Creating a three dimensional grid

I want to create a three dimensional grid (x,y,z) in mathematica and plot a function f(x,y,z) on it. I am not worried about the plotting part now; for that I will probably use ListContourPlot3D or something like that. But, I am having problem in creating the grid itself. In matlab, one can achieve this by Meshgrid command which takes either two or three variable. There are many nice ways to reproduce the two variable meshgrid equivalent in mathematica as discussed in this stackexchange question: Simulate MATLAB's meshgrid function

However, what should be the equivalent for 3D case? I am trying a combination of Riffle and Partition, but it's getting too long and confusing. Any help will be much appreciated. Thanks!!

Answer

There are better ways to make this list that don't involve emulating MATLAB, but what you want is straightforward:

meshgrid3D[xxx_List, yyy_List, zzz_List] := 

 Table[#, {x, xxx}, {y, yyy}, {z, zzz}] & /@ {x, y, z}

{xxx, yyy, zzz} = 
  meshgrid3D[Range[-2, 2, .1], Range[-2, 2, .1], Range[-2, 2, .1]];

ListContourPlot3D[xxx^2 + yyy^2 - zzz^2, Contours -> {0}, 
 Mesh -> None]

Mathematica graphics

For example, it is better to use

grid3D = Table[{x, y, z}, {x, -2, 2, .1}, {y, -2, 2, .1}, {z, -2, 
    2, .1}];
func[x_, y_, z_] := x^2 + y^2 - z^2;
ListContourPlot3D[
 Apply[func,
  grid3D, {3}], Contours -> {0}, Mesh -> None]

Comments

mathematical optimization - Minimizing using indices, error: Part::pkspec1: The expression cannot be used as a part specification

I want to use Minimize where the variables to minimize are indices pointing into an array. Here a MWE that hopefully shows what my problem is. vars = u@# & /@ Range[3]; cons = Flatten@ { Table[(u[j] != #) & /@ vars[[j + 1 ;; -1]], {j, 1, 3 - 1}], 1 vec1 = {1, 2, 3}; vec2 = {1, 2, 3}; Minimize[{Total@((vec1[[#]] - vec2[[u[#]]])^2 & /@ Range[1, 3]), cons}, vars, Integers] The error I get: Part::pkspec1: The expression u[1] cannot be used as a part specification. >> Answer Ok, it seems that one can get around Mathematica trying to evaluate vec2[[u[1]]] too early by using the function Indexed[vec2,u[1]] . The working MWE would then look like the following: vars = u@# & /@ Range[3]; cons = Flatten@{ Table[(u[j] != #) & /@ vars[[j + 1 ;; -1]], {j, 1, 3 - 1}], 1 vec1 = {1, 2, 3}; vec2 = {1, 2, 3}; NMinimize[ {Total@((vec1[[#]] - Indexed[vec2, u[#]])^2 & /@ R...

functions - Get leading series expansion term?

Given a function f[x] , I would like to have a function leadingSeries that returns just the leading term in the series around x=0 . For example: leadingSeries[(1/x + 2)/(4 + 1/x^2 + x)] x and leadingSeries[(1/x + 2 + (1 - 1/x^3)/4)/(4 + x)] -(1/(16 x^3)) Is there such a function in Mathematica? Or maybe one can implement it efficiently? EDIT I finally went with the following implementation, based on Carl Woll 's answer: lds[ex_,x_]:=( (ex/.x->(x+O[x]^2))/.SeriesData[U_,Z_,L_List,Mi_,Ma_,De_]:>SeriesData[U,Z,{L[[1]]},Mi,Mi+1,De]//Quiet//Normal) The advantage is, that this one also properly works with functions whose leading term is a constant: lds[Exp[x],x] 1 Answer Update 1 Updated to eliminate SeriesData and to not return additional terms Perhaps you could use: leadingSeries[expr_, x_] := Normal[expr /. x->(x+O[x]^2) /. a_List :> Take[a, 1]] Then for your examples: leadingSeries[(1/x + 2)/(4 + 1/x^2 + x), x] leadingSeries[Exp[x], x] leadingSeries[(1/x + 2 + (1 - 1/x...

What is and isn't a valid variable specification for Manipulate?

I have an expression whose terms have arguments (representing subscripts), like this: myExpr = A[0] + V[1,T] I would like to put it inside a Manipulate to see its value as I move around the parameters. (The goal is eventually to plot it wrt one of the variables inside.) However, Mathematica complains when I set V[1,T] as a manipulated variable: Manipulate[Evaluate[myExpr], {A[0], 0, 1}, {V[1, T], 0, 1}] (*Manipulate::vsform: Manipulate argument {V[1,T],0,1} does not have the correct form for a variable specification. >> *) As a workaround, if I get rid of the symbol T inside the argument, it works fine: Manipulate[ Evaluate[myExpr /. T -> 15], {A[0], 0, 1}, {V[1, 15], 0, 1}] Why this behavior? Can anyone point me to the documentation that says what counts as a valid variable? And is there a way to get Manpiulate to accept an expression with a symbolic argument as a variable? Investigations I've done so far: I tried using variableQ from this answer , but it says V[1...

Blog

Search This Blog