Skip to main content

debugging - How to find out where an error occurs?


I got this error when using Mathematica:



Part::partw: "Part 5 of {{0.637537,0.362463},{0.00038282,0.999617},

{0.0928437,0.907156},{0.0000222833,0.999978}} does not exist."

I know why it is generated, but the problem is my code is so lengthy and I cannot find where it comes from. Is there any syntax in Mathematica by which I can resolve my problem? Thanks.



Answer



Implementation


Here is a better version of my debug function posted here, which would print the stack on the first message generated, and abort the computation. I have used it extensively with great effect in many cases.


This constructs the nested OpenerView from an arbitrary expression:


ClearAll[openerDress];
SetAttributes[openerDress, HoldAll];
openerDress[f_[args___]]:=

OpenerView[{
HoldForm[f],
HoldForm[f]@@Map[openerDress,Unevaluated[{args}]]
}];
openerDress[x_]:=HoldForm[x];

This uses openerDress to represent stack of execution in a way that is expandable when clicked:


ClearAll[stackPrettify];
stackPrettify[stack : {__HoldForm}] :=
Column @ {

Replace[stack, HoldForm[f_[x___]] :> openerDress[f[x]], 1],
Style[Map[Short, Last[stack], {2}], Red]
};
stackPrettify[___] := Null;

This is a generator of dynamic environments with redefined functions, encapsulating the Villegas - Gayley technique:


ClearAll[withRedefined];
withRedefined[f_Symbol, extraCondition_, beforeF_, afterF_]:=
Function[
code

,
Internal`InheritedBlock[{f},
Module[{inF, dv = DownValues[f]},
Unprotect[f];
DownValues[f]={};
(call:f[args___]) /; extraCondition[args] && !TrueQ[inF]:=
Block[{inF = True},
beforeF[args];
call;
afterF[args]

];
DownValues[f] = Join[DownValues[f],dv];
Protect[f];
];
code
]
,
HoldAll
];


A couple more of the helper functions:


ClearAll[printStack];
printStack[start_, end_]:=Print[stackPrettify[Take[Stack[_], {start, end}]]];

ClearAll[heldF];
SetAttributes[heldF, HoldAll];
heldF[body_]:=Function[Null, body, HoldAll];

Finally, this is the actual debugging utility (some formatting imperfections are due to the SE markdown bug regarding the display of symbols containing $):


ClearAll[debug];                        

debug[debugSymbol_Symbol:Message, failConditionFunction_:heldF[True]]:=
Function[
code
,
Module[{tag},
withRedefined[
debugSymbol,
heldF[!MatchQ[First[Hold[##]],_$Off]],
heldF[If[failConditionFunction[##],printStack[6, -9]]],
heldF[If[failConditionFunction[##], Throw[$Failed,tag]]]

][Catch[StackComplete[code],tag]]
]
,
HoldAll
];

Tests


There are several ways one can use debug. The default one is that it breaks on first Message generated, and prints for you the stack. For example, one may try something like


debug[] @ Sin[Range[10][[1 ;; 15]]]


If you have an access to the source code which you want to debug, and can modify it, you could also use it in the following way:


ClearAll[$debugWrapper]
$debugWrapper[arg_] := arg;

and


debug[$debugWrapper][
Sin[Part[Range[10], $debugWrapper[ 1 ;; 15]]]
]

In other words, you can wrap a piece of code where you suspect a problem, in some wrapper like $debugWrapper, and then extract the execution stack. You can also set a condition on the first event you want to trigger. For example, the following will only trigger the second event wrapped in $debugWrapper:



debug[
$debugWrapper,
Function[arg, MatchQ[Unevaluated[arg], _Span], HoldAll]
][
Sin[$debugWrapper@Part[Range[10], 1 ;; 15]];
Sin[Part[Range[10], $debugWrapper[ 1 ;; 15]]]
]

in which case, only the second event wrapped in $debugWrapper, will be triggered.


Comments

Popular posts from this blog

plotting - How to draw lines between specified dots on ListPlot?

I would like to create a plot where I have unconnected dots and some connected. So far, I have figured out how to draw the dots. My code is the following: ListPlot[{{1, 1}, {2, 2}, {3, 3}, {4, 4}, {1, 4}, {2, 5}, {3, 6}, {4, 7}, {1, 7}, {2, 8}, {3, 9}, {4, 10}, {1, 10}, {2, 11}, {3, 12}, {4,13}, {2.5, 7}}, Ticks -> {{1, 2, 3, 4}, None}, AxesStyle -> Thin, TicksStyle -> Directive[Black, Bold, 12], Mesh -> Full] I have thought using ListLinePlot command, but I don't know how to specify to the command to draw only selected lines between the dots. Do have any suggestions/hints on how to do that? Thank you. Answer One possibility would be to use Epilog with Line : ListPlot[ {{1, 1}, {2, 2}, {3, 3}, {4, 4}, {1, 4}, {2, 5}, {3, 6}, {4, 7}, {1, 7}, {2, 8}, {3, 9}, {4, 10}, {1, 10}, {2, 11}, {3, 12}, {4, 13}, {2.5, 7}}, Ticks -> {{1, 2, 3, 4}, None}, AxesStyle -> Thin, TicksStyle -> Directive[Black, Bold, 12], Mesh -> Full, Epilog -> { Line[ ...

equation solving - Invert and fit implicitly defined curve

I need to fit an implicitly defined curve. I thought I could get some data out of Solve , and then using FindFit . Therefore, I would like to find the relation the parametric curve defined by $F(x,y)=0$: Solve[-(1/2) + 1/2 (0.41202 BesselK[0, 0.1 Sqrt[x^2 + y^2]] + (0.101483 x BesselK[1, 0.1 Sqrt[x^2 + y^2]])/Sqrt[x^2 + y^2]) == 0, y] But I can't get an output: Solve was unable to solve the system with inexact coefficients or the system obtained by direct rationalization of inexact numbers present in the system. Since many of the methods used by Solve require exact input, providing Solve with an exact version of the system may help. >> Edit: In particular, I would like to fit the data coming from the curve with the expression of another curve, and not with a function $f(x)$. In particular, since this clearly looks like a cardioid , I would like it to fit to something like it. What other strategies could I try?

dynamic - How can I make a clickable ArrayPlot that returns input?

I would like to create a dynamic ArrayPlot so that the rectangles, when clicked, provide the input. Can I use ArrayPlot for this? Or is there something else I should have to use? Answer ArrayPlot is much more than just a simple array like Grid : it represents a ranged 2D dataset, and its visualization can be finetuned by options like DataReversed and DataRange . These features make it quite complicated to reproduce the same layout and order with Grid . Here I offer AnnotatedArrayPlot which comes in handy when your dataset is more than just a flat 2D array. The dynamic interface allows highlighting individual cells and possibly interacting with them. AnnotatedArrayPlot works the same way as ArrayPlot and accepts the same options plus Enabled , HighlightCoordinates , HighlightStyle and HighlightElementFunction . data = {{Missing["HasSomeMoreData"], GrayLevel[ 1], {RGBColor[0, 1, 1], RGBColor[0, 0, 1], GrayLevel[1]}, RGBColor[0, 1, 0]}, {GrayLevel[0], GrayLevel...