Skip to main content

regular expressions - Regex named groups -- how to refer back to them in the replacement string



We can use group numbers to reuse the same piece of code while inside regex string, like that:


StringCases["x = y", RegularExpression["([\\w\\s]+)=(?1)"]]


{"x = y"}



To make it more readable and robust (like avoiding the situation when the groups can be renumbered either internally or through a redesign of the regex code), we can name patterns (and yes, (?) / (?&n) syntax works as well as (?P) / (?P>n)):


StringCases["x = y", RegularExpression["(?[\\w\\s]+)=(?&var)"]]

StringCases["x = y", RegularExpression["(?P[\\w\\s]+)=(?P>var)"]]


{"x = y"}


{"x = y"}



Perfect so far. However, what if I want to use the groups in the replacement rule? This works:


StringCases["x = y", RegularExpression["([\\w\\s]+)=((?1))"] :> {"$1", "$2"}]



{{"x ", " y"}}



But this doesn't:


StringCases["x = y", RegularExpression["(?[\\w\\s]+)=(?(?&var))"] :> {"${var}", "${rhs}"}]


{{"${var}", "${rhs}"}}



Of course, I can still use the numbers to refer to the groups:


StringCases["x = y", RegularExpression["(?[\\w\\s]+)=(?(?&var))"] :> {"$1", "$2"}]



{{"x ", " y"}}



But this is exactly what I want to avoid. I want to use the names, as they won't be affected by the code redesign.


I also tried $+{name}, \g, but they all don't work.


So, the question is: can we use names of the groups in the replacement rule?



Answer



Unfortunately, this is not an answer to the problem but rather some information on the subject that is hopefully of interest. As I said in my comment, one way to solve this issue is to transfer the regex into a StringExpression.


StringCases["x = y", 

x : ((WhitespaceCharacter | LetterCharacter) ..) ~~ "=" ~~ y__ :> {x,y}
]

The above code should be equivalent to your regex. What might be of interest for you is how Mathematica handles the named patterns. For this, we can use the undocumented function StringPattern`PatternConvert (undocumented, but you can access its full implementation which is very enlightening).


StringPattern`PatternConvert[
x : ((WhitespaceCharacter | LetterCharacter) ..) ~~ "=" ~~ y__]

(* {"(?ms)((?:[[:space:][:alpha:]])+)=(.+)", {{Hold[x], 1}, {Hold[y], 2}}, {}, Hold[None]} *)

Interestingly, you see that Mathematica converts it into a regex with normal grouping and stores the mapping between the groups and the names you gave. Therefore, it knows that x belongs to the first group.



How this helps you? It probably doesn't. As far as I can see there is no function to automatically turn a regex into a string expression.


Comments

Popular posts from this blog

plotting - How to draw lines between specified dots on ListPlot?

I would like to create a plot where I have unconnected dots and some connected. So far, I have figured out how to draw the dots. My code is the following: ListPlot[{{1, 1}, {2, 2}, {3, 3}, {4, 4}, {1, 4}, {2, 5}, {3, 6}, {4, 7}, {1, 7}, {2, 8}, {3, 9}, {4, 10}, {1, 10}, {2, 11}, {3, 12}, {4,13}, {2.5, 7}}, Ticks -> {{1, 2, 3, 4}, None}, AxesStyle -> Thin, TicksStyle -> Directive[Black, Bold, 12], Mesh -> Full] I have thought using ListLinePlot command, but I don't know how to specify to the command to draw only selected lines between the dots. Do have any suggestions/hints on how to do that? Thank you. Answer One possibility would be to use Epilog with Line : ListPlot[ {{1, 1}, {2, 2}, {3, 3}, {4, 4}, {1, 4}, {2, 5}, {3, 6}, {4, 7}, {1, 7}, {2, 8}, {3, 9}, {4, 10}, {1, 10}, {2, 11}, {3, 12}, {4, 13}, {2.5, 7}}, Ticks -> {{1, 2, 3, 4}, None}, AxesStyle -> Thin, TicksStyle -> Directive[Black, Bold, 12], Mesh -> Full, Epilog -> { Line[ ...

equation solving - Invert and fit implicitly defined curve

I need to fit an implicitly defined curve. I thought I could get some data out of Solve , and then using FindFit . Therefore, I would like to find the relation the parametric curve defined by $F(x,y)=0$: Solve[-(1/2) + 1/2 (0.41202 BesselK[0, 0.1 Sqrt[x^2 + y^2]] + (0.101483 x BesselK[1, 0.1 Sqrt[x^2 + y^2]])/Sqrt[x^2 + y^2]) == 0, y] But I can't get an output: Solve was unable to solve the system with inexact coefficients or the system obtained by direct rationalization of inexact numbers present in the system. Since many of the methods used by Solve require exact input, providing Solve with an exact version of the system may help. >> Edit: In particular, I would like to fit the data coming from the curve with the expression of another curve, and not with a function $f(x)$. In particular, since this clearly looks like a cardioid , I would like it to fit to something like it. What other strategies could I try?

dynamic - How can I make a clickable ArrayPlot that returns input?

I would like to create a dynamic ArrayPlot so that the rectangles, when clicked, provide the input. Can I use ArrayPlot for this? Or is there something else I should have to use? Answer ArrayPlot is much more than just a simple array like Grid : it represents a ranged 2D dataset, and its visualization can be finetuned by options like DataReversed and DataRange . These features make it quite complicated to reproduce the same layout and order with Grid . Here I offer AnnotatedArrayPlot which comes in handy when your dataset is more than just a flat 2D array. The dynamic interface allows highlighting individual cells and possibly interacting with them. AnnotatedArrayPlot works the same way as ArrayPlot and accepts the same options plus Enabled , HighlightCoordinates , HighlightStyle and HighlightElementFunction . data = {{Missing["HasSomeMoreData"], GrayLevel[ 1], {RGBColor[0, 1, 1], RGBColor[0, 0, 1], GrayLevel[1]}, RGBColor[0, 1, 0]}, {GrayLevel[0], GrayLevel...