Skip to main content

performance tuning - Manipulate executes expressions multiple times


I am using Manipulate for a rather intricate front end for data visualization. I was getting very sluggish performance and was able to boil the problem down to a very similar question (Why does Manipulate execute the expression twice?). The suggestions of using ContinuousAction->False and TrackedSymbols does not seem to work in this case.



Let's simplify the problem by producing a simple array of numbers and mapping a simple function through them. The array of numbers needs to change dynamically, here we just change the length based on a manipulation parameter, i:


manipulateSlow[] := Module[{data, updated},
Manipulate[
Print[i];
data = RandomReal[{0, 1}, 100*i];
updated = Map[Sin, data];
, {i, {1, 2, 3}}]]

manipulateFast[] := Module[{updated},
Manipulate[

Print[i];
updated = Map[Sin, RandomReal[{0, 1}, 100*i]];
, {i, {1, 2, 3}}]]

When one plays with the parameter i in manipulateSlow


manipulateSlow[]

the code internal to Manipulate is called multiple times. This is in contrast to manipulateFast


manipulateFast[]


where when fiddling with the parameter i the code internal to Manipulate is only called once per manipulation.


This example is, of course, just a toy. In my real application the process of RamdomReal is replaced by a much slower data reading function. Calling it multiple times is not an option.


EDIT:


I lied when previously saying that TrackedSymbols does not work. The follow fixes the issue of multiple Print evaluations.


manipulateFixed[] := Module[{data, updated},
Manipulate[
Print[i];
data = RandomReal[{0, 1}, 100*i];
updated = Map[Sin, data];
, {i, {1, 2, 3}},TrackedSymbols :> {i}]]


I must be confused about how TrackedSymbols changes the evaluation process. What is happening inside of manipulateFast that does not cause the evaluation to occur twice?




Comments

Popular posts from this blog

plotting - Filling between two spheres in SphericalPlot3D

Manipulate[ SphericalPlot3D[{1, 2 - n}, {θ, 0, Pi}, {ϕ, 0, 1.5 Pi}, Mesh -> None, PlotPoints -> 15, PlotRange -> {-2.2, 2.2}], {n, 0, 1}] I cant' seem to be able to make a filling between two spheres. I've already tried the obvious Filling -> {1 -> {2}} but Mathematica doesn't seem to like that option. Is there any easy way around this or ... Answer There is no built-in filling in SphericalPlot3D . One option is to use ParametricPlot3D to draw the surfaces between the two shells: Manipulate[ Show[SphericalPlot3D[{1, 2 - n}, {θ, 0, Pi}, {ϕ, 0, 1.5 Pi}, PlotPoints -> 15, PlotRange -> {-2.2, 2.2}], ParametricPlot3D[{ r {Sin[t] Cos[1.5 Pi], Sin[t] Sin[1.5 Pi], Cos[t]}, r {Sin[t] Cos[0 Pi], Sin[t] Sin[0 Pi], Cos[t]}}, {r, 1, 2 - n}, {t, 0, Pi}, PlotStyle -> Yellow, Mesh -> {2, 15}]], {n, 0, 1}]

plotting - Plot 4D data with color as 4th dimension

I have a list of 4D data (x position, y position, amplitude, wavelength). I want to plot x, y, and amplitude on a 3D plot and have the color of the points correspond to the wavelength. I have seen many examples using functions to define color but my wavelength cannot be expressed by an analytic function. Is there a simple way to do this? Answer Here a another possible way to visualize 4D data: data = Flatten[Table[{x, y, x^2 + y^2, Sin[x - y]}, {x, -Pi, Pi,Pi/10}, {y,-Pi,Pi, Pi/10}], 1]; You can use the function Point along with VertexColors . Now the points are places using the first three elements and the color is determined by the fourth. In this case I used Hue, but you can use whatever you prefer. Graphics3D[ Point[data[[All, 1 ;; 3]], VertexColors -> Hue /@ data[[All, 4]]], Axes -> True, BoxRatios -> {1, 1, 1/GoldenRatio}]

plotting - Adding a thick curve to a regionplot

Suppose we have the following simple RegionPlot: f[x_] := 1 - x^2 g[x_] := 1 - 0.5 x^2 RegionPlot[{y < f[x], f[x] < y < g[x], y > g[x]}, {x, 0, 2}, {y, 0, 2}] Now I'm trying to change the curve defined by $y=g[x]$ into a thick black curve, while leaving all other boundaries in the plot unchanged. I've tried adding the region $y=g[x]$ and playing with the plotstyle, which didn't work, and I've tried BoundaryStyle, which changed all the boundaries in the plot. Now I'm kinda out of ideas... Any help would be appreciated! Answer With f[x_] := 1 - x^2 g[x_] := 1 - 0.5 x^2 You can use Epilog to add the thick line: RegionPlot[{y < f[x], f[x] < y < g[x], y > g[x]}, {x, 0, 2}, {y, 0, 2}, PlotPoints -> 50, Epilog -> (Plot[g[x], {x, 0, 2}, PlotStyle -> {Black, Thick}][[1]]), PlotStyle -> {Directive[Yellow, Opacity[0.4]], Directive[Pink, Opacity[0.4]],