Skip to main content

Function that counts the number of arguments of other functions


I have a newbie question: is it possible to write a function that counts the arguments (total and optionals) of a given function? Possibly it should be able to work with built-in and custom functions as well.


For example, if I define


f1[x_Integer] := x + 1;

f2[x_Integer, y_Integer: 1] := x + y;
g[x_Real, y_] := x - y;

I would like to have


countArgs[f1]
{1,0}
countArgs[f2]
{2,1}
countArgs[g]
{2,0}


and also, for example,


countArgs[Sin]
{1,0}

thank you.


@celtschk


Well, I didn't even know the use of UpValues, but basically what I am asking is the number of inputs the function needs, I don't care what the function does with those inputs. In your examples I would say



  • {Infinity,0} for foo? It's more a question than an answer, sorry, but I had not thought aboute these unusual cases.


  • this is nasty, I didn't think of a case like that either, I would say {3,{2}}, the {2} meaning exactly 2, to avoid bar[1,2], which is not legal.

  • {2,0} but just because you wrote f[g,g], so it's practically a guess, I don't know what are UpValues and if they go against the spirit of my question by messing with the function. I hope I was clear.

  • the last one I would say {3,0} as they were flattened.


Thank you, I start seeing that my question is not so obvious because there are too many complicated definitions for functions to take into account.


For now I understood that is possible with built-in functions with


SyntaxInformation[f]

(thank you Heike) but that mybe is a little too much asking for a general custom function.



Answer




Here is my attempt. The function below will work on functions with default args and options, as well as those having multiple definitions. I made the following assumptions:



  • Only DownValues - based definitions are considered

  • Default arguments, if present, are always to the right of mandatory arguments.

  • Options, if present, are always to the right of all other arguments, and are declared either by OptionsPattern[] or opts:OptionsPattern[] pattern.


Here is the code:


ClearAll[countArgs];
SetAttributes[countArgs, {HoldAll, Listable}];
countArgs[f_Symbol] :=

With[{dv = DownValues[f]}, countArgs[dv]];

countArgs[Verbatim[HoldPattern][HoldPattern[f_Symbol[args___]]] :> _] :=
countArgs[f[args]];

countArgs[
f_[Except[_Optional | _OptionsPattern |
Verbatim[Pattern][_, _OptionsPattern]], rest___]] :=
{1, 0, 0} + countArgs[f[rest]];


countArgs[ f_[o__Optional, rest___]] :=
{0, Length[HoldComplete[o]], 0} + countArgs[f[rest]];

countArgs[f_[_OptionsPattern | Verbatim[Pattern][_, _OptionsPattern]]] :=
{0, 0, 1};

countArgs[f_[]] := {0, 0, 0};

This function represents a mini-parser for the function's declarations. It returns a list of 3-element sublists, of the length equal to a number of DownValues. In each sublist, the first number is a number of normal arguments, the second one is a number of default arguments, and the last one (which can only be 0 or 1), tells us whether or not there are options declared.


Some examples:



ClearAll[f1, f2, f3, f4, g]
f1[x_Integer] := x + 1;
f2[x_Integer, y_Integer: 1] := x + y;
f3[x_, y_, z_: 1, q_: 2, opts : OptionsPattern[]] := x + y + z + q;
f4[x_, y_: 1] := x + y;
f4[x_, y_, z_] := x + y + z;
g[x_Real, y_] := x - y;

Now applying our function:


countArgs /@ {f1, f2, f3, f4, g}



{{{1, 0, 0}}, {{1, 1, 0}}, {{2, 2, 1}}, {{1, 1, 0}, {3, 0, 0}},{{2, 0, 0}}}

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

plotting - How to draw lines between specified dots on ListPlot?

I would like to create a plot where I have unconnected dots and some connected. So far, I have figured out how to draw the dots. My code is the following: ListPlot[{{1, 1}, {2, 2}, {3, 3}, {4, 4}, {1, 4}, {2, 5}, {3, 6}, {4, 7}, {1, 7}, {2, 8}, {3, 9}, {4, 10}, {1, 10}, {2, 11}, {3, 12}, {4,13}, {2.5, 7}}, Ticks -> {{1, 2, 3, 4}, None}, AxesStyle -> Thin, TicksStyle -> Directive[Black, Bold, 12], Mesh -> Full] I have thought using ListLinePlot command, but I don't know how to specify to the command to draw only selected lines between the dots. Do have any suggestions/hints on how to do that? Thank you. Answer One possibility would be to use Epilog with Line : ListPlot[ {{1, 1}, {2, 2}, {3, 3}, {4, 4}, {1, 4}, {2, 5}, {3, 6}, {4, 7}, {1, 7}, {2, 8}, {3, 9}, {4, 10}, {1, 10}, {2, 11}, {3, 12}, {4, 13}, {2.5, 7}}, Ticks -> {{1, 2, 3, 4}, None}, AxesStyle -> Thin, TicksStyle -> Directive[Black, Bold, 12], Mesh -> Full, Epilog -> { Line[ ...

dynamic - How can I make a clickable ArrayPlot that returns input?

I would like to create a dynamic ArrayPlot so that the rectangles, when clicked, provide the input. Can I use ArrayPlot for this? Or is there something else I should have to use? Answer ArrayPlot is much more than just a simple array like Grid : it represents a ranged 2D dataset, and its visualization can be finetuned by options like DataReversed and DataRange . These features make it quite complicated to reproduce the same layout and order with Grid . Here I offer AnnotatedArrayPlot which comes in handy when your dataset is more than just a flat 2D array. The dynamic interface allows highlighting individual cells and possibly interacting with them. AnnotatedArrayPlot works the same way as ArrayPlot and accepts the same options plus Enabled , HighlightCoordinates , HighlightStyle and HighlightElementFunction . data = {{Missing["HasSomeMoreData"], GrayLevel[ 1], {RGBColor[0, 1, 1], RGBColor[0, 0, 1], GrayLevel[1]}, RGBColor[0, 1, 0]}, {GrayLevel[0], GrayLevel...

Is there a way to do conditional matrix loop using 'continue'

I have the following: n = 3; m = 5; ww = RandomReal[{0, 0.1}, {n, n}]; uu = RandomReal[{0, 1}, {m, n}]; pp = RandomReal[{0, 1}, {n, n}]; ss = RandomInteger[{0, 5}, {m, n}]; Grid[{{"ww", "uu", "pp", "ss"}, {ww // TableForm, uu // TableForm, pp // TableForm, ss // TableForm}}, Spacings -> {5, 2}, Dividers -> All] where I would like to look at every element of matrix ss and produce a matrix tt , with zeroes at the locations in ss which have zeroes, and in all other positions do the following: tt = (-1/Subscript[ww, m]) Log[(1 - uu)/(Subscript[pp, m - 1])], where Subscript[ww, m] is the value at index of ww matrix and where Subscript[pp, m - 1] is the value at index-1 of pp matrix. So for example if the first value ever read from matrix ss happens to be 2, then value taken from matrix ww would be from the row 2, but from pp would be from row 1. Also how to tell difference between a 0 as a valid value from within the matrix elemen...