Skip to main content

built in symbols - What's purpose of the new function BinarySerialize?


11.1 introduced a new function BinarySerialize, but I don't know what it can do better than the traditional method.Its behavior is very similar to Compress,though I cannot find any advantage of it.It even consumes more space than Compress,such as


BinarySerialize[Range[100]] // Normal // Length



805



Compress[Range[100]] // ToCharacterCode // Length


290




And ByteCount[BinarySerialize[Range[100]]] is also greater than ByteCount[Compress[Range[100]]].So what's purpose of this function? Anyone can provide a good example to use it?



Answer



Disclaimer: This answer is written from a user's point of view. For useful insider information on this topic see this discussion with Mathematica developers on Community Forums.


Introduction


Binary serialization is rewriting expressions as an array of bytes (list of integers from Range[0, 255]). Binary representation of expression takes less space than a textual one and also can be exported and imported faster than text.


How do Compress and BinarySerialize functions work?


Compress (with default options) always does three steps:



  1. It performs binary serialization.


  2. It deflates result using zlib.

  3. It transforms deflated result to a Base64-encoded text string.


BinarySerialize performs only binary serialization and sometimes deflates the result using zlib. With default options it will decide itself if it wants to deflate or not. With an option PerformanceGoal -> "Speed" it will avoid deflation. With an option PerformanceGoal -> "Size" it will likely deflate. BinarySerialize returns a ByteArray object. ByteArray is something like a packed array of 8-bit integers. However FullForm of ByteArray is visualized as Base64-encoded text string. This visualization can be somewhat misleading, because internally ByteArrays are stored and operated in binary form, not as text strings.


Binary serialization algorithms of Compress and BinarySerialize


Original serialization algorithm of Compress is described in this answer. That algorithm is not very optimized for size and produces larger-then-necessary output for many typical expressions. For example, it has no support for packed arrays of integers and rewrites such arrays as nested lists, which take a lot bytes.


BinarySerialize uses a more size-optimized binary serialization algorithm compared to what Compress (with default options) does. This algorithm supports packed arrays of integers, has optimizations for integers of different size (8,16,32 bit), stores big integers in binary form (not as text strings), and has other optimizations.


Applications of BinarySerialize


Using BinarySerialize we can write our own Compress-like functions with better compression. For example we can write myCompress function which does the same three steps as original Compress, but uses BinarySerialize for the serialization step:


myCompress[expr_]:=Module[

{compressedBinaryData},
compressedBinaryData = BinarySerialize[expr, PerformanceGoal->"Size"];
Developer`EncodeBase64[compressedBinaryData]
];

myUncompress[string_]:=Module[
{binaryData},
binaryData = Developer`DecodeBase64ToByteArray[string];
BinaryDeserialize[binaryData]
];


Even for simple integer list we can see size reduction.


Compress[Range[100]] // StringLength
(* 290 *)

myCompress[Range[100]] // StringLength
(* 244 *)

myUncompress[myCompress[Range[100]]] === Range[100]
(* True *)


If we take an expression with large number of small integers we get much more noticeable improvement:


bitmap = Rasterize[Plot[x, {x, 0, 1}]];

StringLength[Compress[bitmap]]
(*31246*)

StringLength[myCompress[bitmap]]
(*17820*)


myUncompress[myCompress[bitmap]] === bitmap
(* True *)

Conclusion


The example above shows that the result of a simple user-defined function myCompress based on a BinarySerialize can be almost twice more compact than the result of Compress.


Outlook


To decrease the output size even further one can use a compression algorithm with higher compression settings (in the second step) or use Ascii85-encoding instead of Base64 in the third step.


Appendix 1: Undocumented options of Compress


I have noticed that in Version 11.1 Compress has more undocumented options than in previous versions. Those options allows one to:





  • Disable both compression and Base64 encoding and return a binary serialized result as a string with unprintable characters:


    Compress[Range[100], Method -> {"Version" -> 4}]




  • Change binary serialization algorithm to a more efficient one, but not exactly to BinarySerialize.


    Compress[Range[100], Method -> {"Version" -> 6}] // StringLength


    (* 254 *)





There is also a "ByteArray" option shown in usage message ??Compress but it does not work in Version 11.1.


Note that this behavior is undocumented and may change in future versions.


