Skip to main content

algorithm - Behavior of Graphics`Mesh`InPolygonQ with self-intersecting polygons


Playing around with some of the answers in the question How to check if a 2D point is in a polygon? I noticed that:


Graphics`Mesh`InPolygonQ[poly,pt]


Displays different behavior than the procedure that explicitly uses winding numbers (where a non-zero winding number implies polygon inclusion), for example the function in rm -rf♦'s answer to the aforementioned question:


inPolyQ[poly_, pt_] := Graphics`Mesh`PointWindingNumber[poly, pt] =!= 0

We can see this in the case where we define a self-intersecting polygon that has a "hole" in it:


PointWindingNumberInPolygonQ[poly_, pt_] := Graphics`Mesh`PointWindingNumber[poly, pt] =!= 0;

numRandPoints = 10^4;

testPolygon = {{65.4`, 439.5`}, {233.4`, 524.5`}, {364.40000000000003`, 433.5`}, {382.40000000000003`, 377.5`}, {354.40000000000003`, 293.5`}, {258.40000000000003`, 239.5`}, {94.4`, 207.5`}, {40.400000000000006`, 271.5`}, {18.400000000000002`, 356.5`}, {149.4`, 383.5`}, {187.4`, 330.5`}, {199.4`, 258.5`}, {136.4`, 130.5`}};


boundingBoxCoordinates = {{Min[testPolygon[[All, 1]]], Min[testPolygon[[All, 2]]]}, {Min[testPolygon[[All, 1]]], Max[testPolygon[[All, 2]]]}, {Max[testPolygon[[All, 1]]], Max[testPolygon[[All, 2]]]}, {Max[testPolygon[[All, 1]]], Min[testPolygon[[All, 2]]]}};

randomPoints = Table[{RandomReal[{Min[boundingBoxCoordinates[[All, 1]]], Max[boundingBoxCoordinates[[All, 1]]]}], RandomReal[{Min[boundingBoxCoordinates[[All, 2]]], Max[boundingBoxCoordinates[[All, 2]]]}]}, {k, 1, numRandPoints}];


windingNumPointsInPolygon = {};
inPolygonQPointsInPolygon = {};

For[i = 1, i <= Length[randomPoints], i++,


  If[PointWindingNumberInPolygonQ[testPolygon, randomPoints[[i]]] == True,
    windingNumPointsInPolygon = Append[windingNumPointsInPolygon, randomPoints[[i]]];
  ];

 If[Graphics`Mesh`InPolygonQ[testPolygon, randomPoints[[i]]] == True,
    inPolygonQPointsInPolygon = Append[inPolygonQPointsInPolygon, randomPoints[[i]]];
 ];

];



Graphics[Polygon[testPolygon]]
ListPlot[windingNumPointsInPolygon]
ListPlot[inPolygonQPointsInPolygon]

Notice how -


inPolyQ[poly_, pt_] := Graphics`Mesh`PointWindingNumber[poly, pt] =!= 0

Counts points inside the polygon "hole" as being inside the hole, while -


Graphics`Mesh`InPolygonQ[poly,pt]


Counts points inside the polygon "hole" as being outside the polygon, consistent with the shading for -


Graphics[Polygon[testPolygon]]

How can we characterize the behavior/algorithm of InPolygonQ? While I can understand how the winding number test method works, the trouble is that inPolygonQ is an undocumented function that doesn't give me any hints as to what it is doing.



Answer



The winding number is 0 outside the polygon, -1 in the non-self-intersecting region and -2 in the hole. So to exclude points inside the hole you would just test for the winding number being odd, rather than not equal to zero:


inPolyQ[poly_, pt_] := OddQ @  Graphics`Mesh`PointWindingNumber[poly, pt]

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

front end - keyboard shortcut to invoke Insert new matrix

I frequently need to type in some matrices, and the menu command Insert > Table/Matrix > New... allows matrices with lines drawn between columns and rows, which is very helpful. I would like to make a keyboard shortcut for it, but cannot find the relevant frontend token command (4209405) for it. Since the FullForm[] and InputForm[] of matrices with lines drawn between rows and columns is the same as those without lines, it's hard to do this via 3rd party system-wide text expanders (e.g. autohotkey or atext on mac). How does one assign a keyboard shortcut for the menu item Insert > Table/Matrix > New... , preferably using only mathematica? Thanks! Answer In the MenuSetup.tr (for linux located in the $InstallationDirectory/SystemFiles/FrontEnd/TextResources/X/ directory), I changed the line MenuItem["&New...", "CreateGridBoxDialog"] to read MenuItem["&New...", "CreateGridBoxDialog", MenuKey["m", Modifiers-...
Post a Comment
Read more

How to thread a list

I have data in format data = {{a1, a2}, {b1, b2}, {c1, c2}, {d1, d2}} Tableform: I want to thread it to : tdata = {{{a1, b1}, {a2, b2}}, {{a1, c1}, {a2, c2}}, {{a1, d1}, {a2, d2}}} Tableform: And I would like to do better then pseudofunction[n_] := Transpose[{data2[[1]], data2[[n]]}]; SetAttributes[pseudofunction, Listable]; Range[2, 4] // pseudofunction Here is my benchmark data, where data3 is normal sample of real data. data3 = Drop[ExcelWorkBook[[Column1 ;; Column4]], None, 1]; data2 = {a #, b #, c #, d #} & /@ Range[1, 10^5]; data = RandomReal[{0, 1}, {10^6, 4}]; Here is my benchmark code kptnw[list_] := Transpose[{Table[First@#, {Length@# - 1}], Rest@#}, {3, 1, 2}] &@list kptnw2[list_] := Transpose[{ConstantArray[First@#, Length@# - 1], Rest@#}, {3, 1, 2}] &@list OleksandrR[list_] := Flatten[Outer[List, List@First[list], Rest[list], 1], {{2}, {1, 4}}] paradox2[list_] := Partition[Riffle[list[[1]], #], 2] & /@ Drop[list, 1] RM[list_] := FoldList[Transpose[{First@li...
Post a Comment
Read more

plotting - How to draw lines between specified dots on ListPlot?

I would like to create a plot where I have unconnected dots and some connected. So far, I have figured out how to draw the dots. My code is the following: ListPlot[{{1, 1}, {2, 2}, {3, 3}, {4, 4}, {1, 4}, {2, 5}, {3, 6}, {4, 7}, {1, 7}, {2, 8}, {3, 9}, {4, 10}, {1, 10}, {2, 11}, {3, 12}, {4,13}, {2.5, 7}}, Ticks -> {{1, 2, 3, 4}, None}, AxesStyle -> Thin, TicksStyle -> Directive[Black, Bold, 12], Mesh -> Full] I have thought using ListLinePlot command, but I don't know how to specify to the command to draw only selected lines between the dots. Do have any suggestions/hints on how to do that? Thank you. Answer One possibility would be to use Epilog with Line : ListPlot[ {{1, 1}, {2, 2}, {3, 3}, {4, 4}, {1, 4}, {2, 5}, {3, 6}, {4, 7}, {1, 7}, {2, 8}, {3, 9}, {4, 10}, {1, 10}, {2, 11}, {3, 12}, {4, 13}, {2.5, 7}}, Ticks -> {{1, 2, 3, 4}, None}, AxesStyle -> Thin, TicksStyle -> Directive[Black, Bold, 12], Mesh -> Full, Epilog -> { Line[ ...
Post a Comment
Read more