Skip to main content

simplifying expressions - Separating exponential terms


Suppose I have a lot of expressions multiplied by factors such as:


$$e^{-i\theta[1]-i\theta[2] - i\theta[3]-i\theta[4]-i\theta[5]}$$


I would like to separate this into a product of exponentials of the form


$$e^{-i\theta[1]}e^{-i\theta[2]}...$$


before employing the function ExpToTrig and making substitutions to the result trigonometric functions.



However, since I plan to apply the tangent half angle substitution (cf. my previous question Simplifying Expressions for FindMinimum), I would like the arguments to involve only one variable at a time. In particular, I tried using ComplexExpand on the function to express the trigonometric functions as functions of a single variable, but it expands the entire function out.


In short, I would like to keep the simplified form, but want to expand the exponential as per the above without having to expand the entire expression.


For reference, here is my function


(E^(-I θ[1] - I θ[2] - I θ[3] - I θ[4] - I (θ[5] - θ[6]))
Abs[Sin[ϕ[6]]]^2 (1 - E^(I (θ[1] - θ[6]))
   Cot[ϕ[6]/2] Tan[ϕ[1]/2]) (Cos[θ[1]] + I Sin[θ[1]] + E^(I θ[2])
   Tan[ϕ[1]/2] Tan[ϕ[2]/2]) (Cos[θ[2]] + I Sin[θ[2]] + E^(I θ[3])
   Tan[ϕ[2]/2] Tan[ϕ[3]/2]) (Cos[θ[3]] + I Sin[θ[3]] + E^(I θ[4])
   Tan[ϕ[3]/2] Tan[ϕ[4]/2]) (Cos[θ[5] - θ[6]] + I Sin[θ[5] - θ[6]] - Cot[ϕ[6]/2] 
   Tan[ϕ[5]/2]) (Cos[θ[4]] + I Sin[θ[4]] + E^(I θ[5])

   Tan[ϕ[4]/2] Tan[ϕ[5]/2]))/
(2 Sqrt[(1 + Abs[Tan[ϕ[1]/2]]^2) (1 + Abs[Tan[ϕ[2]/2]]^2)]
   Sqrt[(1 + Abs[Tan[ϕ[2]/2]]^2) (1 + Abs[Tan[ϕ[3]/2]]^2)]
   Sqrt[(1 + Abs[Tan[ϕ[3]/2]]^2) (1 + Abs[Tan[ϕ[4]/2]]^2)]
   Sqrt[(1 + Abs[Tan[ϕ[4]/2]]^2) (1 + Abs[Tan[ϕ[5]/2]]^2)]
   Sqrt[(1 + Abs[Tan[ϕ[1]/2]]^2) (1 + Cos[ϕ[6]])]
   Sqrt[(1 + Abs[Tan[ϕ[5]/2]]^2) (1 + Cos[ϕ[6]])])

Answer



Update


In the interest of simplifying the code somewhat, I've modified one of the replacements. For instance, we can do



expr2 = Thread[expr1, Plus] /. Plus -> Times

or


epxr2 = expr1 /. expT[Plus[a__]] :> Times @@ expT /@ a

rather than


expr2 = expr1 //. {expT[a_ + b_] :> expT[a] expT[b]}

So:


f[expr_] := Thread[expr /. Power[E, a_] :> expT@Expand@a, Plus] /. Plus -> Times /. expT[a_] :> ExpToTrig@Exp@a


or


f[expr_] := expr /. Power[E, a_] :> expT@Expand@a /. expT[Plus[a__]] :> Times @@ expT /@ a /. expT[a_] :> ExpToTrig@Exp@a

Original Post


As Bill commented, Mathematica likes to keep Exp[]'s together. Here's a workaround that I've used in the past. We replace Exp with a dummy head expT, do the re-write using replacement rules, and in the process apply ExpToTrig.


