Skip to main content

differential equations - Extending NDSolve beyond a singularity


The $\tan$ function satisfies the following IVP:


$$y'=1+y^2 ,\quad y(0)=0 $$


and has simple poles at the points $x=\pi/2+ \pi n$ for integer $n$.


When trying to get $\tan$ via numerical integration, the command


NDSolve[{y'[x]==y[x]^2+1,y[0]==0},y[x],{x,-10,10}]

gives a solution which is defined only for $x \in(- \pi/2,\pi/2)$. Is there a way to extend the solution beyond the poles $x= \pm \pi/2$? What about singularities in the general case?


Thank you!




Answer



We can treat the variable $y$ as an element $[y_1 \colon y_2]$ of the projective line. In code, this means replacing y[x] by y1[x]/y2[x]. For an IVP $y' = f(x, y), \ y(x_0) = y_0$, we translate the initial condition as $y_1(x_0) = y_0, \ y_2(x_0) = 1$. Since the substitution yields an equation in two variables $y_1$, $y_2$, $$y_1'y_2-y_1y_2'=y_2^2\;f(x,\,y_1/y_2)\,,$$ we need another equation. So to get a unique solution, we impose the condition in code as


y1[x]^2 + y2[x]^2 == y0^2 + 1

Since this condition is satisfied initially, NDSolve will use it in conjunction with the ODE to determine y1[x] and y2[x] at each step. We can use this condition as it is and solve the system as a differential-algebraic equation (DAE); or we can differentiate it and solve the system as an ODE. The important difference is that the methods and precision available for DAEs are limited.


eqn = y'[x] == 1 + y[x]^2;
blowup = {y -> (y1[#]/y2[#] &)};

newfn = eqn /. blowup /. Equal -> Subtract // Together // Numerator;


newDAE = {newfn == 0, y1[x]^2 + y2[x]^2 == y0^2 + 1};
newODE = {newfn == 0, D[y1[x]^2 + y2[x]^2 == y0^2 + 1, x]};

Block[{x0 = 0, y0 = 0},
sol = NDSolve[{newDAE, y1[x0] == y0, y2[x0] == 1}, {y1, y2}, {x, 0, 10}]
];

Block[{x0 = 0, y0 = 0},
sol = NDSolve[{newODE, y1[x0] == y0, y2[x0] == 1}, {y1, y2}, {x, 0, 10}]
];


Both solutions yield the same plots:


Plot[y[x] /. blowup /. First@sol // Evaluate, {x, 0, 10}]

Mathematica graphics


Compare by overlaying the graph of tangent, the exact solution in this example:


Plot[{y[x] /. blowup /. First@sol, Tan[x]} // Evaluate, {x, 0, 10}]

Mathematica graphics


Update: Another view of what is happening.



A standard model of the projective line $[y_1\colon y_2]$ is a unit-diameter circle tangent to an axis. The corresponding affine line $y$ is given by $y_2 = 1$. Here we project the solution in terms of {y1[x], y2[x]} onto the desired solution y[x] (for x running from 0 to 10).



enter image description here
The projection from the circle model of the projective line onto the affine line y2 == 1. (The cylinder is the product of the interval 0 <= x <= 10 and the projective line or circle.)


cplot2 = ContourPlot3D[y1^2 + y2^2 == y2,
{x, 0, 10}, {y1, -1.05, 1.05}, {y2, -0.05, 1.05},
ContourStyle -> Opacity[0.3], Mesh -> None];
base = Show[
ParametricPlot3D[
Evaluate[{x, ( y1[x] y2[x])/(y1[x]^2 + y2[x]^2), y2[x]^2/(

y1[x]^2 + y2[x]^2)} /. First@sol], {x, 0, 10}],
ParametricPlot3D[
Evaluate[{x, y[x] /. blowup, 1} /. First@sol], {x, 0, 10},
PlotStyle -> ColorData[97, 3], Exclusions -> Cos[x] == 0],
(*cplot1,*)cplot2,
PlotRange -> {{0, 10}, {-2, 2}, {-0.1, 3.05}},
AxesLabel -> {x, y1, y2}];
(* * * * *)
Manipulate[
Show[

base,
Graphics3D[{
Gray,
Table[InfiniteLine[{{0, y, 1}, {10, y, 1}}], {y, -2, 2}],
Table[
InfiniteLine[{{x0, -1, 1}, {x0, 1, 1}}], {x0, 0, 10, Pi/2}],
Red, Thickness[Medium],
Line[{{0, 0, 0}, {10, 0, 0}}],
InfiniteLine[{{x, 0, 0}, {x, y[x] /. blowup /. First@sol, 1}}],
PointSize[Large],

