Skip to main content

numerical integration - 2D inhomogeneous biharmonic equation


How to solve a 2D inhomogeneous biharmonic equation with NDSolve?


I tried the following code:


P[x_, y_] := x y
eq = Laplacian[Laplacian[w[x, y], {x, y}], {x, y}] == x*y;
bc = {w[0, y] == w[1, y] == w[x, 0] == w[x, 1] == 0,
Derivative[2, 0][w][0, y] == Derivative[2, 0][w][1, y] ==

Derivative[0, 2][w][x, 0] == Derivative[0, 2][w][x, 1] == 0};
NDSolve[{eq == P[x, y], bc}, w, {x, 0, 1}, {y, 0, 1}]

but it says



NDSolve::femcmsd: The spatial derivative order of the PDE may not exceed two.



How to derive the solution?



Answer



As mentioned in the warning, currently "FiniteElement" method can't handle 4th order spatial derivatives. So let me show you a FDM-based solution. I'll use pdetoae for the generation of difference equation:



P[x_, y_] := x y
eq = Laplacian[Laplacian[w[x, y], {x, y}], {x, y}] == P[x, y];
bc = {w[0, y] == w[1, y] == w[x, 0] == w[x, 1] == 0,
Derivative[2, 0][w][0, y] == Derivative[2, 0][w][1, y] ==
Derivative[0, 2][w][x, 0] == Derivative[0, 2][w][x, 1] == 0} /.
Equal[a__, b_] :> Thread[{a} == b];
{bcy, bcx} = GatherBy[Flatten@bc, FreeQ[#, _[0 | 1, y]] &];
domain = {0, 1};
points = 25;
grid = Array[# &, points, domain];

difforder = 4;
(*Definition of pdetoae isn't included in this code piece,
please find it in the link above.*)
ptoafunc = pdetoae[w[x, y], {grid, grid}, difforder];
var = Outer[w, grid, grid] // Flatten;

del = #[[3 ;; -3]] &;

ae = del /@ del@ptoafunc@eq;
aebcx = ptoafunc@bcx;

aebcy = del /@ ptoafunc@bcy;

{b, m} = CoefficientArrays[{ae, aebcx, aebcy} // Flatten, var];

sollst = LinearSolve[m, -N@b];


Remark


If you have difficulty in understanding the usage of del, the following is an alternative way for calculating sollst:


fullsys = ptoafunc@{eq, bcx, bcy} // Flatten;

{b, m} = CoefficientArrays[fullsys, var];
sollst = LeastSquares[m, -N@b]; // AbsoluteTiming

Notice this approach is slower.



sol = ListInterpolation[Partition[sollst, points], {grid, grid}];

Plot3D[sol[x, y], {x, ##}, {y, ##}] & @@ domain

Mathematica graphics



Notice I've modified the definition of bc because pdetoae can't parse continued equality at the moment i.e. something like a == b == c isn't supported yet.




Solution for the problem in the comments below


The new-added example in the comment has a nonlinear inhomogeneous term, so LinearSolve can't be used any more, we can use FindRoot instead:


nu = 0.33; h = 0.01; Ye = 2 10^11; P1 = 10^5; 
N11[x_, y_] = (Ye h)/(2 (1 - nu^2)) ((D[w[x, y], x])^2 + nu (D[w[x, y], y])^2);
N22[x_, y_] = (Ye h)/(2 (1 - nu^2)) (nu (D[w[x, y], x])^2 + (D[w[x, y], y])^2);
N12[x_, y_] = (Ye h)/(2 (1 + nu)) D[w[x, y], x] D[w[x, y], y] ;
P[x_, y_] =
N11[x, y] D[w[x, y], x, x] - N22[x, y] D[w[x, y], y, y] -

2 N12[x, y] D[w[x, y], x, y] - P1;
eq = (Ye h^3)/(12 (1 - nu^2)) Laplacian[Laplacian[w[x, y], {x, y}], {x, y}] == -P[x,
y]; bc = {w[x, 0] == w[x, 1] == 0,
Derivative[2, 0][w][0, y] == Derivative[2, 0][w][1, y] == 0,
Derivative[0, 2][w][x, 0] == Derivative[0, 2][w][x, 1] ==
0, (Ye h^3)/(12 (1 - nu^2)) (Derivative[3, 0][w][0, y] +
2 Derivative[1, 2][w][0, y]) + P1 Derivative[1, 0][w][0, y] ==
0, (Ye h^3)/(12 (1 - nu^2)) (Derivative[3, 0][w][1, y] +
2 Derivative[1, 2][w][1, y]) + P1 Derivative[1, 0][w][1, y] == 0} /.
Equal[a__, b_] :> Thread[{a} == b];

