Skip to main content

output formatting - How to eliminate the zero real part of a purely imaginary number?



In Mathematica 9, a purely imaginary number, e.g. 0.9 I, will display as 0. + 0.9i in the output form. How can I eliminate the real part 0. in the output form?



Answer



This is not a specific issue of Mathematica 9, we have the same in ver.8 unlike in ver.7.


Mathematica 8 and 9


First, looking at FullForm of these numbers :


FullForm /@ {0.9 I, 0 + 0.9 I, 0.9 + 0 I, 0.9 + 0. I}


{Complex[0.`, 0.9`], Complex[0.`, 0.9`], 0.9`, Complex[0.9`, 0.`]} 


(see e.g. Meaning of backtick in floating-point literal) and then examining this behvior :


{ Complex[0, 9/10], Complex[0, 0.9], Complex[0.9, 0], Complex[0.9, 0.]}
Chop @ %


{(9 I)/10, 0. + 0.9 I, 0.9, 0.9 + 0. I}
{(9 I)/10, 0. + 0.9 I, 0.9, 0.9 }

we can conclude that assuming the real part as an exact number it will be rewritten as a machine precission number given that the imaginary part is a machine precision number. Reverse need not be always true because e.g. Head[ Complex[0.9, 0]] is Real unlike Head[ Complex[0.9, 0.]]. Perhaps one might consider this as a bug since Chop unexpectedly doesn't work on the real part, while it works for the imaginary part in the above example. On the other hand rewriting Complex[0, .9] as 0. + 0.9I may be considered as a consistency issue.


Nevertheless you can still get the expected result using e.g. RootApproximant :



RootApproximant[0.9 I]


(9 I)/10

However if the imaginary part is not an algebraic number you cannot expect that RootApproximant will appear helpful and you'll have to work with exact numbers from the begining, e.g. this works well RootApproximant[ Sqrt[2.] I] while this doesn't RootApproximant[Pi I], nevertheless one needn't use it at all (Pi I yields I π).


{0 + Pi I, 0. + Pi I}


{ I π, 0. + 3.14159 I} 


Mathematica 7


We have in ver.7 :


FullForm[0.9 I]


Complex[0, 0.9`] 

therefore :


0.9 I



0.9 I

nevertheless this behavior is not quite consistent, e.g. :


{ π I, 0. + π I, π + 0 I, π + 0. I}


{I π, 0. + 3.14159 I, π, 3.14159 + 0. I}


there is even worse problem :


{Pi + 0.9 I, Complex[Pi, 0.9]}


{3.14159 + 0.9 I, Complex[Ï€, 0.9]}

To sum up the behaviour in Mathematica 8 and 9 seems to be more uniform than that of Mathematica 7 and therefore one can say it is an intentional issue. On the other hand Chop works well in ver. 7 :


{ Complex[0., 0.9], Complex[0.9, 0], Complex[0.9, 0.]}
Chop @ %



 {0. + 0.9 I, 0.9, 0.9 + 0. I}
{0.9 I, 0.9, 0.9}

while its defect in ver.8 and 9 is definitely undesirable.


Comments

Popular posts from this blog

front end - keyboard shortcut to invoke Insert new matrix

I frequently need to type in some matrices, and the menu command Insert > Table/Matrix > New... allows matrices with lines drawn between columns and rows, which is very helpful. I would like to make a keyboard shortcut for it, but cannot find the relevant frontend token command (4209405) for it. Since the FullForm[] and InputForm[] of matrices with lines drawn between rows and columns is the same as those without lines, it's hard to do this via 3rd party system-wide text expanders (e.g. autohotkey or atext on mac). How does one assign a keyboard shortcut for the menu item Insert > Table/Matrix > New... , preferably using only mathematica? Thanks! Answer In the MenuSetup.tr (for linux located in the $InstallationDirectory/SystemFiles/FrontEnd/TextResources/X/ directory), I changed the line MenuItem["&New...", "CreateGridBoxDialog"] to read MenuItem["&New...", "CreateGridBoxDialog", MenuKey["m", Modifiers-...

How to thread a list

I have data in format data = {{a1, a2}, {b1, b2}, {c1, c2}, {d1, d2}} Tableform: I want to thread it to : tdata = {{{a1, b1}, {a2, b2}}, {{a1, c1}, {a2, c2}}, {{a1, d1}, {a2, d2}}} Tableform: And I would like to do better then pseudofunction[n_] := Transpose[{data2[[1]], data2[[n]]}]; SetAttributes[pseudofunction, Listable]; Range[2, 4] // pseudofunction Here is my benchmark data, where data3 is normal sample of real data. data3 = Drop[ExcelWorkBook[[Column1 ;; Column4]], None, 1]; data2 = {a #, b #, c #, d #} & /@ Range[1, 10^5]; data = RandomReal[{0, 1}, {10^6, 4}]; Here is my benchmark code kptnw[list_] := Transpose[{Table[First@#, {Length@# - 1}], Rest@#}, {3, 1, 2}] &@list kptnw2[list_] := Transpose[{ConstantArray[First@#, Length@# - 1], Rest@#}, {3, 1, 2}] &@list OleksandrR[list_] := Flatten[Outer[List, List@First[list], Rest[list], 1], {{2}, {1, 4}}] paradox2[list_] := Partition[Riffle[list[[1]], #], 2] & /@ Drop[list, 1] RM[list_] := FoldList[Transpose[{First@li...

dynamic - How can I make a clickable ArrayPlot that returns input?

I would like to create a dynamic ArrayPlot so that the rectangles, when clicked, provide the input. Can I use ArrayPlot for this? Or is there something else I should have to use? Answer ArrayPlot is much more than just a simple array like Grid : it represents a ranged 2D dataset, and its visualization can be finetuned by options like DataReversed and DataRange . These features make it quite complicated to reproduce the same layout and order with Grid . Here I offer AnnotatedArrayPlot which comes in handy when your dataset is more than just a flat 2D array. The dynamic interface allows highlighting individual cells and possibly interacting with them. AnnotatedArrayPlot works the same way as ArrayPlot and accepts the same options plus Enabled , HighlightCoordinates , HighlightStyle and HighlightElementFunction . data = {{Missing["HasSomeMoreData"], GrayLevel[ 1], {RGBColor[0, 1, 1], RGBColor[0, 0, 1], GrayLevel[1]}, RGBColor[0, 1, 0]}, {GrayLevel[0], GrayLevel...