Skip to main content

function construction - Better solution than returning a list of 3 values?


I have a function (using SetDelayed) that currently returns 3 values in a list. Later on I use the result of this list along with [[1]], [[2]], and [[3]] to use the values. Is there a way I can give each value a "name" of some sort, and return only one value in such a way that all these values can be accessed by name? (Coming from an object-oriented programming perspective, I just want to return a single object with a few fields/accessors.)



Answer



Here are some options:


Lists of Rules


A simple option would be to return a list of rules:



$someone = {"name" -> "Fred", "gender" -> "Male", "age" -> 25};

Fields can then be extracted thus:


"name" /. $someone
(* "Fred" *)

"age" /. $someone
(* 25 *)

Wrapper Patterns



A variation on this theme would be to define a pattern that represents a new value type:


$person = person[name_, gender_, age_];

$someoneElse = person["Fred", "Male", 25];

Extracting fields is more verbose:


$someoneElse /. $person :> name
(* "Fred" *)

... but it opens the possibility of extracting values computed from multiple fields:



$someoneElse /. $person :> name ~~ " (" ~~ gender ~~ ")"
(* "Fred (Male)" *)

Manually Defined Wrapper Accessors


We could extend the previous example by writing "accessor functions" that access components of a wrapper:


personName[$person] := name

personGender[$person] := gender

personAge[$person] := age



personName @ $someoneElse
(* Fred *)

personAge @ $someoneElse
(* 25 *)

Automatically Defined Wrapper Accessors


If we were going to define many such wrapper types, it would be convenient to automate the generation of the wrapper functions:



SetAttributes[assembleName, HoldAll]
assembleName[p_Symbol, s_Symbol] :=
Context[p]~~SymbolName[p]~~StringReplace[SymbolName[s], f_~~r___ :> ToUpperCase[f]~~r] //
Symbol

defineAccessors[f:w_[Verbatim[Pattern][_, Blank[]]..]] :=
Cases[f, Verbatim[Pattern][s_, Blank[]] :> (Hold[#[f], s] &@ assembleName[w, s])] /.
Hold[l:s_[___], r_] :> (l := r; s)

For example:



defineAccessors[movie[name_, year_, quote_]]
(* {movieName, movieYear, movieQuote} *)

randomMovie[] :=
RandomChoice @ {
movie["2001: A Space Odyssey",1968,"Watch out! He's got a bone!"]
, movie["Prometheus",2012,"Here, cobra, cobra... Gimme a hug!"]
, movie["Star Wars: The Phantom Menace",1999,"I say we nuke the JJB from orbit..."]
, movie["Firefly",2002,"...Sniff..."]
}


$someMovie = randomMovie[];

$someMovie // movieName
(* "2001: A Space Odyssey" *)

$someMovie // movieYear
(* 1968 *)

$someMovie // movieQuote

(* "Watch out! He's got a bone!" *)

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

plotting - How to draw lines between specified dots on ListPlot?

I would like to create a plot where I have unconnected dots and some connected. So far, I have figured out how to draw the dots. My code is the following: ListPlot[{{1, 1}, {2, 2}, {3, 3}, {4, 4}, {1, 4}, {2, 5}, {3, 6}, {4, 7}, {1, 7}, {2, 8}, {3, 9}, {4, 10}, {1, 10}, {2, 11}, {3, 12}, {4,13}, {2.5, 7}}, Ticks -> {{1, 2, 3, 4}, None}, AxesStyle -> Thin, TicksStyle -> Directive[Black, Bold, 12], Mesh -> Full] I have thought using ListLinePlot command, but I don't know how to specify to the command to draw only selected lines between the dots. Do have any suggestions/hints on how to do that? Thank you. Answer One possibility would be to use Epilog with Line : ListPlot[ {{1, 1}, {2, 2}, {3, 3}, {4, 4}, {1, 4}, {2, 5}, {3, 6}, {4, 7}, {1, 7}, {2, 8}, {3, 9}, {4, 10}, {1, 10}, {2, 11}, {3, 12}, {4, 13}, {2.5, 7}}, Ticks -> {{1, 2, 3, 4}, None}, AxesStyle -> Thin, TicksStyle -> Directive[Black, Bold, 12], Mesh -> Full, Epilog -> { Line[ ...

equation solving - Invert and fit implicitly defined curve

I need to fit an implicitly defined curve. I thought I could get some data out of Solve , and then using FindFit . Therefore, I would like to find the relation the parametric curve defined by $F(x,y)=0$: Solve[-(1/2) + 1/2 (0.41202 BesselK[0, 0.1 Sqrt[x^2 + y^2]] + (0.101483 x BesselK[1, 0.1 Sqrt[x^2 + y^2]])/Sqrt[x^2 + y^2]) == 0, y] But I can't get an output: Solve was unable to solve the system with inexact coefficients or the system obtained by direct rationalization of inexact numbers present in the system. Since many of the methods used by Solve require exact input, providing Solve with an exact version of the system may help. >> Edit: In particular, I would like to fit the data coming from the curve with the expression of another curve, and not with a function $f(x)$. In particular, since this clearly looks like a cardioid , I would like it to fit to something like it. What other strategies could I try?

dynamic - How can I make a clickable ArrayPlot that returns input?

I would like to create a dynamic ArrayPlot so that the rectangles, when clicked, provide the input. Can I use ArrayPlot for this? Or is there something else I should have to use? Answer ArrayPlot is much more than just a simple array like Grid : it represents a ranged 2D dataset, and its visualization can be finetuned by options like DataReversed and DataRange . These features make it quite complicated to reproduce the same layout and order with Grid . Here I offer AnnotatedArrayPlot which comes in handy when your dataset is more than just a flat 2D array. The dynamic interface allows highlighting individual cells and possibly interacting with them. AnnotatedArrayPlot works the same way as ArrayPlot and accepts the same options plus Enabled , HighlightCoordinates , HighlightStyle and HighlightElementFunction . data = {{Missing["HasSomeMoreData"], GrayLevel[ 1], {RGBColor[0, 1, 1], RGBColor[0, 0, 1], GrayLevel[1]}, RGBColor[0, 1, 0]}, {GrayLevel[0], GrayLevel...