "MinimumSaliency" parameter of WatershedComponents can be used to control the number of cell "candidates" in wscomponents - the best value will depend on the contrast of preprocimg among other things.

  • The components in wscomponents need to resolve the individual cells - in the remaining steps, components are only merged, never split. Too many components on the other hand make the post-processing slow and unreliable (since the overlap criterion doesn't work anymore)


Comments

Popular posts from this blog

plotting - How to draw lines between specified dots on ListPlot?

I would like to create a plot where I have unconnected dots and some connected. So far, I have figured out how to draw the dots. My code is the following: ListPlot[{{1, 1}, {2, 2}, {3, 3}, {4, 4}, {1, 4}, {2, 5}, {3, 6}, {4, 7}, {1, 7}, {2, 8}, {3, 9}, {4, 10}, {1, 10}, {2, 11}, {3, 12}, {4,13}, {2.5, 7}}, Ticks -> {{1, 2, 3, 4}, None}, AxesStyle -> Thin, TicksStyle -> Directive[Black, Bold, 12], Mesh -> Full] I have thought using ListLinePlot command, but I don't know how to specify to the command to draw only selected lines between the dots. Do have any suggestions/hints on how to do that? Thank you. Answer One possibility would be to use Epilog with Line : ListPlot[ {{1, 1}, {2, 2}, {3, 3}, {4, 4}, {1, 4}, {2, 5}, {3, 6}, {4, 7}, {1, 7}, {2, 8}, {3, 9}, {4, 10}, {1, 10}, {2, 11}, {3, 12}, {4, 13}, {2.5, 7}}, Ticks -> {{1, 2, 3, 4}, None}, AxesStyle -> Thin, TicksStyle -> Directive[Black, Bold, 12], Mesh -> Full, Epilog -> { Line[ ...

equation solving - Invert and fit implicitly defined curve

I need to fit an implicitly defined curve. I thought I could get some data out of Solve , and then using FindFit . Therefore, I would like to find the relation the parametric curve defined by $F(x,y)=0$: Solve[-(1/2) + 1/2 (0.41202 BesselK[0, 0.1 Sqrt[x^2 + y^2]] + (0.101483 x BesselK[1, 0.1 Sqrt[x^2 + y^2]])/Sqrt[x^2 + y^2]) == 0, y] But I can't get an output: Solve was unable to solve the system with inexact coefficients or the system obtained by direct rationalization of inexact numbers present in the system. Since many of the methods used by Solve require exact input, providing Solve with an exact version of the system may help. >> Edit: In particular, I would like to fit the data coming from the curve with the expression of another curve, and not with a function $f(x)$. In particular, since this clearly looks like a cardioid , I would like it to fit to something like it. What other strategies could I try?

dynamic - How can I make a clickable ArrayPlot that returns input?

I would like to create a dynamic ArrayPlot so that the rectangles, when clicked, provide the input. Can I use ArrayPlot for this? Or is there something else I should have to use? Answer ArrayPlot is much more than just a simple array like Grid : it represents a ranged 2D dataset, and its visualization can be finetuned by options like DataReversed and DataRange . These features make it quite complicated to reproduce the same layout and order with Grid . Here I offer AnnotatedArrayPlot which comes in handy when your dataset is more than just a flat 2D array. The dynamic interface allows highlighting individual cells and possibly interacting with them. AnnotatedArrayPlot works the same way as ArrayPlot and accepts the same options plus Enabled , HighlightCoordinates , HighlightStyle and HighlightElementFunction . data = {{Missing["HasSomeMoreData"], GrayLevel[ 1], {RGBColor[0, 1, 1], RGBColor[0, 0, 1], GrayLevel[1]}, RGBColor[0, 1, 0]}, {GrayLevel[0], GrayLevel...