Skip to main content

graphs and networks - Getting cell edges from a picture


I would like to write a program that, given a picture of an epithelium (2D cell array), for example



enter image description here


automatically detects the cell edges and returns the corresponding lattice. Illustratively,


enter image description here


Naturally, if such program is based on contrast and colour detection, the original picture might need to be edited so that cell membrane contrasts enough with cell interior. Furthermore, unlike the above sketch, I would need such polygons to be convex (maybe too tricky?).


Now, I know this might be a lot to ask, so as a first step I would like to know whether there are already inbuilt functions or packages that might help doing this type of image processing (maybe some neural network implementation?). Once edges are obtained as Line-type objects, for example, building the graph or mesh from them shouldn't be that hard.


Just as a reference, I would be interested in building something along the lines of Packing Analyzer.


Edit: Following Lukas Lang's answer below, it seems the presented code doesn't recognise images with "more evident" edges, like the image


enter image description here


or even a similar picture to the first


enter image description here



Image sources: 1, 2 and 3. Might have to do with the way the image is processed via preprocImg or the mergedCells function. Any ideas?



Answer



Here is an approach based on WatershedComponents and MorphologicalGraph. Some of the steps feel a bit over-complicated, so feel free to point out any improvements.


The end result is a Graph expression describing the cell walls:


enter image description here


Here is the code with some intermediate results:


Get the original image:


img = Import["https://i.stack.imgur.com/elbTN.png"]

enter image description here



Do some blurring & sharpening, followed by an extraction of the red color channel. The goal of this step is to get an image with the cell walls as visible as possible.


preprocImg = First@ColorSeparate@Sharpen[#, 5] &@Blur[img, 3]

enter image description here


The next step is the call to WatershedComponents. Unfortunately, I didn't manage to preprocess the image enough to get perfect results, so we have to postprocess them instead.


wsComponents = 
WatershedComponents[preprocImg, Method -> {"MinimumSaliency", .65}];
wsComponents // Colorize

enter image description here



As can be seen, some of the cells are split into multiple pieces. The idea of the next step is to exploit the fact that the cells are all convex. First, we compute the convex hulls of the individual components:


cellMeshes = Map[
ConvexHullMesh@*
Map[{#2, -#} & // Apply](*
convert from image coordinates to plot coordinates *)
]@
Values@GroupBy[First -> Last]@(* group positions by component *)
Catenate@
MapIndexed[List,
wsComponents, {2}](* add position to component indices *);

Show@cellMeshes

enter image description here


We can now merge those that overlap by some amount (I compare to the "reduced area", in analogy to the reduced mass from physics):


mergedCells =
Graph[(* create graph where overlapping cells are connected *)
cellMeshes,
If[(* check whether overlap is big enough *)
Area@RegionIntersection@##*(1/Area@# + 1/Area@#2) > 0.35,
UndirectedEdge@##,

Nothing
] & @@@ Subsets[cellMeshes, {2}](* look at all cell pairs *)
] // Map[RegionUnion]@*
ConnectedComponents(* merge overlapping cells *);
Show@mergedCells

enter image description here


Now we are almost done - we convert the result back into an image, so that we can finally use MorphologicalGraph. For this, we apply some styling to the regions and rasterize:


procImg = Region[(* apply cell styling *)
#,

BaseStyle -> {EdgeForm@{White, Thick}, FaceForm@Black}
] & /@ mergedCells //
Show[#, PlotRangePadding -> 0, ImageMargins -> 0] & //(*
remove image border *)
Rasterize[#, ImageSize -> ImageDimensions@img] & //
Binarize //
ImagePad[ImageCrop@#, BorderDimensions@#] &(* make border black *)

enter image description here


Now we are at the finish line - a call to MorphologicalGraph and some nice presentation is all that's needed now:



MorphologicalGraph[
#,
EdgeStyle -> Directive[Thick, Red],
VertexStyle -> Blue,
VertexSize -> 2,
Prolog -> Inset[img, {0, 0}, {0, 0}, ImageDimensions@img]
] &@procImg

enter image description here


Notes



The key difficulty with this approach is to get preprocImg to be sufficiently "nice" for WatershedComponents to work. For the three images in the question, the following three approaches seem to work:


img = Import["https://i.stack.imgur.com/elbTN.png"]
preprocImg = First@ColorSeparate@Sharpen[#, 5] &@Blur[img, 3]
wsComponents = WatershedComponents[preprocImg, Method -> {"MinimumSaliency", 0.65}];
Row@{img, preprocImg, wsComponents // Colorize}

enter image description here


img = Import["https://i.stack.imgur.com/5RPz5.png"]
preprocImg = ColorNegate@First@ColorSeparate@Sharpen[#, 5] &@Blur[img, 3]
wsComponents = WatershedComponents[preprocImg, Method -> {"MinimumSaliency", 0.65}];

