Skip to main content

simplifying expressions - Separating exponential terms


Suppose I have a lot of expressions multiplied by factors such as:


$$e^{-i\theta[1]-i\theta[2] - i\theta[3]-i\theta[4]-i\theta[5]}$$


I would like to separate this into a product of exponentials of the form


$$e^{-i\theta[1]}e^{-i\theta[2]}...$$


before employing the function ExpToTrig and making substitutions to the result trigonometric functions.



However, since I plan to apply the tangent half angle substitution (cf. my previous question Simplifying Expressions for FindMinimum), I would like the arguments to involve only one variable at a time. In particular, I tried using ComplexExpand on the function to express the trigonometric functions as functions of a single variable, but it expands the entire function out.


In short, I would like to keep the simplified form, but want to expand the exponential as per the above without having to expand the entire expression.


For reference, here is my function


(E^(-I θ[1] - I θ[2] - I θ[3] - I θ[4] - I (θ[5] - θ[6]))
Abs[Sin[ϕ[6]]]^2 (1 - E^(I (θ[1] - θ[6]))
Cot[ϕ[6]/2] Tan[ϕ[1]/2]) (Cos[θ[1]] + I Sin[θ[1]] + E^(I θ[2])
Tan[ϕ[1]/2] Tan[ϕ[2]/2]) (Cos[θ[2]] + I Sin[θ[2]] + E^(I θ[3])
Tan[ϕ[2]/2] Tan[ϕ[3]/2]) (Cos[θ[3]] + I Sin[θ[3]] + E^(I θ[4])
Tan[ϕ[3]/2] Tan[ϕ[4]/2]) (Cos[θ[5] - θ[6]] + I Sin[θ[5] - θ[6]] - Cot[ϕ[6]/2]
Tan[ϕ[5]/2]) (Cos[θ[4]] + I Sin[θ[4]] + E^(I θ[5])

Tan[Ï•[4]/2] Tan[Ï•[5]/2]))/
(2 Sqrt[(1 + Abs[Tan[Ï•[1]/2]]^2) (1 + Abs[Tan[Ï•[2]/2]]^2)]
Sqrt[(1 + Abs[Tan[Ï•[2]/2]]^2) (1 + Abs[Tan[Ï•[3]/2]]^2)]
Sqrt[(1 + Abs[Tan[Ï•[3]/2]]^2) (1 + Abs[Tan[Ï•[4]/2]]^2)]
Sqrt[(1 + Abs[Tan[Ï•[4]/2]]^2) (1 + Abs[Tan[Ï•[5]/2]]^2)]
Sqrt[(1 + Abs[Tan[Ï•[1]/2]]^2) (1 + Cos[Ï•[6]])]
Sqrt[(1 + Abs[Tan[Ï•[5]/2]]^2) (1 + Cos[Ï•[6]])])

Answer



Update


In the interest of simplifying the code somewhat, I've modified one of the replacements. For instance, we can do



expr2 = Thread[expr1, Plus] /. Plus -> Times

or


epxr2 = expr1 /. expT[Plus[a__]] :> Times @@ expT /@ a

rather than


expr2 = expr1 //. {expT[a_ + b_] :> expT[a] expT[b]}

So:


f[expr_] := Thread[expr /. Power[E, a_] :> expT@Expand@a, Plus] /. Plus -> Times /. expT[a_] :> ExpToTrig@Exp@a


or


f[expr_] := expr /. Power[E, a_] :> expT@Expand@a /. expT[Plus[a__]] :> Times @@ expT /@ a /. expT[a_] :> ExpToTrig@Exp@a

Original Post


As Bill commented, Mathematica likes to keep Exp[]'s together. Here's a workaround that I've used in the past. We replace Exp with a dummy head expT, do the re-write using replacement rules, and in the process apply ExpToTrig.


For instance, if


expr = Exp[-I (4 + a) + c];

we first do



expr1 = expr /. Power[E, a_] :> expT@Expand@a
(* expT[-4 I - I a + c] *)

Then, we separate the terms inside expT using ReplaceRepeated:


expr2 = expr1 //. {expT[a_ + b_] :> expT[a] expT[b]}
(* expT[-4 I] expT[-I a] expT[c] *)

Finally, we convert back to Exp and apply ExpToTrig:


expr2 /. expT[a_] :> ExpToTrig@Exp@a
(* (Cos[4] - I Sin[4]) (Cos[a] - I Sin[a]) (Cosh[c] + Sinh[c]) *)


We can do all at once, of course. Define


f[expr_] := expr /. Power[E, a_] :> expT@a //. {expT[a_ + b_] :> expT[a] expT[b]} /. expT[a_] :> ExpToTrig@Exp@a

in which case


f[expr]
(* (Cos[4] - I Sin[4]) (Cos[a] - I Sin[a]) (Cosh[c] + Sinh[c]) *)

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

plotting - How to draw lines between specified dots on ListPlot?