Appendix 2: Compression option of BinarySerialize


Just for fun one can manually compress result of BinarySerialize[..., PerformanceGoal -> "Speed"] to get the same output as BinarySerialize[..., PerformanceGoal -> "Size"] produces. This can be done with the following code:


myBinarySerializeSize[expr_]:=Module[
{binaryData, dataBytes, compressedBytes},
binaryData = Normal[BinarySerialize[expr, PerformanceGoal->"Speed"]];
dataBytes = Drop[binaryData, 2]; (*remove magic "7:"*)
compressedBytes = Developer`RawCompress[dataBytes];
ByteArray[Join[ToCharacterCode["7C:"], compressedBytes]]

]

We can check that it gives the same result as PerformanceGoal -> "Size" option


data = Range[100];
myBinarySerializeSize[data] === BinarySerialize[data, PerformanceGoal -> "Size"]

Appendix 3: zlib compression functions


Description of undocumented zlib compression/decompression functions Developer`RawCompress and Developer`RawUncompress can be found in this answer.


Appendix 4: Base64 encoding functions


Usage of Base64 encoding/decoding functions from the Developer` context can be explained using the following code:



binaryData = Range[0, 255];

Normal[
Developer`DecodeBase64ToByteArray[
Developer`EncodeBase64[binaryData]
]
] == binaryData

(* True *)

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

plotting - How to draw lines between specified dots on ListPlot?

I would like to create a plot where I have unconnected dots and some connected. So far, I have figured out how to draw the dots. My code is the following: ListPlot[{{1, 1}, {2, 2}, {3, 3}, {4, 4}, {1, 4}, {2, 5}, {3, 6}, {4, 7}, {1, 7}, {2, 8}, {3, 9}, {4, 10}, {1, 10}, {2, 11}, {3, 12}, {4,13}, {2.5, 7}}, Ticks -> {{1, 2, 3, 4}, None}, AxesStyle -> Thin, TicksStyle -> Directive[Black, Bold, 12], Mesh -> Full] I have thought using ListLinePlot command, but I don't know how to specify to the command to draw only selected lines between the dots. Do have any suggestions/hints on how to do that? Thank you. Answer One possibility would be to use Epilog with Line : ListPlot[ {{1, 1}, {2, 2}, {3, 3}, {4, 4}, {1, 4}, {2, 5}, {3, 6}, {4, 7}, {1, 7}, {2, 8}, {3, 9}, {4, 10}, {1, 10}, {2, 11}, {3, 12}, {4, 13}, {2.5, 7}}, Ticks -> {{1, 2, 3, 4}, None}, AxesStyle -> Thin, TicksStyle -> Directive[Black, Bold, 12], Mesh -> Full, Epilog -> { Line[ ...

dynamic - How can I make a clickable ArrayPlot that returns input?

I would like to create a dynamic ArrayPlot so that the rectangles, when clicked, provide the input. Can I use ArrayPlot for this? Or is there something else I should have to use? Answer ArrayPlot is much more than just a simple array like Grid : it represents a ranged 2D dataset, and its visualization can be finetuned by options like DataReversed and DataRange . These features make it quite complicated to reproduce the same layout and order with Grid . Here I offer AnnotatedArrayPlot which comes in handy when your dataset is more than just a flat 2D array. The dynamic interface allows highlighting individual cells and possibly interacting with them. AnnotatedArrayPlot works the same way as ArrayPlot and accepts the same options plus Enabled , HighlightCoordinates , HighlightStyle and HighlightElementFunction . data = {{Missing["HasSomeMoreData"], GrayLevel[ 1], {RGBColor[0, 1, 1], RGBColor[0, 0, 1], GrayLevel[1]}, RGBColor[0, 1, 0]}, {GrayLevel[0], GrayLevel...

equation solving - Invert and fit implicitly defined curve

I need to fit an implicitly defined curve. I thought I could get some data out of Solve , and then using FindFit . Therefore, I would like to find the relation the parametric curve defined by $F(x,y)=0$: Solve[-(1/2) + 1/2 (0.41202 BesselK[0, 0.1 Sqrt[x^2 + y^2]] + (0.101483 x BesselK[1, 0.1 Sqrt[x^2 + y^2]])/Sqrt[x^2 + y^2]) == 0, y] But I can't get an output: Solve was unable to solve the system with inexact coefficients or the system obtained by direct rationalization of inexact numbers present in the system. Since many of the methods used by Solve require exact input, providing Solve with an exact version of the system may help. >> Edit: In particular, I would like to fit the data coming from the curve with the expression of another curve, and not with a function $f(x)$. In particular, since this clearly looks like a cardioid , I would like it to fit to something like it. What other strategies could I try?