Skip to main content

numerical integration - BC for transport equation using NDSolve



First I can solve a transport equation with a source (Is it still called transport equation?) using DSolve. The form of the source serves only as an example. It can be anything.


sol1 = DSolve[
          { D[y[x, t], t] - 2 D[y[x, t], x] == Exp[-(t - 1)^2 - (x - 5)^2],
            y[x, 0] == 0
          },
          y[x, t],
          {x, t}
          ];

Plot3D[Evaluate[y[x, t] /. sol1], {x, -10, 10}, {t, 0, 15}, PlotRange -> All]


It will give me the following results. This is what I expected.


Results using DSolve


My question is, if I want to use NDSolve instead, what should I use as boundary conditions? The BC should allow the bulk to follow out of the domain and never return. I have no idea how to write down the BC.


For example,


sol3 = NDSolve[
          { D[y[x, t], t] - 2 D[y[x, t], x] == Exp[-(t - 1)^2 - (x - 5)^2],
            y[x, 0] == 0,
            y[-10, t] == 0,
            y[10, t] == 0},

          y[x, t],
          {x, -10, 10},
          {t, 0, 15}];

Plot3D[Evaluate[y[x, t] /. sol3], {x, -10, 10}, {t, 0, 15}, PlotRange -> All]

will give me an error and the following results which is obviously wrong:


NDSolve::eerr: Warning: scaled local spatial error estimate of 89.96891825336817` at t = 15.` in the direction of independent variable x is much greater than the prescribed error tolerance. Grid spacing with 25 points may be too large to achieve the desired accuracy or precision. A singularity may have formed or a smaller grid spacing can be specified using the MaxStepSize or MinPoints method options. >>

enter image description here



I think the error might involve something besides BC.



Answer



Another way that works on this kind of problems is to impose the BC/ΙC on the characteristics. For this problem the characteristics are $$t+x/2=c$$ so by making the change of variables: $$ \xi=t+x/2,\, \eta=t $$


the PDE becomes (if I am correctly) $$ u_\eta=e^{-(-1+\eta )^2-(5+2 \eta -2 \xi )^2} $$ for this kind of equation I need just one condition, an initial one:


solalt = NDSolve[{D[y[ξ, η], η] ==E^(-(-1 + η)^2 - (5 + 2 η - 2 ξ)^2), 
                  y[ξ, 0] == 1}, y, {ξ, -5, 20}, {η, 0, 15}][[1, 1]];
Plot3D[Evaluate[y[t + x/2, t] /. solalt], {x, -10, 10}, {t, 0, 15}, PlotRange -> All]

enter image description here


A little care must be given for the domains $(\xi,\eta)$ but its trivial to find it.



Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

mathematical optimization - Minimizing using indices, error: Part::pkspec1: The expression cannot be used as a part specification

I want to use Minimize where the variables to minimize are indices pointing into an array. Here a MWE that hopefully shows what my problem is. vars = u@# & /@ Range[3]; cons = Flatten@ { Table[(u[j] != #) & /@ vars[[j + 1 ;; -1]], {j, 1, 3 - 1}], 1 vec1 = {1, 2, 3}; vec2 = {1, 2, 3}; Minimize[{Total@((vec1[[#]] - vec2[[u[#]]])^2 & /@ Range[1, 3]), cons}, vars, Integers] The error I get: Part::pkspec1: The expression u[1] cannot be used as a part specification. >> Answer Ok, it seems that one can get around Mathematica trying to evaluate vec2[[u[1]]] too early by using the function Indexed[vec2,u[1]] . The working MWE would then look like the following: vars = u@# & /@ Range[3]; cons = Flatten@{ Table[(u[j] != #) & /@ vars[[j + 1 ;; -1]], {j, 1, 3 - 1}], 1 vec1 = {1, 2, 3}; vec2 = {1, 2, 3}; NMinimize[ {Total@((vec1[[#]] - Indexed[vec2, u[#]])^2 & /@ R...
Post a Comment
Read more

functions - Get leading series expansion term?

Given a function f[x] , I would like to have a function leadingSeries that returns just the leading term in the series around x=0 . For example: leadingSeries[(1/x + 2)/(4 + 1/x^2 + x)] x and leadingSeries[(1/x + 2 + (1 - 1/x^3)/4)/(4 + x)] -(1/(16 x^3)) Is there such a function in Mathematica? Or maybe one can implement it efficiently? EDIT I finally went with the following implementation, based on Carl Woll 's answer: lds[ex_,x_]:=( (ex/.x->(x+O[x]^2))/.SeriesData[U_,Z_,L_List,Mi_,Ma_,De_]:>SeriesData[U,Z,{L[[1]]},Mi,Mi+1,De]//Quiet//Normal) The advantage is, that this one also properly works with functions whose leading term is a constant: lds[Exp[x],x] 1 Answer Update 1 Updated to eliminate SeriesData and to not return additional terms Perhaps you could use: leadingSeries[expr_, x_] := Normal[expr /. x->(x+O[x]^2) /. a_List :> Take[a, 1]] Then for your examples: leadingSeries[(1/x + 2)/(4 + 1/x^2 + x), x] leadingSeries[Exp[x], x] leadingSeries[(1/x + 2 + (1 - 1/x...
Post a Comment
Read more

What is and isn't a valid variable specification for Manipulate?

I have an expression whose terms have arguments (representing subscripts), like this: myExpr = A[0] + V[1,T] I would like to put it inside a Manipulate to see its value as I move around the parameters. (The goal is eventually to plot it wrt one of the variables inside.) However, Mathematica complains when I set V[1,T] as a manipulated variable: Manipulate[Evaluate[myExpr], {A[0], 0, 1}, {V[1, T], 0, 1}] (*Manipulate::vsform: Manipulate argument {V[1,T],0,1} does not have the correct form for a variable specification. >> *) As a workaround, if I get rid of the symbol T inside the argument, it works fine: Manipulate[ Evaluate[myExpr /. T -> 15], {A[0], 0, 1}, {V[1, 15], 0, 1}] Why this behavior? Can anyone point me to the documentation that says what counts as a valid variable? And is there a way to get Manpiulate to accept an expression with a symbolic argument as a variable? Investigations I've done so far: I tried using variableQ from this answer , but it says V[1...
Post a Comment
Read more