How can I return a Sequence?

Recently I had the need to redefine a certain symbol in my init.m so it would be automatically omitted from any lists it appears in. I decided to redefine it to an empty sequence, e.g. Locked = Sequence[], but that got me thinking. What if I wanted to return a sequence (not necessarily an empty one) in a := definition? Return doesn't have the SequenceHold attribute, and adding it in a package might cause problems, so what would I do?

EDIT: I think I've figured out what exactly causes me to have the problem. I've defined it to display a Message first to let me know whenever a package I'm importing attempts to "attack my computer". (It is trying to cause my computer to behave in a manner not consistent with my wishes, after all.) So I defined it as Locked := (Message[Locked::nope]; Sequence[]), but strangely it just returns Null. (It doesn't show a return value, but if I do {Locked}, it returns {Null}, and if I try to set it as an attribute it says that Null is not a valid attribute and doesn't set any of them.)

Answer

Calculate the List of results you wish to return and use Apply to replace the head:

listFn[a_, b___] := If[a > 0, {b}, {0}];
seqFn[args___] := Sequence @@ listFn[args];
f[1, seqFn[2, 3, 4, 5], 6]
f[1, seqFn[-2, 3, 4, 5], 6]

(*--> f[1, 3, 4, 5, 6] *)
(*--> f[1, 0, 6] *)

Here listFn represents the calculation of the results and does not need to be a separate function. The particular example above can be written more simply as

seqFn[a_, b___] := Sequence @@ If[a > 0, {b}, {0}]

Edit

It should be stressed that the method assumes listFn actually evaluates to the List of desired inputs; if not, the Head of the expression returned will be replaced with Sequence, perhaps with undesired results. In such a case, a method such as @Jens's may be used.

For instance if a is non-numeric, say a Symbol, in the example above, then you get

f[1, seqFn[x, 3, 4, 5], 6]
(*-> f[1, x > 0, {3, 4, 5}, {0}, 6] *)

Often one can construct a List of the actual results, though. (With thanks to @Mr.Wizard.)

Comments

plotting - Filling between two spheres in SphericalPlot3D

Manipulate[ SphericalPlot3D[{1, 2 - n}, {θ, 0, Pi}, {ϕ, 0, 1.5 Pi}, Mesh -> None, PlotPoints -> 15, PlotRange -> {-2.2, 2.2}], {n, 0, 1}] I cant' seem to be able to make a filling between two spheres. I've already tried the obvious Filling -> {1 -> {2}} but Mathematica doesn't seem to like that option. Is there any easy way around this or ... Answer There is no built-in filling in SphericalPlot3D . One option is to use ParametricPlot3D to draw the surfaces between the two shells: Manipulate[ Show[SphericalPlot3D[{1, 2 - n}, {θ, 0, Pi}, {ϕ, 0, 1.5 Pi}, PlotPoints -> 15, PlotRange -> {-2.2, 2.2}], ParametricPlot3D[{ r {Sin[t] Cos[1.5 Pi], Sin[t] Sin[1.5 Pi], Cos[t]}, r {Sin[t] Cos[0 Pi], Sin[t] Sin[0 Pi], Cos[t]}}, {r, 1, 2 - n}, {t, 0, Pi}, PlotStyle -> Yellow, Mesh -> {2, 15}]], {n, 0, 1}]

plotting - Plot 4D data with color as 4th dimension

I have a list of 4D data (x position, y position, amplitude, wavelength). I want to plot x, y, and amplitude on a 3D plot and have the color of the points correspond to the wavelength. I have seen many examples using functions to define color but my wavelength cannot be expressed by an analytic function. Is there a simple way to do this? Answer Here a another possible way to visualize 4D data: data = Flatten[Table[{x, y, x^2 + y^2, Sin[x - y]}, {x, -Pi, Pi,Pi/10}, {y,-Pi,Pi, Pi/10}], 1]; You can use the function Point along with VertexColors . Now the points are places using the first three elements and the color is determined by the fourth. In this case I used Hue, but you can use whatever you prefer. Graphics3D[ Point[data[[All, 1 ;; 3]], VertexColors -> Hue /@ data[[All, 4]]], Axes -> True, BoxRatios -> {1, 1, 1/GoldenRatio}]

plotting - Mathematica: 3D plot based on combined 2D graphs

I have several sigmoidal fits to 3 different datasets, with mean fit predictions plus the 95% confidence limits (not symmetrical around the mean) and the actual data. I would now like to show these different 2D plots projected in 3D as in but then using proper perspective. In the link here they give some solutions to combine the plots using isometric perspective, but I would like to use proper 3 point perspective. Any thoughts? Also any way to show the mean points per time point for each series plus or minus the standard error on the mean would be cool too, either using points+vertical bars, or using spheres plus tubes. Below are some test data and the fit function I am using. Note that I am working on a logit(proportion) scale and that the final vertical scale is Log10(percentage). (* some test data *) data = Table[Null, {i, 4}]; data[[1]] = {{1, -5.8}, {2, -5.4}, {3, -0.8}, {4, -0.2}, {5, 4.6}, {1, -6.4}, {2, -5.6}, {3, -0.7}, {4, 0.04}, {5, 1.0}, {1, -6.8}, {2, -4.7}, {3, -1.

Blog

Search This Blog