Row@{img, preprocImg, wsComponents // Colorize}

enter image description here


img = Import["https://i.stack.imgur.com/dgz9H.jpg"]
preprocImg =
ColorNegate[20 (#2 - #)*#3] & @@ ColorSeparate@Sharpen[#, 3] &@
Blur[img, 10]
wsComponents = WatershedComponents[preprocImg, Method -> {"MinimumSaliency", 0.45}];

enter image description here




  • As can be seen, each image requires a different approach - unfortunately I couldn't get it to work with a single one yet

  • In the end preprocImg needs to be bright between the cells and dark inside the cells. For the first and second image, this is pretty straightforward using the brightness of the image. (Note that the image needs to be inverted in the second case) For the third image, I had to do some math on the color channels to get a meaningful result.

  • The blur radius is increased in the third case to smooth out the bright and dark areas.

  • The "MinimumSaliency" parameter of WatershedComponents can be used to control the number of cell "candidates" in wscomponents - the best value will depend on the contrast of preprocimg among other things.

  • The components in wscomponents need to resolve the individual cells - in the remaining steps, components are only merged, never split. Too many components on the other hand make the post-processing slow and unreliable (since the overlap criterion doesn't work anymore)


Comments

Popular posts from this blog

plotting - Plot 4D data with color as 4th dimension

I have a list of 4D data (x position, y position, amplitude, wavelength). I want to plot x, y, and amplitude on a 3D plot and have the color of the points correspond to the wavelength. I have seen many examples using functions to define color but my wavelength cannot be expressed by an analytic function. Is there a simple way to do this? Answer Here a another possible way to visualize 4D data: data = Flatten[Table[{x, y, x^2 + y^2, Sin[x - y]}, {x, -Pi, Pi,Pi/10}, {y,-Pi,Pi, Pi/10}], 1]; You can use the function Point along with VertexColors . Now the points are places using the first three elements and the color is determined by the fourth. In this case I used Hue, but you can use whatever you prefer. Graphics3D[ Point[data[[All, 1 ;; 3]], VertexColors -> Hue /@ data[[All, 4]]], Axes -> True, BoxRatios -> {1, 1, 1/GoldenRatio}]

plotting - Filling between two spheres in SphericalPlot3D

Manipulate[ SphericalPlot3D[{1, 2 - n}, {θ, 0, Pi}, {ϕ, 0, 1.5 Pi}, Mesh -> None, PlotPoints -> 15, PlotRange -> {-2.2, 2.2}], {n, 0, 1}] I cant' seem to be able to make a filling between two spheres. I've already tried the obvious Filling -> {1 -> {2}} but Mathematica doesn't seem to like that option. Is there any easy way around this or ... Answer There is no built-in filling in SphericalPlot3D . One option is to use ParametricPlot3D to draw the surfaces between the two shells: Manipulate[ Show[SphericalPlot3D[{1, 2 - n}, {θ, 0, Pi}, {ϕ, 0, 1.5 Pi}, PlotPoints -> 15, PlotRange -> {-2.2, 2.2}], ParametricPlot3D[{ r {Sin[t] Cos[1.5 Pi], Sin[t] Sin[1.5 Pi], Cos[t]}, r {Sin[t] Cos[0 Pi], Sin[t] Sin[0 Pi], Cos[t]}}, {r, 1, 2 - n}, {t, 0, Pi}, PlotStyle -> Yellow, Mesh -> {2, 15}]], {n, 0, 1}]

plotting - Mathematica: 3D plot based on combined 2D graphs

I have several sigmoidal fits to 3 different datasets, with mean fit predictions plus the 95% confidence limits (not symmetrical around the mean) and the actual data. I would now like to show these different 2D plots projected in 3D as in but then using proper perspective. In the link here they give some solutions to combine the plots using isometric perspective, but I would like to use proper 3 point perspective. Any thoughts? Also any way to show the mean points per time point for each series plus or minus the standard error on the mean would be cool too, either using points+vertical bars, or using spheres plus tubes. Below are some test data and the fit function I am using. Note that I am working on a logit(proportion) scale and that the final vertical scale is Log10(percentage). (* some test data *) data = Table[Null, {i, 4}]; data[[1]] = {{1, -5.8}, {2, -5.4}, {3, -0.8}, {4, -0.2}, {5, 4.6}, {1, -6.4}, {2, -5.6}, {3, -0.7}, {4, 0.04}, {5, 1.0}, {1, -6.8}, {2, -4.7}, {3, -1....