Skip to main content

equation solving - Forcing FindRoot to return only real solutions


FindRoot documentation reports that if the equation and the initial point are reals, the solutions are searched in the real domain. However, in the following case I get a complex solution


FindRoot[eq, {h, 1.7}]
{h -> -0.990042 - 0.689686 I}

Same for



Assuming[Reals, FindRoot[eq, {h, 1.7}]]

Where eq is the following. What can I do to force Mathematica to return only real solutions?


eq = 0.2888960456513873` \[Sqrt](0.4149486782073932` + (0.5637605604986459` + 
h)^2) \[Sqrt](0.4756674436221575` + (0.9900423417575865` +
h)^2) + 2.2076945564517114` h \[Sqrt](0.4149486782073932` +
(0.5637605604986459` +
h)^2) \[Sqrt](0.4756674436221575` + (0.9900423417575865` +
h)^2) + 6.735521430523215` h^2 \[Sqrt](0.4149486782073932` +
(0.5637605604986459` +

h)^2) \[Sqrt](0.4756674436221575` + (0.9900423417575865` +
h)^2) + 10.54153050379155` h^3 \[Sqrt](0.4149486782073932` +
(0.5637605604986459` +
h)^2) \[Sqrt](0.4756674436221575` + (0.9900423417575865` +
h)^2) + 8.93280406600778` h^4 \[Sqrt](0.4149486782073932` +
(0.5637605604986459` +
h)^2) \[Sqrt](0.4756674436221575` + (0.9900423417575865` +
h)^2) + 3.8752891330788843` h^5 \[Sqrt](0.4149486782073932` +
(0.5637605604986459` +
h)^2) \[Sqrt](0.4756674436221575` + (0.9900423417575865` +

h)^2) + 0.666148416209407` h^6 \[Sqrt](0.4149486782073932` +
(0.5637605604986459` +
h)^2) \[Sqrt](0.4756674436221575` + (0.9900423417575865` +
h)^2) + 0.4167441738314279` \[Sqrt](0.4756674436221575` +
(0.9900423417575865` +
h)^2) \[Sqrt](1 - (0.4444444444444444`
(-0.022551321792606827` + (0.5637605604986459` +
h)^2)^2)/(0.4149486782073932` + (0.5637605604986459` +
h)^2))

Answer




It will be more convenient to define the function eq this way :


eq[h_] := the formula

Real solutions


For a general technique of using FindRoot the way you would like I recommend to read this post : First positive root. However in order to demonstrate how it works for real numbers we should have a different equation since this one has no real solutions :


NSolve[ eq[h] == 0, h, Reals]


{}


Sometimes it is reasonable to restrict the search for roots to a special region, e.g. if we add an inequality 0 < h < 3 then we don't have to specify the domain Reals because the system understands that h must be real :


NSolve[ eq[h] == 0 && 0 < h < 3, h ]

General remarks on using NSolve you could find here : Solve an equation in R+ since they are valid for Solve as well as for NSolve.


For the function f we can find a global minimum of the real part :


nmin = { h /. #[[2]], #[[1]]}& @ NMinimize[ Re @ eq[h], h]


{-1.83596, 0.100607}


For an idea what we can expect let's plot the real and imaginary parts of f :


Plot[{Re @ eq[h], Im @ eq[h]}, {h, -3, 2}, PlotStyle -> Thick, PlotRange -> {-1, 4}, 
Epilog -> {Red, PointSize[0.015], Point[nmin]},
PlotLegends -> {Placed["Expressions", {Left, Center}]}]

enter image description here


Even though eq has no real roots we can see that one can expect real solutions e.g. for eq[h] - 3/2 near h == -2 and h == 0, using FindRoot with appropriate starting points we find :


FindRoot[ eq[h] - 3/2, #]& /@ {{h, -2}, {h, 0}}



 {{h -> -2.15793}, {h -> 0.14209}}

For deeper understandig of the behavior of the eq function we should take a look at the complex plane.