{bcy, bcx} = GatherBy[Flatten@bc, FreeQ[#, _[0 | 1, y]] &];
domain = {0, 1};
points = 25;
grid = Array[# &, points, domain];
difforder = 4;
(* Definition of pdetoae isn't included in this code piece,
please find it in the link above. *)
ptoafunc = pdetoae[w[x, y], {grid, grid}, difforder];
del = #[[3 ;; -3]] &;
ae = del /@ del@ptoafunc@eq;

aebcx = ptoafunc@bcx;
aebcy = del /@ ptoafunc@bcy;
var = Outer[w, grid, grid] // Flatten;

solrule = FindRoot[Rationalize[{ae, aebcx, aebcy} // Flatten, 0], {#, 0} & /@ var,
WorkingPrecision -> 16]; // AbsoluteTiming
sollst = Replace[solrule, (w[x_, y_] -> z_) :> {x, y, z}, {1}];
sol = Interpolation@sollst;
Plot3D[sol[x, y], {x, ##}, {y, ##}] & @@ domain


Mathematica graphics


Notice setting proper initial values for FindRoot can be troublesome, but luckily it seems not to be a big problem in this case.


Comments

Popular posts from this blog

plotting - Plot 4D data with color as 4th dimension

I have a list of 4D data (x position, y position, amplitude, wavelength). I want to plot x, y, and amplitude on a 3D plot and have the color of the points correspond to the wavelength. I have seen many examples using functions to define color but my wavelength cannot be expressed by an analytic function. Is there a simple way to do this? Answer Here a another possible way to visualize 4D data: data = Flatten[Table[{x, y, x^2 + y^2, Sin[x - y]}, {x, -Pi, Pi,Pi/10}, {y,-Pi,Pi, Pi/10}], 1]; You can use the function Point along with VertexColors . Now the points are places using the first three elements and the color is determined by the fourth. In this case I used Hue, but you can use whatever you prefer. Graphics3D[ Point[data[[All, 1 ;; 3]], VertexColors -> Hue /@ data[[All, 4]]], Axes -> True, BoxRatios -> {1, 1, 1/GoldenRatio}]

plotting - Filling between two spheres in SphericalPlot3D

Manipulate[ SphericalPlot3D[{1, 2 - n}, {θ, 0, Pi}, {ϕ, 0, 1.5 Pi}, Mesh -> None, PlotPoints -> 15, PlotRange -> {-2.2, 2.2}], {n, 0, 1}] I cant' seem to be able to make a filling between two spheres. I've already tried the obvious Filling -> {1 -> {2}} but Mathematica doesn't seem to like that option. Is there any easy way around this or ... Answer There is no built-in filling in SphericalPlot3D . One option is to use ParametricPlot3D to draw the surfaces between the two shells: Manipulate[ Show[SphericalPlot3D[{1, 2 - n}, {θ, 0, Pi}, {ϕ, 0, 1.5 Pi}, PlotPoints -> 15, PlotRange -> {-2.2, 2.2}], ParametricPlot3D[{ r {Sin[t] Cos[1.5 Pi], Sin[t] Sin[1.5 Pi], Cos[t]}, r {Sin[t] Cos[0 Pi], Sin[t] Sin[0 Pi], Cos[t]}}, {r, 1, 2 - n}, {t, 0, Pi}, PlotStyle -> Yellow, Mesh -> {2, 15}]], {n, 0, 1}]

plotting - Mathematica: 3D plot based on combined 2D graphs

I have several sigmoidal fits to 3 different datasets, with mean fit predictions plus the 95% confidence limits (not symmetrical around the mean) and the actual data. I would now like to show these different 2D plots projected in 3D as in but then using proper perspective. In the link here they give some solutions to combine the plots using isometric perspective, but I would like to use proper 3 point perspective. Any thoughts? Also any way to show the mean points per time point for each series plus or minus the standard error on the mean would be cool too, either using points+vertical bars, or using spheres plus tubes. Below are some test data and the fit function I am using. Note that I am working on a logit(proportion) scale and that the final vertical scale is Log10(percentage). (* some test data *) data = Table[Null, {i, 4}]; data[[1]] = {{1, -5.8}, {2, -5.4}, {3, -0.8}, {4, -0.2}, {5, 4.6}, {1, -6.4}, {2, -5.6}, {3, -0.7}, {4, 0.04}, {5, 1.0}, {1, -6.8}, {2, -4.7}, {3, -1....