Skip to main content

equation solving - Forcing FindRoot to return only real solutions


FindRoot documentation reports that if the equation and the initial point are reals, the solutions are searched in the real domain. However, in the following case I get a complex solution


FindRoot[eq, {h, 1.7}]
{h -> -0.990042 - 0.689686 I}

Same for



Assuming[Reals, FindRoot[eq, {h, 1.7}]]

Where eq is the following. What can I do to force Mathematica to return only real solutions?


eq = 0.2888960456513873` \[Sqrt](0.4149486782073932` + (0.5637605604986459` + 
h)^2) \[Sqrt](0.4756674436221575` + (0.9900423417575865` +
h)^2) + 2.2076945564517114` h \[Sqrt](0.4149486782073932` +
(0.5637605604986459` +
h)^2) \[Sqrt](0.4756674436221575` + (0.9900423417575865` +
h)^2) + 6.735521430523215` h^2 \[Sqrt](0.4149486782073932` +
(0.5637605604986459` +

h)^2) \[Sqrt](0.4756674436221575` + (0.9900423417575865` +
h)^2) + 10.54153050379155` h^3 \[Sqrt](0.4149486782073932` +
(0.5637605604986459` +
h)^2) \[Sqrt](0.4756674436221575` + (0.9900423417575865` +
h)^2) + 8.93280406600778` h^4 \[Sqrt](0.4149486782073932` +
(0.5637605604986459` +
h)^2) \[Sqrt](0.4756674436221575` + (0.9900423417575865` +
h)^2) + 3.8752891330788843` h^5 \[Sqrt](0.4149486782073932` +
(0.5637605604986459` +
h)^2) \[Sqrt](0.4756674436221575` + (0.9900423417575865` +

h)^2) + 0.666148416209407` h^6 \[Sqrt](0.4149486782073932` +
(0.5637605604986459` +
h)^2) \[Sqrt](0.4756674436221575` + (0.9900423417575865` +
h)^2) + 0.4167441738314279` \[Sqrt](0.4756674436221575` +
(0.9900423417575865` +
h)^2) \[Sqrt](1 - (0.4444444444444444`
(-0.022551321792606827` + (0.5637605604986459` +
h)^2)^2)/(0.4149486782073932` + (0.5637605604986459` +
h)^2))

Answer




It will be more convenient to define the function eq this way :


eq[h_] := the formula

Real solutions


For a general technique of using FindRoot the way you would like I recommend to read this post : First positive root. However in order to demonstrate how it works for real numbers we should have a different equation since this one has no real solutions :


NSolve[ eq[h] == 0, h, Reals]


{}


Sometimes it is reasonable to restrict the search for roots to a special region, e.g. if we add an inequality 0 < h < 3 then we don't have to specify the domain Reals because the system understands that h must be real :


NSolve[ eq[h] == 0 && 0 < h < 3, h ]

General remarks on using NSolve you could find here : Solve an equation in R+ since they are valid for Solve as well as for NSolve.


For the function f we can find a global minimum of the real part :


nmin = { h /. #[[2]], #[[1]]}& @ NMinimize[ Re @ eq[h], h]


{-1.83596, 0.100607}


For an idea what we can expect let's plot the real and imaginary parts of f :


Plot[{Re @ eq[h], Im @ eq[h]}, {h, -3, 2}, PlotStyle -> Thick, PlotRange -> {-1, 4}, 
Epilog -> {Red, PointSize[0.015], Point[nmin]},
PlotLegends -> {Placed["Expressions", {Left, Center}]}]

enter image description here


Even though eq has no real roots we can see that one can expect real solutions e.g. for eq[h] - 3/2 near h == -2 and h == 0, using FindRoot with appropriate starting points we find :


FindRoot[ eq[h] - 3/2, #]& /@ {{h, -2}, {h, 0}}



 {{h -> -2.15793}, {h -> 0.14209}}

For deeper understandig of the behavior of the eq function we should take a look at the complex plane.


