Skip to main content

programming - Permanently extending the behaviour of functions (like decorators)


Suppose I have a function, e.g.


f[x_] := x^2

It works like this:


f[5]
(* 25 *)


I would like to permanently modify it so that calling f[5] will perform some action before and after the evaluation of the original f. For example, I would like f to behave like ff below:


ff[x_] := 
Module[{res},
Print["Before..."];
res = f[x];
Print["After..."];
res
]

ff[5]


During evaluation of In[]:= Before...

During evaluation of In[]:= After...
(* 25 *)

I would like to do this without needing to know what f does, or how it behaves. Preferably, the modification should be carried out automatically. This would be somewhat similar to decorators in Python.


The Villegas–Gayley pattern makes this feasible for built-in functions because built-in definitions always have lower priority than user-issued ones. But with user-defined functions this is much harder to do reliably because we cannot control the ordering of definitions.




Example application:



Evaluate functions with a certain value of $ContextPath. Ideally, all the functions in the package described in the linked question could be modified in one line of code.


If we have


sym;
g[] := ToString[sym]

then


g[]
(* "sym" *)

Suppose we want to automatically modify g[] so that it behaves like



Block[{$ContextPath = {}, $Context = "myEmpty`"}, g[]]
(* "Global`sym" *)

Answer



Based on your requirements I would move the original symbol to a new context.


wrapper[fn_, mod_] :=
Module[{ctxt = Context[fn], name = SymbolName[fn], x},
Context[fn] = "wrapper`" <> ctxt <> ToString[x] <> "`";
Symbol[ctxt <> name][arg___] := fn[arg] // Unevaluated // mod
]


Your example:


sym;
g[] := ToString[sym]

wrapper[g, Block[{$ContextPath = {}, $Context = "myEmpty`"}, #] &]

g[]


"Global`sym"


Recursion:


fib[1 | 2] = 1;
fib[n_Integer?Positive] := fib[n - 1] + fib[n - 2]

wrapper[fib, #2 &[Print["Before"], #, Print["After"]] &]

fib[7]



Before


After


13

Nested wrappers:


wrapper[fib, #2 &[Print["Primordial"], #, Print["Final"]] &]

fib[12]



Primordial


Before


After


Final


144

Related:



Comments

Popular posts from this blog

plotting - How to draw lines between specified dots on ListPlot?

I would like to create a plot where I have unconnected dots and some connected. So far, I have figured out how to draw the dots. My code is the following: ListPlot[{{1, 1}, {2, 2}, {3, 3}, {4, 4}, {1, 4}, {2, 5}, {3, 6}, {4, 7}, {1, 7}, {2, 8}, {3, 9}, {4, 10}, {1, 10}, {2, 11}, {3, 12}, {4,13}, {2.5, 7}}, Ticks -> {{1, 2, 3, 4}, None}, AxesStyle -> Thin, TicksStyle -> Directive[Black, Bold, 12], Mesh -> Full] I have thought using ListLinePlot command, but I don't know how to specify to the command to draw only selected lines between the dots. Do have any suggestions/hints on how to do that? Thank you. Answer One possibility would be to use Epilog with Line : ListPlot[ {{1, 1}, {2, 2}, {3, 3}, {4, 4}, {1, 4}, {2, 5}, {3, 6}, {4, 7}, {1, 7}, {2, 8}, {3, 9}, {4, 10}, {1, 10}, {2, 11}, {3, 12}, {4, 13}, {2.5, 7}}, Ticks -> {{1, 2, 3, 4}, None}, AxesStyle -> Thin, TicksStyle -> Directive[Black, Bold, 12], Mesh -> Full, Epilog -> { Line[ ...

dynamic - How can I make a clickable ArrayPlot that returns input?

I would like to create a dynamic ArrayPlot so that the rectangles, when clicked, provide the input. Can I use ArrayPlot for this? Or is there something else I should have to use? Answer ArrayPlot is much more than just a simple array like Grid : it represents a ranged 2D dataset, and its visualization can be finetuned by options like DataReversed and DataRange . These features make it quite complicated to reproduce the same layout and order with Grid . Here I offer AnnotatedArrayPlot which comes in handy when your dataset is more than just a flat 2D array. The dynamic interface allows highlighting individual cells and possibly interacting with them. AnnotatedArrayPlot works the same way as ArrayPlot and accepts the same options plus Enabled , HighlightCoordinates , HighlightStyle and HighlightElementFunction . data = {{Missing["HasSomeMoreData"], GrayLevel[ 1], {RGBColor[0, 1, 1], RGBColor[0, 0, 1], GrayLevel[1]}, RGBColor[0, 1, 0]}, {GrayLevel[0], GrayLevel...

equation solving - Invert and fit implicitly defined curve

I need to fit an implicitly defined curve. I thought I could get some data out of Solve , and then using FindFit . Therefore, I would like to find the relation the parametric curve defined by $F(x,y)=0$: Solve[-(1/2) + 1/2 (0.41202 BesselK[0, 0.1 Sqrt[x^2 + y^2]] + (0.101483 x BesselK[1, 0.1 Sqrt[x^2 + y^2]])/Sqrt[x^2 + y^2]) == 0, y] But I can't get an output: Solve was unable to solve the system with inexact coefficients or the system obtained by direct rationalization of inexact numbers present in the system. Since many of the methods used by Solve require exact input, providing Solve with an exact version of the system may help. >> Edit: In particular, I would like to fit the data coming from the curve with the expression of another curve, and not with a function $f(x)$. In particular, since this clearly looks like a cardioid , I would like it to fit to something like it. What other strategies could I try?