Skip to main content

list manipulation - Composition with Transpose failure with Dataset


Is the failure of the 2nd Transpose here a known bug?


Dataset[{{0, 10}, {2, 11}, {3, 12}}][
Transpose /* Map[MinMax] /* Transpose] // Normal



Failure[Transpose, {"MessageTemplate" :> Transpose::nmtx, 
"MessageParameters" -> {{__}, Transpose}}]

Similarly for


Dataset[{{0, 10}, {2, 11}, {3, 12}}][
Query[Transpose /* Map[MinMax]] /* Transpose]

For both of these, without the Normal, the error msg is: "The first two levels of {__} cannot be transposed".


Yet the seeming equivalent query, albeit with an intermediate Dataset, works:



Dataset[{{0, 10}, {2, 11}, {3, 12}}][Transpose /* Map[MinMax] ][
Transpose]// Normal

And without Dataset, this works also:


{{0, 10}, {2, 11}, {3, 12}} // Transpose // Map[MinMax] // Transpose


{{0, 10}, {3, 12}}




Answer




The problem is due to two factors:



  1. The type system cannot infer the data type that results from a call to MinMax.

  2. A type-checked application of the Transpose query operator will fail when applied to an argument with an unknown type (i.e. from MinMax).


I think that point #1 could be considered a bug, although the fact of the matter is that a great many operators are not (yet) known to the type system. Given these omissions, it might be reasonable to expect the Transpose operator to be more forgiving.


Analysis (current as of version 11.0.1)


When an operation succeeds outside of a Dataset but fails within, the cause is usually a type-inferencing failure. That is indeed the case here.


traceTypes will reveal the failure:


traceTypes[Dataset[{{0, 10}, {2, 11}, {3, 12}}]][Transpose /* Map[MinMax] /* Transpose]


traceTypes screenshot


We can see that the type machinery cannot infer the resultant type of applying MinMax to a list of integers:


Needs["TypeSystem`"]
TypeApply[MinMax, {Vector[Atom[Integer], 3]}]
(* UnknownType *)

Furthermore, a type-checked application of AssociationTranspose (the query-form of Transpose) will not accept a vector of unknown type:


Needs["GeneralUtilities`"]
TypeApply[AssociationTranspose, {Vector[UnknownType, 2]}]

(* FailureType[{Transpose, "nmtx"}, <|"Arguments" -> {__}|>] *)

This last failure is the source of the message we see.


Work-around


As noted in the question, a work-around is to perform the final Transpose in a second query:


Dataset[{{0, 10}, {2, 11}, {3, 12}}][Transpose /* Map[MinMax]][Transpose]

double-query dataset screenshot


When the final query result is wrapped back into a dataset, type deduction takes place which is more reliable than type inferencing. By splitting our query in two, we allow such type deduction to take place so that the final Transpose operator can be applied to a known type:


Needs["Dataset`"]

Dataset[{{0, 10}, {2, 11}, {3, 12}}][Transpose /* Map[MinMax]] // GetType
(* Vector[Vector[Atom[Integer], 2], 2] *)

TypeApply[AssociationTranspose, {Vector[Vector[Atom[Integer], 2], 2]}]
(* Vector[Vector[Atom[Integer], 2], 2] *)

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

plotting - Plot 4D data with color as 4th dimension

I have a list of 4D data (x position, y position, amplitude, wavelength). I want to plot x, y, and amplitude on a 3D plot and have the color of the points correspond to the wavelength. I have seen many examples using functions to define color but my wavelength cannot be expressed by an analytic function. Is there a simple way to do this? Answer Here a another possible way to visualize 4D data: data = Flatten[Table[{x, y, x^2 + y^2, Sin[x - y]}, {x, -Pi, Pi,Pi/10}, {y,-Pi,Pi, Pi/10}], 1]; You can use the function Point along with VertexColors . Now the points are places using the first three elements and the color is determined by the fourth. In this case I used Hue, but you can use whatever you prefer. Graphics3D[ Point[data[[All, 1 ;; 3]], VertexColors -> Hue /@ data[[All, 4]]], Axes -> True, BoxRatios -> {1, 1, 1/GoldenRatio}]

plotting - Filling between two spheres in SphericalPlot3D

Manipulate[ SphericalPlot3D[{1, 2 - n}, {θ, 0, Pi}, {ϕ, 0, 1.5 Pi}, Mesh -> None, PlotPoints -> 15, PlotRange -> {-2.2, 2.2}], {n, 0, 1}] I cant' seem to be able to make a filling between two spheres. I've already tried the obvious Filling -> {1 -> {2}} but Mathematica doesn't seem to like that option. Is there any easy way around this or ... Answer There is no built-in filling in SphericalPlot3D . One option is to use ParametricPlot3D to draw the surfaces between the two shells: Manipulate[ Show[SphericalPlot3D[{1, 2 - n}, {θ, 0, Pi}, {ϕ, 0, 1.5 Pi}, PlotPoints -> 15, PlotRange -> {-2.2, 2.2}], ParametricPlot3D[{ r {Sin[t] Cos[1.5 Pi], Sin[t] Sin[1.5 Pi], Cos[t]}, r {Sin[t] Cos[0 Pi], Sin[t] Sin[0 Pi], Cos[t]}}, {r, 1, 2 - n}, {t, 0, Pi}, PlotStyle -> Yellow, Mesh -> {2, 15}]], {n, 0, 1}]

plotting - Mathematica: 3D plot based on combined 2D graphs

I have several sigmoidal fits to 3 different datasets, with mean fit predictions plus the 95% confidence limits (not symmetrical around the mean) and the actual data. I would now like to show these different 2D plots projected in 3D as in but then using proper perspective. In the link here they give some solutions to combine the plots using isometric perspective, but I would like to use proper 3 point perspective. Any thoughts? Also any way to show the mean points per time point for each series plus or minus the standard error on the mean would be cool too, either using points+vertical bars, or using spheres plus tubes. Below are some test data and the fit function I am using. Note that I am working on a logit(proportion) scale and that the final vertical scale is Log10(percentage). (* some test data *) data = Table[Null, {i, 4}]; data[[1]] = {{1, -5.8}, {2, -5.4}, {3, -0.8}, {4, -0.2}, {5, 4.6}, {1, -6.4}, {2, -5.6}, {3, -0.7}, {4, 0.04}, {5, 1.0}, {1, -6.8}, {2, -4.7}, {3, -1....