Point[{{x, 0, 0}, {x, y[x], 1}, {x, ( y1[x] y2[x])/(
y1[x]^2 + y2[x]^2), y2[x]^2/(y1[x]^2 + y2[x]^2)}} /.
blowup /. First@sol]
}]
],
{x, 0, 10}
]

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

front end - keyboard shortcut to invoke Insert new matrix

I frequently need to type in some matrices, and the menu command Insert > Table/Matrix > New... allows matrices with lines drawn between columns and rows, which is very helpful. I would like to make a keyboard shortcut for it, but cannot find the relevant frontend token command (4209405) for it. Since the FullForm[] and InputForm[] of matrices with lines drawn between rows and columns is the same as those without lines, it's hard to do this via 3rd party system-wide text expanders (e.g. autohotkey or atext on mac). How does one assign a keyboard shortcut for the menu item Insert > Table/Matrix > New... , preferably using only mathematica? Thanks! Answer In the MenuSetup.tr (for linux located in the $InstallationDirectory/SystemFiles/FrontEnd/TextResources/X/ directory), I changed the line MenuItem["&New...", "CreateGridBoxDialog"] to read MenuItem["&New...", "CreateGridBoxDialog", MenuKey["m", Modifiers-...

How to thread a list

I have data in format data = {{a1, a2}, {b1, b2}, {c1, c2}, {d1, d2}} Tableform: I want to thread it to : tdata = {{{a1, b1}, {a2, b2}}, {{a1, c1}, {a2, c2}}, {{a1, d1}, {a2, d2}}} Tableform: And I would like to do better then pseudofunction[n_] := Transpose[{data2[[1]], data2[[n]]}]; SetAttributes[pseudofunction, Listable]; Range[2, 4] // pseudofunction Here is my benchmark data, where data3 is normal sample of real data. data3 = Drop[ExcelWorkBook[[Column1 ;; Column4]], None, 1]; data2 = {a #, b #, c #, d #} & /@ Range[1, 10^5]; data = RandomReal[{0, 1}, {10^6, 4}]; Here is my benchmark code kptnw[list_] := Transpose[{Table[First@#, {Length@# - 1}], Rest@#}, {3, 1, 2}] &@list kptnw2[list_] := Transpose[{ConstantArray[First@#, Length@# - 1], Rest@#}, {3, 1, 2}] &@list OleksandrR[list_] := Flatten[Outer[List, List@First[list], Rest[list], 1], {{2}, {1, 4}}] paradox2[list_] := Partition[Riffle[list[[1]], #], 2] & /@ Drop[list, 1] RM[list_] := FoldList[Transpose[{First@li...

mathematical optimization - Minimizing using indices, error: Part::pkspec1: The expression cannot be used as a part specification

I want to use Minimize where the variables to minimize are indices pointing into an array. Here a MWE that hopefully shows what my problem is. vars = u@# & /@ Range[3]; cons = Flatten@ { Table[(u[j] != #) & /@ vars[[j + 1 ;; -1]], {j, 1, 3 - 1}], 1 vec1 = {1, 2, 3}; vec2 = {1, 2, 3}; Minimize[{Total@((vec1[[#]] - vec2[[u[#]]])^2 & /@ Range[1, 3]), cons}, vars, Integers] The error I get: Part::pkspec1: The expression u[1] cannot be used as a part specification. >> Answer Ok, it seems that one can get around Mathematica trying to evaluate vec2[[u[1]]] too early by using the function Indexed[vec2,u[1]] . The working MWE would then look like the following: vars = u@# & /@ Range[3]; cons = Flatten@{ Table[(u[j] != #) & /@ vars[[j + 1 ;; -1]], {j, 1, 3 - 1}], 1 vec1 = {1, 2, 3}; vec2 = {1, 2, 3}; NMinimize[ {Total@((vec1[[#]] - Indexed[vec2, u[#]])^2 & /@ R...