According to this question LinearSolve
can be compiled. However, CompilePrint[]
shows a call to MainEvaluate[]
but no warning is generated. It appears that LinearSolve
is not compilable, given the presence of MainEvaluate[]
. But the lack of any warning is surprising. Something more subtle appears to be going on. Consider the following.
In[1]:= SetSystemOptions[
"CompileOptions" -> "CompileReportExternal" -> True];
In[2]:= << CompiledFunctionTools`
In[3]:= v2 = Compile[{{m, _Real, 2}, {v, _Real, 1}},
LinearSolve[m, v]
];
In[4]:= CompilePrint[v2]
Out[4]= "
2 arguments
3 Tensor registers
Underflow checking off
Overflow checking off
Integer overflow checking on
RuntimeAttributes -> {}
T(R2)0 = A1
T(R1)1 = A2
Result = T(R1)2
1 T(R1)2 = MainEvaluate[ Hold[LinearSolve][ T(R2)0, T(R1)1]]
2 Return
"
There are no warnings generated, but I am not sure why there is a call to MainEvaluate[]
in the CompilePrint
.
There is a much clearer warning that compiling fails when one uses options within LinearSolve
while attempting to compile. Consider the following:
In[5]:= v3 = Compile[{{m, _Real, 2}, {v, _Real, 1}},
LinearSolve[m, v, Method -> "Cholesky"]
]
During evaluation of In[5]:= Compile::extscalar: Method->Cholesky cannot
be compiled and will be evaluated externally.
The result is assumed to be of type Integer. >>
During evaluation of In[5]:= Compile::exttensor: LinearSolve[m,v,Method->Cholesky]
cannot be compiled and will be evaluated externally.
The result is assumed to be a rank 2 tensor of type Real. >>
Also, CompilePrint[]
gives the following:
In[6]:= CompilePrint[v3]
Out[6]= "
2 arguments
1 Integer register
3 Tensor registers
Underflow checking off
Overflow checking off
Integer overflow checking on
RuntimeAttributes -> {}
T(R2)0 = A1
T(R1)1 = A2
Result = T(R2)2
1 T(R2)2 = MainEvaluate[ Function[{m, v}, LinearSolve[m, v,
Method -> Cholesky]][ T(R2)0, T(R1)1]]
2 Return
"
Questions:
- If
LinearSolve
can't be compiled, why is there no warning in the default case? Is there something more subtle going on (e.g. some parts of the process are compiled)? - If yes, how can one use the
Method
option within theCompiled
function to ensure that what can be compiled actually is?
Answer
acl already posted the crucial information needed to solve this conundrum (i.e., the definition of Internal`CompileValues[LinearSolve]
), but wishes to delete his post since he had not interpreted it to give the complete answer. Therefore I re-post the following observation along with a summary of what it means.
The input,
Internal`CompileValues[];
ClearAttributes[Internal`CompileValues, ReadProtected];
Internal`CompileValues[LinearSolve]
yields:
HoldPattern[Internal`CompileValues[LinearSolve]] :> {
HoldPattern[
LinearSolve[
System`CompileDump`x_?(Internal`TensorTypeQ[Real, {_, _}]),
System`CompileDump`b_?(Internal`TensorTypeQ[Real, {_}])]
] :> _?(Internal`TensorTypeQ[Real, {_}]),
HoldPattern[
LinearSolve[
System`CompileDump`x_?(Internal`TensorTypeQ[Complex, {_, _}]),
System`CompileDump`b_?(Internal`TensorTypeQ[Complex, {_}])]
] :> _?(Internal`TensorTypeQ[Complex, {_}])
}
Briefly put, this tells us that when the compiler sees a function call like LinearSolve[x, b]
, it knows that:
- when x is a real matrix and b is a real vector, the result is a real vector
- when x is a complex matrix and b is a complex vector, the result is a complex vector
As a result of this knowledge, the compiler is able to determine what type of register is needed to store the return value from LinearSolve
in these two cases. This is important if further operations are then carried out on the result: in the absence of type information, all subsequent operations on LinearSolve
's return value would need to be performed via the interpreter using MainEvaluate
for full generality, but because the type of the result is predetermined, such operations can be compiled instead. However, since LinearSolve
is a highly optimized top-level function, compilation does not offer any benefit outside of this scenario, and so knowing the return type has no value if LinearSolve[x, b]
is the entire contents of the compiled function, since the operation may as well have been performed via the interpreter anyway.
As regards why LinearSolve[x, b, Method -> m]
produces a message: it is because the definition for Internal`CompileValues[LinearSolve]
does not provide for pattern matching against LinearSolve
calls when any Method
is specified. It handles only the form LinearSolve[x, b]
.
Conclusion
Just because Internal`CompileValues[func]
is defined for some function func, one cannot assume that func can be called directly from compiled code without using a MainEvaluate
call. It simply means that the compiler has information about func which it can incorporate into the compilation process as a whole.
Comments
Post a Comment