For instance, if


expr = Exp[-I (4 + a) + c];

we first do



expr1 = expr /. Power[E, a_] :> expT@Expand@a
(* expT[-4 I - I a + c] *)

Then, we separate the terms inside expT using ReplaceRepeated:


expr2 = expr1 //. {expT[a_ + b_] :> expT[a] expT[b]}
(* expT[-4 I] expT[-I a] expT[c] *)

Finally, we convert back to Exp and apply ExpToTrig:


expr2 /. expT[a_] :> ExpToTrig@Exp@a
(* (Cos[4] - I Sin[4]) (Cos[a] - I Sin[a]) (Cosh[c] + Sinh[c]) *)


We can do all at once, of course. Define


f[expr_] := expr /. Power[E, a_] :> expT@a //. {expT[a_ + b_] :> expT[a] expT[b]} /. expT[a_] :> ExpToTrig@Exp@a

in which case


f[expr]
(* (Cos[4] - I Sin[4]) (Cos[a] - I Sin[a]) (Cosh[c] + Sinh[c]) *)

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

plotting - Filling between two spheres in SphericalPlot3D

Manipulate[ SphericalPlot3D[{1, 2 - n}, {θ, 0, Pi}, {ϕ, 0, 1.5 Pi}, Mesh -> None, PlotPoints -> 15, PlotRange -> {-2.2, 2.2}], {n, 0, 1}] I cant' seem to be able to make a filling between two spheres. I've already tried the obvious Filling -> {1 -> {2}} but Mathematica doesn't seem to like that option. Is there any easy way around this or ... Answer There is no built-in filling in SphericalPlot3D . One option is to use ParametricPlot3D to draw the surfaces between the two shells: Manipulate[ Show[SphericalPlot3D[{1, 2 - n}, {θ, 0, Pi}, {ϕ, 0, 1.5 Pi}, PlotPoints -> 15, PlotRange -> {-2.2, 2.2}], ParametricPlot3D[{ r {Sin[t] Cos[1.5 Pi], Sin[t] Sin[1.5 Pi], Cos[t]}, r {Sin[t] Cos[0 Pi], Sin[t] Sin[0 Pi], Cos[t]}}, {r, 1, 2 - n}, {t, 0, Pi}, PlotStyle -> Yellow, Mesh -> {2, 15}]], {n, 0, 1}]
Post a Comment
Read more

plotting - Plot 4D data with color as 4th dimension

I have a list of 4D data (x position, y position, amplitude, wavelength). I want to plot x, y, and amplitude on a 3D plot and have the color of the points correspond to the wavelength. I have seen many examples using functions to define color but my wavelength cannot be expressed by an analytic function. Is there a simple way to do this? Answer Here a another possible way to visualize 4D data: data = Flatten[Table[{x, y, x^2 + y^2, Sin[x - y]}, {x, -Pi, Pi,Pi/10}, {y,-Pi,Pi, Pi/10}], 1]; You can use the function Point along with VertexColors . Now the points are places using the first three elements and the color is determined by the fourth. In this case I used Hue, but you can use whatever you prefer. Graphics3D[ Point[data[[All, 1 ;; 3]], VertexColors -> Hue /@ data[[All, 4]]], Axes -> True, BoxRatios -> {1, 1, 1/GoldenRatio}]
Post a Comment
Read more

plotting - Mathematica: 3D plot based on combined 2D graphs

I have several sigmoidal fits to 3 different datasets, with mean fit predictions plus the 95% confidence limits (not symmetrical around the mean) and the actual data. I would now like to show these different 2D plots projected in 3D as in but then using proper perspective. In the link here they give some solutions to combine the plots using isometric perspective, but I would like to use proper 3 point perspective. Any thoughts? Also any way to show the mean points per time point for each series plus or minus the standard error on the mean would be cool too, either using points+vertical bars, or using spheres plus tubes. Below are some test data and the fit function I am using. Note that I am working on a logit(proportion) scale and that the final vertical scale is Log10(percentage). (* some test data *) data = Table[Null, {i, 4}]; data[[1]] = {{1, -5.8}, {2, -5.4}, {3, -0.8}, {4, -0.2}, {5, 4.6}, {1, -6.4}, {2, -5.6}, {3, -0.7}, {4, 0.04}, {5, 1.0}, {1, -6.8}, {2, -4.7}, {3, -1.
Post a Comment
Read more