I would like to create a plot where I have unconnected dots and some connected. So far, I have figured out how to draw the dots. My code is the following: ListPlot[{{1, 1}, {2, 2}, {3, 3}, {4, 4}, {1, 4}, {2, 5}, {3, 6}, {4, 7}, {1, 7}, {2, 8}, {3, 9}, {4, 10}, {1, 10}, {2, 11}, {3, 12}, {4,13}, {2.5, 7}}, Ticks -> {{1, 2, 3, 4}, None}, AxesStyle -> Thin, TicksStyle -> Directive[Black, Bold, 12], Mesh -> Full] I have thought using ListLinePlot command, but I don't know how to specify to the command to draw only selected lines between the dots. Do have any suggestions/hints on how to do that? Thank you. Answer One possibility would be to use Epilog with Line : ListPlot[ {{1, 1}, {2, 2}, {3, 3}, {4, 4}, {1, 4}, {2, 5}, {3, 6}, {4, 7}, {1, 7}, {2, 8}, {3, 9}, {4, 10}, {1, 10}, {2, 11}, {3, 12}, {4, 13}, {2.5, 7}}, Ticks -> {{1, 2, 3, 4}, None}, AxesStyle -> Thin, TicksStyle -> Directive[Black, Bold, 12], Mesh -> Full, Epilog -> { Line[ ...

calculus and analysis - Integral of the Sinc product

Let us consider the following integral $$ B_n = \int_0^\infty \prod_{k=1,3,5,\dots}^n\frac{\sin (x/k)}{x/k}dx $$ By definition, Sinc[x] == Sin[x]/x , therefore B[n_?OddQ] := Integrate[Product[Sinc[x/k], {k, 1, n, 2}], {x, 0, Infinity}] B /@ Range[1, 13, 2] {Pi/2, Pi/2, Pi/2, Pi/2, Pi/2, Pi/2, Pi/2} OK, everything is fine. But... B[15] 467807924713440738696537864469 Pi/935615849440640907310521750000 What's going on? Answer As Eckhard wrote in comments B[n] is the n-th Borwein integral . (The letter B was not accidental :) ) This funny properties of Borwein integrals is related to the Fourier transform of Sinc function FourierTransform[Sinc[x], x, k] 1/2 Sqrt[Pi/2] (Sign[1 - k] + Sign[1 + k]) Plot[%, {k, -2, 2}, Filling -> 0] which is the box function. The result is $\pi/2$ while the sum $$ 1/3+1/5+\dots+1/n $$ B_n = \frac{\pi}{2} - \pi \bigg(\sum_{k=3,5,\ldots}^n\frac{1}{k} -1\biggr)^\frac{n-1}{2}\prod_{k=3,5,\dots}^n\frac{k}{k-1}. $$ For $n=15$ it is equal to $$ \frac{46780...

list manipulation - Selecting multiple columns from a matrix?

Sample data: data = { {{2013, 1, 1}, 24.13, 167.67, 231.82}, {{2013, 1, 2}, 32.15, 170.92, 225.99}, {{2013, 1, 3}, 35.43, 172.68, 221.67}, {{2013, 1, 4}, 36.73, 173.05, 218.32}, {{2013, 1, 5}, 58.19, 165.96, 197.05}, {{2013, 1, 6}, 69.99, 163.50, 187.52}, {{2013, 1, 7}, 71.37, 154.21, 175.58}, {{2013, 1, 8}, 72.51, 149.66, 163.25}}; I want a DateListPlot with three graphs, so for a matrix formed by columns 1 and 2, one for columns 1 and 3, and 1 for columns 1 and 4. At the moment I'm using this code: data2 = Transpose[{data[[All, 1]], data[[All, 2]]}]; data3 = Transpose[{data[[All, 1]], data[[All, 3]]}]; data4 = Transpose[{data[[All, 1]], data[[All, 4]]}]; DateListPlot[{data2, data3, data4}, Joined -> True, Filling -> {3 -> {1}}] but I have a hunch that this can be done more efficiently. I don't like the Transpose s in particular. Any ideas? edit (for extra credit) What if I need to multiply the second column by 2, which in my solution is simp...