Skip to main content

regular expressions - Regex named groups -- how to refer back to them in the replacement string



We can use group numbers to reuse the same piece of code while inside regex string, like that:


StringCases["x = y", RegularExpression["([\\w\\s]+)=(?1)"]]


{"x = y"}



To make it more readable and robust (like avoiding the situation when the groups can be renumbered either internally or through a redesign of the regex code), we can name patterns (and yes, (?) / (?&n) syntax works as well as (?P) / (?P>n)):


StringCases["x = y", RegularExpression["(?[\\w\\s]+)=(?&var)"]]

StringCases["x = y", RegularExpression["(?P[\\w\\s]+)=(?P>var)"]]


{"x = y"}


{"x = y"}



Perfect so far. However, what if I want to use the groups in the replacement rule? This works:


StringCases["x = y", RegularExpression["([\\w\\s]+)=((?1))"] :> {"$1", "$2"}]



{{"x ", " y"}}



But this doesn't:


StringCases["x = y", RegularExpression["(?[\\w\\s]+)=(?(?&var))"] :> {"${var}", "${rhs}"}]


{{"${var}", "${rhs}"}}



Of course, I can still use the numbers to refer to the groups:


StringCases["x = y", RegularExpression["(?[\\w\\s]+)=(?(?&var))"] :> {"$1", "$2"}]



{{"x ", " y"}}



But this is exactly what I want to avoid. I want to use the names, as they won't be affected by the code redesign.


I also tried $+{name}, \g, but they all don't work.


So, the question is: can we use names of the groups in the replacement rule?



Answer



Unfortunately, this is not an answer to the problem but rather some information on the subject that is hopefully of interest. As I said in my comment, one way to solve this issue is to transfer the regex into a StringExpression.


StringCases["x = y", 

x : ((WhitespaceCharacter | LetterCharacter) ..) ~~ "=" ~~ y__ :> {x,y}
]

The above code should be equivalent to your regex. What might be of interest for you is how Mathematica handles the named patterns. For this, we can use the undocumented function StringPattern`PatternConvert (undocumented, but you can access its full implementation which is very enlightening).


StringPattern`PatternConvert[
x : ((WhitespaceCharacter | LetterCharacter) ..) ~~ "=" ~~ y__]

(* {"(?ms)((?:[[:space:][:alpha:]])+)=(.+)", {{Hold[x], 1}, {Hold[y], 2}}, {}, Hold[None]} *)

Interestingly, you see that Mathematica converts it into a regex with normal grouping and stores the mapping between the groups and the names you gave. Therefore, it knows that x belongs to the first group.



How this helps you? It probably doesn't. As far as I can see there is no function to automatically turn a regex into a string expression.


Comments

Popular posts from this blog

plotting - Filling between two spheres in SphericalPlot3D

Manipulate[ SphericalPlot3D[{1, 2 - n}, {θ, 0, Pi}, {ϕ, 0, 1.5 Pi}, Mesh -> None, PlotPoints -> 15, PlotRange -> {-2.2, 2.2}], {n, 0, 1}] I cant' seem to be able to make a filling between two spheres. I've already tried the obvious Filling -> {1 -> {2}} but Mathematica doesn't seem to like that option. Is there any easy way around this or ... Answer There is no built-in filling in SphericalPlot3D . One option is to use ParametricPlot3D to draw the surfaces between the two shells: Manipulate[ Show[SphericalPlot3D[{1, 2 - n}, {θ, 0, Pi}, {ϕ, 0, 1.5 Pi}, PlotPoints -> 15, PlotRange -> {-2.2, 2.2}], ParametricPlot3D[{ r {Sin[t] Cos[1.5 Pi], Sin[t] Sin[1.5 Pi], Cos[t]}, r {Sin[t] Cos[0 Pi], Sin[t] Sin[0 Pi], Cos[t]}}, {r, 1, 2 - n}, {t, 0, Pi}, PlotStyle -> Yellow, Mesh -> {2, 15}]], {n, 0, 1}]

plotting - Plot 4D data with color as 4th dimension

I have a list of 4D data (x position, y position, amplitude, wavelength). I want to plot x, y, and amplitude on a 3D plot and have the color of the points correspond to the wavelength. I have seen many examples using functions to define color but my wavelength cannot be expressed by an analytic function. Is there a simple way to do this? Answer Here a another possible way to visualize 4D data: data = Flatten[Table[{x, y, x^2 + y^2, Sin[x - y]}, {x, -Pi, Pi,Pi/10}, {y,-Pi,Pi, Pi/10}], 1]; You can use the function Point along with VertexColors . Now the points are places using the first three elements and the color is determined by the fourth. In this case I used Hue, but you can use whatever you prefer. Graphics3D[ Point[data[[All, 1 ;; 3]], VertexColors -> Hue /@ data[[All, 4]]], Axes -> True, BoxRatios -> {1, 1, 1/GoldenRatio}]

plotting - Mathematica: 3D plot based on combined 2D graphs

I have several sigmoidal fits to 3 different datasets, with mean fit predictions plus the 95% confidence limits (not symmetrical around the mean) and the actual data. I would now like to show these different 2D plots projected in 3D as in but then using proper perspective. In the link here they give some solutions to combine the plots using isometric perspective, but I would like to use proper 3 point perspective. Any thoughts? Also any way to show the mean points per time point for each series plus or minus the standard error on the mean would be cool too, either using points+vertical bars, or using spheres plus tubes. Below are some test data and the fit function I am using. Note that I am working on a logit(proportion) scale and that the final vertical scale is Log10(percentage). (* some test data *) data = Table[Null, {i, 4}]; data[[1]] = {{1, -5.8}, {2, -5.4}, {3, -0.8}, {4, -0.2}, {5, 4.6}, {1, -6.4}, {2, -5.6}, {3, -0.7}, {4, 0.04}, {5, 1.0}, {1, -6.8}, {2, -4.7}, {3, -1.