Complex solutions


The complex roots can be rewritten as pairs of real numbers :


pts = {Re @ #, Im @ #}& /@ (h /. NSolve[ eq[h] == 0, h])


{{-1.86925, 0.135055}, {-1.86925, -0.135055}, {-1.08654, 0.84989},
{-1.08654, -0.84989}, {-0.990042, 0.689686}, {-0.990042, -0.689686},

{-0.0268207, 0.391104}, {-0.0268207, -0.391104}}

Let's visualize the function eq in the complex plane :


GraphicsRow[ 
Table[ Show[ ContourPlot @@@ {
{ g[eq[x + I y]], {x, -2.5, 0.5}, {y, -1.5, 1.5},
PlotLabel -> Style[ g[HoldForm @ eq[x + I y]], Blue, 25],
ColorFunction -> "DeepSeaColors", Epilog -> { Darker @ Green, PointSize[0.03],
Point[pts] } },
{ Re @ eq[x + I y] == 0, {x, -2.5, 0.5}, {y, -1.5, 1.5},

ContourStyle -> {Red, Thick}},
{ Im @ eq[x + I y] == 0, {x, -2.5, 0.5}, {y, -1.5, 1.5}, PlotPoints -> 50,
MaxRecursion -> 3, ContourStyle -> {Cyan, Thick}}}],

{g, {Re, Im}} ] ]

enter image description here


The green points denote the complex roots, you can see that there are no real roots. The red lines are solutions to Re[ eq[h] ] == 0 while the cyan lines denote solutions to Im[ eq[h] ] == 0. One can see a that there are some branch cuts on the plots, i.e. the definition of the function eq is reliable only if we use it in appropriate regions in the complex plane.


Comments

Popular posts from this blog

plotting - Filling between two spheres in SphericalPlot3D

Manipulate[ SphericalPlot3D[{1, 2 - n}, {θ, 0, Pi}, {ϕ, 0, 1.5 Pi}, Mesh -> None, PlotPoints -> 15, PlotRange -> {-2.2, 2.2}], {n, 0, 1}] I cant' seem to be able to make a filling between two spheres. I've already tried the obvious Filling -> {1 -> {2}} but Mathematica doesn't seem to like that option. Is there any easy way around this or ... Answer There is no built-in filling in SphericalPlot3D . One option is to use ParametricPlot3D to draw the surfaces between the two shells: Manipulate[ Show[SphericalPlot3D[{1, 2 - n}, {θ, 0, Pi}, {ϕ, 0, 1.5 Pi}, PlotPoints -> 15, PlotRange -> {-2.2, 2.2}], ParametricPlot3D[{ r {Sin[t] Cos[1.5 Pi], Sin[t] Sin[1.5 Pi], Cos[t]}, r {Sin[t] Cos[0 Pi], Sin[t] Sin[0 Pi], Cos[t]}}, {r, 1, 2 - n}, {t, 0, Pi}, PlotStyle -> Yellow, Mesh -> {2, 15}]], {n, 0, 1}]

plotting - Plot 4D data with color as 4th dimension

I have a list of 4D data (x position, y position, amplitude, wavelength). I want to plot x, y, and amplitude on a 3D plot and have the color of the points correspond to the wavelength. I have seen many examples using functions to define color but my wavelength cannot be expressed by an analytic function. Is there a simple way to do this? Answer Here a another possible way to visualize 4D data: data = Flatten[Table[{x, y, x^2 + y^2, Sin[x - y]}, {x, -Pi, Pi,Pi/10}, {y,-Pi,Pi, Pi/10}], 1]; You can use the function Point along with VertexColors . Now the points are places using the first three elements and the color is determined by the fourth. In this case I used Hue, but you can use whatever you prefer. Graphics3D[ Point[data[[All, 1 ;; 3]], VertexColors -> Hue /@ data[[All, 4]]], Axes -> True, BoxRatios -> {1, 1, 1/GoldenRatio}]

plotting - Mathematica: 3D plot based on combined 2D graphs

I have several sigmoidal fits to 3 different datasets, with mean fit predictions plus the 95% confidence limits (not symmetrical around the mean) and the actual data. I would now like to show these different 2D plots projected in 3D as in but then using proper perspective. In the link here they give some solutions to combine the plots using isometric perspective, but I would like to use proper 3 point perspective. Any thoughts? Also any way to show the mean points per time point for each series plus or minus the standard error on the mean would be cool too, either using points+vertical bars, or using spheres plus tubes. Below are some test data and the fit function I am using. Note that I am working on a logit(proportion) scale and that the final vertical scale is Log10(percentage). (* some test data *) data = Table[Null, {i, 4}]; data[[1]] = {{1, -5.8}, {2, -5.4}, {3, -0.8}, {4, -0.2}, {5, 4.6}, {1, -6.4}, {2, -5.6}, {3, -0.7}, {4, 0.04}, {5, 1.0}, {1, -6.8}, {2, -4.7}, {3, -1.