Complex solutions


The complex roots can be rewritten as pairs of real numbers :


pts = {Re @ #, Im @ #}& /@ (h /. NSolve[ eq[h] == 0, h])


{{-1.86925, 0.135055}, {-1.86925, -0.135055}, {-1.08654, 0.84989},
{-1.08654, -0.84989}, {-0.990042, 0.689686}, {-0.990042, -0.689686},

{-0.0268207, 0.391104}, {-0.0268207, -0.391104}}

Let's visualize the function eq in the complex plane :


GraphicsRow[ 
Table[ Show[ ContourPlot @@@ {
{ g[eq[x + I y]], {x, -2.5, 0.5}, {y, -1.5, 1.5},
PlotLabel -> Style[ g[HoldForm @ eq[x + I y]], Blue, 25],
ColorFunction -> "DeepSeaColors", Epilog -> { Darker @ Green, PointSize[0.03],
Point[pts] } },
{ Re @ eq[x + I y] == 0, {x, -2.5, 0.5}, {y, -1.5, 1.5},

ContourStyle -> {Red, Thick}},
{ Im @ eq[x + I y] == 0, {x, -2.5, 0.5}, {y, -1.5, 1.5}, PlotPoints -> 50,
MaxRecursion -> 3, ContourStyle -> {Cyan, Thick}}}],

{g, {Re, Im}} ] ]

enter image description here


The green points denote the complex roots, you can see that there are no real roots. The red lines are solutions to Re[ eq[h] ] == 0 while the cyan lines denote solutions to Im[ eq[h] ] == 0. One can see a that there are some branch cuts on the plots, i.e. the definition of the function eq is reliable only if we use it in appropriate regions in the complex plane.


Comments

Popular posts from this blog

plotting - How to draw lines between specified dots on ListPlot?

I would like to create a plot where I have unconnected dots and some connected. So far, I have figured out how to draw the dots. My code is the following: ListPlot[{{1, 1}, {2, 2}, {3, 3}, {4, 4}, {1, 4}, {2, 5}, {3, 6}, {4, 7}, {1, 7}, {2, 8}, {3, 9}, {4, 10}, {1, 10}, {2, 11}, {3, 12}, {4,13}, {2.5, 7}}, Ticks -> {{1, 2, 3, 4}, None}, AxesStyle -> Thin, TicksStyle -> Directive[Black, Bold, 12], Mesh -> Full] I have thought using ListLinePlot command, but I don't know how to specify to the command to draw only selected lines between the dots. Do have any suggestions/hints on how to do that? Thank you. Answer One possibility would be to use Epilog with Line : ListPlot[ {{1, 1}, {2, 2}, {3, 3}, {4, 4}, {1, 4}, {2, 5}, {3, 6}, {4, 7}, {1, 7}, {2, 8}, {3, 9}, {4, 10}, {1, 10}, {2, 11}, {3, 12}, {4, 13}, {2.5, 7}}, Ticks -> {{1, 2, 3, 4}, None}, AxesStyle -> Thin, TicksStyle -> Directive[Black, Bold, 12], Mesh -> Full, Epilog -> { Line[ ...

equation solving - Invert and fit implicitly defined curve

I need to fit an implicitly defined curve. I thought I could get some data out of Solve , and then using FindFit . Therefore, I would like to find the relation the parametric curve defined by $F(x,y)=0$: Solve[-(1/2) + 1/2 (0.41202 BesselK[0, 0.1 Sqrt[x^2 + y^2]] + (0.101483 x BesselK[1, 0.1 Sqrt[x^2 + y^2]])/Sqrt[x^2 + y^2]) == 0, y] But I can't get an output: Solve was unable to solve the system with inexact coefficients or the system obtained by direct rationalization of inexact numbers present in the system. Since many of the methods used by Solve require exact input, providing Solve with an exact version of the system may help. >> Edit: In particular, I would like to fit the data coming from the curve with the expression of another curve, and not with a function $f(x)$. In particular, since this clearly looks like a cardioid , I would like it to fit to something like it. What other strategies could I try?

dynamic - How can I make a clickable ArrayPlot that returns input?

I would like to create a dynamic ArrayPlot so that the rectangles, when clicked, provide the input. Can I use ArrayPlot for this? Or is there something else I should have to use? Answer ArrayPlot is much more than just a simple array like Grid : it represents a ranged 2D dataset, and its visualization can be finetuned by options like DataReversed and DataRange . These features make it quite complicated to reproduce the same layout and order with Grid . Here I offer AnnotatedArrayPlot which comes in handy when your dataset is more than just a flat 2D array. The dynamic interface allows highlighting individual cells and possibly interacting with them. AnnotatedArrayPlot works the same way as ArrayPlot and accepts the same options plus Enabled , HighlightCoordinates , HighlightStyle and HighlightElementFunction . data = {{Missing["HasSomeMoreData"], GrayLevel[ 1], {RGBColor[0, 1, 1], RGBColor[0, 0, 1], GrayLevel[1]}, RGBColor[0, 1, 0]}, {GrayLevel[0], GrayLevel...